The Old Tricksters

Note: Behind the green door, there is a post about trying to walk ten thousand steps a day, a post about the NFL draft, and the Sunday podcast. Subscribe here or here.


One of the tricks played upon the American people since the middle of the last century has been to take unreasonable ideas and cloak them in reasonableness so that reasonable people will embrace them. The main tool for doing this has been the people we call conservatives. One of their main tasks is to take the radical ideas of the people they claim to oppose, make these ideas sound reasonable and then offer up a plan to implement these ideas in a reasonable way.

A great example of this is civil rights. Conservatives eventually came to defend and promote the cause on the grounds that it was always a conservative value, as equality before the law is a first principle of conservatism. You see, civil rights were about applying the existing law to all people. Specifically, it was about granting equality before the law to black people in the South, where those bad whites have been willfully excluding black people from the constitutional order.

Of course, the civil right agenda was vastly more radical and utopian. That is made clear in the Brown decision, which declares all discrimination is assumed to be immoral and unconstitutional by default. Therefore, anyone seeking to exercise their freedom of association must first get permission from the court. Further, it says that diversity is the highest goal, so all public policy must bend towards it. Three generations of social destruction have been the result of this new moral order.

We are now seeing the same trick being played with regards to DEI. At its core, what DEI does is take the open society claims in Brown and formalize them as a set of rules and measures that apply everywhere. It is not enough for you, a white person, to not discriminate against nonwhites. You must commit your life to rooting out those who continue to discriminate and you must seek to remove anything that can cause something other than the ideal open society.

This is, of course, complete madness, which is why reasonable people have concluded that the people behind it are crazy. As these pogroms were unleashed on the public, the public found ways to revolt, even when questioning the goals and policies of DEI was said to be worse that slavery. The general disgust with these programs and the people promoting them is what made it possible for the President of the United States to go on the offensive against the federal civil rights regime.

Luckily for the crazies, the conservatives have a solution. Their task now is to take these repugnant ideas and make them seem reasonable. You see it in this Heather MacDonald column that seems to support Trump’s efforts to remove antiwhite policies from the government. She repeats the familiar critiques of the diversity agenda, which is refreshing, coming from a conservative. Then she slips in the poison pill that goes unnoticed under all the reasonableness.

Down near the bottom, she writes, “The White House needs to persuade Congress to clarify that civil rights mean freedom from discrimination.” Most reasonable people would not think much of that line, but it is the most important sentence in the whole piece and the most racial thing you could read anywhere. It is the core claim of the race communists since all of this started almost century ago. It is the upending of the core idea of the liberal society in favor of utopianism.

Rights, as normal people understand them, are things you have as a feature of you being a human being. No one must do anything for you to exercise your right to speech or your freedom of religion. Rights are negative rights because they prohibit others, mostly the government, from preventing you from exercising your rights. It is the reason the First Amendment starts with the words, “Congress shall make no law.” You have your rights unless someone tries to deny them to you.

Now, consider the claim that you have freedom from discrimination. The only way you can be free of discrimination is if everyone else does something and that something is associate with you. In other words, everyone must do something for you to have this right, which is the opposite of our notion of rights. Of course, the only way this can happen is by force. People will naturally wish to associate with who they like for any reason they like, so they must be prevented from doing this.

What MacDonald is doing is the old conservative trick of affirming the moral claims of the people they claim to oppose, while pretending to oppose them. Every time one of the anti-DEI conservatives cries racism over these programs, they are affirming the central moral claim of the race communists, which is that any discrimination for any reason is immoral. Therefore, any means necessary is justified in preventing people from associating as they see fit.

Civil rights rely on the ethics of the penitentiary. The foundation of a prison is that the inmates must always seek permission to move inside the prison. Their freedom of movement and association comes at the permission of the guards. This is exactly the model the race communists imagine for society, as it is the only way for create a world where people are free from discrimination. You can only be free from discrimination in a world where such a thing is not possible.

None of this should surprise anyone, given the background of the Manhattan Institute and the man who underwrites it. Paul Singer is an open borders fanatic who embraces the same open society ethos as George Soros. He also helped fund the Russian Collusion Hoax through the Washington Free Beacon. Another feature of conservatives is that they tend to be bankrolled by the same people who bankroll the people conservatives claim to oppose.

That aside, it is an example of how conservatives are like a drug-resistant virus that even when they are despised still manage to cause trouble. The reason for this is there is always a need to make the unreasonable demands of the radicals seem reasonable enough so that normal people will go along with them. If DEI sounded unreasonable to you, no worries, the conservatives have a reasonable alternative that wreaks the same havoc, but in a gentler sounding way.


If you like my work and wish to donate, you can buy me a beer. You can sign up for a SubscribeStar or a Substack subscription and get some extra content. You can donate via PayPal. My crypto addresses are here for those who prefer that option. You can send gold bars through the postal service to: Z Media LLC P.O. Box 1047 Berkeley Springs, WV 25411-3047. Thank you for your support!


