They generally send in Blacks to burn your house down. And fir that an AR 15 serves nicely. A Barret gives even more range. Both useless against an A10 but if it gets to that point China will seize the West Coast.

I’m sure the British would have been so much better off without the Maxim gun. Anway most of the people liable to do that have guns and more than a few can clean, maintain and repair them. This is not a high IQ thing , only a moderate one and lots and lots of gang bangers fall into that category Also the more guns and ammo out there, the better As for the civil war trope It’s all asymmetrical warfare and small arms help a lot during small urban infantry engagements which is all anyone will see anyway, There will… Read more »

I cordially disagree. The gun in general made life better for humanity and its not like swords or machetes aren’t fine for mass slaughter. Just ask the Rwandans

My opinion is since the cat is out of the bag, the more guns the better. Same with nukes. Nukes bring peace.

Again, the concept here is not to match weapon for weapon, man against man, with a superior technological force. It is to deny the enemy control of territory and wear him and the supporting populace down. In short, to make the cost of such a conflict more expensive than it’s worth.

All of which is done quite nicely with field weapons and improvised explosives as we’ve learned in the ME and before in Vietnam.

If you don’t understand the “militia thing” – then you don’t have any core understanding of why this country worked as well as it did for that period up until the “progressives” came in and set us on the path for where we stand today.

The Battle of Athens is a good place to start. Lots of good ol boys with their guns put a corrupt local government in its place/

The “militia ” as a true military force doesn’t exist in the US any more. They call it the National Guard – but that is just another example of Garet Garrett’s “change within the form” . The progressives gutted the structure and organization of the miltia as originally envisioned – and called it the “National Guard”. If you look at Guard literature now – they claim the provenance of the miltia – but it’s not true. The Guard can – and DOES , get sent overseas. The Guard can also be called up by the Feds with minimal things that… Read more »

Every adult male 17-45 not in the military is part of the organized or unorganized militia. Title 10 USC s.246.

Here’s your legal authorization to muster at any time.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/246

Now go ahead and try doing that. I see that snippet of US Code brought up all the time in 2nd amendment circles – but my feeling is that it means pretty much next to nothing because it’s not implemented IN REALITY. It’s technically legal to open carry in MA according to a strict reading of the law. Go try doing it and see what happens to you. The reason why I bring up the militia is that it was PART OF THE SOCIAL STRUCTURE. That code means nothing – because the standing of the militia within the social structure… Read more »

The only examples Carlsdad gives are made up stories about how he heroically told a POC off…

This will be 4th generation warfare. The more the government uses their killing machines the more the resistance will grow. 4th gen warfare requires the resistance to have the morally superior position.

When repeatedly pressed in his interview with Tu-Ca, Trump said he wouldn’t promise to do anything about tech censorship. That’s a big one.

Felix, Regarding AR-15’s against A-10’s and AH-64’s. Ask the U.S. military how their wonder weapons worked out in Afghanistan against borderline retarded goat herders with AK-47’s. Below is an excellent link, but to make a long story short: The U.S. is vastly bigger than Afghanistan and has a much larger population. The government elites wouldn’t be sending an army to the other side of the world. The government people and their families and children would be surrounded by and vulnerable to the rebels at all times. The real question is to what extent the armed population would resist. But assuming… Read more »

That is one of the reasons why the biggest killer of NATO troops of there is IED’s. You can make em with just about anything, and trigger devices are only limited by your ingenuity.

Show me on the doll where the US “won” in Iraq – or has “won” in Afghanistan. Last time I checked – the Russians had a massive body count disparity vs. the Germans during WW2. The Germans killed the Russians with high efficiency. Yet the Soviets are still considered to have “won” the war. Body count alone does not tell the whole story. The Nazis rule exactly where these days? Yet we’re surrounded by friggin Commies. I’m willing to bet that once the US finally gives up and leaves Afghanistan – they’ll go right back to doing what they’ve always… Read more »

“Dying 20 to one.” Body count was a popular term during the Vietnam War. The fact that for every American death suffered, the U.S. killed killed several enemy troops is the reason that South Vietnam is the free and independent nation it is today.

And the taliban burn down those schools once we leave. Also our troops only control the territory they stand on for the moment, once they leave it’s enemy territory.

It’s pretty much of a joke presence and a costly one.

I support the right to own the same small arms as the police and military, but it might make the most sense to have a sniper—err deer rifle with good glass. Remember the havoc the two Negroes caused in DC shooting out the back of a Caprice? (I know they used an AR15.) Chuck Shoymer may get a federal ban someday on “assault weapons” and regular capacity magazines, but the most effective ones will probably be the hardest to ban—grandpa’s dee-uh huntin’ rifle.

