The assault on the Blob has taken up most of the attention in Washington, along with the reproachment with Russia, but the biggest item on the Trump agenda is the restructuring of the American economy. If you listen to what Trump says when asked about what has been happening thus far, it often circles back to the economy and how he imagines it to be after his changes. The thing is no one in the media follows up on it so Trump is never asked about that end goal.
There were some hints in the Russia coverage. One of the participants from the Russian side was the head of their sovereign wealth fund. This is something Trump has said he wants to create for the American government. A sovereign investment fund is a state-owned investment fund that does the same things a private investment fund, except it also has an eye on policy. A sovereign wealth fund acts as an additional level in both foreign and domestic policy.
This is not a thing you typically see in the West, as the Western economic model is built on the assumption that the government should not meddle in markets. This is a big lie, of course, as Western governments regulate everything. The thing is the regulations are dictated by the market makers through the miracle of regulatory capture, so the political class has limited control of the regulations. A sovereign wealth fund would put the political class on an even footing with the market makers.
That brings us back to the administrative state and the Blob that has consumed it over the last thirty years. In theory it regulates the economy in the interests of the people, but in reality, it has been a conduit so that the parasites within the blob can suck the blood, as in money, from the system. That money is used to maintain control of the host and launch projects abroad. Trillions are sent into the system, but what comes out does not make any sense to anyone, even the people inside it.
Take the Department of Education, for example. It was organized under Jimmy Carter for the purpose of housing all educational programs under one agency. Today it has a quarter trillion-dollar budget and employs 3900 people. Now, that does not mean those employees have a sixty-million-dollar salary. Most of the money gets sent to the states via grants and subsidies. Put another way, a tiny number of people in Washington dictate education policy to the country through this agency.
Trump has ordered its dismantling, but it is not about the money. Pell Grants, for example, are not going away yet. They would be shifted to another agency and eventually either automated or killed off by Congress. The reality is things like Pell Grants are a subsidy to colleges and universities, not students. All government subsidies end up in the pockets of the industry getting the subsidy. If you create grants for buying BMW’s, then BMW raises its prices by the amount of the grant.
From the Trump perspective, the federal government meddles in the economy far too much, but even worse, it meddles in the wrong things, while at the same time it ignores the big things that it should be managing. The federal government spends hundreds of billions subsidizing colleges and universities but ignores the bizarre trade relations we have with Canada and Mexico. In other words, Trump-o-nomics is not rebranded conservatism or libertarianism. It is a radical reordering of priorities.
One way to think of what Trump has in mind is the corporate model, but the start-up variety rather than the late stage decline model. American Inc. is an aging company like IBM that is bogged down in old rules and old thinking. It survives, not on making new and better products, but on the proceeds of past success. If you were to revitalize IBM, you would strip out the good stuff into a new company and hand it to smart people and leave the old stuff to the investors.
That is the goal of the Trump program. The new model for American Inc. is to be like a startup where the people running it, the Executive branch, set the general goals and the broad operational outlines, but the people inside of it, the states, business, and the people, are left to figure out the rest. Things like tariffs, global trade deals and the sovereign wealth fund are tools for setting the broad agenda and correcting imbalances that arise inside the economy.
Anyone familiar with startups or growth companies knows that the enemy of growth and innovation is management. In the 1990’s, for example, ambitious people would see the hiring of human resources people as a sign to move onto the next startup, because they understood that human resources were the death of innovation. The assault on the Blob, therefore, is like the termination of the human resources, diversity, and training departments of a struggling corporation.
There is much more to this, but the thing to take away is that what is happening is just the small setup parts for a larger reshaping of the economic order. Those meetings with the Russians are more about economics than war. In fact, you already hear the change in language regarding Ukraine away from ideology and to economics. For Trump and America Inc., Ukraine is a bad business deal. The goal now is to bring it to a quick close and claw back some of the money.
In this regard, the Trump era may one day be seen as the bookend to the New Deal era that gave rise to the managerial state. It has been lost to the need to recast the New Deal to fit modern narratives, but the FDR people were inspired by what was happening in Europe at the time. This is what gave Burnham the inspiration to write the book, The Managerial Revolution. The irony of the man they swear is Hitler bringing to an end a system partially inspired by Hitler should not go unnoticed.
If you like my work and wish to donate, you can buy me a beer. You can sign up for a SubscribeStar or a Substack subscription and get some extra content. You can donate via PayPal. My crypto addresses are here for those who prefer that option. You can send gold bars through the postal service to: Z Media LLC P.O. Box 1047 Berkeley Springs, WV 25411-3047. Thank you for your support!
I’m a boomer in the mid-70s who was always a dissident. Everything I saw in my misspent youth conveyed to me the idea of cultural and social rot. No matter how much I was horrified at developments in the 60s and 70s, the idiots around me seemed to nod and go along with whatever Uncle Walter intoned every weekday evening. It was sickening. I kept telling myself that the only thing that could turn things around was complete collapse. Reagan got my hopes up. The Bush Family dashed them. And from the depths of despair, a real estate magnate from… Read more »
Outside of a tight circle, it seems no one knew what was about to unfold. A note of caution is in order in that the military has not been adequately purged yet and that could prove a problem.
True. However, the lethal end of it is massively disgruntled. Watch Sean Ryan’s interview of Pete Hegseth. I think ZMan said it best a few weeks back. To paraphrase, ‘given what is happening, it is most likely that things are far worse than anyone knows.’ Even Con Inc guys like Claremont were saying the empire had an extremely weak hand and postulated that somewhere inside the Regime, those not having butt orgies, snatching purses, twerkin’ in Ghana … … were maybe considering doing a deal with China that wasn’t to our advantage. Clearly America’s empire is retreating and establishing a… Read more »
Spot on. Despite my misgivings about Musk and the Tech Bros, they are so far into the revolution that they seem required to go balls to the walls or have their heads on pikes. It is inevitable that things were worse than even the godawfulness we knew. Opportunities will abound barring a military coup, which cannot be fully discounted just yet. The ideal situation, of course, would be states like California and New York seceding and being sent the aliens they foisted on everyone else.
If they secede can we invade them and make them into territories? it would allow all of the leaders to be banished to Gitmo. The regular people left would be very happy. oh the possibilities.
Territories…no voting rights!
They could take on all the Undocumented Democrats they wanted then, and it wouldn’t make a diff.
The future US cannot surrender California. Americans bled to take it from Mexico, enormous human and capital resources went into its development, what happens to its abundant natural resources, harbors, and road/rail nets is not a matter for the freaks inhabiting the coastline and hordes of illegals to dispose of by voting, it belongs to all of us.
Six months after indeoendence, the PLA Navy would be homported in San Diego and San Francisco Bay.
Then we’d be stuck with all their illegal aliens. When it comes time for the blue states to secede, that’s probably the bargain we’ll have to make: they get to go, and in exchange we get to rid ourselves of all those wogs. Their problem, not ours.
If we’re smart about it, we’ll keep the agricultural areas of CA and let them have the coast. They might be dumb enough to go for that.
This assumes that the Central Valley is not Mexsquatimalonduralombia already. If farming is done by bot that could change. Sadly, I think California is lost as far as the foothills demographically. Interestingly is the huge amount of emergent military/aerospace tech that is taking root in the LA Basin. The tool/machining and remnants of aerospace from The Golden State are a great ecosystem that they are moving into. It is almost entirely white. Perhaps that could split with SanFrancisco/Sacramento. Of course, the LA government is totally hopeless. Any way. I babble on. There is a lot to be optimistic about. A… Read more »
The hell with gitmo. They get the wall – then all the swarths get a choice – wall or Mexico – every damn one…
We can dream. For some reason lefties don’t mind violence but the right is all about compassion and fairness
Like many here, I would love to see a renewal of traditional “Western” values in Western Europe (and here in the colonies, for that matter!) However… Until the UK stops imprisoning ordinary citizens, sometimes for years, for the “crime” of saying something on social media that here might be considered impolite, or even get them kicked off Facebook or even Musk’s X, Until Germany does little better, but also is trying to outlaw one of that nation’s political parties, Until several of these nations can bring themselves to admit that mass immigration to their homelands is… Read more »
It seems, and just a guess, that the military problem is mostly at the top to near top, and less of a problem as you go down the ranks.
