Libertarianism

From time to time I get serious queries about my views on libertarianism. I take a backseat to no man in my disdain for modern libertarians, so I think a lot of people just assume I have never bothered to fully understand the topic. This is a popular defense from libertarians and soccer enthusiasts. As with soccer, the primary appeal of libertarianism is its simplicity, so this line of defense is a bit silly. Still, I thought a fuller explanation of my views on the topic would make for an interesting show this week, so here we are.

Now, as we see with defenders of Islam, libertarians have a habit of strapping on roller skates whenever you begin to analyze their thing. “That’s not the real Islam” follows every terrorist attack. “That’s not the real libertarianism” will inevitably show up in the comments of this podcast. I chose to rely on Hans-Hermann Hoppe for this show, as he is the pope of the faith right now. I did draw on Rothbard a bit and Rand, of course. I largely ignored the childish scribbling from Reason [clown horn] and Cato.

This week I have the usual variety of items in the now standard format. Spreaker has the full show. I am up on Google Play now, so the Android commies can take me along when out disrespecting the country. I am on iTunes, which means the Apple Nazis can listen to me on their Hitler phones. The anarchists can catch me on iHeart Radio. YouTube also has the full podcast. Of course, there is a download link below. I’m now on Spotify, so the millennials can tune in when not sobbing over white privilege and toxic masculinity.

This Week’s Show

Contents

  • 00:00: Opening
  • 02:00: Wrong From The Start
  • 12:00: Getting There and Keeping It
  • 22:00: The Reality Of The Market
  • 32:00: The Story of Iceland
  • 42:00: Drug Legalization
  • 47:00: Libertarian Trade
  • 52:00: Individualism
  • 57:00: Closing

Direct Download

The iTunes Page

Spotify

Google Play Link

iHeart Radio

Full Show On Spreaker

Full Show On YouTube

108 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Member
1 year ago

Libertarianism is a common stepping stone for people shedding the traditional “conservative” identity as it has a mildly significant political party and lots of big money backers but it has little in the way of staying power. Libertarianism is a great philosophical topic to discuss via simplistic memes (Taxation is theft!) and social media posts but it is not a serious political philosophy because it prefers esoteric theories over the reality of human nature. I was a big proponent of libertarianism up until the 2016 election and I am sure I am not alone. On the other hand, some libertarian… Read more »

Frip
Member
Reply to  Arthur Sido
1 year ago

Remarkable that the Dissident Right reduces people who happen to be gay to the word “sodomite”. So a fellow American citizen, taxpayer, creative contributor to society, possible awesome uncle, great neighbor, softball coach, and all around good guy is just…sodomy. Nice. Real nice.

Chris_Lutz
Member
Reply to  Frip
1 year ago

Maybe because open homosexuality is a disaster from a societal standpoint. A thief can be a fellow American citizen, softball coach, good neighbor, and all around good guy. He’s still a thief. Rampant and open homosexuality is a sign and an additional cause of a collapsing society. It’s a hedonistic activity and homosexuals are not, in general, a group that cares about the future of society. It also is a mental illness.

They aren’t going to plant the tree they’ll never sit in the shade of.

vinteuil
Reply to  Chris_Lutz
1 year ago

“open homosexuality is a disaster” – so I guess you’d prefer your gay priests & coaches & scout-masters &c to be closeted?

I mean, that worked so well with, e.g., Jerry Sandusky!

vinteuil
Reply to  Chris_Lutz
1 year ago

I’ve planted, at last count, some three or four hundred trees, and fussed over them, endlessly, back in the day in Virginia, and now here in Missouri.

Unfortunately, my thoroughly heterosexual nephew & niece couldn’t seem to care less about our land, our people & all that sort of thing.

For them, I’ll always be their awkward gay racist uncle.

Glenfilthie
Glenfilthie
Member
Reply to  Frip
1 year ago

You’ve allowed degenerates to whitewash the issue for you. Those “fellow American citizens, taxpayers, creative contributors to society and potentially awesome uncles and softball coaches” … are far more likely to sodomize your kids than be a positive influence on them. Or infect them with easily prevented diseases like HIV. Libertarians are big proponents of faggotry and drug addiction whether they admit it or not, which is why I’ve always dispensed with them by contemptuous laughter. Most libertarians I know really aren’t that bright for the most part. They’re not stupid – but from what I’ve seen they haven’t been… Read more »

bilejones
Member
Reply to  Frip
1 year ago

The insolence of you Sodomites knows no bounds. The word sodomite to describe you shirt-lifters, pillow biters and turd-burglars has been in use in English since at least the year 1615 – according to the entry on page 925 of volume 15 of my copy of the Oxford English Dictionary. You may wish to check your own. The real issue is why we sane people allowed you perverts to appropriate the perfectly useful word “gay” to describe your filth. You are, of course, so fucking gay, cheerful and happy that you, thankfully, commit suicide at a rate about four times… Read more »

Din C. Nuffin
Din C. Nuffin
Reply to  Arthur Sido
1 year ago

It is obvious to everyone except the sodomites that their proclivities are perverted. Try looking at your hole card.

bilejones
Member
Reply to  Arthur Sido
1 year ago

.

