Gaming Iowa

The final Des Moines Register poll has been released and there’s both joy and consternation across the land. The anti-Trump folks are going one of two ways on it. Some have resigned themselves to the inevitable and are exploring various forms of suicide. Others are denying physical reality and following in the steps of Dorothy Martin and her UFO cult. Back in 2012 we saw the same thing in the week prior to the general election.

The Trump supporters are a bit sanguine about it. They are happy to see their man pulling into the lead, but they fear it is a false dawn. After all, all of the experts have said that this is an impossibility. So conditioned to accept expert opinion, they cannot believe that the unicorn they are seeing is real. I can’t blame them for it. I’ve seen a lot of weird stuff in my life and this is pretty weird. I still can’t get over Jerry Falwell endorsing Trump.

When gaming these things out, it is important to remember that Iowa is the not always a good barometer. Of the last seven contested GOP campaigns, Iowa picked correctly three of seven times. The Democrats are not much better. Iowa has picked correctly five of the last nine contested Democrat races. I’m just looking at the Wiki page going back to the 70’s, which is a good enough sample to see that it is a coin flip as to whether Iowa matters.

If the polls and prognostications are correct and Trump wins Iowa, he goes into New Hampshire with a massive headwind (edit: I have a poor sense of direction) tailwind and a good shot at running the table. He’s already a big favorite in New Hampshire and he leads in the later events. Iowa was thought to be his weakest state for him so a win and he probably sees his numbers jump everywhere.

The question is how the rest of the field will respond. There’s clearly a good portion of the GOP electorate who has been trained to hate Trump by their keepers in the Conservative Industrial Complex. Will we see the rest of the field lock shields, pick a champion and launch an anti-Trump counter attack? That’s a good possibility, but history says these efforts fizzle due to the fact the factions hate one another as much as they hate the bogeyman they share.

So, we have one possible outcome. Trump wins and we quickly see some sort of stop Trump effort coalescing around a single candidate. The betting now has Trump as a 49% chance of winning so let’s give this scenario the same chance. Next week we have a Trump victory and the beginnings of a CIC organized stop Trump campaign around one of the losers.

The next most likely outcome in Iowa, according to the numbers, is a Cruz win in Iowa. Barring something close to an asteroid strike, it would also mean Trump comes in second and Rubio third. Cruz has the best “ground game” in the state and we’re told that means a lot, but the data suggests maybe not all that much after all. Thirty years ago the number of volunteers and endorsements was a proxy for voter sympathies, but that’s not true today. Otherwise, Trump would not exist.

A Cruz win means he goes into New Hampshire with some momentum, but he is not very popular there and the rebel vote is solidly behind Trump. How much of a dent it puts in Trump’s support is unknown, but his vote is not going to the party men so in this scenario, not much changes for Trump.  On the other hand, it makes mounting an anti-Trump campaign impossible. The party hates Cruz too. That makes this scenario the nightmare scenario for the CIC.

We have a 49% chance of a Trump win and a 40% chance of a Cruz win, both are bad news for the CIC. Reading the propaganda organs, their hope is Rubio wins, thus launching both a javelin at the heart of the rebels and launching a new crusade for the men in modestly priced suits who make up the Conservative Industrial Complex.

Having a bisexual Cuban amnesty fanatic knock off the evil ones would be for them what Obama was for the other side of the managerial elite. Wednesday in Washington would be an unofficial holiday as the locals partied into the wee hours.

Once sober, they would pull the plug on the rest of the field, train their guns on Trump and we would get a replay of 1992 where a wall of sound would hit the public, declaring Trump out of bounds. Trump’s support would collapse down to the core 25% and he would look for a way to exit the scene.

Finally, there’s the man from nowhere scenario. Rick Santorum won last time, even though no one gave him much thought. The reason he won, the reason the CIC refused to acknowledge at the time, was that Romney was terrible. Santorum was the “none of the above” option. The only guy who could plausibly play that role this time in Ben Carson and he is not looking too good. I’d give this a one percent chance of happening.

There we have it. There’s a 49% chance Trump wins and sets off a real old fashioned civil war in the party. There’s a 40% chance Cruz wins and delays the civil war or even prevents it. A lot will depend on how New Hampshire goes in this scenario. Then there is a 10% chance the CIC destroys the rebel alliance and reasserts its control of the process. Finally, we have a 1% chance of something crazy happening that tells us nothing.

33 thoughts on “Gaming Iowa

  1. Just a quick note: The “Jerry Falwell” who endorsed Trump isn’t THE Jerry Falwell of Moral Majority fame. It’s actually his son, Jerry Fallwell Jr. Falwell Sr. passed away a few years ago.