Question is, if orders conflict, would the lower rank take his orders from his immediate supervisor or Commander in Chief?
Unlike banana republics and even some better ones, like MX. The power of the military is not primal/complete. The States have their National Guard, and the municipalities, local police powers. Coupled with guns up the wazoo in the hands of the populace, the federal army would have its hands full if the States officially joined in civil disobedience, i.e., rebellion. A military coup of sorts against Trump would be a nightmare to maintain.
c matt: “It seems, and just a guess, that the military problem is mostly at the top to near top, and less of a problem as you go down the ranks.“ I dunno; I’m seeing an helluva lotta Cluster B in the Military, amongst the young-n-fertiles [aged maybe 18 to 42]. Cluster B is destroying everything in its path. It’s damned near impossible to get any constructive work done, nor any reliable relationships forged, when Cluster B is the reigning psychological flavor du jour. All y’all older folks, who don’t hafta deal with the Anti-Social Personality Disorder & the Narcissism… Read more »
Trump keeps exempting them from the hiring freezes and RIFs…that is a big problem.
A lot of troublemakers in the bureaucracy will flood into vacancies in DOD which already has an oversupply of shiftless do nothings.
It’s a pity because the DoD is the motherlode of the waste, fraud, and abuse that DOGE was created to eliminate.
None of us saw this coming. I held out more hope for Trump than the Dissidents and was often criticized for doing so. Not criticizing – they had ample ammo for their arguments and stance. But I am (was) a businessman too. To succeed against the rot in Noo Yawk, Trump had to deal with extremely shitty people like the Clintons and other red tape/politically correct raiders and buccaneers. The cost of doing that, personal and financial – would have been horrendous. In business I have seen it a hundred times – where instead of bad deals go from “the… Read more »
Still wayyyyy to early to take victory laps. He’s announcing wasteful spending, that is good, but i’m not seeing cuts yet and i won’t celebrate until people go to jail. And i’m talking about small time people who were “just following orders”, i want big names, then i’ll celebrate.
Makes me wonder if the 2020 election steal will be viewed in a light similar to the coup against Gorbachev: a late flex by a system so incompetent that they couldn’t even make the overthrow of their own government stick.
I’m starting to think that Trump being cheated out of the election in 2020 was ultimately a good thing for him and America. Instead of 4 more years as a lame duck POTUS, he was able to walk away and kindle his anger into a stone cold revenge machine.
2020 was 08 but worse because the problems of 08 have only grown exponentially. If Trump is smart, he’ll rip off the bandaid, take the sharp deep recession, and hopefully have some healing before his term is over to help whoever runs after him. No bailouts, no 0% rates, then i’ll take him seriously.
It would be a fake recession, though. GDP is a crappy unit of measurement, made specifically to trick people into thinking any reduction in government spending is a terrible, terrible thing.
In reality, who cares if DC and NoVa housing collapses? Who cares if saving for retirement is so easy you no longer need to pay someone to manage it for you?
Until we start using a real measure of our economic output, something like Net Private Production, they will continue to win the battles using semantics.
“they will continue to win the battles using semantics.” Disagree, they’re coming to the end of kicking the can. Nature will force what they’ve been trying to put off, unless resources aren’t finite. Making the stock market the countries retirement account was always stupid, and i have no sympathy for those who can’t or won’t think for themselves. They were only able to do what they did in 08 and again in 2020 because the rest of the world didn’t have an alternative. Everyone here is saying boy trump really did some planning and thank god he lost in 2020,… Read more »
Heck i’m of the opinion we’re already in a recession and yes the gimmicked numbers and huge government deficits are the only reason people aren’t screaming. But look how .gov workers begin to scream? They finally get a taste of what everyone else has been dealing with for years. Healthcare and Higher education are due for a big correction. These people have been a protected class for quite some time, time for them to learn they’re no better then the “deplorables”
All education, I’ll bet you’d agree. Rotten all the way down.
Note Gorbachev and the military coup during the collapse. The military simply did not have the heart to enforce it and arrest the State Duma. Yeltsin won by climbing a tank and telling at the soldiers to yield to the people. They did.
“…the Department of Education…was organized…for the purpose of housing all educational programs under one agency.”
Now do Homeland Security.
The unexpected effect of the New Deal system is that, over time, these giant federal agencies become malignant. Whether in the USSR, the USSA, the EU, China…it seems to be a consequence we couldn’t know until it was tried.
Energy? Defense? The Interior, such as FDA, USDA, HHS, CDC, HUD, etc. Name one that hasn’t turned on the heritage population, or that works better. NOAA, for gosh sakes, with the ridiculous Climate Change fooferal.
A top prio should be the military. Some kind of coup is not out of the question. The Obama-era traitors need to go.
“it seems to be a consequence we couldn’t know until it was tried.”
Rome and China, England, any empire has always tried it. Never works. Greed and power always lead to the same end.
The cunningly named Homeland Security should be at the top of the list to go. They are near the hub of the crimes perpetrated on us for decades.
Do Donald and Co. denounce it and put it six feet under? Nupe. Instead, he appoints someone named ‘Kristi’ (tee-hee!) to run the treasonous monstrosity.
How could she be any worse that such luminaries as Mayorkas, or Jeh Johnson or Chertoff or Janet Napolitano or Kelly?
Yeah, I agree that may not have been the best pick. I’m just hoping that Marx was at least right about first as a tragedy, second as farce. Only by completely discrediting the agency is there a possibility of getting rid of it.
Unfortunately, I won’t be convinced that this can last until the people who are responsible for the destruction are “removed” so they can’t simply reinstall it all. The problem with the new America is we are a very stupid country now. Retarded leftist females along with brown and black retards are in abundance and worshipped. In a healthy society, these vermin would be rounded up and tied to the bottom of the ocean to act as a tourist attraction.
You are going to be disappointed. That is simply not going to happen. Like the poor, the scum will always be around you, though the names and faces of some might change.
The problem with having a power structure is inevitably your enemies will gain control of that structure.
Dude, for a political junkie / commentator, the first 30 days of Trump 2.0 have been like dying and going to Heaven. I’ve never had so much fun and it seems neither have you. Party on Wayne!
We’re not worthy! We’re not worthy!
Party on Garth!
Schwing!
Sure, but there’s only 47 months to go, my friend! 🙂
It’s [Republican] Party Time. Excellent!
“Most of the money gets sent to the states via grants and subsidies.”
Wherever it ends up, it’s just squandered on bureuacracy, paperwork, woke studies, committee meetings, and subsidies to tech giants in “education” like Apple and Texas Instruments. None of it goes to anything useful. The Department of Education should just be shuttered. The USA is dying of bureaucracy.
Sometimes I like to compare these government agencies to corporations just to put things into perspective. $250 billion of revenue puts you at tenth on the Fortune list. But of course, the DOE doesn’t DO anything, they don’t build anything, they don’t make anything, not even in the abstract way a FIRE company does and makes things, so they need “only” 3900 employees to shuffle papers and distribute money around. Normally companies that produce that much revenue have at least 50,000 employees if not hundreds of thousands or Amazon and Walmart who both have over a million. You’ll often see… Read more »
It has been airbrushed out of history, but early Mussolini’s Italy inspired much of the New Deal. The National Recovery Act of 1933 was based directly on fascist economics. It elevated a new elite and punished the old. As for today, what was a rogue elite a year ago is the rising elite today. The economic reforms are as much about who/whom as they are about profits and efficiency. The sclerotic system being dismantled now was discredited by easily exposed fraud and theft and attention drawn to the funding of the majority’s dispossession. The sovereign wealth fund is one of… Read more »
Got in there before me about Mussolini being the biggest New Deal inspiration! Conveniently “forgotten” in all the Ra-Ra/Pearl harbor/D-Day/Schindler’s List stuff.
Mussolini was broadly popular before the Ethiopia thing and then his love affair with Hitler. He should have listened to his lieutenant Italo Balbo, who advocated a British alliance as in WWI.