Shrugger
Shrugger
1 year ago

I called myself a libertarian for quite a while until I realized a lot of those guys believed things I know are crazy. But libertarianism was my gateway drug away from National Review “conservatism”. So at least it was transitionally useful in my case.

Hoyos
Hoyos
Reply to  Shrugger
1 year ago

So you’re a libertarian presenting, transreactionary?

Shrugger
Shrugger
Reply to  Hoyos
1 year ago

I’m not sure what I am now, but most lefties would call me a Nazi. So I have that going for me, which is nice.

CAPT S
CAPT S
1 year ago

There are the libertarian intelligentsia, and these are the ones I think you have a beef with; their ideology has become an “ism” … a religion. And it’s a false ideology because most libertarians seem to assume that human nature aspires to goodness. (No different from socialists on that point.) But if you distill some of the libertarian tenets down to “government should leave productive people the hell alone” then that’s pretty good political philosophy, no? Further, our Founders had a foreign policy that looked a lot like the libertarian Non-Aggression Principle, which seemed to serve America well until 1914.… Read more »

Moran ya Simba
Moran ya Simba
Reply to  thezman
1 year ago

Power itself is expansive and that includes government, representative or otherwise. Checking individuals or fractions from getting undue power is the interesting Q libertarianism tries to address and it will not work the way libertarians imagine.

Hoyos
Hoyos
Reply to  thezman
1 year ago

See? That’s where I’ve landed over the years. Ultimately you have to have an independent arbiter for disputes, and that’s not something human beings can really hire out, that and internal and external security issues.

They also ignore externalities of economic decisions almost all the time and don’t seem to understand that you can do something that is short term profitable and long term disastrous.

There have been any number of tolerably functioning and free societies, the libertarian critique of which through “expansive government” is that nothing lasts forever, except AnCapistan would.

Din C. Nuffin
Din C. Nuffin
Reply to  thezman
1 year ago

I’m glad you can read and interpret his writing. I can’t, and i have a Mensa card.

Zeroth Tollrants
Zeroth Tollrants
Reply to  CAPT S
1 year ago

I can only speak for myself, but 99% of the Lolbertarians I’ve had exposure to, need to have their NAP shoved up their heiney with a tank.
Some, I assume, are good people.

Nick
Nick
1 year ago

Complete and brutal take down of another materialist utopian Jewish ideology. Great podcast. If we could get all these high IQ whites to stop playing with these shiny distractions. We could win this thing in a generation

Moran ya Simba
Moran ya Simba
1 year ago

Good analysis; a libertarian society is probably not stable, ie it will evolve into something else. Game theory suggests that bands of strong men would gang up, in business, as ‘corporations’, or simply as gangs of violent men. And create monopolies for own benefit. The only defense against this is to make your own band of men….and that’s how tribes, then kings, then states etc, arose. Libertarianism is simply trying to go back to square one and then watch essentially the same systems grow up, probably in worse versions. And, it is actually a sort of offshoot of the marxist… Read more »

Teapartydoc
Member
Reply to  Moran ya Simba
1 year ago

Distributivism has the same problem. Once you have distributed the property and given people freedom over whether it is alienable or not, it will end up being disrributed unevenly again. What are you going to do? Redistribute it every fifty years?

Moran ya Simba
Moran ya Simba
Reply to  Teapartydoc
1 year ago

I agree, but the important thing to realize is that libertarianism does not maximize either meaningful lives (raising a family is central for 99% for that) or liberty, b/c it will end up in oligarchy or anarchy.

Teapartydoc
Member
Reply to  Moran ya Simba
1 year ago

In that respect even something as stupid as distributivism is better than libertarianism.

Zeroth Tollrants
Zeroth Tollrants
Reply to  Teapartydoc
1 year ago

It’s obvious, Doc. That’s when you offer the free sex change & a lifetime of hormone therapy. Duh. Lolberts will love that. They are super into being trannies.
Maybe you can throw in a lifetime of free weed, as well?

