If you view the mass media through a skeptical lens, you can’t help but notice how parts of the official narrative are at odds with observable reality. The “whole black lives matter” nonsense is a good example. It is a handful of paid trouble makers, but the media carries on like it is a great wave sweeping society. Even race obsessed blacks know that the biggest threat to black lives in America is black lives.
The thing is, the flow of made up nonsense is so steady and universal, it is easy to stop noticing it. Everything is warped to fit the narrative in a million little ways that is hard to notice after a while. Take a look at this “news” story in the sports pages.
A Florida State official said in a deposition that 20 rape claims had been made against Seminole football players in the last nine years, according to the Associated Press.
Melissa Ashton, the director of FSU’s victim advocate program, made the statement last summer during a deposition in the ongoing civil lawsuit filed by former student Erica Kinsman against the university. Kinsman said the university failed to respond to her allegations that former quarterback Jameis Winston raped her.
The deposition was released as part of an open records request by the Associated Press.
Ashton also asserted that she thought football players received special treatment at the school and that most of the alleged victims declined to press charges for fear of retaliation.
A Florida State spokesperson told the Associated Press that the school could not confirm the number of allegations because communications with victims in confidential through the victim advocate program.
The first red flag is the weird data set of nine years. That tells me they are trying to have fun with numbers to get a scary statistic. Even so, let’s use the nine year figure. How many players would have gone through the program in nine years? Roughly 300 is the number. A college program carries 100 players and adds/subtracts 25 per year. Using a full roster in year one. they added 200 new players over the subsequent eight years.
Let’s assume for a second that these rape claims are actually rapes and not the more common “next morning regrets”, that’s 20 rapes in a pool of 300 men. Let’s assume the worst case and none of the “rapes” were committed by the same men. That’s a 6.6% rapist population. Even the most outlandish estimates from the rape industry claim 4.5% of males are rapists.
So, the reporting of the “rape epidemic” seems plausible, until you think about how a man gets a scholarship to play football at an American college. For their demographic, these males have higher grades and test scores than their coevals. They overwhelmingly come from two-parent families compared to their cohort. They have participated in extracurricular activities for most of their primary school years.
More important, they are subjected to extensive background checks that go back to elementary school. These kids have been recruited since they hit puberty. Teachers, coaches and counselors have been hovering around them 24/7 as soon as they showed promise as an athlete. In college, they have full time minders to watch over them.
The point being is that the likelihood that football players will have a 50% higher rape rate is at odds with everything else we know. Scholarship athletes have higher graduation rates than the general student population and lower overall crime rates than their demographic cohorts (age, sex, race). In other words, the rape industry is suggesting that the “rape culture” as it pertains to athletics is this wild outlier, completely out of sync with all of the other statistics.
Of course, that’s not the case. One of those rape claims is against Jameis Winston. The police, Feds and school have investigated this, depriving him of many normal protections in an effort to corroborate the accuser’s charges. The facts suggest the accuser got drunk, went home with the player, woke up and figured out she may have won a golden ticket. How many of the other charges are similarly bogus is unknown, but some surely are.
That’s the easy stuff to spot for a crime thinker like the people reading this blog. Shame on you! The hard part is picking out the more subtle agit-prop baked into mass media reports. The line, “most of the alleged victims declined to press charges for fear of retaliation” is the sort of thing we always see in these stories, but never see much in the way of supporting evidence.
What we’re supposed to believe is the college campus is a testosterone fueled penis culture where women are treated like the TV show Mad Men imagined women were treated in the olden thymes. Here we have legions of examples where males are driven off campus for wearing a sombrero on Cinco de Mayo, but they have a free hand to wear the coeds as hats.
At Yale, a women falsely accused a male student of rape. Her charges were dismissed as entirely without merit. She was permitted to harass the male student and have her friends harass the guy. The campus even helped her do it. Yet, we’re supposed to think that women who were actually raped really fear retaliation? The only way to believe that is to believe the same admins celebrating “mattress girl” are then shaming real rape victims.