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
97 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Xman
Xman
4 hours ago

Yep. Drives me nuts how the “conservatives” embraced Wilsonian progressive imperialism and sending armies to invade foreign countries in the name of “democracy.”

If you listen to “conservative” talk radio you will year this kind of shit, like the loathsome Sean Hannity blathering on about how bad the Taliban treated “women and gays.” When did it become a “conservative” principle to give a damn about how women and gays are treated in some Third World shithole?

And when did it become a “conservative” principle to care more about the borders of Israel than the borders of the U.S.?

Zfam
Zfam
Reply to  Xman
3 hours ago

“Loathsome” is a good start at describing Sean Hannity. Off the top of my head, I’ll add “big mouthed” and “moronic”.

Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
Reply to  Zfam
2 hours ago

A lot of talking heads have come and gone from the prime time Fox News lineup, many have fallen out of favor, only Sean has remained constant for the last 29(!!) years. And it isn’t because he is saying anything novel, insightful, or even intelligent. On the contrary

Arthur Metcalf
Member
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
2 hours ago

I’ll finish — “On the contrary, his CIA pin on his suit lapel tells you why he is there.”

NoName
NoName
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
2 hours ago

Sean Hannity has the career he has precisely because his masters selected him to have the career that he has.

HINT: Rupert Murdoch is (((No True Scotsman)))…

TempoNick
TempoNick
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
1 hour ago

I will say this, he is far less annoying on the radio. I haven’t listened to him since Rush died, but when I did, which was infrequently, I could tolerate him on the radio. I can’t stand him on TV.

Last edited 1 hour ago by TempoNick
Steve
Steve
Reply to  TempoNick
15 minutes ago

Huh. I was kind of the opposite. I could kind of tolerate Hannity, but Colmes was insufferable. I figured Colmes was only there to make Hannity look insightful by contrast.

Saw a clip of him the other day. Man, has he aged. Evil does not do good things to one’s appearance.

TempoNick
TempoNick
Reply to  Zfam
1 hour ago

I love the way he used to say the name “Bibi Netanyahu.” It almost sounded like Hannity was having some kind of a sexual climax.

Last edited 1 hour ago by TempoNick
Tars Tarkas
Member
Reply to  Xman
1 hour ago

As cringe and retarded as Hannity is, he is infinitely preferable to the likes of Shapiro. The average age of a Hannity fan is likely well North of 65, Shapiro has a much younger audience and does much more damage.

Zfan
Zfan
Reply to  Tars Tarkas
51 minutes ago

The fourth chipmunk

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
4 hours ago

It’s interesting to watch the reaction of normie conservatives when I tell them that I disagree with people like Rufo about DEI at private corporations, that private businesses, like private individuals, should have freedom of association.

If Coca-cola or Intel want to have a workforce that looks like the overall population, fine. But that means that I can have a business that only hires white men or whomever I choose to hire, just as I can choose who to be friends with. Normies brains can’t figure out how to process this logic.

Marko
Marko
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 hours ago

I somewhat recall normies years ago – even left-of-center types – being comfortable with private companies hiring whomever they wanted. Kind of like “whatever happens in the bedroom is your business”.

I guess normies have evolved.

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
Reply to  Marko
3 hours ago

Sadly, they have. Normies are just so excited to push back against the anti-white propaganda and policies that they’re willing to accept the loss of freedom of association. They’ve finally found a counter to being called a racist. “How can I be racist if I’m against discrimination,” they retort.

They don’t understand that they’ve accepted the Left’s morality.

Jack Dodson
Jack Dodson
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 hours ago

Yes. As I earlier commented, even as late as the Eighties/early Nineties a handful of conservatives would condemn the Civil Rights Act of 1964 but the few who did were suppressed and supplanted by today’s robots. A guy named Paul Weyrich was the last I heard state his opposition on television to the horror of his interviewer Chris Matthews. Barry Goldwater, who was in many ways a bleeding heart racial liberal, made opposition to the CRA a central part of his 1964 campaign. If that were done today the FBI would be ramming down the candidate’s front door at 4… Read more »

Last edited 3 hours ago by Jack Dodson
Arthur Metcalf
Member
Reply to  Jack Dodson
2 hours ago

And of course by the end of his second stint in the Senate Goldwater was moving left, fast. If he’d lived to be 120 he’d be a Democrat in the Senate now.

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Jack Dodson
2 hours ago

Weyrich was a good guy. One of his arguments, made not too long before he died, was that peoply genuinely on the Right should withdraw from the broader cesspit, educate their own children, husband Western civilization, and then, after America’s inevitable collapse, reemerge and rebuild a Western state from the rubble. We were to be akin to Irish monks in the Dark Ages.

ray
ray
Reply to  Jack Dodson
1 hour ago

NOBODY allowed public standing opposes the CRA. From gruntlings up to the president. Can you imagine DJT speaking out against Civil Rights or Feminism?

Beyond the pale. Sacrilege against their real religion.

