Free Association & Equality Before The Law

If you are going to pick one thing that is a must-have for a liberal western society, the most likely choice is equality before the law. Things like free speech, elections and private property are important, but they are dependent upon equality before the law. After all, if the ruling class has privilege over everyone else in the law, that will turn to an advantage in disputes over property, politics and even speech. If you look at the list of “rights” we consider to be essential to a civil society, all of them count on equality before the law.

Now, simply having equality before the law does not make for a liberal society. In theory, you could have a society with no property rights at all and still have equality before the law. A communist society, in which all property is held by the public and administered by the state, could have legal equality. Similarly, you could have a society with highly restricted speech and still have legal equality, as long as the speech limits were universally applied and enforced. In other words, equality before the law is not enough.

Obviously, equal justice may be a fundamental requirement of a liberal society, but you need other stuff to make it work. Property rights, enforcement of contracts, freedom of expression and the other items we tend to associate with civil liberty. Even though they cannot exist without equality before the law, a liberal society cannot exist without all those add-on items. This is basic civics, so what about the things that must exist in order for a society to maintain equality before the law? What is its necessary accessories?

The correct answer here is freedom of association. After all, you can have equality before the law along with limits on other rights like speech, as long as they are universally applied. Logically, there is no way to evenly administer limits on association, beyond very broad categories like segregation. Even there, the law is forced to treat one group different from others. This is the crux of Brown v. Board of Education. The material equality of education facilities did not alter the fact that segregation treated blacks unequally.

You cannot have equal justice without free association, for the simple reason the law must always put one citizen ahead of another, in order to limit association. Telling the tavern owner he cannot serve Koreans penalizes the Korean,  the tavern owner or possibly the other tavern patrons. It really does not matter who is or is not punished, as the only possible intent of the law is a bias against one group in favor of another group. There can be no equitable reason for placing such limitations on citizens.

This is why America is rapidly sliding away from liberal democracy into something closer to a corporate oligarchy. Once free association was abandoned in the 1960’s, it opened the door to endless meddling by the managerial state in the rights of the citizens. If the people can no longer decide with whom they wish to associate, or not associate, they can no longer have the right to free expression. After all, if you are forcing people together who don’t wish to be together, you better monitor their speech. Otherwise, you get a bloodbath.

Put another way, the reason that Christian bakers are being forced at gun point to bake cakes for people they see as degenerates is the state has no other choice. Once you dispense with freedom of association, you abandon equality before the law. It also means ever splintering minorities are incentivized to demand special privileges from the state, by forcing the court to choose between groups. The homosexual terrorists are attacking Christians, so they can get their group status set above that of Christians.

This explains the fracturing of American public life and the increasing anti-white hostility we see in our popular culture. Once you abandon equality before the law, people rationally seek group identity in order to press for privileges. The arbitrariness of the law creates the appearance of a zero sum game, in which the gains of one group must come at the expense of another. In the increasingly lawless free-for-all that is modern America, the rational thing for non-whites to do is agitate to get their piece of the crumbling white pie.

Of course, the reason America abandoned free association in the middle of the last century was in an effort to accommodate the minority black population. It is also why Continental societies have never bothered with free association. Wherever there are minority populations, the majority will inevitably impose its will on that minority, simply in the course of pursuing its own rational interests. Blacks in America can only be integrated by force, against the will of the white majority. That’s what happened last century.

This is probably why the managerial class has made a fetish of the downstream items we associate with liberal society, like voting, and sacrilized the positions within the political class. Any call to reform the political system and every criticism of the powerful is met with howls about “defending our democracy.” Since we now have an illiberal system, the people in charge have reached their status by illiberal means. Therefore, their legitimacy is not self-authenticating. The hooting about democracy is a defense mechanism.

One of the puzzles the libertarians have never un-puzzled is how a society can go from a non-libertarian state to a libertarian one, without a violent, miraculous blood bath. Even in theory, a libertarian state must be a starting point of a society. Once it transitions from that condition, it can never go back. Something similar is most likely true with regards to free association and equality before the law. Once these are abandoned, the interests opposed to their return grow, making a peaceful transition back to the lawful state impossible.

As a matter of simple logic, a return to liberal society now means revolution.

This post has already been linked to 6971 times!