Pre 1939, certain Nazi German ideas were welcomed in the US. Nazi academics toured and gave lectures about eugenics. German airships provided an interesting alternative to ship travel until the unfortunate incident in 1937. IBM sold them business machines for…well, never mind.
They got some of their ideas from us! Then they sperged.
Uncle A’s racial views came primarily from English-speaking intellectuals, like Darwin, Herbert Spencer, and Houston Stewart Chamberlain.
And he idolized Lincoln and his methods…
“These are not our people per se and in time may be outright adversarial, but as things stand they are not hostile and even are helpful.”
Who is the subject of your sentence, the “These?” The owners of companies whose incomes are bigger than the GDP of many nations, like Elon or Zuck?
If Trump is leading a revolution, who is the new elite supplanting the old?
Somewhat. Along with the Tech Bros, foreign policy people such as Witkoff who transitioned from the private real estate sector, and new financial thinkers such as Bessent are “these,” and they are the new elite. If you are indicating they were previously powerful, yes, of course, that’s how it always works. Power seeks more power.
I’m just trying to figure out who the players on the field are and who is fighting whom.
A rough way to characterize who is being attacked is anyone who had any contact with USAID.
But who is attacking them and why?
I feel like a lowly Greek peasant in ancient times watching helplessly as the gods fight it out in the sky.
Heh, same. I was vaguely aware of Bessent and Witzkoff but some of these names are totally new to me.
Well put. I was not aware of many of the names and I’m still uncomfortable with quite a few of them (Bessent being a homosexual, for example) but I’m trying to separate policy from personality – although that itself varies tremendously based on the individual. One thing I have noticed are the names/sexes/races of those who actively oppose Trump’s changes – and I know I unquestionably want to see them lose. Example – DOJ lawyers (extrapolate ethnicities, religion, sex, nationally and hate lawyers even more): https://www.thejusticeconnection.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Open_Letter_to_Federal_Prosecutors__2-18-2025_.pdf
Those of us who believe that ethnicity and sexual perversion command more loyalty than professed values don’t have much to say right now because of the rapidity of Trump’s fuselage.
I’m starting to hear the same old arguments that we can ally ourselves with j3ws, non-whites, and perverts because some small fraction of them are supporting Trump.
I’m always willing to revise my beliefs, but I fully expect my belief that “ethnicity > values” to eventually be vindicated.
I try to remind people that the palecons thought they could ally with the neocons and they got destroyed.
Totally agree. I enjoy the firings and the discovery of graft, but the scope is in no way surprising to me, and it’s not the same as actual budget cuts, as Mr. House notes. Of course, we don’t have budgets, we have ‘continuing resolutions.’ We’ll see if anything changes with that. And yes, I think the ‘allies of convenience’ thing is being massively overplayed. Sure, maybe the techbros got tired of being dictated to by bureaucrats, but their global AI future is not one I want (and Trump’s backing of IVF – beloved by Musk, leftists, and queers worldwide) is… Read more »
Trump made a campaign promise about IVF. He is not a Christian nor a social conservative, which the Christian Right has chosen to ignore considering the alternatives. He made a deal with the CR to appoint conservative SCOTUS members and that was enough to gain their support. He also seems to be against the whole trans thing (as is Musk), so that is another plus.
I know Trump isn’t a social conservative. I don’t care about SCOTUS judges (they all suck) but I was not aware he made a campaign promise about IVF. I abhor all these artificial intrusions into conception, along with surrogacy and rent-a-wombs. So now I’ll get downvoted by all the saad womyns who couldn’t have kids, or whose sister’s cousin couldn’t, or whose neighbor couldn’t. My best friend couldn’t, and she refused all the Frankenstein options. As I said earlier, sometimes life sucks. Deal with it.
Eric Idle says it best…
https://youtu.be/X_-q9xeOgG4?si=5zb4ZhTzY1n8uaVK
Amen, brother!
IVF is the least of it. Cloning, CRSPER, embryo selection: we’re at the end stage of sexual reproduction.
IVF seems at the bottom of those other “procedures”. They seem worthless if you can’t get the egg back into the nest.
Did you mean to say the rapidity of Trump’s “fusillade” or were you drawing an image of his fast-flying bombers over their targets?
It works either way!
Everyone prematurely celebrating the demise of USAID ought to have a gander at this. As long as a single US citizen government employee remains on the ground outside of US borders, they will continue to do as they wish.
https://twitter-thread.com/t/1891500886691656152
Good stuff. Thank you for the link. It highlights the failure of the conservative, to think that all they have to do to fix things is to pass some laws and issue some orders.
Conservatives squandered any moral authority that might have been obeyed about 75 years ago, or longer. No one on this Earth cares what they think. Inveterate and invertebrate fecklessness has removed unleaded solutions from the toolkit, and we are all going to be worse off because of it.
I’ve seen excerpts from this, thanks for posting the entirety. It looks like there were parallel institutions being built on our dime. It was a coup of sorts and it is remarkable it still might be able to be dismantled.
If it’s an internal shakeup, then it is reform and not revolution. Revolution draws from outside the formerly powerful and elite.
Almost all revolutions are led by the powerful and elites who are lesser in statue than those in command and whom they wish to topple. There have been a few exceptions such as the Bolshevik Revolution, but when you drill down even its leaders would pass at least as Upper Middle Class. This was supposed to be something like the Thermidorian Reaction but has become revolutionary. Since apparently the intelligence services are under control and the propaganda organs are discredited, the only fly in the ointment is the military, which traditionally has put down revolutionary governments. Franco would be a… Read more »
I don’t see the military as a real risk. Their people are our people. The MAGA mob is filled with ex-military. Trump could field ten million patriots in a very short time. A coup would backfire on the establishment and accelerate the rate of change by removing the resistance by force. The average American is pissed at the people who have driven this country in the ditch. Unleashing the rage would be something to see.
You never want to fight someone who is certain they are in the right. They will fight to the last man.
The top-level military are still Obama-Biden hangovers. They are probably too incompetent to stage a successful coup but we shouldn’t take a chance. They need to go.
I am not sure the senior military leaders are “our people.” Too many of them got rank under Obama and Biden. I think many of them should retire (or else!).
One way to get rid of them is to reorganize. Shrink the command structure by two thirds and you immediately get rid of the bulk of the four starts. From there, you can work in your own people. I suspect something like that is even “on the table” in the Trump back room.
This would be ideal.
Commander in Chief can just fire them. He is the top guy.
But that would leave a lot of replacements in a hurry and perhaps push resistance from top brass. Be sneaky about it, sell it as cost savings and strengthening “homeland” defense. And really, WWII started with I believe 7 four stars and was pretty consistent throughout the war in such scarcity of command structure—even with what, 12M servicemen?
You are correct. Today Hegseth announced the military has been directed to make 8% budget cuts yearly for five years, exempting certain programs. That means personnel cuts and fewer generals and admirals (we have a superfluity).
In a revolution worthy of the name the upper brass would be…replaced, most likely by either very unconventional, or by traditional methods, depending upon your viewpoint.
Agree…I am looking at the rank and file. Top has to bounce.
“Trump could field ten million patriots in a very short time.”
Popular conservative opinion.
Those ten million would make an attractive target for several A-10 Warthogs. The army of deer rifles is simply a leaderless mob waiting to be slaughtered by professionals.
Hegseth needs to form a new leadership cadre and ease the dangerous ones into a generous retirement.
Even if not UMC, they would get backing from other elites as in the case of eh Bolshies.
Well if the insurrection is led by sub-elites, then it isn’t revolution, but reformation. The elite cadre is being reformed, it is not being expunged nor destroyed.
I put the probability of a coup two weeks ago at 50:50. When I heard about the Blackhawk crash my first thought was, “Was Pete Hegseth on board?”. That Tulsi and RFK got through the Senate has me a bit more confident, but the purge of the four stars hasn’t started yet. The good news is that the people most likely to stage a coup are the same people who ran the withdrawal from Afghanistan. A coup would (hopefully) be like the August 1991 USSR coup, yesterday’s men exposed before the nation and opposed by the colonels and Team Trump.… Read more »
Technocrats, of course, like the steel and rail barons of old.
