[subscribe2]In the 17th century, European settlers in North America saw the native populations as an obstacle to progress. That was not an unreasonable proposition since the natives had no made it far past the stone age. They were using stone arrows and spears, wore animals skins and lived in nomadic tribes. From the perspective of Europeans, these people were barbarians. The locals may not have been very advanced and they were certainly not very bright, but they soon figured out that it was a bad idea to let the white man settle in their lands. A long war of attrition won by the technologically superior (and eventually numerically superior) whites turned North America into Ice People territory. The point being that even primitive nomads could quickly figure out that the tribe that controls the land wins and the tribe that loses, dies out. Love of tribe is a natural part of man.

Everywhere else on plant earth, human populations have been killing one another over land since the dawn of time. So much so we have developed elaborate methods to keep tribes apart from one another. People knew that mixing a bunch of Tribe X into Tribe Y’s turf was going to lead to violence. Either Tribe X would seek to take over or Tribe Y, worried that Tribe X may try to take over, would kill the people of Tribe X first. It may seem totally irrational to the modern alpha male reading this while in his footie pajamas and drinking hot cocoa, but to mother nature it is perfectly rational. I’m fond of saying, just because you don’t understand it does not mean it is irrational. The problem is most likely with you.

Now, against that backdrop consider what the open borders fanatics in the GOP are considering for the end of this summer. It will consist of at least four bills, to be voted on by the end of the summer: 1) an amnesty for illegal aliens that doesn’t lead to citizenship, 2) a Dream Act–like amnesty granting green cards (and eventual citizenship) to illegals who came as teenagers and younger, 3) a bill requiring tracking of foreign nationals (like the eight previous ones passed since 1996), and 4) increased importation of low-skilled workers to compete with unemployed Americans. They’re trying to get the approval of Representative Luis Gutierrez, the firebrand amnesty-pusher from Chicago, who would never — can never — accept any arrangement that would require the full implementation of enforcement systems prior to any legalization.

This little bit of lunacy from the author is the best:

And though none of the bills is likely to offer a path to full citizenship, the fact Republicans are preparing to take on immigration at all is a sign the party is coming to grips with a political reality: if they want to win elections in the long run, they’ll have to face the issue.

After the last amnesty, the GOP’s share of the Hispanic vote declined from 37% to 30%. In fact, it has never again risen about 31% and that was with George Bush, who spoke Spanish and was an amnesty fanatic. Bush arguably did more for Mexican peasants than any Mexican leader in the history of the country. Bush expanded resettlement and dropped the English requirement. Further, the lunatic writing the piece just assumes it is the GOP’s problem to fix what his cult has destroyed. Liberal democrats were the champions of the last two amnesty deals and are behind the current amnesty deal. In fairness, the global elites are buying off buffoons like Boehner and Ryan so both parties have their snouts in the trough this time.

Immigration is neither a good thing or a bad thing. The degree and timing is what determines the right course. In boom times, it may make sense to bring in guest workers and ramp up the naturalization of immigrants. The numbers should reflect the needs of the native population. In lean times, like the last five years, foreign workers should be thrown out with exceptions being made in high skill fields. We can safely assume, for example, that we will never have too many mathematicians or brain surgeons. otherwise, the point of government is the protection of the citizens. If the people of Mexico are unhappy with our immigration rules, too bad. They are not our problem. They should make Mexico better so they don’t have to flee their native lands.

Nothing like economic necessity is involved here. The ruling elites of America have concluded that America is too white. They want to remedy that by importing fifty million Mexicans, who they consider non-white. If it were practical, they would bring in fifty million Congolese, but the running of slave ships over the Atlantic is bad form, for now. Paul Ryan, who will be dead soon, most likely is acting out of pure greed, but malice should not be discounted. There’s a reason why companies take away privileges from those about to quit or retire. Short-timers do not take the long view or care much for those who will be left behind. Ryan could very well be nursing bitterness at his fate and it is manifesting itself as a hatred for those he sees as less deserving – his fellow Americans.

That’s what I suspect is driving the mass suicide we see going on throughout the West. When the majority of British school children are not British, it is not hard to see what the future holds for the Brits. Religions are fueled by self-loathing. Christianity, for all it s faults, offered a celebration of life as an antidote to the self-loathing of the faithful. You may be a sinner and hate yourself for the sin, but God loves you nonetheless, as long as you live a Christian life. Liberalism offers no such antidote. Instead, it offers a never ending liturgy on why it would have been better if none of us had ever been born. it is not hard to see why eventually the adherents would want to speed up the process. Surrendering over your tribe’s land to another tribe is one sure way to erase your people and their history.