105
Leave a Reply

avatar
26 Comment threads
79 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
55 Comment authors
AManOfPrincipleAlzaeboChristopher Chantrill Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Member

Face it, the negro problem and all attempts at fixing it are the source of much of our suffering. Fifty or sixty years later we are still at odds and are being constantly subjugated to more and more indignities and violation of our basic rights. Things are worse than ever. Now our overlords openly express their hatred for us and strive to double down with flooding the country with non assimilable foreigners and taking away free speech rights. Now Farrakan calls for an end to white men. Seeing any progress here? What ever we can do, this has to end… Read more »

JimP
Guest
JimP

I’m not sure the black population is not without its uses to the rest of us. European nations were without these problems and decided to import their own underclass without the people having a say in the matter. You couple that with the European view of rights on speech and self defense; and you’re eventually going to have cities on fire. It’s reasonable to think the black population not only served as somewhat of a brake on out of control leftism; but reinforced the need to protect our self defense rights. Now the idea of gun confiscation is pretty much… Read more »

Member

“European nations were without these problems and decided to import their own underclass without the people having a say in the matter.”

The underclass is of utility to the elites. End of story.

AManOfPrinciple
Guest

Marx’s critique against The Reserve Army of The Unemployed gets used as a how-to manual by the modern Globalists.

Jaro
Guest
Jaro

Numbers count for a lot in life, even if you have guns. Tactical protection doesn’t seem to have afforded strategic protection, in the sense that the US has been demographically transformed more than Europe.

MBlanc46
Guest
MBlanc46

It was the crack in the wall that the authoritarians used to destroy the republic.

Member

I came to the same conclusion many years ago. Loss of rights of association accompanied the civil rights laws of the fifties/sixties. Once that precious right was breached, legal minds simply forged ahead with every other type of “freedom” they could think of imposing upon us. There has been something of a speed bump with reference to Obamacare…but we’re not out of the woods on that yet. And we must never forget that civil rights was always a wedge issue for radical socialists to get their foot in the door of our institutions. Getting them back out will require violence.… Read more »

Mark Matis
Guest
Mark Matis

Actually, freedom of association still exists. For the Preferred Species. Have you ever seen “Law Enforcement” or the “Legal” system attempt to tell a Black they have to associate with a White? Same for Hispanics? Same for Homosexuals? Same for Muslims? THEY can associate – or not – with whoever they damn well please. Whites and Christians, on the other hand… This is all brought about by “Law Enforcement” and the “Legal” system, and will continue as long as they feel free to ignore their very oaths of office to the Constitution. Do you know where they live in your… Read more »

Member

Recognizing and giving special status to the enforcers of elite law, whether written or not is going to be a key to influencing what side the average policeman takes when the regime falls and is replaced. I think paying attention to where they live and being aware of who their relatives are and never speaking ill of them whilst denigrating the regime they work for will be a decisive tool. It is the same thing the French people did with the military, and the radicals did with the national guard in the 18th century. That way when they stormed the… Read more »

Mark Matis
Guest
Mark Matis

When you do it that way, you and yours will be dead. But then that’s your choice. They are Rove Republican swill who will do WHATEVER they are told, as long as that paycheck keeps comin’ in. And Your Betters know to keep paying them as long as they need them, regardless of whether that pay is debtbucks siphoned from your bank account, or authorization to “requisition” whatever they think they need from the Mere Citizens. And when Your Betters have hied off to their North American Redoubt, or their Caribbean Redoubt, or wherever else they intend to go when… Read more »

Glen Filthie
Guest
Glen Filthie

Free association sounds good, Z. But if you get that, there will still be fall out: Cities like Baltimore, Detroit, DC and other black communities will come to resemble the film sets of Planet Of The Apes. Or maybe Escape from New York. What cost will accrue from having these black failed city states within our own borders? Now game THAT out: Tryone and Laquisha are trying to raise their kids in a black dump. What are they going to do? They’ll try to move out and move in with Whitey – which is the problem we have right now.… Read more »

Member

Each of the cities you mention were peaceful, prosperous, and awesome back when freedom of segregation existed. I believe they would go back to being great if that freedom were to return, but I can’t say so for certain.

A.B. Prosper
Guest
A.B. Prosper

Back when segregation was a thing the US was 90% White with the rest being Black and Amerind who were quite oppressed There were very few Asians, Middle Easterners, Africans or Mestizos all vying for political power and spoils The US was also almost entirely Christian (including the Blacks and many Amerinds ) and we lived in an information poor industrial society under a semi populist social democratic regime Prior to this the US was a backwards violent nation with regular labor violence and things the US military bombing strikers being fairly common that’ after the Wild West era till… Read more »

Member

And perhaps they’ll make a TV game-show over who gets to be the lucky Negro whose death brings the races to the desired ratio.