Well, to be honest, the Vanguard is led by the Usual Suspects*, but they do have a knack for that. “These are not our people per se and in time may be outright adversarial, but as things stand they are not hostile and even are helpful.”
*Luttnick, Ellison, Thiel, Altman, Fink, Adelson, etc.
The Usual Suspects have a knack for knowing which way the wind is blowing. They are, per usual, acting more as remoras than as leaders. And some of those Usual Suspects are a rogue elite within their ingroup. Witzkoff is a good example. In addition to the Tech Bros, there are new financial elites coming onboard.
“…acting more as remoras than as leaders.” Hmm. By gum, I think you might be right. For instance, yes they could bend our innovations, such as Fink with his Aladdin AI for market trends…but they didn’t invent such innovations. That’s true for just about anything we made that was turned against us. The shortness (and thus effective practicality) of their vision is based on tikkun olam. Talmud, and thus talmudic praxis, is not more than a giant casebook of how to get around the rules. No real innovation there, so… And reaching Mars? Nope. The messianic End Time vision is… Read more »
Henry Ford invented modern production and prevented a hostile takeover of his vision in his lifetime. His son Edsel obviously later fueled those who had tried. May a Thousand Henry Fords bloom.
This world was cursed by God for reasons found in the Book of Genesis.
As for tikkun, neither the ‘reformed’ Jews nor anybody else has the power to repair a world under God’s curse. We can do good works, certainly.
But it is hubris to imagine we are sufficient to ‘fix everything’ because, y’know, we’re just so wise and wonderful.
The talmud is a bunch of rabbis pretending to be God. That’s what ya get for hanging around Babylon.
Maybe we can make America into a decent place to live and raise children in again. No World fixing.
WILLS, this a thousand times, and so say all of us.
So say us.
Exactly. A goal both excellent and realistic.
Leave the world-saving to God.
Apologies to the audience, didn’t mean to go down the (((echo))) chamber route. Was thinking out loud about the whys and wherefores of the whole technocracy cyber-thingie.
I like the anecdote about Witkoff going to Israel and demanding a meeting with Netanyahu on the sabbath. Netanyahu tried to beg off and Witkoff told him that he didn’t care about their sabbath and he better get his behind over ASAP.
If you’re talking about the crypto-bros as part of the new financial elite, many of them are well aware that “green energy” will not power their crypto mining operations. There are of course types of cryptocurrency that do not rely on energy intensive “proof of work” but Bitcoin and most of the other popular coins do. I’m sure a lot of crypto-bros could easily envision a world where electricity costs put a permanent damper on the crypto-economy the same way European green policies have suffocated heavy industry there.
It’s a new elite attempting the supplant the old elite. Musk, Trump and the other billionaires realized that they were seen as below the managerial class. They would never really run things. The same was true for the upcoming political class such as Vance and King Cobra. They’d never be anything more than glorified lawn jockeys.
The billionaire class teamed the savvy political troops (Vance, etc.) to take on the Deep State/managerial class. The battle has begun. We’ll see who wins.
The billionaires are tired of being pushed around by the bureaucrats and backed Trump.
Don’t discount fear. The billionaires obviously have much to lose and the socioeconomic trajectory frightened them. The nomenklatura had to be ousted before it began to hit them harder to keep up their lifestyles. Something I never thought I would write since he is so loathsome: Yarvin was spot on about the people running the show and the need to buy them out.
You can bet that the managerial class trying to put Trump in prison and the way it tried to push around Musk was noticed by the other billionaires.
Right. At a local level, observe the machinations now to oust Eric Adams as NYC mayor, and think about the people who have financial houses on Wall Street. They either will have to orchestrate a statewide Color Revolution or bug out in such a way that the State Attorney General Letecia James can’t grab their wealth.
Judging from the VDare precedent, you can never leave New York
Well, if you’re incorporated there, you’ve given them the rope to hang you with, even if all your actual operations are elsewhere. Same thing happened to the NRA…
I am curious about how that battle will take shape, C.
We saw something very similar with Putler – and maybe the US (and the rest of us) will have to do the same? Eg:
I don’t think it would be all that difficult to do either. Only a handful would need to be made as examples to encourage the others to go away…
“..il est bon de tuer de temps en temps un amiral pour encourager les autres.”
I’m OK with an old elite that gets born again hard and takes out the trash, just saying. I mean, I do love my country and don’t want everything burnt down.
Good point..FDR admired Mussolini and consciously emulated him…He even prosecuted old guard members like Andrew Mellon, but that backfired on him and was abandoned ultimately…
The reverse of the 1916-1945 US dime is the Roman fasces symbolizing Unity-Authority-Justice. The libertarian tendency in US politics opened the door for the monsters who formed a shadow government and ran a foreign policy hostile to our people from 1947-yesterday. Only power can defeat power.
Bring back the Mercury Dime.
Jack offers fairly sober reflections. I will pass on a comment that seems wise, probably because somebody else said it: Beyond all doubt many of Roosevelt’s programs were straight from the socialism playbook, but that writer explained by saying Socialist candidates were gaining in popularity in that era, and the Democrats co-opted to some degree their proposals. E.g. central planning of agriculture is bad when the Communists did it, but it makes perfectly good sense to lift us out of the depression. Left unsaid was that it was a new way to funnel money from the government to private interests,… Read more »
It’s becoming very clear that Trump and his team are going big – like FDR big. They are attempting to reshape the economic and political order both at home and abroad. I have no clue if they’ll succeed, but you have to love the moxie. I’d keep an eye on Treasury Sec. Bessent. That guy knows trade and currencies. (He actually worked with Soros.) He’s fully aware of the impact of reducing the trade deficit will have on the Eurodollar system. Hint: Not good. You can bet that they are looking to reorder not just the global trade system but… Read more »
Yes. I don’t think even the most committed MAGA elements could have predicted what is underway. This obviously was planned over years and based on intimate knowledge of the weaknesses in the current system. What is shocking is how close to the vest this restructuring was held. Project 2025 was a social issues distraction while the most radical changes in the economic system plausible were planned. Also amazing is the political acumen involved to discredit the old and to usher in the new. This most certainly was not a Hail Mary. As you point out, it is an open question… Read more »
Agreed. I’m stunned the plan and execution, but I’m completely blown away by the secrecy. Nobody saw this coming. How did they work for years to build this plan and nobody hinted about it much less leaked it. Truly amazing.
I can’t think of anything that even comes close in regard to the secrecy. It may have been doable only because the key players largely were not part of the Blob and the old D.C. establishment. The next shoe to drop likely will be prosecutions based on financial fraud. If that take is right, it accomplishes two goals: 1. payback and retribution; and 2. consolidation of power for the new elite. Amazing times.
Our enemies are nothing if not arrogant. The planning for these acts could have taken place in the middle of the day in Times Square and they would have blown it off.
Ignore “Big Balls” at your own peril.
It also has the potential to re-orientate the system to being more honest and discourage fraud. Being punished and destroyed will keep a lot of clever people in line.
Agreed on the secrecy. But consider all the effort most of us have needed to put into concealing our political views from normies let alone crazies. Feeling people out before coming close to freely expressing ourselves. Also consider that many of the architects of this revolution were (are?) probably high up in organizations that would have hurled them into the void at the slightest hint of this level of extreme heresy.
Under these circumstances the amazing stealth makes sense.
I too am stunned. However, I am also heartened. What is the common denominator we find with all these leaks and leakers? They benefit the leaker. In short, leakers are in “it” for themselves! They are scum and traitors. ‘Men without chests” as C.S. Lewis sagely penned almost a century ago.
To me, no leaks indicates a truly dedicated cadre in the works—and of course that is the first requirement for true change to occur.
They have good people who are working for and dedicated to a cause. They are serious people who understand the cost and consequences of failure.
I’m not. Corporate takeovers involve lots of people, too, and their cover is rarely blown. Even when you know who is likely looking to pull one, and you put cameras everywhere, including up his rectum, it still comes as a surprise.
