This was on American Digest. This is when you see that the people running this country are not of this country. Homosexuals make up about 2% of the population. If BK monopolizes the gay demographic, it is a rounding error on their financials. It’s a rounding error on the store level financial. Pretending that homosexuals are a super-valuable market segment was never meant to be taken seriously. It was always agit-prop intended to justify normalization.
Now, throw in the lunatic population, which makes up a consistent 20% of the population. Lunatics like waving the rainbow flag because they think it offends Christians. Note that Evangelical Christians are 26% of the population. Lunatics are not all enthusiastic for gays. Male lunatics, for the most part, keep their head down and avoid saying anything. The reason is men, even lunatic men, find homosexuality mildly repulsive. Even extreme fanaticism cannot overcome biology.
The point being is that a few minutes considering the numbers shows that Burger King is not gaining anything from this. They will most likely piss off a portion of the customer base with this nonsense. Throw in the fact that homosexuals don’t eat fast food and Burger King is known as the McDonalds for black America and you have a recipe for marketing disaster. Blacks and downscale whites loath this rainbow stuff.
The people running Burger King, on the other hand, live in their ruling class echo chamber. In that weird world of pod people, everyone loves homosexuals and thinks their cause is on par with the Civil Rights Movement. You can be sure that the marketing geniuses that came up with this “don’t know anyone who opposes gay marriage.” The reason for that is they are an alien class of people wholly unfamiliar with the people over whom they rule.
As I’m fond of saying, American has been colonized by aliens.
Everything must be converted to the political. Living in the suburbs and driving cars have been turned into political statements, as have been marriage to someone of the opposite sex and having children within wedlock. Why can’t lunch just be lunch, no more and no less?
We’re all the same inside, but we come in different wrappers? Is that what they mean? So what’s next, a special wrapper just for African-Americans? Another one to celebrate illegal immigrants? There’s no end to how this game of “equal but separate” can be played. Of course, on the rare occasion when I do stop at a fast food shop, I’m there to eat, not for a lecture. If I want a lesson in morality, I consult my religious leader, not my burger cook.
Maybe Oscar Meyer can come out with the rainbow edition of wieners for the homo picnics and the gay Olympics
I can imagine gays may be secretly dismayed that their ‘passion’ can now been reduced to the wrapping on low-quality-dead-animal burgers. Something that can be thrown away.