Member

That’s easy, forbid the sale of white owned property to non-whites.

See what you can do with one teeny breach of freedom of association?

TomA
Guest
TomA

Empire disease inevitably culminates in degeneration, collapse, revolution, and then rebirth or diaspora. At the root, our degeneration is driven by prolonged affluence and the attendant dependence addiction being wrought by politicians bribing voters. This weakens us incrementally and persistently. It doesn’t really matter how sick our political system becomes if we grow evermore fat and lazy, and then whine for more government handouts/bailouts.

calsdad
Guest
calsdad

Re: Empire disease. When did the worm turn? Seems like there is a lot of consensus that the U.S. headed down a bad road during the 1960’s when it opened the floodgates to immigration from non-European countries. The U.S. has had a “black problem” for a couple of hundred years – but was at least keeping it somewhat in check. Now – when did the United States decide to go down the road to Empire? I would argue that the groundwork was laid as far back as Woodrow Wilson and his involvement in WW1. Paleocons – like Pat Buchanan –… Read more »

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

+100, calsdad.

Member

But we didn’t become multicultural because we went around building empires. We became multicultural because we allowed mass immigration. There was plenty of South American influence with little migration before the gates were opened in the 60’s, so I don’t see any relationship. I think the Jews with money figured out that a way to increase their relative power was a coalition with minorities. The combination of money and votes had political power. They got the borders opened and poured in voters. This coalition lobbied for more and more freebies as they do everywhere else. That’s not even really a… Read more »

Member

Wars always promote centralization and the strengthening of the trading classes, i.e. merchants, bankers, financiers.

Member

The Civil War was the first war for empire the USA fought.

Issac
Guest
Issac

Fortunately, revolutions can be bloodless eg. The Glorious Revolution in Britain. Unfortunately, bloodless revolution requires the upper class to partake heavily of the new dispensation.

Member
James LePore

I used to think that there would be a straight line from the 1965-66 civil rights acts to thought police and mind control probably a hundred years later. What I missed was the rise of the diversity cult and its extremely greedy leaders. They want civil rights acts of their own. Refusal to serve a tranny in your restaurant will put you in jail, colleges will have to admit a certain quota of bisexuals and illegal immigrants, polygamy will make a comeback, etc. Elite whites have given the crazies a seat at the table as a way of humiliating non-elite… Read more »

D&D Dave in the Bubble
Guest
D&D Dave in the Bubble

Another one for your list is the regressives will soon grant organizations like NAMBLA with victim status as they try to lower the bar on morality to ground zero. Then you will be forced to accept a child molestor as being of normal fiber or off to the gulag with you for being a hater.

calsdad
Guest
calsdad

Good. All that means is that the elites don’t understand what creates guerilla armies. The Germans found out during WW2 that going into a village and killing a few people as an example if one of their officers got shot – really didn’t work. All you did was piss off the dead people’s relatives and breed more guerilla fighters. So they started burning down entire villages. Now you just sent a signal to all the remaining villages that what they’re engaged in is a fight to the death. The Japanese learned the same thing (well actually they didn’t learn) in… Read more »

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

Amen. You’re on fire tonight, calsdad.

Max
Guest
Max

By making absurd, dishonest predictions about future leftist beliefs?

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

By ascribing victim characteristics to the pedophile, who is viewed as suffering from a “disorder” rather than cultivating degenerate sexual fetishes toward those who are too young to experience such things and the behavior is therefore criminal, the stance toward zero-tolerance treatment of pedophiles is softened. This is how desirable, high-trust civilizations are chipped away at until they devolve into low-trust, degenerate cesspools. Well-meaning people think they are being evolved and making the world a better place by opening their minds to such garbage. There are great reasons why traditions and mores are taught and maintained. Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not… Read more »

Max
Guest
Max

“It’s now a hate crime to not let some perv touch your child’s private parts in the public bathrooms?”

I won’t insult your intelligence by believing that you think this is something that any leftist will ever support. .