The secrecy thing is something we’ve been indoctrinated to believe. They want us to think that, and we do. Because it lets them get away with it, since so few are willing to accept that it was too big to keep secret.
And people say Q followers like me were falling for a psy-op? I can’t say that I understood every step they were going to take in full detail, but so far everything Trump has done is something that was covered in the so-called “conspiracy” world. Elimination of the income tax isn’t going to be a surprise to me and neither are tariffs.
If I’m surprised by anything it’s that he has a pretty good chance of succeeding. I thought he was going to need more Congressional authorization to make things happen.
Q may have been turning the Regime’s own techniques against them, which is to say putting out outlandish and disqualifying information to distract from the things actually being done somewhat along the same lines. As for congressional approval, the system was so degraded and debased that it has become easily circumvented. Congress largely is a ceremony now.
Did not follow Q much, but another technique frequently used is to put something seemingly outlandish “out there” to make it part of the discourse. Once part of the discourse, it moves from unthinkable, to thinkable, and then hopefully further on to possible, etc.
Q failed because it insisted on believing in white hats within the system when there is little evidence of this.
Q was like believing in Santa Claus.
If the income tax is eliminated then I’ll hoist the drinking cup made from my enemy’s skull in honor of the Q brigades. Whether they deserve it or not won’t matter as we feast on marrow from liberal bones.
“ Also amazing is the political acumen involved to discredit the old and to usher in the new.”
It wasn’t that hard. The old had discredited itself. All that was needed was someone to recognize the opportunity and step up.
They’ve been planning this for a million years!
I figured he would when he selected Pete Hegseth for SecDef. I saw an interview with him where he was questioned about geostrategy and it was clear he didn’t know a thing. This is not a criticism of the man. When one reaches his level of rank one has specialized in one or more proficiencies. Douglas McGregor, for example, is a warrior scholar with deep learning in geostrategy. He, like Hegseth, is a killer and a leader of socially cooperative killers. He is NOT a paperpushing fop like everyone who has been in that office for the last 30 years.… Read more »
Hegseth was picked because he was a guy on TV who said nice things about Trump and made noise about stopping woke nonsense. I would have been happier to see my mechanic get nominated- he knows more about the world that some guy who thinks because he was in the national guard he has some special insight.
Why would they reorder the global trade and financial systems? The American elite and blob benefit enormously from the status quo. Really, it is one of the major sources of their power. They’re not going to give up a major source of their power voluntarily.
My guess (only a guess or suspicion) is that the elite internecine war is between the financiers vs. the manufacturers. The global system as now existing is good to OK for the manufacturers, but phenomenal for the financiers. The manufacturers don’t like it and want a better balance.
If the manufacturers don’t like it, why did they close their American factories and ship the equipment to China and Mexico? Plus, now that some manufacturers are leaving China, why are they relocating to India and Vietnam and other Asian countries, along with Mexico and not re-shoring back to the US?
But their power is mostly that we all accept the idea that they have power. Someone in the last couple days made a reference to Braveheart. When he’s on his avenging rampage, he meets the ministers gaze and turns his eyes down in the natural reaction, submission. Then the veil lifts, and he sees the minister as the vile thing that he is, and slashes his throat. That’s all that need happen.
Étienne de La Boétie had it pegged. That should become required reading.
That cow is going dry, they need the next cow. Global trade has run out of gas because of some little debt problem.
“…the impact of reducing the trade deficit will have on the Eurodollar system.”
Will that mean more scraps of paper flooding back into the US, or not enough floating around out there?
I realize tariffs will likely be offset by the forex, that is, their currencies will get cheaper to compensate thus maintaining a pretty even keel, but that’s as far as my limited understanding goes.
What do you think could happen? Will our SS or welfare go kaput, cannibal hordes raiding the AI centers for copper for their axes and fresh meat?
I don’t know that reducing the trade deficit is going to have that big of an effect. We don’t have much exportable to trade, and what we are trading away, we should not be.
Let’s say tariffs worked as hoped, and we can make $5 widgets. The $3 widgets are still available from China or Indonesia or somewhere, so why would Germans buy our stuff at a 66% premium?
Tariffs put you into a death spiral. Sell out the future for a benefit today.
That’s the traditional thought from traditional economists, and given conditions of the time, correct. However, nothing says that tariffs are immutable and cannot be negotiated away when such is favorable to the US economy. Additionally, perhaps some added expense is justifiable in the name of national security. It’s not either/or. It’s degrees. An example is automobile production where any number of countries require factories or parts to be manufactured within their country in order to sell such within their borders.
We already have a large trade deficit with Germany. Trade should only be for goods which both countries have a good they are more efficient producing for natural reasons like climate or resource availability. This is not the system of trade we have today. The advantage China has over the US is the lack of enforced regulations, an artificially cheap Yuan and a very low standard of living in China. With capital and goods free to move around, manufacturers naturally seek a market to make their goods with low costs and a market to sell those goods with high costs.… Read more »
Germans don’t seem to be good at much without that sweet sweet cheap russian gas. Why do you think BMW and other top German brands that used to be status symbols are driven by all kinds of dinggleberries today? Because they need the volume. Or Trader Joes and Aldis, both German companies. Never set foot until after 08, wonder why that was? Had to let them in to keep em docile. Or Ford or GM giving up their car markets to the Japanese and Koreans, another sacrifice on the alter of Empire. Or gambling being legalized in most states in… Read more »
Trade should not be between countries. It should be between the owners of those goods and services. Putting the government in charge of trade will come out no better than putting them in charge of healthcare or education or energy or agriculture.
I get the comparative advantage thing. So where do you see America’s comparative advantage?
Who is going to be buying our $5 widgets? Why would they in essence subsidize American lifestyles and environmental and policies and worker’s “rights”?
That is a problem, comparative advantage, but the concept is sound. We really don’t need more Walmarts at this time, especially when the supplier of cheap Walmart goods is an adversary of the USA.
We need less mega corporate concentration and more small local business that keeps the money in the community. Since the 70’s we’ve been in a kind of quasi robber baron redux. Except this time instead of just being dirt poor, the oligarchs supplied credit to the masses. That rug has not been pulled yet, but i suspect it will. Then you’ll have machine gun pillboxes watching over miners as the descend to get that black coal so pigs on this animal farm can stay warm in the winter. Maybe the machine guns will be AI controlled, what a brave new… Read more »
Thing is, self evidently, we do need more Walmarts. They wouldn’t keep springing up like noxious weeds if they were losing money. We have the market to sustain them. What needs to be addressed is the incentive structures that make that model successful.
As a side benefit of adjusting those incentives, you will also solve or at least ameliorate the “robber baron redux” that @Mr. House is talking about.
That’s libertarian fantasy. Next thing you’ll say is immigration isn’t real, it’s just people “moving” Or, maybe an army is just individuals crossing border. What right do we have to defend ourselves? We not only have the right, we have the duty. We are blessed with almost every kind of mineral, large amounts of sea coasts, multiple climatic zones, everything from polar to sub-tropical. Despite some of the bad human capital, we also have large numbers of very high quality human capital. We have efficient capital markets. For 50 years we put out the highest quality and lowest priced consumer… Read more »
“That’s libertarian fantasy.“
Next you will be doing a dimestore Obongo — “You didn’t build that.”
“At one point, protectionism was called The American System.“
Who called it that? The industrialists who profited from protectionism, right? But just like “safe and effective”, enough people bought into it that it became law of the land, and, by some bizarre coincidence, happened to turn those same industrialists into robber barons.
Do we have the right to defend our nation? Can we regulate what is bought and sold in America? Are there any limits to anything?
Yes, libertarianism is pure fantasy. It imagines a world that does not and never will exist. It entirely fails to take the human condition into consideration.
Now you are just being silly. Stop it with the strawman arguments.
FWIW, there is nothing magical about the “national” part of national defense. We didn’t even have such a thing at the founding. We just all assume it is more efficient to pool all resources into the Federal State and, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, further assume they will use it wisely and efficiently.
Think of the military bases around the world. Is there really any reason to trust these same people with our defense?