  2. Pingback: My Iowa Prediction | Rotten Chestnuts

  3. Did you know that the guy responsible for that Santorum win is in charge of the Trump campaign in Iowa? That’s why you are hearing that Trump’s ground game is not good. They are smart enough to keep their mouths shut about it

  4. If Rubio wins, he only does so because the non-Rubio vote was split between Trump and Cruz. With that the case, I’m not convinced that a Rubio win means the CIC can declare victory. All it would take would be for Trump and Cruz voters to consolidate behind one candidate, who would then have the majority of the support.

    I think Trump and Cruz would fight it out for a while, but by Super Tuesday, one or the other would be vanquished and the survivor could go on to defeat Rubio.

  5. Conservatism Inc. have a real fear of Trump, a Trump Presidency could overthrow the whole Neocon establishment and recreate American Conservatism.

    • Comment on another blog: Trump is a Nationalist, not a Conservative. I think this is as good a characterization as any.
      He’s certainly not a conservative.

      • Nationalism IS the new Conservatism. Conservative Inc. just hasn’t realized it yet. If you wish to “conserve” American values, the first step is to make sure America retains it’s historical demographic composition.

        • I think that is very short sighted. I can think of several ideologies that aren’t conservative and I’m sure you can also.
          Yes, Trump may follow through with some of his border speeches (remember in 2006 when a fence was going to be built– leftist tied some of it up in court), but Trump is limited to how much he can use the executive branch,
          Meanwhile, many of his other proposals smack of increasing the regulatory state– very un-conservative.
          I’m thankful Trump had the courage to speak against unfettered immigration, but I think people shouldn’t have any illusions about what he will do making all those tremendous deals he’s so famous for.

  6. The average Joe and Jane totally understand that before ISIS, Al Qaeda, China, Russia, Castro, Boko Haram or Iran can or will destroy the USA, unlimited, open immigration (as we have right now) will get the job done first.

    IMHO that is the main reason Trump is, so far anyway, leading the field.

    • The alternative to Trump winning is Democrat whomever. Trump has opened people’s eyes to the GOP complicity in immigration/low-wage/foreign-worker policy. Once you believe someone’s sold their country for $$$, there’s no chance voting for them. It’s Trump or stay home.

  7. Pingback: I Wish Liberals Would Have Same Intolerance For Muslims That They Do For Christians | News and Nudes IowaDawg Style

  8. I’m actually pulling for Cruz. People hate him and he told the ethanol crooks to **** off. Good enough for me. Tim

      • My read here is his internal polling showed he was not going to win so he throws this bomb thinking maybe it tempts Trump into responding. if not, he has a ready make excuse he can offer the purists. “I would have won if not for my principled stand on ethanol.”

        My rule is as soon as I hear the word “principled” I hide my wallet.

        • Sounds right. I have people in Iowa, and I see a lot of these type shenanigans. If you wonder why the Rick Santorums, Michelle Bachmanns, and assorted other loons always seem to win there, the answer is “Jesus wants ethanol subsidies.”

          • Guess I was wrong about that one. I wonder if that’ll change the dynamics in Iowa going forward — now you can tell the ethanol lobby to self-pleasure. Naaaaahh… they’ll read this election as a one-off. But still, one can dream.

          • Bibles > subsidies in the Bible belt. Ted Cruz did everything but lay hands on the lepers in Iowa to win the church vote. They were willing to excuse his apostasy on other things as a result.

            Looking at the vote totals and spending, Cruz spent about 20 million to get 1500 more votes than Trump. I think if I’m Team Trump, I’m feeling pretty good. If I’m Team Cruz, I’m really worried about New Hampshire. Rubio, of course, is out buy chaps.

          • Wait… I thought that $13,333 per vote was Cruz’s “superior ground game.” This is all very confusing!! I just don’t understand politics at all. But Rubio buying chaps… that I understand. I thought I was the only one thinking “this dude has to be gay.”

    • The funny thing is I have no thought much about who I would vote for if I had a vote. I think Bush should be sent into exile. Rubio is as dumb as a goldfish. Kasich was a guy I used to think was sensible, but then he lost his marbles. Tubby from New Jersey is just too ridiculous to be president. Trump’s personal style is not my thing, but I bet he is a fun guy to play golf with or have a drink with. Cruz has always given me pause. There’s just something devious about that guy. I can’t quite put my finger on it. I think when he trolled the Arab Christians by talking about Israel, he revealed a lawful evil quality that just worries me.

      I guess I’m just enjoying the show too much to have a rooting interest.

  9. Having a bisexual Cuban amnesty fanatic knock off the evil ones would be for them what Obama was for the other side of the managerial elite. Wednesday in Washington would be an unofficial holiday as the locals partied into the wee hours.

    Yes, know them by their boots!

  10. “…goes into New Hampshire with a massive headwind….” Tailwind? I flew air transport for a living for a long time. Tailwinds improved things. Headwinds didn’t.

Comments are closed.