Never Play Chess With A Russian

Back in the Bush years, it was fairly obvious our ruling class had no idea how Pashtuns, Tajiks, Hazaras, Uzbeks thought about the world. America went into Afghanistan thinking Pakistan was an ally and that the locals would treat the invaders different than all the other invaders since Alexander the Great. The Bush people sort of understood that nation building in Afghanistan was a waste of time, but they thought they could be the baddest street gang on the block.

Then the parade of idiots known as the Obama Administration came along and tried to win friends and influence bronze age people, wasting lives and treasure for no earthly reason. Of course, this may be giving the Bush people too much credit. They went blundering into Iraq fully convinced they could turn Iraq into a democratic, multicultural democratic paradise. Instead they unleashed decades of ethnic hatred, resulting in a blood bath and a massive failed state.

It is one thing to have nutty ideas about backward people on the periphery. That’s somewhat understandable, if not defensible, but it appears our rulers have no idea how anything works anymore. The problems in Ukraine are an obvious example. The Russians have always had a sense of space that drives their national identity. Any threat to it, particularly from the West, is going to get a response.

The problem is that our ruling class is very insular. There’s no longer a bubbling up of talent based on merit. Instead we have a credentialed elite that likes to pretend they are at the top of a meritocracy, but in reality they just ticked off the right boxes in the secular exam system. Everywhere you look you see Ivy League grads who rode the coattails of other Ivy League grads. The American foreign policy establishment is looking more like a priesthood than collection of seasoned realists.

Stories like this are a good example of the sloppy work that is the result of this insularity.

A Russian loan to France’s National Front. Invitations to Moscow for leaders of Austria’s Freedom Party. Praise for Vladimir Putin from the head of Britain’s anti-European Union party.

As the diplomatic chill over Ukraine deepens, the Kremlin seems keener than ever to enlist Europe’s far-right parties in its campaign for influence in the West, seeking new relationships based largely on shared concern over the growing clout of the EU.

Russia fears that the EU and NATO could spread to countries it considers part of its sphere of influence. And it has repeatedly served notice that it will not tolerate that scenario, most recently with its Ukraine campaign.

Europe’s right-wing and populist parties, meanwhile, see a robust EU as contrary to their vision of Europe as a loose union of strong national states. And some regard the EU as a toady to America.

The fact that many of Moscow’s allies are right to far-right reflects the Kremlin’s full turn. Under communism, xenophobic nationalist parties were shunned.

Now they are embraced as partners who can help further Russia’s interests and who share key views — advocacy of traditional family values, belief in authoritarian leadership, a distrust of the U.S. and support for strong law-and-order measures.

Statements by leading critics of the EU, or euroskeptics, reflect their admiration of the Kremlin.

This is obviously a planted story. The idea is to discredit the dissenters in Europe and America, by connecting them to Hitler 3.0 or whatever we’re up to now on the Hitler chain of existence. Of course, Hitler Putin financing these dissenters is justification for continuing the cold war on Russia. That’s all fair game, but this is so ham-fisted and stupid it makes me wonder if it is not some sort of bad joke. Later in the story they claim Gerhard Schroeder and Italy’s former Premier Silvio Berlusconi were Putin clients.

That’s the insularity part. The true believers running American foreign policy seem to lack any sense of self-awareness. This makes it impossible for them to see the world through the eyes of their competitors. It also has led to foolish fights with Putin over Ukraine, an utterly worthless slab of land on the fringe of Europe. Their need for a bogeyman to explain any resistance to their weird secular religion has created enemies where none needed to exist.

6 thoughts on “Never Play Chess With A Russian

  1. “This is obviously a planted story. The idea is to discredit the dissenters in Europe and America, by connecting them to Hitler 3.0 or whatever we’re up to now on the Hitler chain of existence.”

    Bingo! It is Anne Applebaum working for the jewish deep state.

  2. “The one big reason English speaking people came to dominate the world is a willingness to identify, recruit and cultivate fresh talent to keep the ruling class vibrant.”

    True enough. it is also relevant that when the Brits built their empire there was not the level of micromanagement we see today. People like Clive went off and did their thing and eventually a letter would arrive back in London detailing what he had done. By the time the reply got to India Clive had done a whole lot more.

    Today our communications makes it possible for lots of managers and other ‘experts’ to say “no” at once and so freelancing is a thing of the past.

  3. We seem to be seeing a boiling off of the sort of talent that has made the West dominant. Instead, the ruling class is increasingly dominated by box checkers good at colouring between the lines, but incapable of seeing the whole picture. Anyone showing the spark of originality is hounded out before they can become a threat.

    This is not a new thing in history, but it is new in Anglo-Saxon history. The one big reason English speaking people came to dominate the world is a willingness to identify, recruit and cultivate fresh talent to keep the ruling class vibrant. But as I’m fond of saying, we have become a different sort of Iran. A religious cult has taken over and debate is therefore forbidden.

  4. Don’t play chess with a Russian unless you’re Bobby Fischer, who was crazier than Spassky. The wildcard we have always been able to play has been our crazy military guys-Patton, John Paul Jones, LeMay, et al. I don’t know if we have any like them in our military right now, but I sure hope so because Putin is not the least bit afraid of us. And neither are the Islamists. They’re laughing at how weak-kneed we are.

  5. Putin does not see it necessary to apologise for his nation: they are what they are and they know they can tough out a few harsh winters or cold shoulders. Some other ‘leaders’ however feel it is their duty to grovel before the world and feel even weaker than usual if people don’t like them a lot.

    You pays your money and you takes your choice.

  6. It may be a simple analysis, but check the obvious between Obama and Putin. Your eyes don’t lie. On the one hand a virile, fervent nationalist, macho heterosexual leader, on the other a sloop shouldered, national apologist, metro sexual (at best, more likely bi-sexual or homosexual) panderer. Can you guess who is who?

Comments are closed.