A.B. Prosper
A.B. Prosper
Reply to  Teapartydoc
1 year ago

On overweening belief in the sanctity of private property is a product of modernism and its not necessarily a good one. A man’s home may be his castle and inviolate but putting limits on private wealth for the common good is moral and often the right call If you doubt me, let me show you the kids version Play monopoly in the late game when one guy owns all the property . Even with money on free parking , the game is unplayable and real world economics while far more complex still operates with the same base principle Scarcity is… Read more »

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
Reply to  A.B. Prosper
1 year ago

Nice. Making private property the highest value is a deception for avoiding the tribalism inherent in the world. The only people who have ever made property sacred are whites. The libertarian must believe that the sanctity of property is universal, which is manifestly false. When the libertarian fetishizes property he is deflecting from the fundamental tribal nature of the world.

Greg Johnson once proposed a steep progressive tax on anyone who earns more than a million dollars a year. He said, “Our community would be better off without someone who objects to this.”

Corn
Corn
Reply to  LineInTheSand
1 year ago

Who is Greg Johnson? Also, if you’re making $1 or $2 million a year and you’re not happy you need a therapist, not a tax cut. I seem to recall a brief article in the news a few years back, some survey or poll was taken and some shrinks concluded there was a sort of income comfort zone. If you made too little money, stress or dreams denied gnawed at you. But the study indicated that people who made $500K, $1M or more yearly were no happier on average than people who made $100 or $200K yearly. IIRC correctly the… Read more »

Denny Bilson
Denny Bilson
1 year ago

Libertarianism is only attractive to white males. This is because it allows them to deny their unfair advantages and privileges.

DeBeers Diamonds
DeBeers Diamonds
Reply to  Denny Bilson
1 year ago

Envy isn’t a good look on you, even if this trolling is a bit more effective than you usually provide. Everything, including socialism, is best run by the evil white male empire.

Tax Slave
Tax Slave
Reply to  Denny Bilson
1 year ago

You forgot “…white males with a fully functional penis.” Unlike you.

A.B. Prosper
A.B. Prosper
Reply to  Denny Bilson
1 year ago

Partially true. I almost upvoted you for this, Soros troll or not since sometimes you provoke needed discussion Libertarianism is for White Males who think they are Reardon from Atlas Shrugged and are being held back by the man. If I could only work kids to death in my cat litter mine, I’d be rich and successful. Its a disgusting ideology and no wonder it was cribbed for the Satanic Bible That said while White Men especially the upper classes do have privileges though working class and poor Whites are treated like shit quite unfairly Healthy societies divide rights and… Read more »

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
Reply to  Denny Bilson
1 year ago

You are correct about the appeal of libertarianism but I have to ask, “Do the Japanese have Japanese advantage and privilege in Japan?” When blacks receive extra scrutiny in Asian countries are those instances of white supremacy?

DeBeers Diamonds
DeBeers Diamonds
Reply to  LineInTheSand
1 year ago

Until leftists are driven out of the academy, Asians will be both “victims” and “unwitting co-conspirators” of white supremeists.

Abelard Lindsey
Abelard Lindsey
Reply to  Denny Bilson
1 year ago

Guys, don’t you recognize sarcasm when you see it?

Slovenian Guest
Slovenian Guest
1 year ago

“Libertarians generally believe in and abide by the non-aggression principal, which renders the philosophy itself impotent in the cause of implementing its own principals.” – James LaFond He continues: “Libertarians generally seem to believe that the Founding Fathers of the U.S, were libertarians, when the majority of them were either bankers with monopolistic designs or slave masters seeking to wring more profit from their chattel. The actual libertarians of the Revolutionary Era were those escaped and released white slaves who headed into the Ohio Country to escape the plantation economy and the natives they battled against. And, for the tie… Read more »

Drake
Drake
1 year ago

Good job. A decade ago I would have called myself a Libertarian. I’ll always want less government in my life and in general. But the flaws in some of the ideas and the complete denial of the consequences of their ideas drove me away. Reason has drifted significantly to the left over the past decade. They used to at least stand up to bad ideas such as Islam, not anymore. Now they can’t admit that inviting millions of Muslims into a western democracy is a horrible idea that will result in bloodshed and eventually war or progroms. They also refuse… Read more »

David Wright
Member
1 year ago

Want a take on Libertarianism from today. Go to Lew Rockwell and two articles stand out with the standard fare. One about hoping the Russians win the trade war, because:bad policy. Two Jesus was not a socialist but probably would be closer to us.
Ideology is a bitch, and I consider those types at Rockwell much better that your standard “Reason” types. I still go because there because still a paleo remnant there.