As we learn that the lying and the thieving was worse than anyone imagined, it also becomes clear why no one in the GOP is publicly challenging anything Trump is doing. They are all terrified. And with good reason. Tip O’Neill was wrong: there are times when politics is not local. And this is one of those times. In 2026, a national primary camapaign could be waged by the administration against every sitting Republican, and it revolves around the challenger endlessly repeating a simple three-part question: “Were you too stupid to understand the corruption, were you too cowardly to do… Read more »
Elon, and even Trump, are pretty agnostic politically (and who ca blame them), so stacking the Democratic party with more Dick Gephardts and fewer Mullah Omars would suit their purposes just fine.
I’ve concluded much the same- Trump either has dirt on these slimeball republicans or he has given the impression that he does- and that terrifies them. He just needs to imply that he’ll pay to primary them and most will fall right in line, and then take out a handful and replace with loyalists. Boom, Trump’s got a congress that will back him up. Everyone is just assuming that Trump is done after 2 years and will inevitably lose congress, but if he has the goods- and Musk’s hinting about checking into people with low salaries becoming millionaires suggests he… Read more »
Someone else could speak to this better, but I assume that when Musk bought Twitter, he also bought of everyone’s DMs.
They know that a guy who they tried to kill twice and imprison for 400 years but won the election in a landslide anyway will have ZERO trouble recruiting and electing their replacement.
You do realize the Mar-a-Lago raid was the FBI trying to get the Epstein dirt back in house, right?
So how do they (and we) know they were successful. If I removed documentation of criminal impropriety, I’d sure have a copy or two stashed away safely. That’s why I don’tbelieve in this conspiracy theory of yours.
I think they realize Trump outfoxed them. That’s probably why they used wind-up toys to try to strike fear of death into him. Why not a competent assassin? Trump is not that stupid. He’s alive for the same reason Snowden is — deadman switches. So long as he’s alive, you know there’s worse to drop.
Obviously, I don’t know it’s the Epstein files. Whatever it is, it’s enough to instill fear into the recalcitrant Rs and even some Ds. It’s not simple corruption — DOGE has already made it plain there’s not going to be any way to hide .
“Repeat that in 218 races”
435
My dad never went to college but I remember when I was preparing to go and filing FAFSAs and such to get my gibs, he did a rundown on why this stuff was actually making college so expensive. Of course, he was correct, and showed far more insight than any politician I have seen expound on the topic since. Of course, college is a key cog of the left wing control of our society, maybe THE key cog, and the regime has a key interest in maintaining it, even if it means breaking the law to do so (Brandon’s debt… Read more »
Yep. 100% true. Student loans and grants made college less affordable. The government would lend some 18-year-old sucker with no collateral and no goals in life untold sums of money to study Sociology and Women’s Studies. The college would get paid up front, and a few years later when the kid was living in her parent’s basement and couldn’t afford to pay the loans on minimum wage plus tips as a barista, it was up to the government, not the college, to collect. Consequently, colleges kept raising tuition, and would be loath to ever turn a $tudent away. They’d keep… Read more »
“…at a community college where I worked 20 years ago, 65% of the courses offered were non-credit remedial courses.” Bingo, yatzee… Yep, couple years ago my university—top 20 research institution—admitted to 40% of the Freshmen taking remedial course work. When I first applied for college, there were no remedial courses. You met admission standards or not. Problem is of course as you implied, there are waay too many students in college/university. As I’ve noted, the average college attendee IQ is now estimated at 102-104. Slightly better than average IQ for the nation, or perhaps that which we once had—three or… Read more »
“When I first applied for college, there were no remedial courses. You met admission standards or not.”
Clearly a racist admission policy, the lawyers today would sue the piss out of a university for refusal to admit 80-IQ blacks on probation…
Even the University of California system required you to pass a dumbbell math and English test before you could take any further math or English courses back in my day (late 60s -70s). The test was pathetically easy but lots of kids flunked it even then. It must be worse now.
Humm. I replied to your comment in agreement and elaboration and it went into “comment waiting approval” and disappeared. Sigh…there was effort and knowledge put into the comment.
They’re nibbling at the corners of the leftist monastic system right now but I have to believe that the cardinals of the system are worried, and probably with good reason as any reform will be unstable without their overthrow.
“I wouldn’t mind paying a bit more for a computer if it meant I could buy a house or send a kid to college without saddling him with 20 years of debt.”
Congratulations. You have embraced the suck and become a DC Republicant.
That’s just kicking the can down the road. It may be better for your kid, but makes it vastly worse for your grandkid.
agreed 100%, no more bailouts, no more 0% rates
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
When I got my MBA about 15 years ago, I had saved up to pay for it. At the orientate was about 1,000 students in the cohort. On Day 1 after the introductions this announcement was made, “For those of you enrolling in the program who haven’t figured out how to pay for it yet, please go through the double doors and our Stafford Loan officers will get you squared away.” The college was in charge of securing the loans. I’ll never forget that. Nor the stupidity of people pursuing an advanced degree completely based on loans because they “hadn’t… Read more »
I haven’t always been the greatest dad but one thing I did accomplish was to get my two kids who wanted a college education through the system debt-free.
Back in the day, when I was still moderately essential and not yet obsolete..if I found myself between jobs I always took a hard look at the staff during the interview process. If I saw too many pakies, chinks, or prissy frightened furtive white men… I would politely finish up my interview and not return any follow up calls and would reject follow up interviews or offers. I wanted a job, not a nanny or baby sitter and I had no use for shitty women or queers. It’s worth money to not have to deal with arseholes on the job… Read more »
Somewhat recent experience with this, about 4 years ago. I went into an office, DC adjacent area for an interview and I was, quite literally, the only “man” on that floor of the building. A balding manlet was escorting me to the conference room. There were soyboys, manlets, problem glass wearing ‘guys’ galore, and then nothing but skirts and jeets. I immediately just laughed to myself, “I’m wasting my time”, I was polite but knew that not in 10,000 years were they going to hire me. The sole alpha male cutting a literal swatch through a sea of estrogen infused… Read more »
That’s something I always bring up in regards to DEI: it makes everything worse, not just the segment they’re looking to pump incompetent colored people into.
Modern Amerika is an alliance between women and the type of men you’ve described. The ‘alpha’ men have been weeded-out carefully over the past 5 decades.
That is why Goddess Columbia’s burbs and District are full of these male-things, and why the nation is corrupt and failing.
“For Trump and America Inc., Ukraine is a bad business deal. The goal now is to bring it to a quick close and claw back some of the money.”
Outstanding!!!
Now do Israel.
It’s fun to hear the lamentations of our enemies, but it’s a little early for champagne: 1) our budget deficit is grotesque. DOGE will just put a 350 lb fatty on a small diet 2) We have to grapple with the Triffin Paradox. Reforming the trade/monetary system is a generational project and must go way beyond reciprocal tariffs 3) The Israel lobby still runs our foreign policy 4) The immigration progress is nice but is a drop in the bucket 5) All the fired government/NGO workers will be easily mobilized by the Left. The next election cycle will be utter… Read more »
5) All the fired government/NGO workers will be easily mobilized by the Left. The next election cycle will be utter chaos. They are comparatively few and without the slush fund possibly unable to be mobilized in any significant way. In fact, it would have been expected to have happened already but it seems the money drying up makes that difficult if not impossible on a national scale. The actual gangsters who matter apparently were far fewer than would be expected. One thing that really has stuck with me is how much return Soros got on his political investments. None of… Read more »
Re: [GS] George Soros
See: https://qalerts.app/?n=3623
Obviously people were aware of the graft; the GOP senators and congressmen may be falling into line on the nominations because of that. As far as I recall, that’s the first actual Q post I’ve read. Everything else was paraphrased. I don’t know what to make of Q, which I had disregarded as nuttery, but it was something more.
Like I said, Trump could have easily disavowed it. He not only refused to do that, he actually toyed with it and teased it at his rallies.
I hope you’re right. I’m not so optimistic.
Not optimism, although for once that is warranted, but observation of these types frozen in place. Spitballing here, but they set up a surveillance state that is likely being used against them now.