I can understand why someone would want a gun for home defense, but I never got the militia-thing. Home defense is where it starts. After self-defense the most important role of a gun, as soon as order breaks down, is to be able to acquire other weapons by, well, robbing them or conquest if you prefer (this is a war situation so civil society rules dont apply anymore). But that’s the individual level. On the societal level, the fact that both population and government knows a lot of the people have guns, works as a deterrent or at least as… Read more »

To what? The gun-owning demographic in America – the legal one, that is – is being politically raped on a production line basis, and state after state is falling to invaders. That IS a valid question. The wife of an African national park ranger once said ‘most of the time you dont need a gun. But when you do need it, you need it desperately.’ She was talking about angry elephants and lions but the same is true if the quarrelsome creature is a human with a gun. The question I ask myself is ‘if guns are not important in… Read more »

In Europe, it’s to keep them out of the hands of criminals and psychos. The homicide rate in the US is about 6 (six!) times the European average, that’s probably a hint. See, that’s where you trust the ppl in charge in a way I fundamentally can’t anymore. For starters it’s not working, criminals in Europe HAVE guns. Hell, they have hand grenades. About the US vs Europe, if you ignored black crime rates, the US is safer than, say, the UK. Gun laws restrict WHITE (and Asian) access to guns. They are irrelevant to black access to guns, and… Read more »

Just answer me one thing, WHY should there be gun registration for people who have no criminal record? What purpose could that possibly serve, other than….?

Keeping track of the guns and helping the police when they’re used for nefarious purposes. Much the same reason we register cars. Why would they want to keep track of your guns? If an unregistered and fully legal gun was stolen, the owner could, and presumably would, report it stolen just as he would with any other stolen item. After all, something does not have to ‘registered’ to be reported stolen later. And do you think your definition of ‘nefarious purposes’ is the same as that of a ‘woke’ legislator, judge or prosecutor? Maybe you’re just ‘a little too proud… Read more »

the overwhelming majority of Europeans agree with the current gun regime

And did the majority of Europeans also agree to be overrun by muslims?

We have established that the essence of guns is not the power to kill. There are many ways to kill besides guns. The salient feature of guns is the power to resist other guns. I can’t think of a time in the history of the West where it seemed a less good idea to let the government have a monopoly on this power.

No, I dont think guns would have prevented the mohammadan invasion since they failed to prevent a similar Mexican invasion of the US. The gun debate is about something else, the right to self-defense and the relationship between state and citizen. However, speculatively there may be a correlation. Gun control in Europe is not centuries old. In the 1930s or so, you could walk around London w a revolver in your pocket, perfectly legally. What happened between then and now, of course, is that society became terribly sissified and feminized. And such a society, overrun by budybodying safety nazis, ‘shittests’… Read more »

At the risk of sounding rude, why don’t you Scandinavians try taking back your own countries before telling me how to run my country?

That is an unfair comparison. European nations are 80%-90% white. We are at best 70% white if the official numbers are to be believed. 13% of population is black and they commit 50% of all homicides in the US. Mostly against other blacks but a frightening amount of violence is directed at whites too. As long as you avoid the big cities and their vibrants, most places in the US are just as safe as your average European town or village. I grew up in a city of fewer than 100,000 people. The gunownership rate in my state is estimated… Read more »

I have never seen a comparison of that sort. I would bet American rates would be slightly higher due to the nature of our founding. Fact is, if you do not hang out in the hood, join a criminal gang or use illegal drugs, you are very unlikely to be a murder victim in the United States.

Maine has a homicide rate like Europe. As do many other states. They don’t have European gun laws though, they have European demographics.

European gun laws will just mean I’m vulnerable to the demographics. But I think the laws are coming. Our rulers Balkanized the nation with violent people so now they will need more totalitarian methods to control it. Those methods won’t work though.

We’re intermixed in America. If team red decides to gather together in a city and take a stand against a standing Army it will go poorly. But even the Afghans aren’t stupid enough to do that. Let’s say I’m a military helicopter pilot or a former one. My AR-15 my net me any the rebel forces an Apache Gunship of their own. In fact I think that’s how the beginning of the war could go. With say 25% of the military defecting and street battles for control of military bases. Or at least that should be a priority for the… Read more »

I prefer the odds to be stacked as much in my favor as possible. Even a few hundred thousand irregulars would do a hell of a lot of damage.