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

Max, Want to see some real Leftist-supported legislation with real impacts on us U.S. citizens? Things any reasonable person would find objectionable because they are destructive to society but our Leftist politicians still pass in to law? Leftists thought these things were a good idea, these things that destroy all that is decent and sustainable for a great society. In California alone we see the supposedly unintended consequences of Leftist utopian thinking: California Democrats legalize child prostitution https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/california-democrats-legalize-child-prostitution Knowingly exposing others to HIV will no longer be a felony in California http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-gov-brown-downgrades-from-felony-to-1507331544-htmlstory.html Unintended consequences of Prop. 47 pose challenge for… Read more »

Karl McHungus
Guest
Karl McHungus

a society that allows NAMBLA isn’t in a position to protect the kiddie diddlers. They are all known and they will all be pruned.

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

Podesta’s gonna get charged?
Hahahaha, yeah sure anytime now

Ed Wallis
Guest
Ed Wallis

Justice is the process that protects a man’s life, property, natural rights, status and his dignity. Order is the principle and the process to ensure that a people will have just leaders, loyal citizens, and public tranquility. Freedom is the principle that a man is made master of his own life. These three great concepts are the cement of American society. Some nations have order without justice or freedom. China is a modern example of a tyranny where order is maintained, but there is no justice or freedom. Somalia is an example where there is freedom, but no order or… Read more »

Member

If we are honest with ourselves, many of us will admit that one reason we were attracted to libertarianism is that it offered hope of a return to freedom of association. Then when they went nutso over the homos, it was game over. They said they didn’t want to fuck around in social issues and then they jumped in the deep end of the pool. In all probability because they were modern equivalents of the dechristianizers of the French Revolution. Being free to hate religion wasn’t good enough for them, they had to try and destroy it, too.

Member

There is a great deal more freedom in China than the US.

In those areas where the US has the appearance of choice the system is rigged so that either choice works for the elites.
There has been scarcely a bump in the gentle glide-path into globalism from Bush the wrinkled on.

It took Trump, what? 12 months before the Neo-con foreign policy went into overdrive.

reluctantreactionary
Guest

There is a remote possibility that elites may wake up and restore the rule of law based upon the realization that the present system is bad for business in the long run. This was essentially Moldbug’s argument. My fellow open minded progressives. Places like Detroit and Baltimore are costing us a lot of money. I’ve been reading old books, and I discovered that societies with an owner are more accountable. I also realized that we open minded progressives pretty much own everything these days, but we are not acting like owners. Let’s take this thing over and make it work.… Read more »

~Lance Colvard
Guest
~Lance Colvard

I’ve got it figured out folks. Once we whites become a mathematical minority, I’m going to retire with all the benefits that people of color and immigrants have come to enjoy. They will give us those benefits right? And then I’m going to criticize people of color for being born with color that made us poor white folks having such high I.Q’s and needing to go on welfare etc… Just kick-back and enjoy the ride. Easy Peasy:)

D&D Dave in the Bubble
Guest
D&D Dave in the Bubble

It’s a nice thought, but the elites in power will decide that whitey (dirt people version) hasn’t fully paid the bill for the slave days and we’ll have to fight tooth and nail for our diminished benefits. Though we will be the lucky ones cause we’ll be gone by the time countries outside of Africa decide its time to implement the Zimbabwe (and now South Africa) doctrine for dealing with whites.

LineInTheSand
Guest
LineInTheSand

I know you’re being sarcastic but I have an elderly member of my family who really believes that whites will enjoy the benefits of being minority when that day comes. “Just wait till all those white kids can get minority scholarships.” He really believes that the minorities of this country will treat us fairly when we are helpless. Infuriating.

Member

That’s some nuclear-grade suicidal stupidity right there. (On the part of the family member, I mean.)

LineInTheSand
Guest
LineInTheSand

He married into the family and I have contempt for him. He lives in a gated community outside of an Hispanic Arizona town. His foolish views allow him to dismiss me as alarmist racist. This probably explains why John McCain keeps getting reelected in AZ.

Karl McHungus
Guest
Karl McHungus

Arrange for this douche nozzle to be dropped off near the border, late at night. Get him a t-shirt that says “I have many dollars in my pockets” JIC.

Member

Written in spanish and english.

Joseph Suber
Guest
Joseph Suber

Climbing mid-tier elites live in a bubble where they get cheap strawberries and maid service, and the nig-nogs are kept out by gates, environmental regulation and local corruption that ensures their property values remain high. This is what they will support uber alles, over all general civic goods. They just don’t care about us, or whether we get to organize, or if we get de-platformed for not being nice. They have a black friend. They know a mexican who shows up to work on time and speaks english. They have been to a gay wedding. Our suppression by any means… Read more »

MBlanc46
Guest
MBlanc46

Free association is fundamental. Excellent point. This should be the hill that we choose to die on. All of the other guaranteed rights are important, of course, but not of much utility if you’re not allowed to choose your associates. By asserting that right we’ll be called racists and bigots. But they call us that, anyway.