Elon is on record pointing out how effective Soros’ funding of liberal DA candidates was at undermining law and order.
This is an error introduced by the antisemites, who imagine Jews as an all-knowing, all-seeing omnipotent hive mind. The Israel lobby runs Israel policy and they do not have a free hand. They also have to deal with the actual Israelis who have other ideas.
Agreed about the “omnipotent/hive mind” issue. I’m clearly one of the more philo-Semitic people active on this site. That said, I think actual Israelis and AIPAC want us to solve their Iran problem for them. Meanwhile, they (both AIPAC and actual Israelis) have screwed up big time over the past 25 years and have dragged us along with them. That’s just a fact and I tell my Jewish friends the same thing. The smarter ones get it and the more naive ones think 80 million Iranians will magically disappear.
They run US foreign policy with respect to the mideast (or West Asia if you prefer). But it appears they are not necessarily all on the same page with each other.
The lobby is so powerful that it could induce Trump to propose his ridiculous and illegal “throw the Palestinians out of Gaza” policy. Removing the Palestinians from Palestine has been a wet dream of the Israelis for 75 years but we have always pretended we were against that. Apparently, those days are past. How such a policy benefits the USA I know not. BTW – the proper use of the term anti-Semite is to describe someone who has a racial objection to Jews (e.g., 𝘋𝘦𝘳 𝘍ü𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘳). Those who object to Jewish behavior or religion are a different breed. Jews are… Read more »
Gaza looks like a squirrel.
Well, you gotta start somewhere. I think the strategy of attacking the funding – the oxygen/life blood – is probably the best place to start. And exposing the grift/waste is the bet way to start the attack.
“All the fired government/NGO workers will be easily mobilized by the Left.” By whom? One of the first things we learned from all this is that “the Left” is a largely fake construction of the federal government. The reason why “the Left” was mobilized in 2017-2020 was because we underwent a color revolution, by the exact same people who engineer color revolutions around the globe. The whole point of taking out USAID and NED and all them immediately was to deprive them of the energy to do it to us again. I also wonder just how many government employees are… Read more »
‘We have to grapple with the Triffin Paradox’
Agreed. This is a terrible problem; the fuzzy little guys are just so cute, and multiply so fast, you can’t get rid of them.
Darn Triffins.
Right. More Triffins, More Truffles.
The irony of Federal “help” for education is that the endless availability of Federally guaranteed student loans has allowed Universities to hire thousands of useless, often DEI, administrators and offer innumerable courses in utterly useless subjects, while raising tuitions by a factor of 10-20 times…All of which has massively harmed students and their families, while enriching the top faculty at places like Harvard…
Eliminating all Federal aid and interference in education would be the best thing Trump could ever do to fix this mess….
Yes, subsidizing elite overproduction by sending demonstrably unqualified students into the degree mills has been an intellectual as well as a financial disaster.
Higher education, as well as certain other “industries” such as regulatory compliance, civil rights (fear of discrimination lawsuits) has allowed the US to do something like what the Soviets achieved in producing a near-zero unemployment rate. The problem is the same as the one the USSR had though – a lot of the “jobs” are pure bullshit and when they are eliminated, a tsunami of unemployment such as has not been seen since the Great Depression will flood the land. There are tons of small college towns that will become ghost towns when the college disappears just as used to… Read more »
I know everyone here has enjoyed the tears and lamentations the last couple weeks, but despite knowing how unhinged our enemies are, they still continue to surprise me somehow. It came to my attention through hosting with AirBnB that their CEO (or former, don’t know) was being brought onto the DOGE team. Hosts, mainly women, are losing their freaking minds. Which I know is not surprising, but the weird part I noticed is that it is mainly from women from Europe and non-US countries. One complained about how bad she felt for all those fired government workers. It boggles the… Read more »
We had always assumed that people thought of bureaucracy as a curse word, because we thought of it that way, but we are now getting a good look at how the “left” really felt about it all along. Even the lowest woman on the street baizuo. They felt that the bureaucracy was “theirs.” Probably ever since the advent of social security,
Enforced protectionism due to sanctions has worked out well for Russia because it is still super-majority White Russian, where Moslems from the former Soviet Union serve the same purpose America’s Blacks did in the 19th century. Soviet achievements in science and technology were actually quite impressive, although hampered by an unworkable economic system. Similarly, China’s recent decades of rapid growth are not a testament to communism (quite the opposite), but to the stability which enabled the Chinese to realize their economic potential. In the U.S., our population going forward will be not too dissimilar from that of Latin America, whose… Read more »
In the category of things you could not have made up, Jonah Goldberg of all people compares Elon Musk’s DOGE department to the search for WMDs in Iraq. Any network who puts him on the air should have their broadcast license pulled.
https://x.com/tomselliott/status/1892216982067437813
Yesterday the question came up of what comes next: warlordism or Caesarism?
They’re shooting for AI as Caesar (a demigod, as well) even now, trying to circumvent both.
A demi-god? I dunno, creating something more complex and intelligent than ourselves would place us above God, and I don’t see that happening.
Reality isn’t very important. Immigration is economically ruinous to almost everybody, yet everyone we think of as wearing green-eyeshade-colored glasses (business, economists, libertarians, etc.) demands it—more, forever. That decision is made. Reasons are invented or ignored ad hoc. A company that replaces its American nerds with Indians obliterates its productivity, reputation, and future. You can point to it on the graph. The “bros” might nod. They’re still doing it, not least to punish you for thinking you’re allowed to object to it. See Elon’s Christmas drug binge. “AI” (the several things that are called that) is normal calculation, as seen… Read more »
more of a “deus ex machina” type scenario 😛
Well, when the Senate anoints OpenAI as the Great K.A.R.N.A.K….
“If you were to revitalize IBM, you would strip out the good stuff into a new company and hand it to smart people and leave the old stuff to the investors.” It’s been a long time since I’ve dealt with IBM, but those days were of the first assault of the old IBM as king of the hill. We were one of two major universities to have no significant IBM equipment on campus. This of course meant we were a prime target of IBM sales. What I immediately noticed was that IBM in those days did not market to the… Read more »
And that, Children, was the IBM Way. Was never part of it, but enjoy reading reminiscences from the inside and outside.
Sales ain’t the half of it.
The craft of Institutional Capture has deep roots.
“Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM.”
But maybe they should have been.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DYQQf1KjYo Today’s film is ‘Javier Goes to Davos’ in which our hero’s Mileimobile drags the religion of the elites up ‘n down the pristine avenues of Switzerland. He dumps on Woke. Infers it’s a cancer that must be eradicated. He dumps on Feminism, the first leader in history to address the world about that Cult of Death, calling out its selfishness and corruption. The stones on this dood! It is 22 minutes of loverly shitkicking while the audience squirms and sweats and looks around at the architecture. It is a Beautiful Thing. Donald Trump, you look like Cocoa Boy compared… Read more »
This is good. While still too subdued [for me, IMO], it is a surprising amount of directness from a sitting president of a country, and he said this at the WEF of all places.
The most amazing thing is that globohomo has invited him back for their most recent event, and his speech this year is even better, a lot better actually.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATNbGD37Dz0
He even brought up and directly criticized the current globohomo practice of transplanting enormous “migrant” hordes. This part astonished me. Perhaps, just maybe, there is some real hope.
The article is all logical and makes sense except for one thing. If you think Larry Fink was running amok with what he was forcing companies to do on behalf of global warming, you haven’t seen running amok until the feds are given the power to twist corporate arms and dictate corporate policy.
I still can’t understand how Vanguard, Blackrock and State Street haven’t been sued into oblivion for their “ESG” voting on the ETF’s they manage.
Who is ready to have their life ruined taking on those guys
The Managerial Revolution is free here: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.17923
Its like $5 on Kindle, cheapskate
Re: Russia. Rubio met with the Russians this past week. He identified three basic goals 1.normalizing relationships such as reopening embassies in each others countries. 2. ending the Ukraine war (note that Europe and Zelensky are being completely ignored). 3. geopolitical partnership with Russia on matters of shared interests – the Russians nodded vigorously during the translation Russia is worried about China. But the US decided to informally declare war on Russia which ended (for a time) our ability to work together. Russia and the US basically control the world’s energy supplies/reserves. There’s no natural reason for us to be… Read more »
“We dislike the Europeans as much as they do.” You’re the kind of guy that cheered when the German civilians got run over in Munich.