The assumption that Civil Rights is wonderful and that we must liberate and empower yet more ‘minorities’ is accepted and holy writ in the West.

One-third of Donald’s cabinet is female. Funny old universe, that’s the number of angels that rebelled, too. Prolly just a coincidence. :O)

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
2 hours ago

But of course Lefists, and probably most Grillers, don’t really oppose freedom of association. How many of them rail against the Congressional Black Caucus, Black Entertainment Television, the NAACP, etc.? These people oppose white freedom of association.

We live in a society that, intellectually and culturally, is purely driven Jim Snow.

Arthur Metcalf
Member
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
2 hours ago

Yes, the Rufos and James Lindsays of the world have spread the term “woke Right” to plant Crimethink “you’re a leftist” into the minds of anyone who dares to suggest such a thing. One of the many reasons I have stopped listening to these people altogether. I’m sure Rufo will get the Presidential Medal of Freedom by the end of Trump’s term, and it’ll be one helluva’ diverse (but conservative diverse! not liberal diverse!) crowd that day in the East Room.

Last edited 2 hours ago by Emmanuel_Thoreau
Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
Reply to  Arthur Metcalf
2 hours ago

There’s an easy line in the sand to determine who is on our side: Are you okay with whites (or the various white tribes) viewing themselves as a people and organizing to protect and preserve that people?

Lindsey and Rufo argue about much, but both would say no to that question. So would Steve Sailer. Of course, these people remain silent about other groups doing just that.

Arthur Metcalf
Member
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
2 hours ago

I have right-wing gun-nut friends who would cut me off if I asked them that. Reason? Half of ’em would be wearing black athletes’ sportsball jerseys while they stood around their F-150s with Trump signs and American flags. One or two might even take a swing at me. I consider this whole thing lost. Pro (and now college) sports (25-year-old professional Serbians in the NCAA, athletes bouncing from Stanford to UCLA to Illinois each year without attending class once) kills it. The normie mind who worships their local sportsball teams follows the ins and outs of hundreds of athletes, most… Read more »

Last edited 2 hours ago by Emmanuel_Thoreau
Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Arthur Metcalf
56 minutes ago

There is no doubt in my mind that sports, and the integration thereof, was one of the prime salients of our current Negromania. White male sportsball fans came to worship the likes of Jackie Robinson, Willie Mays and Jim Brown, white women, observing their men’s adulation of the Hutus, somewhat followed suit, and here we are in the African States of America.

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Marko
2 hours ago

You must have palled around with Methuselah before the flood because I don’t ever recall left-of-center types being comforable with private businesses hiring whomsoever they liked.

Tom K
Tom K
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
2 hours ago

Well, I did pal around with Methusy and I don’t recall that either. It used to be businesses under 35 employees(?) were exempt but it used to be only millionaires (billionaires in today’s terms) paid an income tax, so prog mission-creep never sleeps, like kudzu.

Hemid
Hemid
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
1 hour ago

They started saying it when they realized that private businesses no longer exist—private corporations, more specifically. “Tech,” for example, simply is intelligence and law enforcement. So it can do whatever it wants to you. You’re a libertarian, right? They’re only against business that’s not of use to the project, small enough to evade diversity, etc. “Guy with a dealership” is still the stereotype enemy. Remember, when Elon laid out his vision for Tesla—when he was still Soy Tony Stark (officially)—it wasn’t to make and sell cars but to use “green” subsidies to wipe out Dealership Guy, the middle-class middleman who… Read more »

3g4me
3g4me
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 hours ago

At this point having officially-sanctioned racial discrimination (which we do have) would be fine with me – IF it went both ways. I would not care about blacks having their own prom or graduation ceremony, as long as Whites could also have their own. But blacks – just like Jews – demand to be treated as both ‘equal’ and ‘special’ simultaneously. Totally aside from the fact that equality does not exist in nature, they demand and get to have it both ways. I would certainly patronize any establishment that said it was for Whites only. Sure, the cuckservatards would screech… Read more »

ray
ray
Reply to  3g4me
1 hour ago

‘Minorities’ are encouraged and funded to have their own spaces. Whites are discouraged and called supremacists and insurrectionists.

Females are encouraged and funded to have their own spaces. Males are discouraged, criminalized and called misogynists as well as the usual supremacists and insurrectionists.

Girl Scouts? All good. Boy Scouts? An instrument of the Patriarchy that must be destroyed.

3g4me
3g4me
Reply to  ray
36 minutes ago

It’s all of a piece – anti-White, anti-male animus. Fueled by envy and hatred. Plus the cognitive dissonance of accepting that ‘equality’ and ‘special’ or ‘different’ can coexist. All propagated by non-White non-Christians so that they wouldn’t so obviously stand out as alien in White nations. Soon there will be no more White nations. Over 50% of children in the US are non-White; over 40% in the UK. People are stuck on the number and proportion of adults, but what matters for the future is children. The White child is becoming an endangered species.