Teapartydoc
Member
1 year ago

My understanding of the opioid crisis is a bit different. Thirty years ago in my state we were required to have duplicate prescription pads specifically for schedule II drugs as a hedge against fraud, which was very unusual. The low level of fraud led to dropping the special Rx’s to having the same plain paper Rx for all prescriptions. (Actually, when I went to med school having pre-printed Rx’s was something high class doctors did, or drug or medical stationery companies provided as promotions, we were taught to write them on blank pieces of paper). There was a very gradual… Read more »

Moran ya Simba
Moran ya Simba
Reply to  thezman
1 year ago

‘…libertarians routinely exclude social capital from their cost analysis of public policy.’

Uhm, social capital does not exist in libertarianism, exactly as in marxism, ‘culture doesn’t exist’. Libertarianism is marxist analysis reaching a different conclusion. It is a one-dimensional view of humans. Ayn Rand was a lot closer to Old Karl than she or her fans ever realized. She just decided he got the analysis right and the conclusion wrong. Real conservatives think he got both wrong.

Teapartydoc
Member
Reply to  thezman
1 year ago

Never mentioned them by name or the company, but this all fits in precisely with the timeline I just described. It is the same story told from a different perspective.

Drake
Drake
Reply to  Teapartydoc
1 year ago

My 2 cents.

The more refined and powerful the drugs, the more addictive. Marijuana, coca leaves, hemp, and that sort of stuff aren’t particularly harmful or addictive. Start refining cocaine, heroin, and pharmaceutical pain killers and you get some dangerous stuff.

I’ll still argue that the enforcement of drug prohibitions (just like alcohol prohibition) is more costly than it’s worth.

DeBeers Diamonds
DeBeers Diamonds
Reply to  Drake
1 year ago

Singapore actually takes drug prohibition seriously, meaning customs inspections and hanging dealers. Our government conducts a phony war with the DEA, while the CIA enables the cartels to evade enforcement.

Regardless of what we allow to be legal or not, the state should have a monopoly on distribution (Canada has state-run liquor/weed/casinos). Loan sharks like (((Dan Gilbert))) should not be allowed to manipulate the political process to gain a monopoly on vice. The underclass should be strictly forbidden from accessing vice, lottery tickets are bought by the low-IQ when they should only be bought by the 1%.

Drake
Drake
Reply to  DeBeers Diamonds
1 year ago

I’m not real keen on state-owned businesses.

DeBeers Diamonds
DeBeers Diamonds
Reply to  Drake
1 year ago

The government has a tendency to be less efficient than the private sector, when it comes to vice that would be a good thing. Casinos would be less appealing if they were in a drab Soviet Brutalist building rather than a glitzy Vegas skyscraper.

Drake
Drake
Reply to  DeBeers Diamonds
1 year ago

Unless and until that money becomes a vital revenue stream for bureaucrats’ retirement fund or similarly important budget items. Then they’ll be fully committed to creating addicts.

DeBeers Diamonds
DeBeers Diamonds
Reply to  Drake
1 year ago

Incidence of tobacco use is on a secular decline, despite its importance to state budgets. No real effort has been made to ease advertising restrictions or public smoking bans. Gilbert wasn’t even able to get smoking allowed in his casinos here in Ohio. The cost of vice is socialized, the benefits are private. Removing the former is unelectable social darwinism.

Cloudbuster
Member
Reply to  Teapartydoc
1 year ago

I don’t enjoy watching people suffer, but there are serious dysgenic drawbacks to the welfare state of good intentions. As teapartydoc says, propensity to addiction is heritable. A welfare state that enables addicts is effectively encouraging dysgenic breeding. But an effective prohibition regime isn’t doing much better. Set aside the fact that an effective prohibition regime in a nation the size of the US is a unicorn, unless we become a completely different, far more repressive society, and maybe even then. Even if prohibition were successful, the propensity for addiction is still there and will surely express itself in different… Read more »

Mike_C
Mike_C
Reply to  Teapartydoc
1 year ago

Re: special prescription pads for narcotics. I almost feel bad responding to a thoughtful comment with an anecdote, and a borrowed anecdote at that, but here goes. So the VA system had these special green-paper narcotics prescription pads back when I was a medical resident. Each sheet had a serial number stamped on it, and a clerk recorded the block of numbers that you “controlled” when they issued you a narcs pad. Well, someone walked into the team room where us trainees kept our coats, backpacks, etc and made off with a colleague’s backpack, which happened to have her narcs… Read more »

wjkathman
wjkathman
1 year ago

Along my path at various points, I have considered myself a conservative, constitutionalist, classical liberal, libertarian, anarchist, anarcho-capitalist, etc. At current, I qualify mostly as a heretic to the Progressivist religion mismanaging our culture. My main objective is to value truth above all else. Politics is beyond my circle of influence. I am increasingly aware of the limitations and drawbacks of individualism in a world filled with tribalists; however, because I have always viewed myself through a lens of individualism, it is not a mentality I can easily abandon. Let us concede that libertarianism makes a poor fit with human… Read more »

