Stupid People

Way back in the olden thymes, I became acquainted with the phrase “pseudo-intellectual poseur.” The person using it was a very liberal person aiming it at some other liberal person. I no longer remember why I was privy to this bum fight, but the phrase stuck with me. The Brits have an old word that conveys a similar sentiment. George Galloway once called Chris Hitchens “a drink-soaked former Trotskyist popinjay.”

As in all of these progressive bum fights, the person hurling the accusation is most likely projecting what they hate about themselves onto the object of their anger. Progressives are full of self-loathing, among other things. George Galloway is a windbag and grifter, the very definition of a popinjay. In the bum fight I witnessed, the two combatants were both mediocre minds pretending they were something better.

Anyway, the phrase “pseudo-intellectual poseur” always comes to mind when I think of Vox. There’s a humorless scold quality salted with a genteel prissiness one used to associate with upper class homosexuals. Mostly, it is mediocre minds prancing around as intellectuals when they would be better off teaching English at a public middle-school.

This is a great example from Matt “Don’t Call Me Julio” Yglesias.

Studies done in the United States show that immigration raises average incomes of native-born Americans, including native-born Americans with low skill levels. Immigration is, of course, even better for the incomes of the immigrants themselves, which makes reduced barriers to migration one of the biggest possible game changers for overall global growth. What’s more, as the Economist’s Ryan Avent has recently shown, more immigration could be a highly effective fix to the currently hot topic of secular stagnation.

Now, put aside the fact that we could fill out those same posters with pictures of Pakistani pimps and their teenage victims. Yglesias is claiming that the laws of supply and demand do not apply to labor markets. After all, if increasing the amount of low-skilled labor increases the wages of low-skilled labor, we have stumbled upon a truth that invalidates the foundations of economics. Everything we know about economics is therefore wrong.

Of course, that’s not the case and Yglesias is a stupid person for saying it. His frequent use of the phrase “game changer” is one of those easy to spot signs that the person using it is not very bright. Stupid people love talking about game changers. At the root of it is the magical belief that utopia is just around the next bend. But, they think it sounds clever so they decorate their language with it as well as other abracadabra phases.

7 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bob Reed
Bob Reed
9 years ago

Voxaplainations often fail in a similar manner. I’d be amused by the thinly veiled attempt to put an intellectual veneer on what is progressive propaganda, but that amusement is highly attenuated by the fact that legions of low information voters buy into their performance as being erudite…

el baboso
Member
9 years ago

Cycles of economic growth and decline are easy to justify in retrospect and impossible to predict from the vantage point of the present. Occasionally, some cat (out of the 10,000 or so other charlatans in the fortune telling business) gets the broad outlines of the next cycle correct and is praised as a prophet until his next prediction is inevitably wrong. The fact the economists use the term “cycle” to describe phenomena that have no fixed period or amplitude shows what a pack of psuedo-scientific fakirs they are. Like most utility functions, the immigration utility curve is likely to be… Read more »

JimmyDeeOC
JimmyDeeOC
Reply to  el baboso
9 years ago

Unnecessary People. Earlier this year the crazy person that is Fred Reed (though for a crazy person, he gets A LOT of things right) proffered his economic treatise. Like most things Fred, it’s a fun read. “…….Finally even these measures ceased to be enough. College graduates began living with their parents and lining up for jobs a Starbucks because there was no need for them anywhere else. Resort was had to outright charity. Thus food stamps, Section Eight housing, free lunches at school, AFDC, and all the other disbursements of free money. Those receiving the free money no longer had… Read more »

Steve C.
Steve C.
Reply to  JimmyDeeOC
9 years ago

According to Nancy Pelosi, we should be on the cusp of a renewal of the arts, a virtual Rennisance (like the one they had in France) because now all the Julia’s can quit their slavish 9-5 dungeons that provided health insurance and do arty stuff or web design.

grey enlightenment
9 years ago

the media fosters this pseudo intellectual behavior since journalists who write about many things cannot possibly be experts in all of them

el baboso
Member
Reply to  grey enlightenment
9 years ago

The media were pretty good when they were reporting the 5 W’s about interesting or sensational stuff that happened in the last 24 hours or so. Even when they started doing investigative pieces that were often serialized over several days or printed in the Sunday supplement, they were still OK though the investigation was often tied to some cause or another. When every j-school jamoke started turning every article into an opinion piece with each rushing to fill his work with the latest post-modern folderol, then the whole thing falls apart. The internal contradictions were too great. One the one… Read more »

Steve C.
Steve C.
9 years ago

I will admit, my younger self was not too concerned about illegal immigrants.

The “game changer” for me was when I read about farmers complaining about the shortage of stoop laborers willing to accept a pittance wage. It’s not so much that I want my lettuce to be more expensive. Why does your business problem become an excuse to upend the generally accepted law of supply and demand?