Steve
Steve
Reply to  3g4me
2 minutes ago

This is all true. Gov’ts at most levels are committed to your destruction. And most here are convinced it cannot be reformed.

The part of the DR I cannot grasp is that if I had a piece of machinery that was supposed to make widgets, and instead it produced scrap, and I knew it could not be repaired, I’d get rid of the thing. Not the 95% I mentioned earlier, the whole kit ‘n’ kaboodle. Why does DR have a nostalgia for the silly thing? Especially when many point out it was flawed right from the start?

Last edited 2 minutes ago by Steve
Dutchboy
Dutchboy
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
11 minutes ago

Corporate DEI policies are the result of government coercion. They think they can avoid lawsuits and government investigations if they do that stuff. Nobody hires incompetents willingly.

Grant
Grant
3 hours ago

The key is to take the poison out of the word “discrimination.” There was a time where it was a compliment to call somebody “a man of discriminating tastes.” Ironically, the people most likely to have this moniker applied to them were people who would recoil at the idea of racial discrimination. The fact of the matter is that people discriminate all the time. Humans are designed for that. If people didn’t discriminate, everything would be a new phenomenon that had to be evaluated on its own basis devoid of any context. Every decision you made from whether you wanted… Read more »

iForgotmyPen
iForgotmyPen
Reply to  Grant
3 hours ago

Great post. Civil rights have been an absolute disaster, but whatever it gives the women the good feels so totally worth our cultural destruction. Was at youth baseball tournaments this weekend and the amount of suburban white women toting around mixed kids was atrocious. They simply should not be given autonomy, they are incapable of making good decisions for their people. Thousands of years of genetics being handed down to you, and you’ve decided you’d do away with your blond hair and blue eyes and mix it up with some color. It used to be the trashy white women you’d… Read more »

Xman
Xman
Reply to  iForgotmyPen
2 hours ago

“the amount of suburban white women toting around mixed kids was atrocious.”

Yeah, miscegenation and/or mixed-race adoptions have become another “conservative value” (cf. French, David and Barret, Amy Coney)

mmack
mmack
Reply to  Grant
3 hours ago

The fact of the matter is that people discriminate all the time. I laugh at line “The White House needs to persuade Congress to clarify that civil rights mean freedom from discrimination.” Anyone who has bought anything on a loan (vehicle, house, furniture, etc.) KNOWS the banks and financing firms “discriminate”. They look VERY closely at your ability to pay back. And sometimes, boo-hoo, they don’t lend the money. As we’ve seen with the 2007-08 housing meltdown, or the sad case of Mitsubishi USA, handing money or goods to people who can’t (or won’t) pay it off ends up horribly… Read more »

Jack Dodson
Jack Dodson
Reply to  mmack
3 hours ago

It is like the cliche “don’t be judgmental,” which is voiced by someone being judgmental.

Mycale
Mycale
Reply to  Jack Dodson
3 hours ago

I was poking around X and some shitlib said “I am tired of <insert cultural war issue here>, right wingers are being too mean, can’t we just be excellent to each other.” Obviously, nobody has ever told a shitlib that they neeed to be nice or “excellent” to someone who opposes any of their policies, no matter what they are. I mean, they were knives out when people opposed their gas stove ban. The “don’t be judgemental” stuff is just a very good tool that liberals use to hammer their opponents. The fact that right-wingers tend to be more Christian… Read more »

Jack Dodson
Jack Dodson
Reply to  Mycale
2 hours ago

It is or at least was a good tool but there also seems to be quasi-religious cognitive dissonance at play.

Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
Reply to  Mycale
2 hours ago

When a woman is losing an argument she sometimes says “why do we have to fight all the time”

Arthur Metcalf
Member
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
2 hours ago

And then they fight with you over the fact that you started the fight.

Chris
Chris
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
1 hour ago

Agreed. I remember some coworkers sitting behind me in the cafeteria around May of ‘93 and they were discussing politics over lunch. One female took issue over the fact that one of the guys correctly pointed out how Clinton was never going to give the middle class a tax cut and that his nominees “nanny” problems were a glaring example of the lefts hypocrisy. She couldn’t counter anything he said with facts of her own and she finally said, “Why can’t you just let him be president?” and that comment drew objections from the others seated at the table. the… Read more »

TempoNick
TempoNick
Reply to  Mycale
1 hour ago

Just post a picture of the Minneapolis riots, remind them how they were swinging bike locks at people just for having a different political opinion. Oh, the riots in DC, buckets of blood spilled during the French and Russian revolutions and the list goes on. It’s high time these people were put in their place.