Mass media is Imagination Land for the ruling elite. Granted, much of it is deliberate. The people running the BBC want to use their power to shape behavior, promote their friends and skim money from the people through taxes. The same rackets exist everywhere in the West. That said, a lot of it is just a general insanity that has infected these people, like a rage virus. For them, reality has become the enemy at the gates.
The wise person avoids Negroes as much as possible.
Thanks for easing that passive aggressive SJW a$$clown’s pain. Dip$hits whipping out the Ole Nazi Card usually know little to nothing about them other than what their Marxist friends / teachers know to be “true”…. Trying to obfusticate the point of the article is also classic SJW behavior… Brutal & short as U demonstrated is the best way to deal with their “opinions”…
Pingback: Saturday morning links - Maggie's Farm
That graphic is known to be wrong. It originated with a Nazi group in the UK. it was fact checked here:
I don’t care for politifact, but I think they did a good job on this.
That’s fine, but besides the point. The point being that the greatest threat to black people is other black people, a point no one can dispute. Further, blacks account for an outlandish amount of crime. Young black males are 3% of the population and commit 27% of the homicides, almost all of them against blacks.
Well, that the graphic is wrong is not beside the point. That it originated from a nazi group is not beside the point. The point you are making — the point in the comment above — could have been made with real statistics. I like your blog because of the level of intelligence, and intelligent people don’t cite made up statics, from a made up organization.
Stop the bullshit. Agenda commenting is neither clever or original. Take you campaign somewhere else.
Why coerce sex when you have this?
The U of L basketball prostitute scandal allegation might indeed be true, but I would like to point out that just because someone says it, doesn’t make it true – especially if they are trying to sell a book.
Kind of strange how this started with black crime stats and segued into false rape accusations. Crime stats, broken down by race, are always available at the FBI’s website if you dare to wade through them, which I have. White on black crime is actually fairly uncommon, and white on black sexual crimes pretty rare. Check out the black crime rates for all crimes, keeping in mind that blacks are 13% of the population.
The rape thing is a different kettle of fish. There has always been an undercurrent of “untouchableness” about star athletes. They start to believe their hype, especially if they have not much else in their lives going on. They start to believe that anything goes, engaging in behaviors that other circumstances would council them was unwise, not to mention immoral. That said, Feminism’s legacy has greatly muddied the waters between young men and women today, creating situations that would have been either easily resolved or easily avoided a generation ago. How to behave? Many people have no clue.
You may find these stats interesting.
Presently the FBI appears to have only published the full statistical tables up to year 2008. After that the FBI website only has smaller “bulletins” that do not include the full data.
From this data we find that blacks commit sexual assault against almost as many whites as blacks. However, white on black sexual assault is an extreme rarity.
Year 2003 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black:0
[Statistical zero is not the same as absolute zero. I am led to believe that statistical zero in these examples means less than 10]
Black on White: 20,309
Black on Black: 21,104
Year 2004 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 11,610
Black on Black: 35,330
Year 2005 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black : 0
Black on White: 37,460
Black on Black: 36, 620
Year 2006 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 32, 443
Black on Black: 7,705
Year 2007 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 14,092
Black on Black: 12,780
Year 2008 – Rape/Sexual Assault
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 19,292
Black on Black: 34,841
Total over six conservative years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 135,206
Black on Black: 148,380
Average over six consecutive years:
White on Black: 0
Black on White: 22,534
Black on Black: 24,730
Interesting. The graphic I used was from here. The interesting thing about crime is except for blacks, the pattern is to rap, rob and murder your own people. Blacks spread the love, but still do most of their damage to each other.
Mattress Girl went to Columbia.
I was on a roll.
There is an inversion, I think, in the Whites killed by Whites 16% and Whites killed by Blacks 81%.