Cerulean
Cerulean
Reply to  wjkathman
1 year ago

“We should take every chance to remind folks that various governments killed over half a billion people during the 20th Century.” Can’t argue. Unfortunately, if you broadcast this truth to the general public, it will have zero effect. Better to be selective and mindful about it, no? “Power has proven itself one hell of a dangerous commodity.” True. But if that makes you avoid exercising or delegating power, the danger to you is worse. Avoidance just amplifies your adversaries’ power. From the podcast: “We are evolved to live in hierarchical groups. … The great challenge is to rally your people… Read more »

wjkathman
wjkathman
Reply to  Cerulean
1 year ago

Power is a damned if you do/damned if you don’t scenario. A power vacuum is bound to be filled at some point and likely by tyrants. Take power yourself and you become a potential tyrant. Men are not angels and none of us is immune to corruption. It’s never easy trying to transmit anything of substance to the general public. Most people prefer bells and whistles over challenging insights. Give them too much to ponder and they will probably reject your message.

Bruno the Arrogant
Bruno the Arrogant
1 year ago

If libertarians really hated the state as much as they hate the nation, they might actually be good for something.

Except they don’t, and they aren’t.

Chief ShortingBull
Chief ShortingBull
1 year ago

Somehow the country survived the zombie apocalypse of every drug imaginable drug being legal before America lost it’s mind in the late progressive era. You know, that backward time where despite the absence of big, loving government to destroy the foundation of the Constitution, we whelped out little advancements like the light bulb, phonograph, telegraph, telephone, A/C electric, the airplane and I’m sure one or two other things. And I’m having a hard time figuring out who to root for in this drug war. If MS-13 pulls a home invasion of my house at 4:00AM, I’m at least allowed to… Read more »

james wilson
james wilson
Reply to  Chief ShortingBull
1 year ago

The reason 1906 happened was because the average addict was a white middle aged housewife. Now she couldn’t buy coke of opium at the drug store, and we were off to the races. Libertarianism brought us coke for $2.50 an ounce, and temperance brought organized crime, private and public.

Dutch
Dutch
1 year ago

Libertarianism is the cop-out when you reject the status quo, but don’t want to face the socially uncomfortable cultural and biological realities right in front of you.

Here’s the test. When you are with lefties that for whatever reason you aren’t interested in intimidating, and you are forced to put some opinions out there, you cloak your views in libertarian arguments.

Slovenian Guest
Slovenian Guest
Reply to  Dutch
1 year ago

To paraphrase The Z Man:

“Libertarianism is a convenient hiding place for people unwilling to take on the Left. If you reject central planning of the national economy, but are afraid to be called bad things by the local lunatics. In the culture war, libertarians will never go over the top and will, once in a while, turn their weapons on their comrades. You just can’t trust them to fight.”

Teapartydoc
Member
Reply to  Dutch
1 year ago

I think this is true up to a point, but I also think that the reason so many libertarians have lefty friends and spouses is that they are all utopians at heart, and mostly atheistic as well. A shared atheistic utopianism is the common ground on which they can agree. After that collectivism vs individualism is a minor quibble over how to make paradise. And since the libertarian realizes that his beliefs are basically bullshit, he will usually defer to his communist wife when with her, and explain why she is wrong when discussing things with others when she’s not… Read more »

Slovenian Guest
Slovenian Guest
1 year ago

Odd that you didn’t mention your age on podcast #53!

Thorsted
Thorsted
1 year ago

Evolutionary anthropologist, Robin Fox mentions the relation of feeling pried and associate with one kin-group in “The Tribal Imagination -civilisation and the savage mind” an episode. He had been to a dinner where there was a Lebanese. Foxs mentions to him a lebanese author for saying that all in the middle east that do something or accomplish something always dedicates it to his kin-group of clan or tribe. The Lebanese became extremely angry and denied that and said “The man who wrote that is likely to come from that clan or that tribe” -so, tribalism is confirmed with denialism of… Read more »

pyrrhus
pyrrhus
1 year ago

FYI, wolves and coyotes are genetically closer than Africans and Asians, though regarded as different species. Both groups can interbreed…and that doesn’t make coyotes a “social construct.”

DeBeers Diamonds
DeBeers Diamonds
1 year ago

Our friends, the farmers.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/26/gop-yoder-vote-provide-more-visa-workers-for-farmers/

If you can read the comments, lots of “farmers” that are quite pissed that their slave labor illegals could be gone. Privatize the profit, socialize the loss through degraded white/black work ethic, wage stagnation and drugs.