NoName
NoName
Reply to  Jack Dodson
2 hours ago

Jack Dodson: “It is like the cliche “don’t be judgmental,” which is voiced by someone being judgmental.” So call them out on it. Call them out on it with a devoutly religious conviction. Simply interrupt their blather, and ask, “How can can you judge me as being judgmental without first having been judgmental yourself?” PS: Long term, the solution is not to interact with these personalities; long term the solution is to make absolutely certain that our children do not make babies with their children; and that, in fact, our bloodlines vastly outbreed their bloodlines. In the end, the Ghost… Read more »

Last edited 2 hours ago by NoName
Arthur Metcalf
Member
Reply to  mmack
2 hours ago

Well, that’s most under 30 now, so strap in. They’ll be dominating politics within a decade. I tell my friends in blue states with successful small businesses to get out now, while they still have the opportunity. A few more state elections and the legislatures of those states will begin making lists of property held and bank balances, and go from there with the “laws.” The people who scream and yell when pulled over by a cop for speeding will literally hold the power to take everything from you. But they refuse to concede. They believe they are more powerful,… Read more »

Last edited 2 hours ago by Emmanuel_Thoreau
3g4me
3g4me
Reply to  Arthur Metcalf
1 hour ago

No one believes anything will ever happen to them . . . until it does. Same reason people complain about public schools and local officials, but ‘their’ schools/officials are fine. ‘Their’ neighborhoods are safe. ‘Their’ Chinese and Indian neighbors are all-American. Normalcy bias is incredibly persistent. Many of those who left blue states during the plandemic are now trickling back; others are busily remaking their new states’ politics. We have never regretted selling it all and moving to the middle of the woods, but most can’t handle that kind of change.

Arthur Metcalf
Member
Reply to  3g4me
1 hour ago

Normalcy bias is the hack that has been used on five generations of Americans. It’s incredibly effective.

I’ve never met anyone who has it, by the way. Even when I describe it. “Oh no, I’m not that way, I just look at the data and reality.” Unreachable. Utterly unreachable.

I wish I had known about it when I was making major career decisions and family decisions in my 20s.

3g4me
3g4me
Reply to  Arthur Metcalf
26 minutes ago

We all wish we had been wiser when young. I divested myself of most liberalism in my mid 20s, but I’m always learning. I now make it a habit to thank my husband for providing for the family all these years – especially when he sees what I spend on groceries.

Dr_Mantis_Tobbogan_MD
Member
Reply to  Grant
2 hours ago

The other thing about “discrimination” is that too many Christians ignore that God created nations. The words natal, nativity and nation, among others, derive from the Latin word nasci, which means to be born.” The story of the Tower of Babel is a great one for this age because God, by scattering the peoples and giving them different languages, showed how he wants people to live. He definitely doesn’t us jammed together into one country, having to be “tolerant” of strangers and their cultural mores that might be offensive. As for freedom of association, the civil rights movement has created… Read more »

Melissa
Melissa
Reply to  Dr_Mantis_Tobbogan_MD
2 hours ago

Spot on.
I hope the next Pope will understand and speak frankly about these fundamental issues.

ray
ray
Reply to  Dr_Mantis_Tobbogan_MD
47 minutes ago

After Babel, God divided the languages and permitted nationalism (Deuteronomy 32:8) under angelic supervision. Michael Heiser writes well on this topic.

God is not a globalist. Globo-Christians have no Biblical authority or support.

3g4me
3g4me
Reply to  Grant
2 hours ago

I went through this argument with my dearest friend, a devout Christian. “Jesus wouldn’t approve of slavery,” she asserted, even though nowhere in the Bible did he condemn it or call for slaves to uprise or be given their freedom. Instead, Jesus pointed out the reciprocal oblivations of slave/servant and master. My friend is not a stupid woman, and I know I planted some seeds. It’s abominably difficult for most people to question what they’ve been told is moral and accept that it’s all lies.

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  3g4me
49 minutes ago

Most people prefer the palatable to the plausible.

NoName
NoName
Reply to  Grant
2 hours ago

Grant: “Nobody can or should feel sorry for blacks as their problems are all products of self-making and they seem intent on generating problems for everybody else.” From the Darwinian point of view, we are all the products of our ancestors’ making of us. The kneegr0w’s problem is that it lacks several hundred thousand years of evolution which the ancestors of the White race had to struggle through. I would also add that the natural mating pattern of most all White Europeans was monogamous 1-Man:1-Woman pairings, with possibly a brief exception in greater Scandinavia, circa maybe the 8th Century to… Read more »

Last edited 2 hours ago by NoName
Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  NoName
1 hour ago

Why monogamous, when most other peoples were not? As a genetic strategy to preserve our breeding core. We of the 124 alleles for hair and eye color have a plentitude of diversity, as long as we keep it amongst our own. In this way, we preserve and reinforce our unique traits. Abraham had concubines, as do Amerindians; heck, Abe got hisself a whole cousin race out of it, the brood by his darkie concubines, the Ishmaelite Arabs. The Semitic genetic strategy is to harvest desirable traits while boiling off their more assimilable outliers, useful to a parasitic people. Their cultural… Read more »

james wilson
james wilson
Member
Reply to  NoName
56 minutes ago

The northern European race changed as much for a thousand years beginning with the middle-ages as it did in the forty thousand before it. Two massive changes forged that evolution in intelligence and impulse control: feudalism-manoralism, and unprecedented outbreeding caused by mating dictates of the Church to break down tribalism, which was the single great impediment to their power and which brought about unprecedented outbreeding. Europeans are not the alone in that period of forged evolution; it happened in east Asia and perhaps to an unfortunate extent. Regular execution played a large part in both civilizations. In Europe it was… Read more »