D&D Dave in the Bubble
Guest
D&D Dave in the Bubble

Oh you can have all the freedom of association you want in the leftist utopia. However, it must be State-approved freedom of association or its off to the reeducation camp for you.

Of course the delicious part of this is a lot of the left’s victim groups don’t want to associate with each other in any case, thus at some point they will have to start to eat their own.

DeBeers Diamonds
Guest
DeBeers Diamonds

Off topic:

You may have heard of the “Racism Dog” twitter account/bot. Who or whatever is behind this aims at getting the Right banned by mass reporting.

It is more abundant than ever that we need regulation, if not nationalization of the social media giants. The “dog” is the literal explanation of “targeted harassment” and nothing is done.

Member

“Separation of business and state” should have been in the Bill of Rights.

Member

Along with separation of school and state.

Member

Will public spaces even exist anymore or will every desirable area be turned into an “amusement park” with an entry fee?

Without white racial guilt, there is no way anyone would be forced to bake a cake. Now any pushback always results in “could they refuse service to a black”? The left has used racial guilt to successfully undermine our institutions. Same in Europe — nobody particularly wants an invasion of Muslims, and they sure don’t want to pay their welfare, but accepting the end of their way of life is evidently preferable to be called a “racist”.

Whiskey
Guest

Roseannes shiw has been canceled and she’s been canned by her Agency. It seems the Chelsea not Jarrett tweet that did it. Hillary is a massively popular and powerful politician… just with elite through her patronage machine.

Free association for elites with zero consequence and hereditary privilege and offices, McCains wife an uberliberal is set to inherit his office upon death — and the jackboot of diversity and over for you deplorables is the rule.

We need to break elite power and connections.

LFMayor
Guest
LFMayor

Instead of pulling the rope, what if we played it out instead? Hillary is walking around in what might very well be Darpas first mobile iron lung, let her in the game! Schedule moar, moar speaking engagements for Nancy Pelosi, poppin’ an’a lockin’. Upthread someone mentioned Nambla getting main stream coverage… good! How do you break a dog from shitting on the carpet? Rub his nose in it and blister his ass. That’s what it’s going to take to get normies signing up, rub their nose in all this shit. The negative reinforcements are that it’s simply awful enough to… Read more »

Whiskey
Guest

Love it

Rod1963
Guest
Rod1963

True believers do not see the warts on their gurus. Hillary could stroke out on stage and her supporters would still believe she is fit for office even if she was in a wheel chair as a result of said stroke. The GOP has the same sorts of mindless minions – these are the people who voted in McCain multiple times, same with McConnell and Graham, just to name a few. God almighty these men were and are walking turds. Instead find and support populists running for office. Give a middle-finger the “moderate” GOP puke because they always sell out.… Read more »

AAP
Guest
AAP

When you no longer count ballots by hand he who controls the voting machine wins…

A.B. Prosper
Guest
A.B. Prosper

I am not surprised it was canceled, they were looking for an excuse and while I watched the show twice I think it as dripping with narrative, Still how even the tiny amount of red pill the show was a poor fit for TV which is crap these days anyway The best thing anyone can do is not watch any of it. Turn off the TV and read something pre Cultural Marxism, draw, or do anything except consume the Lefts poison> Leave TV to the Boomers Now most people on our side seem to think we can just flip the… Read more »

Member

If you’ve heard Roseanne in interviews over the last few years, it was plain she is truly batty. Like true dumb conspiracy theorist batty. When her show started again I was surprised she had the mental ability to do it. It was just a matter of time till she said crazy shit to get herself fired. I don’t hate her. She really is crazy though.

Holiday Inn
Guest
Holiday Inn

Why was the Z account suspended for a while, and why is it back?

Member

It freaks me out when that happens. Where do we go if Zman is ever shut down? Is there a plan?

PawPaw
Guest
PawPaw

I got the “account suspended” page and instantly had visions of Tommy Robinson in prison with ISIS radicals. Poor old Z, I thought, he’s going to be thrown into a cellblock in some black ops CIA gulag with a bunch of soy-boy millenials wearing man-buns.

Saml Adams
Guest
Saml Adams

Suppose Gab would be the alternate rally point.