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
Reply to  DeBeers Diamonds
1 year ago

Harsh but true. Many farmers are just opium addicts on a larger scale. Give me my fix and f*ck everyone else.

If we cut off all immigrant labor could they go cold turkey?

De Beers Diamonds
De Beers Diamonds
Reply to  LineInTheSand
1 year ago

It would be painful for sure. The horse-trading for E-Verify has always involved some quid pro quo for either a new helot visa (H-2C) or bureaucratic streamlining for the existing H-2A. The correct thing to do would be to mandate that able bodied without dependents (ABWD) be forced to take these jobs or else lose benefits. We’d probably see more importation of food from Mexico, Central America, Brazil and West Africa. Not a bad thing as it would reduce incentives to migrate. Remittance income is a “resource curse”.

bilejones
Member
1 year ago

Hans Herman Hoppe’s last name is pronounced as in kangaroo.

btw I liked last weeks version of TBTM

bilejones
Member
Reply to  thezman
1 year ago

But they are both Hoppers

Mike_C
Mike_C
Reply to  bilejones
1 year ago

While we’re on pronunciation, Alþingi is pronounced “alTHingi”. The third letter is not a weird “p” but rather the character “thorn” which has fallen out of English, but survives in Icelandic.

Context switch: I’d like to see someone go into a gun shop and ask for a bottle of “Kangaroo’s number 9”.

Tax Slave
Tax Slave
1 year ago

Great podcast. Speaking of individualism, Black Pigeon Speaks put up a new video on the issue. Wondering what you think of him, Zman?

https://youtu.be/lrVyXdwft8E

Frip
Member
Reply to  Tax Slave
1 year ago

I am not Zman but I like Black Pidgeon. One thing that bugs me though is how he illustrates his points with video. It’s manipulative and condescending, and just over the top stupid. “Modern life’s entertainment as distraction.” Cut to slow-mo scene of girl laughing on an amusement ride. We get it, thanks. “Yadda yadda tribalism”. Shows zombies. gtfo. I get that it’s a video and we need to look at something moving. But yeah, it’s kinda weird.

Cloudbuster
Member
Reply to  Frip
1 year ago

I think that’s just creative videography..Better than the balding talking head that is Stefan Molyneux.

Member
Reply to  Tax Slave
1 year ago

Download youtube directly to you phone sd card as audio only mp3 using videoder. I almost never watch high verbal content youtube videos anymore. Listen to the mp3 cgonversion in the car.

Member
1 year ago

More clown horn! At least it’s a must if Nick Gillespie or the apple heads at the Scroto Institute get a mention.

Cloudbuster
Member
1 year ago

Libertarianism is a tough one for me. If we were all angels, Libertarianism would be great. But we’re not, and we’re importing and breeding more and more devils all the time. Like all Utopian schemes of the Right and the Left, Libertarianism starts with “First, create humans that don’t behave like humans.” We were actually mind-bogglingly close in the 18th and 19th century US. I think we’ve all heard the saying attributed to John Adams: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” (Haven’t checked to see… Read more »

bilejones
Member
Reply to  Cloudbuster
1 year ago

The basic assumption is that it’s for smart white guys. Doesn’t work for the distaff side or the mystery meats.

Din C. Nuffin
Din C. Nuffin
1 year ago

Bastiat convinced me years ago “Free Trade” was wonderful. I scoffed at Perot when he talked about the “giant Sucking sound”. Now you have convinced me, not about the issues like free trade, but about me being too impressionable to read any more. Thanks a lot.

Cloudbuster
Member
Reply to  Din C. Nuffin
1 year ago

The thing is, words in politics mean, like the Caterpillar in Alice in Wonderland, exactly what they want them to mean. What they call “free trade” is nothing of the kind. So, does free trade work? Hell if I know. I haven’t seen it in operation. NAFTA doesn’t implement free trade any more than the Affordable Care Act implements affordable care.

Mark Taylor
Member
1 year ago

If you ask a libertarian why Detroit is a basket case they will tell you it’s onerous taxation and regulation policies. There’s some truth in their criticisms of government in general but I don’t need to spin myself in circles trying to explain things like Detroit in order to be critical of the government. There’s a lot of problems with libertarianism but I came to the conclusion a while ago that even if I wanted a libertarian world, supporting open borders libertarians would more quickly turn us into Venezuela than if I supported the socialist party.

Cloudbuster
Member
Reply to  Mark Taylor
1 year ago

Just to clarify, in case there was any doubt, Detroit is a basket case because it’s full of Blacks.