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Grant
2 hours ago

I agree, but with one proviso–the word that must be detoxified is “racism,” which in the inclusivity-exclusivity dyad, is the primary base of discrimination. I do not wish to be around negroes, I wish to exclude them, because, for many good reasons, I dislike them. And that is racism. This so-called “pathology” is, of course, entirely normal. What is abnormal is race treason, the sine qua non of the Spiteful Matants, i.e. white Leftists.

UsNthem
UsNthem
3 hours ago

One of the many reasons I never read “conservative” commentary anymore is due to the reasonableness of their opinions. I don’t want reasonableness – the time for that is long gone. I want fire and brimstone and a spade called a spade…

Arthur Metcalf
Member
Reply to  UsNthem
2 hours ago

You mean you didn’t read Buckley’s book-length hem-haw gosh-I-don’t-know-he-gives-the-impression-he-is essay on Pat Buchanan back in the early 90s, which did him so much damage?

Wkathman
Wkathman
3 hours ago

“The conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently, it never occurs to them that you can’t make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society without causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values.”-Ted KaczynskiRegardless of his heinous extracurricular activities . . . that man was not without insight. Freedom of association is one such traditional value. I’ll add my own observation: If you embrace the morality of… Read more »

Captain Willard
Captain Willard
3 hours ago

I know a lot of the Manhattan Institute types. My regular golf buddy is a member. There are libertarian/open-borders types, some Neocons (Karl Rove apparently spoke there the other night), some paleo-cons and quite a few DR or closet DR types. It’s a pretty intellectually diverse right-wing group. Most support Trump (albeit I don’t know a statistically-relevant sample). Many would accept Zman’s argument herein based on my conversations. Heather MacDonald probably couldn’t speak on 95% of college campuses right now without causing a riot. She is as close to the edge of the “great divide” as any public intellectual can… Read more »

Jack Dodson
Jack Dodson
Reply to  Captain Willard
2 hours ago

I don’t know but in fairness I’ve never heard MacDonald live in a private setting. I have heard MacDonald on television bleat too much about the poor downtrodden blacks and Jim Crow, yadda, yadda. She may be couching her language/lying but she seems in broadcast interviews to accept the larger point about prohibiting discrimination.

Wolf Barney
Wolf Barney
Reply to  Captain Willard
2 hours ago

From only casually following Heather MacDonald for many years, I always thought of her as being in the DR3 camp. Dems R the Real Racists is the battle cry for a lot of these conservatives, and makes them feel morally righteous.

RealityRules
RealityRules
Reply to  Wolf Barney
2 hours ago

Exactly. She is permitted to argue that the real harm is done to blacks. What she knows she can never say, is that this is unjust and very harmful to whites. If or until people advocate for what is good for whites and advocate for eradicating what is bad for them, on behalf of whites and whites alone, it will only get worse. AA was wrong. Woke is not being put away. It is still very much on the rampage as Woke is not Woke. It is a system that is anti-White and anti-Western to its core.

NoName
NoName
Reply to  Captain Willard
2 hours ago

Captain Willard: libertarian/open-borders types

Existential Traitors to the White Race.

EXTREMELY SUSCEPTIBLE to (((Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum)))’s “Objectivist” meta-Psy-Op.

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Captain Willard
1 hour ago

I’ve always liked MacDonald. She and Michael Anton are probably in the same boat. And she writes very well.

james wilson
james wilson
Member
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
51 minutes ago

Agree, but the point is still true, she is a part of the right wing gatekeeper brigades–no one to the right of me. Her gate is far to the right of Ben Shapiro’s gate, but it is a gate no less. Shapiro is acutely aware of and devoted to his gate, MacDonald, like many of us, may not be.

Tom K
Tom K
3 hours ago

It’s rich that it’s devolved to this. “Civil rights rely on the ethics of the penitentiary…” Imagine a day when we’ll all be felons on probation. No free movement.

Me: “I’m moving to Texas.”
My parole officer: “No you’re not.”
Me: “I don’t like it here. I’m being discriminated against.”
My parole officer: “STFU honkie.”
Me: “I didnt do nuffing wrong.”
My parole officer: “Hmmm, says here you said *nicker*”
Me: “But you just said it.”
My parole officer: “STFU honkie.”

