Chris Mathews, like many on the Left, went insane during the Bush years and never recovered. Instead of getting proper medical care, he was given a TV show. Despite living in the only whites-only town in the Baltimore – Washington area, he has spent the last six years lecturing us about race. His central claim is that all mention of Obama outside the Left is motivated by race. Now, Mathews is calling Obama a shuffling, well, he’s calling him lazy. I’ll leave it at that.
CHRIS MATTHEWS: Let’s get tough here. Is this the problem of a second term that presidents get lazy, intellectually lazy, and cut off from the country and they start picking deputies for jobs instead of looking for the best people? The lazy thing to do is somebody leaves, you promote their deputy. This is, I think, part of the endemic problem of second terms. They don’t go out and mix with people, find new people, new hotshots to fill these jobs. They just keep promoting the person whose turn it is and they’re not as good as the person they picked the first time…
MATTHEWS: And before you get me accusing this president of being physically lazy. I think there is a social kind of laziness. Refusing to reach out and meet a lot new people and check a lot of possibilities. Don’t just go with the next person in line. And I really think this second term cabinet is not up to the first term cabinet because they never are. And you know that, Roger. They just never are.
Kennedy went out and met people like [Robert] McNamara and [Dean] Rusk and he went looking for them and he put them into the best slots he could. And he talked them into it, he recruited people he didn’t even know [and] he recruited them. Presidents should go out and look for people. They should be practicing affirmative action all the time in leading or else they get atrophied into that little world of people like Valerie [Jarrett] and Mrs. Obama and you’re just listening to the same voices all the time.
I know it is a rigorous demand but it’s a real one. Or else you’re going to get smaller as your presidency goes on and therefore more vulnerable to surprises.
The hilarious thing about the Left’s elevation of Obama to the top spot is how little they know about the man. In his two autobiographies, he went on at length about being lazy. He has said this in interviews. He has gone into detail about how he gets bored with all sorts of things like showing up for work and listening to advisors. Yet, the Left is always surprised that Obama is what he says he is. it’s almost as if they really don’t care about Obama the man and just see the black guy. Like they can’t get past his skin color…
The One, like Moses and Jesus, had a miraculous birth and childhood. Good start if you want to pull the oceans back, but Stanley Dunham could give both those old timers lessons in miracles. That’s his boy.
I hope everyone is enjoying their “post-racial” America, courtesy of the Person Occupying the White House. When I put on my very best tinfoil hat, I wonder if he is a Moslem plant, who teemed up with the Marxists as a cover story. Of course, just as you say, those who voted for him largely know nothing about him. The Cult of Personality wins the day.
No one knows who Obama really is, if You look to his mother family it screams CIA, She dates AND married useful Foreigners for The USG.
But who really made Obama into POTUS was The Chicago Jewish elite.
I am convinced that there is some very small part of the brain which, when malformed or under developed, causes the sort of disorders, common and even necessary in young people, to become a permanent feature of the adult personality. Such people are immune to argument or experience, and even find it repugnant.
“Yet, the Left is always surprised that Obama is what he says he is.”
That single sentence perfectly encapsulates the last 6 years of American history.
Good God! Matthews has some weird heroes… McNamara & Rusk? The policy geniuses who brought us the Vietnam War? (Though I think Mathews is unfairly leaving out another Harvard genius – McGeorge ” I made mistakes of perception, recommendation and execution” Bundy.) “We were wrong, terribly wrong. We owe it to future generations to explain why.” — McNamara, writing in his 1995 memoir, In Retrospect, on the management of the Vietnam War http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1913028_1913030_1913022,00.html http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/64713/lawrence-d-freedman/lessons-in-disaster-mcgeorge-bundy-and-the-path-to-war-in-vietna Let’s just hope that Obama doesn’t find the next Rusk & McNamara. These guys always fail up. McNamara was made head of the World Bank. Here’s… Read more »