Being Wrong

There’s a genre of expository writing where the author explains in detail how he got something completely wrong. The name for this form is “nonexistent” because no one ever does it. Similarly, you will never hear a lecture from an economist explaining how he got some prediction totally wrong. For instance, Obama’s economic team swore that the stimulus bill would set off an economic boom through the magic The Multiplier. They were wrong and it was a flop, but no one talks about it because it is simply not done.

This is something you see in all fields, not just public policy. You never read about scientists discussing how they screwed up an experiment or fell for some nutty idea that sounded good at the moment. What we expect and what we get is equivocation, denial and when that does not work, an attempt to flush the incident down the memory hole. It usually works too. Paul Ehrlich was hilariously wrong about human populations, but he has paid no price.

The weird thing about this, I think, is we know that being wrong is usually more important than being right. When you are a student learning mathematics, you are required to show your work in detail. The reason is the teacher wants to see your mistakes. In sports, coaches focus on the mistakes even after a big win. The reason is we learn more from our errors than through our successes. It’s an axiom of life that old people teach to young people as they help them get over some difficulty.

I think one reason why public people never admit being wrong is they know that a lot of people really want them to be right. The people telling the public that economic science said the stimulus bill was a sure fire cure for the economy knew that a lot of people wanted that to be true. They voted for Obama believing he was Jesus. Those economists selling the stimulus probably believed it too. They really really wanted to be on the winning side of history. When that did not happen, they could not face it so they did not face it. The dogs barked and the caravan moved on.

Our side of the game is not immune to this either. Read Zero Hedge and you come away thinking the world is about to explode any minute. Every day they have a post title something like “Five Charts Predicting Armageddon.” That’s been a feature every day since it started in 2009 and the world has not exploded. More important, being wrong for six years has not discouraged them. In fact, they are more certain than ever, operating under the theory that they are due, I guess.

It’s not just the fringe weirdos on our side. Reagan was convinced that taking tax hikes off the table would eventually force the welfare state into retreat. His reasoning at the time sounded great. Make tax hikes the third rail of politics and it leaves borrowing as the only way to finance the government. Eventually, the bond markets would force a roll back as the deficits would grow so large that eventually no one would lend. Reagan came into office when debt was at $900 billion. He left with debt at $2.6 trillion. Obama will leave office with $20 trillion in debt.

I’ve been thinking about that a lot lately. In the 1980’s people knew that no country could survive with public debt equal to or greater than GDP. Now, that mountain of debt may one day topple over and take us all down, but it is not happening tomorrow. As it stands, the great day of reckoning over public debt is 25 years late and nowhere to found. That’s important to keep in mind when thinking about the current issues of the day. The odds are, we are all wrong about what’s coming next.

The people in charge, the central planners running the economy through the central banks, are often mocked by people on our side. After all, every effort at central planning has failed miserably so why should this time be different. The thing is, it has been different and it remains different. Say what you will, but the massive debt and real estate bubble that burst seven years did not plunge the world into depression. Maybe it was dumb luck or maybe the central planners are better than we think. I’m not saying they are perfect or that they really know what they are doing, but I don’t see any soup lines either.

It’s possible that the looming custodial state, where the Cloud People rule over the Ground People like game wardens, is going to be wonderful. The Ground People will embrace being cared for like children and accept being pushed around by the authorities when necessary. The sense of looming catastrophe that animates much of the alternative right will turn out to be completely misplaced. Instead, it will be viewed as a great leap forward for humanity.

Or, I could be completely wrong.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Crazed Weevil
Guest
Crazed Weevil

I think you had it right before, when you mentioned how much slack there is in the system to absorb the huge fuck ups that have happened over the last 20-30 years. All the predictions about The Great Collapse ™ seem to ignore that slack and hence they’ve all been shown to be wrong since they work only off past observations where fuck ups had large, immediate effects from the go.

Future predictions need to take that slack into account before we can guess when the next crash will be. Or what the aftermath will look like for that matter.

UKer
Guest
UKer

No one is wrong because they will tell you later there are always so many factors coming into play. Therefore reasonably it can be argued that even a cast-iron prediction will soon reveal that there were many other elements and influences (perhaps unseen) which couldn’t be assessed at the time.

In other words, all predictions have wiggle room to allow the predictor to wriggle free. Like all those recurring predictions of the end of the world which seem to miss, it’s only because apparently divine forces can change his/her/its mind. But who on earth could predict that, hey?

Jack
Guest
Jack

What fun. I believe wars should won. I could be wrong though.

Olddog
Guest
Olddog

What about “trickle down” economics? Is that still supposed to work?

Member

If productivity climbs high enough, the cloud people won’t need to boss the rest of us around. They will constitute the inner party. The technicians who keep the whole thing running will be the outer party. They can then sterilize or euthanize the proles… maybe keep some breeding stock on reservations for risk mitigation and local color. Maybe all of those mountains of debt just won’t matter in the end.

Rick B
Guest

The best ending line ever…………..

Lorenzo
Guest
Lorenzo

We don’t see soup lines because we give out SNAP cards. Today’s queues would dwarf those of the 1930s if the SNAP card holders had to stand in line to be fed.

Aeneas
Guest
Aeneas

What keeps the dollar the reserve currency of the world and the US economy growing is aircraft carriers and cruise missiles.

james wilson
Guest
james wilson

Tocqueville- When Europeans landed in China three hundred years ago, they found there that almost all the arts had reached a certain degree of perfection and were surprised that they had not improved beyond that point. The Chinese, in following the path of their ancestors, had mislaid the reasons for the direction the latter had chosen. They still used the formula without asking why; they kept the tool but they had lost the skills to adapt or replace it. The Chinese were, therefore, not able to change anything and had to abandon any notion of improvement. The well of human… Read more »

trackback

[…] Z Man: […]

trackback

[…] Read it. […]

grey enlightenment
Guest

since we’re talking about being wrong, I think a post you made while back about Amazon may qualify . but everyone is wrong at least once

trackback

[…] The Z Blog: […]

trackback

[…] The Z Blog: […]

cruithni
Guest
cruithni

“…I don’t see any soup lines either.”

1. You’re looking in the wrong places. There are soup lines. I spent several months this year as a volunteer chef at one.

2. SNAP has helped hide the soup lines. Now the government just gives you a faux credit card and loads you up each month electronically.