Pimpkin's Nephew
Pimpkin's Nephew
1 year ago

It is written, in John 15:13, “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” This is of course the sort of maudlin nonsense rejected by libertarians. A libertarian is simply a self-worshipping asshole, if I may be allowed to generalize. There exist neither moral nor economic arguments for a libertarian ‘laying down his life” for anyone at all; sovereign in his leather jacket in a godless matrix, he has one task: To be awesome! Laugh all you want at the great swindle known as Christianity, or even Communism, but John’s precept… Read more »

Frip
Member
Reply to  Pimpkin's Nephew
1 year ago

Can’t believe I’ve never run across John 15:13. My mom used to drill verses into my head every day. That’s such a cool line. I see it online just now. But I’m gonna have to check one of my real bibles to verify it’s actually in there.

Rod1963
Rod1963
Reply to  Pimpkin's Nephew
1 year ago

“Self-worshiping asshole” is a apt description of the buggers. The ones I knew were all obsessed over drugs and prostitution of all things. It did tell me where their values lay and it was in very bad place.

I think their model human is a cross between Gordon Gekko and that sociopath Ayn Rand(did you know she admired a gruesome serial killer as a ‘real man’ in her private dairies).

Cloudbuster
Member
Reply to  Pimpkin's Nephew
1 year ago

That’s a pretty terrible mischaracterization of Libertarians. Sure, some Libertarians are jerks, just like some people of any group you can name. At its base, Libertarianism is just:

1. Don’t take other people’s stuff without their permission.
2. Don’t hurt people.
3. Keep your word.

It’s a utopian, unworkable philosophy, sure.

However, there’s nothing about Libertarianism that prevents you from being a Christian, from being generous (It’s your stuff, you get to decide what to do with it, including giving it to other people to help them), from laying down your life, from living by a a religious code.

Berty
Berty
1 year ago

There’s a very strong cultural Marxist strain in libertarianism. The same people who tell you we can’t have borders or any kind of social safety net will immediately declare that the government must prevent discrimination against blacks or gays or Muslims. Freedom to discriminate is apparently against freedom. Arguing with them is pointless because as a previous comment noted they just get angry.

William Middleton
William Middleton
1 year ago

Great podcast Z Man! I think the biggest problem for Libertarianism, other than being a utopian fantasy, is that it is almost exclusively a “frontier” ideology. You referenced that word a few times in the podcast but having a frontier with low hanging fruits that could easily be exploited (land, labor, capital) was the reason that it sorta worked for a while in the U.S. And it’s the reason why it has no appeal in Europe, which has been settled for thousands of years. Libertarians idioitically think that the UK can solve its astronomical housing costs with just adopting a… Read more »

Member
1 year ago

It’s easy to poke fun at liberatarianism – I do it all the time at misesuk.org – but … the real discussion point you need to spend a Power Hour on, and which was almost a throw-away comment, is the point that you get as much government as the social organization can bear without collapsing, no more, no less. This is actually the elephant in the room all thanks to modern technology. We’re entering the panopticon and it’s increasingly clear that only those with the least morals and the highest psychopathy are in in charge. Once you get beyond social… Read more »

Troll King(-36)
Troll King(-36)
1 year ago

Re: vigilantes will make us paint our houses red.

Not intending to defend them, but did the kkk ever try to make people build their houses a certain way or write books, songs, pamphlets, and even magic cards a certain way? You are trying to rationalize.

Lineman
Lineman
1 year ago

Libertarian equals death because they won’t fight for the resources they need to survive…They can only survive by the sacrifice of others…

Peter White
Peter White
1 year ago

Lots of people with lots of different beliefs call themselves libertarian. I love the fools who think that because they oppose laws against some drugs and prostitution they are therefore libertarian. My definition of libertarian is someone who practices the NAP. NAP means “non-aggression principle.” So let’s be clear about what NAP means. The NAP is about determining under what circumstances an act of violence, or the threat of violence, or an act of fraud is morally justified. According to the NAP, violence, threats of violence and fraud are only justified in response to the initiation of violence, the threat… Read more »

Lineman
Lineman
Reply to  Peter White
1 year ago

NAP works in civilized society that only became civilized by the use of force… Quite the quandary wouldn’t you say…Here is an example that shows why NAP is foolish to use in an uncivilized world…Two men grab the same item at the same time which means survival for the one who gets it for their family/tribe/community and death for the other…The one who uses force first wins the item… What are you prepared to do and remember it’s not just you who’s dying its everyone you care about…Now the real kicker, the other guy is evil and by letting him… Read more »

David Davenport
David Davenport
Reply to  Lineman
1 year ago

“Let’s compare two examples. If you and I are walking down a road, you heading east and me heading west, and as we pass each other I punch you in the nose, we can all probably agree that that is an act of violence. .. ”

But what if you-heading-east, without overt violence, positions himself on the sidewalk so that you-heading-west have to step aside?