Member

Before I was red pilled about there not being a Left and Right, so much as a managerial elite intent on keeping the current system intact, the paragraph below wouldn’t have made much sense to me. From New York Magazine article on Gorsuch: “Linda Greenhouse, the longtime New York Times Supreme Court correspondent, probably went too far when she called Gorsuch Trump’s “judicial avatar.” Gorsuch is by all accounts a square and decent family man. Still, he seems to share with the president who nominated him — as well as the senator who oversaw his confirmation — a cavalier attitude… Read more »

Member

I think something you’ve said before relates. The left defines the morality. As long as many accept their preferred groups are above criticism or that racism is a high crime, freedom of association cannot exist as a moral principle.

My Comment
Guest
My Comment

“Free association is fundamental.” Free association is built on the idea of the prioritization of individual rights which is derived from a very specific culture and is not shared by non white cultures which prioritize the family and the overall group. Surveys show that the only demographic to strongly support free speech for thought crimes and the second amendment is the white male (mainly right of center ones). our replacements also do not believe in putting ideals above practical considerations of what is in it for “me and my family.” The most lofty their ideals get involves considering what is… Read more »

Member

“Surveys show that the only demographic to strongly support free speech for thought crimes and the second amendment is the white male” And gun rights, and the amount of redistribution, and …… And yet, our libertarian talking heads shill for open borders. It’s as if institutions are set in stone, and not a function of voting, and levels of social trust. I’ve been to DC cocktail parties with those folks, and even when I considered myself one of them, I always knew, in the back of my head, when push came to shove, they’d side with the Left. Fear of… Read more »

Din C. Nuffin
Guest
Din C. Nuffin

Where did I read this morning that only 1% of blacks were criminal? I remember thinking, “That’s not that bad?” But after a bit of reflection, hmm… 40% on welfare, that can’t be right. So if the population of the USA is 327 million, and 12.6% are negro, that’s 41 million negros. 6.6 million persons were in jail or corrections jurisdiction, 35% of whom are black, that is 5.6% of the total blacks who are currently under the jurisdiction of jail or probation. If only a small percent are women, that raises the black male criminals to 10% of the… Read more »

Auntie Analogue
Guest
Auntie Analogue

It boils down to this: the abolition of freedom of association handed the managerial class (who are nothing but the collaborators of the 0.1$ Globalis$t Open Border$ Tyrant$) the power to dictate to us according to “Who? Whom?” This will come to an end only when the White members of the collaborating 10% realize that they – and their children – are on the bottom of their 10% “Who? Whom?” totem pole. Even then, I would bet that the White collaborators among the 10% will continue to believe against all evidence that they still have skin in the game. “A… Read more »

sirlancelot
Guest
sirlancelot

Got the same ” account suspended ” message as well. Forgive my conspiracy theory paranoia , but have seen this happen to other conservative sites. Must be a pain in the ass to create a mirrored site although would appreciate your efforts since I too would miss your blog. Have tried to befriend blacks in the past and it’s always ended badly. Would now just like to live , work and play with my own kind. Unfortunately Lefty insist on court-mandated integration in white neighborhoods and the workplace. And most of these culprits are white themselves. Revenge of the Nerds,… Read more »

Member

Got the same. Tried 2 different ISP’s two different browsers plus whatever verizon uses on a smart phone.

Wang Wei Lin
Guest
Wang Wei Lin

When politicians and oligarchs reserve for themselves privileges and protections they deny to ‘regular’ citizens you have tyranny or the beginning of tyranny.

Dave smith
Guest
Dave smith

Hey white boys! Trepidation about end result is always the same. In a few months after the forced expulsion from all whites in their comfort zones. The colored problem is fixed “boom” me and my little armalite.
Survivors please open the republic’s windows air out the stench, hold an exorcism, weep as a group. Get back to work

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

The zinger that might have been. Too bad you’re unable to articulate your thoughts so we can’t tell what exactly you are trying to express. Ebonics might have been more effective! Good luck.

Member

“We hold theses truths to be self evident……” but of course to the UNIPARTY they are not evident. the UNIPARTY has for 38 years shown that , “Some are more equal than others!”!

Christopher Chantrill
Guest
Christopher Chantrill

The only thing arguing against this is that the ceaseless revolution in the market economy and the start-up culture are a kind of free-association culture that is working against the official compulsion culture. It is only when the start-up has had its IPO that it starts to hire Good Little Girls to run HR.