Long ago I was in a business that employed a lot of entry level labor. The pay was pretty good, given the requirements, but it was hard to get good help. White guys wanted indoor work and black guys rarely applied for any position. That means we mostly hired Spanish guys, primarily Puerto Ricans. Even so, the turnover was terrible. A big reason for it was the state family services lunatics. I forget the exact name of the division, but they were in charge of collecting alimony and child support, the latter being most of their work.

The department was all women, angry spiteful women. I’d hire a guy and within a month a letter from the state would arrive telling me to seize his paycheck. They would take most of his pay, based on some formula I never understood. There was no negotiating with them. I’d explain that the guy was not going to work for no pay so they would get nothing unless they relented, but they never relented. It was obviously not about the money for these women. It was spite.

As you get older, you learn that women often go crazy in their middle years, morphing into womyn. That’s probably the case with this batshit crazy judge in Michigan.

A U.S. Navy sailor from Washington State is currently serving on a submarine thousands of miles away in the Pacific Ocean, but a judge has ordered him into an impossible custody scenario: Appear in a Michigan courtroom Monday or risk losing custody of his 6-year-old daughter.

Navy submariner Matthew Hindes was given permanent custody of his daughter Kaylee in 2010, after she was reportedly removed from the home of his ex-wife, Angela, by child protective services. But now a judge has ordered him to appear in court Monday, or risk losing his daughter to his ex-wife in addition to a bench warrant being issued for his arrest, ABC News reports.

Hindes’ lawyers argue he should be protected by the Service Members Civil Relief Act, which states courts in custody cases may “grant a stay of proceedings for a minimum period of 90 days to defendants serving their country.”

But the Michigan judge hearing the case, circuit court judge Margaret Noe, disagrees, stating: “If the child is not in the care and custody of the father, the child should be in the care and custody of the mother.”

The judge reiterated that regardless of Hindes’ assignment under the Pacific Ocean, he will appear in court or face contempt of court.

Judge Noe denied the motion for a stay under the Service Members Relief Act, ruling that he could have arranged for his wife to bring the child to her mother, saying, “At this point, I don’t think I have any alternative but to enter a bench warrant for his arrest,” Noe said.

When you have a lot of laws, you’re going to need a lot of judges. When you have a lot of judges, you end up with a lot of lunatics on the bench. This womyn strikes me as a bitter man-hater, so consumed with her hatred she tramples the laws she is sworn to uphold. Without a systemic way to filter out lunatics, cranks and the deranged, these judges remain in place for years after it is obvious they should be removed.