You think the Russians like you? Russians consider themselves to be closer to Europeans than deracinated nationalists like you.
George Bush pushed NATO to the east, not Europe. The Russians remember the history of Mr.Baker’s pledge and Bush’s betrayal even if you don’t.
This isn’t about being ‘friends’, it’s about the return of realpolitik. It’s in the long term interest of both countries to find ways to work together. Nobody has to like or respect anybody for a deal to make sense.
Nice straw man! I especially liked how you inserted the word “friends” which I never wrote nor implied. We have areas of mutual strategic interest including energy production and China. And Russia has been invaded twice by two of Europe’s most celebrated megalomaniacs losing tens of millions of its citizens in the process. Yes, the US has been meddling in their affairs, just as they meddle in ours. But there are a lot of areas in which we can work with them. Russia probably wouldn’t mind ending the Middle East conflicts simply by bringing Iran to the negotiating table while… Read more »
“If you create grants for buying BMW’s, then BMW raises its prices by the amount of the grant.”
Yes, indeed. In most cases it is quite obvious. Case in point, EV vehicles. In 2024 the $7k rebate was lifted for most EV’s. The market took a hit. For example, I bought mine with $6k off of the MSRP sticker. No haggling, simply a sign on the sticker price on the window of the EV. GM advertised their EV’s with a “special” GM discount of $7k! Saw this myself.
Some folk never “catch wise” as they say.
Decent people don’t assume everybody is lying and trying to screw them all the time.
Those people are the problem.
(I copy-pasted that from the Party platform.)
It will never cease to amuse me that countless shitlibs doing their acts of piety and sacrificing their dollars on the EV altar were actually funding Musk and thus The Orange Fuhrer. I know that wasn’t your motive but around me I know it was for the myriad Tesla drivers I see every day.
The Century is dead, long live the Century!
At some point Trump will [have to?] deal with Congress. He obviously is not going to use them to get the majority of what he wants done done. But he can bring them in strategically to hold or consolidate the gains he’s made.
Given that it will require a lot of time and political capital to get the worthless seat-warmers do to anything useful for the country, he will have to choose what he wants them to do with great wisdom.
Birth-right Citizenship?
Income tax?
Election reform?
Did you know that on 13th February, a US military aircraft landed in Moscow? With Mike Waltz in it?
The analogy of the USA to IBM is great. They owned “tech” through the ‘60’s & ‘70’s. Then Apple went public in 1980, followed by Microsoft et al and they quickly fell by the wayside – never got the mojo back. Didn’t hire a visionary to turn the prospects around. Trump seems to be the visionary this country needs to pull its head out of its ass.
lou gerstner would like a word
Lou threw the baby out with the bathwater, doubtless catching more than a few vested options in the process.
Ask an old school EE about Carly Fiorina… 🙂
Is it “rapprochement” or “reproachment?”
How are we going to have a sovereign wealth fund without the wealth part? Sure, America has tons of wealth in the abstract, but certainly not liquid wealth that could be put in a sovereign wealth fund.
My question is who controls and how will the Sovereign Wealth Fund be controlled?
If we had any excess wealth to be put in a sovereign wealth fund, it would be mismanaged and squandered and used to do evil. Just imagine what a sovereign wealth fund would have been used for under a Biden administration. We would have used the fund to “defund” oil and gas and instead “invested” it in solar and wind boondoggles. Every university across the country would have a big influx of fund money. But the US cannot even fund itself from taxes. The average American (this might even be household) has under 1000 Dollars in the bank and tens… Read more »
The “Bidens” of the world will rob us to pay for their favored projects and reward their allies whether we have a sovereign wealth fund or not. That’s no reason not to have one. Kind of like the digital panopticon; it’s coming, whether we like it or not. The question is who runs it and for what purpose.
What are you talking about? There’s scads of wealth. All the buildings, all the real estate, all the people are sources of future government revenue. So long as you believe in a sovereign state with taxing “authority”, the wealth at their fingertips is staggering.
Almost all of the existing RE in the US already has a claim on it. Plus, it’s private property in most cases. The idea that we could just monetize private property and undeveloped land doesn’t seem right to me. But, admittedly, I could be wrong. If we monetize public land today and put the money in a sovereign wealth fund, what happens in the future should the state/feds want to sell or lease the land in the future? Is this not double accounting? Taxing resources is something we generally already do. For example, people who own an oil well get… Read more »
I already said taxation is theft. You don’t have to sell me on it.
Happens all the time. The gov of Illinois a few years back sold rights to collect tolls (on federal highways!!!) to some overseas firm in exchange for a big windfall so he could prove the state wasn’t failing. W tried the same thing, offering more highway funds for state or locality who sold rights to the roads to foreign entities.
The cash is there. It just takes enough scummy, immoral jerks in places of power to make it happen.
Perhaps in the same way the Fed “monetizes” debt, that is, click-o-the-keystrokes? Reclassify those digitals digits as column B instead of column A? DOGE has discovered a number of budget entries that could be reclassified as a very healthy SWF in the trillions. Martin Armstrong proposed reclassifying the debt entirely and thus getting rid of it (and not paying the b*stards for ‘printing’ our own money.) It used to be you couldn’t use a Treasury bond as collateral; now, you can use just about any debt instrument. Armstrong says reclassify all the public debt as equity coupons, as in coupon… Read more »
Trump has already proposed that the US get half the equity in TikTok US if it’s divested. He’s planning to do a lot of deals like that where the US will acquire stakes in businesses and other assets. If it works, it will quickly create a fairly large asset base.
Who would buy tiktok under those conditions? (I am assuming you mean if someone buys tiktok for 10b Dollars, 1/2 of that value goes to the government and with the government controlling 50% 0f tiktok)?
Even if that means Bytedance only gets 50% of the sale price with the other 50% going to uncle sam, well they ain’t going to sell it for anything less that gives them their true value.
Bytedance would get paid full ‘fair market value’.
A strategic buyer like Amazon or Meta along with maybe some private equity firms would pay that price but give 50% of the equity to the US government. So yes, the USG would get the shares for ‘free’ in this scenario.
Just mint a giant platinum coin and put the face value at $5 trillion.
Problem solved!
I worked at Microsoft for a little more than a decade, beginning in the mid-90’s, and I saw firsthand how its fantastic success attracted parasites both in government and within the company, who all wanted a piece of its enormous profits. A state legislator sometime around 2000, for example, bemoaned the fact that they’d missed the opportunity to tax the stock options Microsoft was using as rewards and incentives for employees at all levels (not just upper management). But the real sign of trouble was the growth of the Legal and HR departments, in both cases a response to lawsuits… Read more »
[…] ZMan scopes it out. […]
Trump admin has record low levels of deportations for illegal immigrants. Trump is on track to deport fewer than one million illegals over his whole second term.
Still, enjoy the DOGE distraction. Shiny, shiny keys.
Does he also have record low numbers of illegal entries? I get that more deportations are necessary, but perhaps there are also fewer illegal crossings and more “self-deports.” If prior admin had 1 M deports, but 5 M crossings (net 4 M in), I would prefer 500k deports and 1 M crossings (net 500k in – sure, net 0, or even negative is the goal).
Honestly don’t know, not even sure how or if it can be measured accurately.
There are tens of millions of illegals in the US.
The number of deportations is…the number of people deported who should not be in the US.They were giving out numbers daily, now it’s weekly, and I suspect soon it will be monthly.
Obama was tougher on illegals than Trump.
I agree it would be very difficult to forcibly deport them all. The answer is to set the incentives so they self-deport. A few get sent to CECOT, the rest will get the message.
Big Ag pawn Noem being placed at DHS was a red flag
My big happy/sad moment was when she shuttered all the Chinese-owned meat packing plants in SD for CoViD…