Deep Thoughts on Religion

The best guess of science is that belief evolved as one of man’s first cognitive traits. Most likely it evolved with language, but that’s a guess. Until science is able to pin down the exact spots on the genome that control belief, which will never happen in our lifetime, all we have is speculation. What we know about language and belief says the two most likely evolved as complimentary traits and emerged very early in humans.

In our current age, we tend to think of belief as religion, specifically monotheism, like Christianity and Islam. It’s more accurate to think of religion as a subset of belief, which includes culture, altruism, faith in what others say and so on. There are lots of things we accept as a matter of faith that fall outside the supernatural. Belief is what allows acquired knowledge to be passed around and passed between generations.

Religion, like language, is an incredibly efficient storehouse of acquired knowledge. If you believe the tides operate on the digestive rhythms of the great invisible guppy beyond the horizon and you have jotted them down in the Book of Guppy, your people now have a very useful chart of the tides. It’s also easy to pass this knowledge from one generation to the next by teaching the great faith of the guppy to the children. The fact that there is no big invisible guppy is irrelevant.

The evidence we have suggests that the first religions were naturalistic. When you live off the land as hunter-gatherers, explaining the natural world is an important part of survival. The first “gods” were probably spirits associated with things early man observed in nature. The winds, the rains, thunder, lightning and the changing of the seasons would be things early humans would know and “explain” by associating them with the supernatural.

Fertility gods have been found in human settlements all over the world, which makes a lot of sense when you think about it. What makes life possible is the reproductive urge. Associating human fertility with animal and plant fertility, the fertility of the earth, is just another way of storing what has been learned about the natural world, including the people in it, into a portable set of beliefs that can be passed onto the next generation.

Most likely, religion became more structured and the gods more human, when man began to settle and develop agriculture. Human settlement requires cooperation and that means rules of conduct, enforcement of the rules, ways to deal with free loaders, how to defend property and so on. Religion makes for a very useful way to establish rules and enforce them. After all, if the gods say stealing is wrong, then punishing thieves is pleasing to the gods. Religion, it would seem, is essential to human settlement.

Something people often forget is that a big part of man’s environment is other men. Just as we have evolved to be a social animal, our cognitive toolkit evolved to benefit the social animal. It’s entirely possible that our sense of belief, our religious urge is what drove man to settle. Once man was able to accumulate enough knowledge about the natural world, settling down in one place may have been a natural development.

One of the great challenges of evolutionary biology is knowing which way the causal arrows point. More often than not, they point in both directions. The point here is that belief is one of the more important and powerful parts of the human animal. It lies at the core of what we are and how we went from foraging about in packs like chimps to living as we do today. It also shaped how we settled and how we altered our environment, which in turn helped shape humanity.

Modern people like to think we have abandoned all of those primitive things like gods, superstitions, rituals intended to change the direction of events. Christianity has mostly died out in Europe. About 70% of Czechs never attend church services. Only 44% of Germans say they believe there is a God. Churches in the Low Countries are being auctioned off as they no longer have parishioners. The main area of the Thirty Years War is no longer Christian. Imagine that.

It’s tempting to think humans are losing their religiosity, but that’s not how biology works. We can no more consciously abandon belief than we can will ourselves to be left handed Bolshevism, Marxism, Nazism and Fascism competed for a while to be the new religion of Europeans. Now it is multiculturalism and the nature cults like global warming and environmentalism. If the news is correct, the American cult of anti-racism is finding a home in Europe as well.

In the early years of widespread narcotic trafficking, well organized gangs that operated under strict rules ran the trade. They were violent and chaotic, but the violence and chaos were manageable. Then the cops decided to chop the heads off the drug gangs, thinking the organizations would die or be great diminished. Instead, the bits and pieces of the shattered organizations became block-by-block street gangs, making war with one another over drug corners and sneakers.

The collapse of Christianity in the West has followed a similar pattern. The various national and regional expressions of Christianity provided order and rationality to human belief. The slow motion collapse of these organizations resulted in crackpot death cults like Nazism, Marxism and Bolshevism. Today we have various forms of nature worship and minoritism, which are just as nutty and self-destructive, just less bloody so far.

B. S Haldane identified fanaticism as one of the four important inventions, which he associated with the Judeo-Christian tradition. He was mistaken. The Greeks figured out that men would fight harder when they had a reason to fight. In all probability, fanaticism evolved not long after man had a reason to believe. Like belief, it is something that is a permanent feature of the human condition.

Humanity staggered along through the agrarian age with religions that helped make agrarian life sustainable. Christianity eventually allowed the West to advance beyond sustenance farming and finally became an asset in the rapid technological advance of the West. Whether or not the new religions will be an asset or the undoing of the West is impossible to know from where we sit. What we know is people will keep believing in something with some portion falling for it fanatically.

 

19 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lorenzo
Lorenzo
9 years ago

Somebody, maybe C.S. Lewis or Chesterton said, “When people stop believing in God, they don’t believe in nothing, they believe in everything.”

Whether or not there is a God, that has turned out to be true.