How do you react to that?

And you suppose you, without violence, protest his rudeness, but you-heading-east repeats his act of dominance time after time? What do you do about that?

Peter White
Peter White
Reply to  David Davenport
1 year ago

I step aside. Why should I be a jerk just because someone else is being a jerk?

David Davenport
David Davenport
Reply to  Peter White
1 year ago

“When a worm is stepped on,it curls up. In the language of slave morality, that is humility.”

–Nietzsche

Peter White
Peter White
Reply to  Lineman
1 year ago

What quandary? How do you know that civilized society only came about by force? That’s a premise. Prove its truth please.

Your example of two men and the item seems a bit forced. Really? Just that one item, makes the difference between living and dying for a whole family? Really?

And what do you mean by the other guy being “evil?” How do I know that the other guy is evil? Perhaps he committed an act of aggression? Ah! Now I know he’s evil.

Abelard Lindsey
Abelard Lindsey
Reply to  Peter White
1 year ago

One issue that there really isn’t any other rational definition of morality than the NAP. Rejecting the NAP as the standard of morality means that there is a “void” that can only be fille by power. The only thing that exists outside of NAP is power.

Peter White
Peter White
Reply to  Abelard Lindsey
1 year ago

Indeed!

Gorgar
Gorgar
1 year ago

Gorgar pleased, esp what Z did there at the end.

TomA
TomA
1 year ago

Excellent podcast. I would like to add one aspect that may be helpful to your understanding. Big “L” libertarianism as a political movement is a farce as you so eloquently explain. However, small “l” libertarianism is, at it’s root, about love of liberty and survival of the fittest. The latter is about as ancient and natural as evolution itself.

Abelard Lindsey
Abelard Lindsey
1 year ago

I get your points about HBD, immigration, and the like. I even agree with them. I think we can agree that there is no solution to be found through politics. There are only non-political solutions to our problems.

Abelard Lindsey
Abelard Lindsey
1 year ago

I think the closest example of a society to libertarianism is Singapore. Singapore is mostly free-market, with the major exception being real-estate (government owns most real estate). Singapore is successful because it is comprised mostly of industrious Chinese people who were raised under an English-based common law system. The alt-right endevours to create a “white” version of Singapore, it would seem. This is probably the best we can accomplish as a realistic objective. One thing is certainly true. Human capital is the basis of everything. HBD is real. Any further improvement in any society can only come about through improvement… Read more »

David Davenport
David Davenport
Reply to  Abelard Lindsey
1 year ago

” Singapore is successful because it is comprised mostly of industrious Chinese people who were raised under an English-based common law system. The alt-right endevours to create a “white” version of Singapore, it would seem.”

No, the alt-right endeavors to re-create white America. No need to copy a copy of the original. Singapore is for Chinese people who act white much of the time.

Also, it would seem that someone needs to “endevour” to improve his American English spelling. Perhaps some bio-engineering is needed to accomplish this.

Abelard Lindsey
Abelard Lindsey
Reply to  David Davenport
1 year ago

So this critique of libertarianism is a white nationalist thing. Is it fair to describe the alt-right or dissident right as white nationalism?

David Davenport
David Davenport
Reply to  David Davenport
1 year ago

In his full comment, Abelard says:

“Its becoming abundantly clear to me that bio-engineering is the future. (e.g. making humans better). Anything else is mere entertainment.”

Question: Isn’t eugenics, including eugenics conducted along racial lines, a type of bio-engineering?

Abelard Lindsey
Abelard Lindsey
Reply to  David Davenport
1 year ago

Its a crude form of it, yes.

Abelard Lindsey
Abelard Lindsey
Reply to  David Davenport
1 year ago

Its stuff like this that makes me think that bio-enigneering is a very big deal with regards to improving human society.
http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2018/07/game-over-genomic-prediction-of-social.html
I talk about improving human society only because i see it as the only justification of any kind of collectivism. If you’re not out to make a difference, then why do anything at all (other than to liver your own life on your own terms, that is)?

Abelard Lindsey
Abelard Lindsey
1 year ago

If the NAP is wrong, then there is no morality at all. Is it possible that morality does not exist? That there is no such thing as morality? That it is nothing more than a fiction created by different peoples at different times?

I think we all agree that there is no universal belief system that applies to all humans. Thus, any attempt to create such is pointlessly silly.

YIH
YIH
1 year ago

There was an old Soviet-era joke: There is no ”truth” in https://translate.google.com/?hl=en#ru/en/pravda and no ”news” in https://translate.google.com/?hl=en#ru/en/Izvestiya
And of course, no ”reason” in Reason [clown horn].