Last edited 3 hours ago by Tom K
Jack Dodson
Jack Dodson
3 hours ago

Down near the bottom, she writes, “The White House needs to persuade Congress to clarify that civil rights mean freedom from discrimination.” Most reasonable people would not think much of that line, but it is the most important sentence in the whole piece and the most racial thing you could read anywhere. It is the core claim of the race communists since all of this started almost century ago. It is the upending of the core idea of the liberal society in favor of utopianism. Yes. Repackaging bad products doesn’t mean the product has become any better. Ms. MacDonald in… Read more »

RealityRules
RealityRules
2 hours ago

Heather MacDonald has good qualities. However, she benefits from the perverse incentives of the Managerial system. Most of the managing goes away if you remove the rules that make need for the managers. MacDonald is not a conservative. Conservatives, more rightly called traditionalists civilizational guardians if rightly constituted, play a role which is to create the illusion that writing and lecturing will convince the crazies that they are wrong. This time, MacDonald will convince enough people who will then vote the proper way to bring about a restoration. It is really impotence designed to do two things. MacDonald reinforces managerialism.… Read more »

Tom K
Tom K
Reply to  RealityRules
1 hour ago

Singer is what they called a “vulture capitalist.” IOW, a late-stage capitalism strip-miner of the assets of sound companies that actually produced things. Are there any of those bones left to scavenge? So I don’t know what he does today, probably he’s transitioned to full-time “philanthropist.” He’s an early-lifer. Not pro-life, just early-life.

Epaminondas
Member
3 hours ago

This article just reminds me again why I want to roast the Republican establishment over a bed of hot coals.

Jeff Albertson
Jeff Albertson
3 hours ago

Nice tip on Singer and the Washington Free Beacon; what a rat’s nest.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Free_Beacon
I’m starting to understand your use of “conservative”, wink-wink.
I heard that Claudine Gray was fired and replaced by someone more cooperative, but kept her salary around 80000. sweet!

Jeff Albertson
Jeff Albertson
Reply to  Jeff Albertson
3 hours ago
  • $800,000. sorry

I was wondering why she went so quietly…

Mycale
Mycale
3 hours ago

I’ll never forget National Review’s op-ed “Time for a Compromise on Transgenderism”, written smack-dab in the middle of the first Trump administration. It was, of course, couched in the language of civil rights. I am not surprised we are seeing “The Conservative Case for DEI” smack-dab in the middle of the second Trump administration, couched in the language of civil rights. It’s the same script, playing out the same way, because their job is to undermine the Trump administration and try to funnel popular support away from Trump’s policies and towards the postwar consensus. It is positively demonic because the… Read more »

Last edited 3 hours ago by Mycale
Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
Reply to  Mycale
3 hours ago

The timing of the film Conclave, in which a tranny pope is selected, just a few months before the real life death of the Satan Pope, doesn’t strike me as entirely coincidental

Mycale
Mycale
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
2 hours ago

I didn’t watch Conclave but I saw one clip where Fiennes literally says “diversity is our strength”. Obviously, Hollywood was always a tool used by the people in charge of it to undermine the Catholic faith, because they hate the Catholic faith. So it doesn’t surprise me that this movie came out. As for timing, well, Pope Francis was an old man and had health issues for a while, so I don’t know.

redbeard
redbeard
4 hours ago

Saw an image on npr the other day of some middle/older privileged white women protesting… something.

One had a sign which read “Say ‘no’ to transgender discrimination.” Transgender is not a word but anyway I take this to mean; “Say the word ‘no’ to discerning the difference of people who are not acknowledging differences who want to be different.” Do I have that right?

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
Reply to  redbeard
3 hours ago

Do acknowledge that a man in a dress isn’t a women but don’t acknowledge that men and women are different. Don’t allow a man into a woman’s bathroom but do allow women into a men’s only college.

mmack
mmack
Reply to  redbeard
3 hours ago

Grandma / Karen ain’t got nothing better to do so she’s out there spouting nonsense.

ray
ray
Reply to  mmack
35 minutes ago

Stupid WordPress.

G Lordon Giddy
G Lordon Giddy
3 hours ago

I have struggled with how to describe our enemies, communist just doesnt seem to fully fit, i have heard fascist used but while there are elements of fascism that does not fit either. Totalitarian fits but is not specific enough.
Describing them as leftists leaves out a few sane leftists left among us and some of my views might be described as leftist,
” race communist” however is a decent description of our enemies, as best that i have heard so far.

Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
Reply to  G Lordon Giddy
3 hours ago

Cultural marxist also kind of works, but not many people know what it means. Baizuo is the best word I know, but again, most people have to look it up. Once they do, however, it is very clear.

Zfam
Zfam
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
3 hours ago

“Baizuo” is a great Chinese import not found at WalMart or Dollar General.
It is a very useful thing to occasionally view our culture from a foreign perspective.

Last edited 3 hours ago by Zfam
Mycale
Mycale
Reply to  G Lordon Giddy
3 hours ago

“Gay Race Communism” is something I have seen a few times and it sums it up really well, but so does “Satanic”.

Andy Texan
Reply to  G Lordon Giddy
2 hours ago

Our enemies are the international globalist conspiracy. Their goals are one world (neo-feudal) government and depopulation. Government officials throughout Anglo-European countries including the US are on-board.

Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
Reply to  Andy Texan
2 hours ago

Without the baizuo to help them, how much of their agenda could they accomplish?

3g4me
3g4me
Reply to  Andy Texan
2 hours ago

It’s only White depopulation they are hell-bent on. They’re fine with all the black/brown/yellow worker bees.

james wilson
james wilson
Member
Reply to  3g4me
47 minutes ago

They are fine with bees that don’t work. They may prefer them.

NoName
NoName
Reply to  G Lordon Giddy
1 hour ago

G Lordon Giddy: “I have struggled with how to describe our enemies” The Council of the Sanhedrin approve the major Psy-Ops. The Frankfurt School screenwriters then begin publicizing the novel propaganda of the new Psy-Op. Finally, owing to their control of the free flow of fiat electrons from the Federal Reserve, the Council is able to subsidize the various Mass Media & Social Media outlets to effectively brainwash the idiot goyim into boarding the psychological cattle cars which are headed to the kosher meat-packing plant of the new Psy-Op. They’ve been replaying this gig ever since poor stupid idiot Oliver… Read more »

ray
ray
1 hour ago

When someone named Heather evaluates your society and disburses ‘alternative’ information, you’re dun before begun. Why would Heather MacDonald upset the Civil Rights Regime apple cart? It is what empowers, enriches, and employs her as a minor political celebrity delivering that delicious, umm baby ain’t it delicious, attention. Gold vein for a chickadee. No group has benefitted more from the Civil Rights Regime of the past 60 years than women, especially white women, who always lead the charge towards yet more ‘civil rights’ (homos, illegals, gangsters, transvestites, et al.) and maternal totalitarianism. Hilarious but yes Righty men love to imagine… Read more »

Last edited 1 hour ago by ray
Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
Reply to  ray
11 minutes ago

I’ll lay 4 to 1 odds HM is a dyke

Jack Boniface
Jack Boniface
Member
2 hours ago

NR, Buckley’s old magazine, recently used its issue celebrating his 100th birthday to condemn him for opposing Brown, desegregation and voting rights until the mid-1960s. It wasn’t enough for them he sold out at a critical time, during LBJ’s “civil rights” purges. They dug up his past offenses against the Party Line, which might have stemmed from his partly Southern heritage. After he flipped, he became the top purger for conservatism, as Z has written about in a couple of places, leaving the movement as sterile as the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in 1980. Here’s the online version:… Read more »

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Jack Boniface
34 minutes ago

John O’Sullivan once noted that any institution not explicitly rightwing will become leftwing over time. But, as the case of NR has shown, even being explicitly rightwing is not enough. For there to be any hope of any rightwing institution holding the line, there must be a rightwing charter in place that is based upon a clear, rigorous and rigid definition of Rightism, and absolute ideological purity of all members must be maintined through discrimination and occasional expulsion. What’s more, there must be the willpower to do what is necessary permanently.

Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
9 minutes ago

There’s a case to be made that NR’s explicit right wingness was a deception from the git go

Dutchboy
Dutchboy
17 minutes ago

DEI is a Jewish invention intended to facilitate discrimination against white Christians. Similarly, the perversion of civil rights into anti-white discrimination and the abolition of freedom of association was also the work of Jews. The whole civil rights “revolution” was in fact a Jewish project using non-white front men to hide the actual movers and shakers. Reversing this situation politically will be close to impossible. The Jewish financial and ideological control of the Democratic Party is manifest and the Republican Party is not far behind.

Horace
Horace
1 hour ago

“Conservatives eventually came to defend and promote the cause on the grounds that it was always a conservative value, as equality before the law is a first principle of conservatism.” Laws are a codified extension of ethnocentric mores (root cultural [behavioral] values that are downstream of genome). Making sure that the law applies equally to everyone (rule of law) is all fine and good. Where the conservatives went wrong was not ensuring the laws that govern us all remained an extension of OUR Northwestern European ethnocentric mores. We now have neither laws that are ours, nor equal and fair application… Read more »

Ride-By Shooter
Ride-By Shooter
2 hours ago

“One of the tricks played upon the American people since the middle of the last century has been to take unreasonable ideas and cloak them in reasonableness so that reasonable people will embrace them.” That trick goes all the way back to the beginning of the USA. It was used effectively in the declaration of “Separation”, and there’s been no end to its use ever since. To become a good American has required all along a suspension of reasonableness, connivance at obvious falsehoods, gullibility, and practiced illogical thinking. The moralism of the “civil rights” race war emerged in the poisoned… Read more »

Greg Nikolic
4 hours ago

Establishment conservatives back liberal programs because liberal thinkers control the mass media.

It is not just the news (what Donald Trump calls the “fake news”) that trumpets the straight-up liberal line, it is the entire mammoth entertainment complex, which is just as important. What this does is put constant pressure on the citizenry to think at a certain angle to any problem or situation. Conservatives, imbibing the same mother’s milk of mass media, naturally fall in line with the rest…

— Greg (my blog: http://www.dark.sport.blog)