Buckaroo Banzai
Buckaroo Banzai
9 years ago

Figuring out how mankind adopted religion is one of those things that seems blindingly obvious to me. It’s just a logical evolution of human behavior. It all starts with self-awareness. From self-awareness, man then recognizes he can, through his direct actions, meaningfully affect his environment. However, man’s ability to directly affect his environment is limited. This then leads to two conclusions. First– if my ability to affect my environment is limited, this also implies my ability to perceive my environment is limited. Five senses are insufficient, and thus world I perceive is merely a subset of the entire world that… Read more »

james wilson
james wilson
9 years ago

Christianity has a tortured history. In some cases the torture was literal. But nothing in it’s instruction manual supports unkindness, to the contrary. Islam demands barbarism. What Asian religions offer I do not much know. Ancestor worship seems to work for some. In general they seem to be philosophies of acceptance (obedience) more than they are religions. For better and for worse–and why not both?–Western Civ rode with Christianity. When Christians lost their faith they retained the sense of sin without the saving belief in redemption. We are left with Progressives. Tocqueville– Whenever among the opinions of a democratic nation… Read more »

etcetera
etcetera
9 years ago

Good post, though I tend to agree with Karl Horst. Religion is something that is both extremely important and not important at all for a civilization. The best analogy I can come up with is the clothes people where. Fashions are an obvious way to distinguish yourself and the tribe you currently affiliate you, and mark you out from the crowd or make you indistinguishable. Clothes can be more or less comfortable, practical, smart or sloppy, or expensive. So in some ways clothes are a big deal. On the other hand, no one walks around naked (its been claimed that… Read more »

james wilson
james wilson
9 years ago

In general, people who believe themselves to be free of religious belief fall prey to unquestioning belief more often than any other, and defend it as if it were their inheritance. Which, unfortunately, it will be.

neil
neil
9 years ago

Absolutely love the posts on politics, history and culture. Real insights there. Whenever you wander into religion, you come off as just another insufferable atheist douche like Richard Dawkins. Deriding “the great invisible guppy” is the Zman doing some real Yankee culture signaling there — making sure the reader doesn’t mistake him for one of those icky Dirt People he often writes about. He just sympathizes with their political and cultural plight. Glad you got that straight.

Drake
Drake
9 years ago

We already know what happens when Christianity is replaced by Islam. When Rome fell, the classical world continued on under Goth rule. And North Africa continued on as a prosperous area of trade and farming.

When the Muslims took over there was that brief “golden age” we hear about (a generation of North Africans converted to Islam but not yet culturally Muslim). Then, a slow steady decline into goat-herding poverty, piracy, and tribal bickering.

Karl Horst (Germany)
Karl Horst (Germany)
9 years ago

“Christianity eventually allowed the West to advance beyond sustenance farming and finally became an asset in the rapid technological advance of the West.” I would disagree. Take three examples all of which are on completely different continents; the Egyptians, the Aztecs and the Chinese. At their peek, all of these civilizations were well beyond sustenance farming without any influence from Christianity whatsoever as were their engineering and scientific capabilities. It wasn’t religion that held them back, it was only the lack of access to resources such as coal and iron that kept them from advancing. In fact, the Egyptian and… Read more »

Karl Horst (Germany)
Karl Horst (Germany)
Reply to  thezman
9 years ago

@ theZman – I won’t argue the benefits of Christianity from a personal perspective; I’m a born again Christian and an engineer by profession. But In James 2:20 “Wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?” The idea is that faith alone won’t accomplish anything. To take this premise a step further, you can have all the faith in the world about traveling to the moon, but without the resources and the ability to turn them into a rocket ship, its just empty prayers. Conversely, it is still possible for secular man to accomplish great things,… Read more »

Karl Horst (Germany)
Karl Horst (Germany)
Reply to  thezman
9 years ago

@ theZman – If you read Job from chapter 38 through 41, it starts in 38:4 with “Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?” In the next few chapters God goes on to question Job about chemistry, biology, physics, astronomy, oceanography and just about every topic of science. I think it was God’s way of saying, “Here’s a list of questions. Now go use that amazing brain I gave you, use some of that logic and reason that came with it, and go figure it out.” 🙂

UKer
UKer
Reply to  thezman
9 years ago

An interesting aspect for me is that in the UK in the ‘age of enlightenment’ was the most prevalent ‘first’ profession of many prominent scientists, discoverers and even the students of other cultures was that they were vicars. The way the Church of England organised itself was to basically give money and a decent house to people who, once or twice a week, would read a sermon in church. As they were not particularly ‘humanitarian’ in the way most people might think of preachers and so on, they had lots of free time to study obtuse things. I believe the… Read more »

fodderwing
fodderwing
Reply to  UKer
9 years ago

A great book: How the Irish Saved Civilization by Thomas Cahill,, brings us from Rome to the Middle Ages but shows the power of a few clerics with time on their hands.

Earth Abides
9 years ago

Hi Z-Man:
Your blog is incredible. Modern day Plato. As for the genome marker for “beliefs”, could you please Google “V-MAT gene”. There is a gene sequence motivator.
Thank you.

ben dover
ben dover
9 years ago

Is nothing not something too? Way below your handicap, please redo.