The Immigration Bomb

Somewhere in the Bush years, I threw in the towel on the Republicans. It was not the endless and largely pointless wars that did it for me. Iraq and Afghanistan were understandable blunders. Maybe not excusable, but certainly understandable. No, what did it for me was the domestic side. They did not do a damn thing to roll back the welfare state, despite having control of both houses and the executive. Not only did they not cut a single penny, they went on a spending spree. Worse yet, they expanded the portfolio of every domestic agency. It became clear that all the talk about small government and liberty was a big fat lie

Given that the other party is a wholly owned subsidiary of Lunatic Inc, I’ve been in a  funk for a decade now. The election of 2010 did not offer much hope. One look at Boehner made it clear he was a timid, unimaginative man with the charisma of an old sneaker. The nomination of Romney for the 2012 election was comical, in many respects. Romney is a decent man and would be an able administrator, but he represented more of the same. You cannot be a credible alternative to the lunatics if you’re just offering more of the same.

Up until a month ago or so, I was pretty sure the upcoming midterms would be uneventful. A president’s second midterm is always rough as his own base has run out of steam while the other party’s base is motivated to send a message. Given the state of the GOP, but adjusting for the endless list of scandals and buffoonery from Obama, I was thinking the GOP adds to their margin in the House and maybe wins the Senate by a seat or two at most. The people may be pissed at the HLIC (That’s Head Lunatic In Charge), but the warm bowl of mush on offer from the GOP would temper their enthusiasm. Honestly, who can get excited about putting Mitch McConnell in charge of the Senate?

I’m starting to change my mind. John Derbyshire points out in his latest transmission that Americans are actually talking about immigration. That’s something no one thought possible a year ago. Not only are they talking about it, they consider it the top issue. There’s also a big majority now in favor of decreasing legal immigration. Given the way we romanticize immigration, that’s mind boggling. What’s even more stunning is our rulers are now clutching their skirts over it. That’s when you know things have turned. Even lunatics are running for cover now.

Potential 2016 Democratic presidential candidates are showing divisions over how to handle the surge of illegal immigrant children, underscoring how quickly the immigration issue has gone from what they thought was a guaranteed political winner to an electoral headache.

Some Democratic governors considering presidential bids also are having to grapple personally with the surge as they decide whether to fight or accept the Obama administration’s requests to house the children in facilities within their borders.

Those within Congress, meanwhile, will have to take tough votes on boosting spending and changing the law to allow for faster deportations — all under the close scrutiny of Hispanic groups that are prepared to punish those they deem to be working against immigrant rights.

Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley sparked a feud with the Obama administration in recent days when he publicly called on President Obama not to send children back to their countries of origin but privately urged a White House official not to house them at a site in Maryland, either.

“What I said was that would not be the most inviting site in Maryland,” Mr. O’Malley told CNN on Wednesday. “There are already hundreds of kids already located throughout Maryland.”

Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has taken a more enforcement-centered approach. She told a CNN-sponsored town hall last month that the children “should be sent back as soon as it can be determined who responsible adults in their families are.”

She said some children might have valid humanitarian reasons to stay but the key was to send a signal of tough enforcement.

“We have to send a clear message: Just because your child gets across the border, that doesn’t mean the child gets to stay,” she said. “So we don’t want to send a message that is contrary to our laws or will encourage more children to make that dangerous journey.”

The thing to keep in mind is Obama is the leader of the foaming-at-the-mouth lunatic wing of the Liberal Democrats. The Clintons are the leaders of the establishment lunatics. ( I really need to work on my labels) The two wings despise one another with the intensity of a thousand suns. Clowns like Martin O’Malley are in the Clinton wing. Fake Indian has the support of the Obama’s. If Cankles chooses not to run, she will throw her big fat ass behind O’Malley in the primary. Immigration therefore becomes the dividing issue in the Democrat primary battle.

Of course, the ongoing disaster on the border is what’s driving the the news cycle now. The administration has decided to take the Tony Blair approach to immigration. That is, they want to flood the nation with immigrants thus changing the debate from whether we should let them all in to how we should treat them now that they are here. That means the issue could very well be with us for a lot longer than the current news cycle. Faced with a tailor made issue to use against the other party, the GOP will be tempted to screw it up by preemptively surrendering on the issue. The defeat of Eric Cantor, however, seems to have removed that knife from their hands.

It’s way too soon to get hopeful, but the immigration bomb has gone off finally. Unlike most issues, this one is lethal for the Liberal Democrats. Blacks are strongly against immigration. Latinos are strongly against illegal immigration. On the other hand, the plutocrats at the top of the party want open borders. Upscale whites are divided on the issue. Those in STEM fields are fine with low skill immigration, but against the H1B1 rackets. Immigration is not a problem for the coalition as long as it is not an issue important to the public. That’s suddenly changed with the Children’s Crusade going on south of the border.

The GOP is not shielded from this explosion. Boehner and Ryan and Cantor were ready to do the bidding of the Chamber of Commerce and pass amnesty this fall. That’s suddenly out the window. The people who vote for them and provide the boots on the ground are against amnesty. The shearing effect on the party will not tear it apart, but it does give the good guys a shot to force changes. Even Conservative Inc is jumping on the bandwagon. As John pointed out in his transmission, what was once considered off-limits is suddenly all the rage on the Right.

Maybe there’s some hope after all.

 

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
jdallen
Guest
jdallen

Nope. No hope. We will end up like the Brits and the French (and most of Europe), wondering how to get rid of the illegals we fooled around and let in.

Maybe we should let them ALL in, then we move to the Mideast.

Bones
Guest
Bones

If it were 1980, and the country had 1980 demographics, I’d say your analysis was spot on. However, that horse has left the barn. According to the Rasmussen Poll for July 19, 47% of those surveyed approved of Obongo’s job performance as president. 84% of Dems approved of his job performance. A fresh Dem face will easily pick up the few extra points. While I personally despise the little shit, and that colors my thinking, objectively there is no question that he is the worst president the country has had at least since the 19th Century. However, he is the… Read more »

Bones
Guest
Bones

I hope you are right. I hope Obama is a one-off. I hope Brimelow’s Traditional American Nation isn’t sandbagged by the Republicans.

BooneWaxwell
Guest
BooneWaxwell

<>>>

Don’t forget the educational system. It amazes me that 90% of the country is not leftist with the 0-22 years old indoctrination program.

fodderwing
Guest
fodderwing

The Republican Party badly needs to split up. In 1854 the Party split, with the then “RINO”s going their own way into deserved obscurity. The Repubs didn’t win elections for six years until they put a President in the White House in 1860; a President who, by the way, fundamentally changed America. At the time they were quite radical, which frankly is what they need to be now. I get a kick out of far left Dems and their Media pointing out how “radical” the conservative wing of the Republican Party is. It’s a great joke. Leftists are too sly… Read more »

Smokey
Guest

MILITARIZE THE BORDER!!

It is the only answer. it is Constitutional. And for that reason, Obama won’t do it.

gobsmacker
Guest
gobsmacker

“Last time I checked, they don’t have another Magic Negro ready to com in for 2016”

True, but that’s only because they have moved on from “Yes We Can” to “Vote for the Vagina”

Stephen Carter
Guest
Stephen Carter

I say use illegals for stem cell research and compulsory organ donations. Where’s the downside?

james wilson
Guest
james wilson

It could not be more obvious that the greatest obstacle to a conservative emergence is the Republican Party.

trackback

[…] Mr. Z: The Immigration Bomb […]