The Great Awakening

Ron Unz has gotten back to writing and he has put out a handful of long columns under the American Pravda category. These are posts where he digs into the official narrative on some subject and his experience with discovering the truth. They are packed with lots of well researched information about the topic, often from obscure sources that have been erased from the official narrative. To his credit, he digs into the credibility of his source material, as to why they have been deliberately forgotten. That’s always useful.

I find them a bit too long, but that may be a matter of taste. There is something about reading from a screen that makes long articles less pleasant for me. People have looked into this and found that shorter is better than longer on-line. It’s one reason the long form essay is going away. Most people consume their content on-line, so they prefer short pithy articles. There’s also the fact that most of this stuff is read at work, where you steal a few minutes to read something before lunch or on a break. But, that’s a small quibble.

Anyway, this entry on post-war Europe was really interesting. The post-liberation reprisals in France and Belgium get some mention in the official narrative, but almost exclusively with regards to women who slept with German soldiers. The gang-like warfare between communists and their enemies is never mentioned. Of course, there is never any mention of what happened to many German soldiers in prisoner of war camps. War is an ugly business and ideological war is the ugliest. so the post-war was no picnic.

In regards to the ideological aspects of it, the blind hatred of the Germans by the American elite is never discussed. That’s why no one learns about the Morgenthau Plan in their history classes. It is another example of how ideological enemies cannot see the humanity in one another. The rage-fueled Progressives of America were no different than their moral predecessors, the abolitionists. They came to see the other side as the pure expression of evil and wanted them exterminated. The Morgenthau Plan was about genocide.

The most interesting part of theses posts is that they fit into the “red pill” experience you hear from many who journey to this side of the divide. Not everyone makes the journey, as they were always here, but did not know there was a “here.” Many do have a moment when the light went on and they either began to question their view of the world or simply changed their mind about some important item. Often, it is a book or article that is the triggering event. In that regard, these posts are a good addition to the catalog.

Of course, none of his posts would be possible without modern technology. When the only store of knowledge was controlled by the people running the official narrative, there was no way to “red pill” anyone or be red-pilled yourself. Unless you found a stash of old books that had been proscribed, you had to accept the official narrative at face value. Whatever happens in these troubled times, the fact that the society that produced the technological revolution could be consumed by it suggests nature in the long run, is self-correcting.

Reading the article on post-war Europe, I was reminded of something that often gets forgotten. That is, it is not enough to undermine the moral legitimacy of the prevailing orthodoxy. That phony narrative sold to us is not just propaganda in support of the current order, it gives Americans a reason to feel patriotic. It makes us proud of who we are as currently defined by the people in charge. Learning that it is a lie is like like learning that you were adopted. It leaves a hole and something must fill it. Something will fill it.

While undermining the moral authority of the people in charge is a big part of our project, we also have to work on a replacement. It’s not enough to get people wise to the hypocrisy of the New York Times, for example, with regards to race. They Sarah Jeong fiasco does red-pill  a lot of people, but that only matters if they have something else to embrace. In the movie from which the term “red-pill” originates, the characters had an alternative vision of their future. Without that, they would have had no reason to take the red pill.

This is the lesson of the Great War. The collapse of the monarchical system left a giant void in Europe. That system had been discredited, but there was not a replacement for the people to embrace. Liberal democracy had yet to evolve the secular morality to justify it, so into the void flowed Marxism and Fascism. The twentieth century was the fight between liberal democracy, fascism and communism, with the result being the neo-liberal order we have today. The lesson is that what comes next is not better by default.

The posts on antisemitism will be of some interest, especially to the JQ’ers. Ron is Jewish, so he comes to the subject from a different angle than the anti-Semites, but he is refreshingly frank about the material. It’s  good reminder that Jews are not the monolith JQ people need to believe. There are a lot of alt-Jews out there. It’s not a majority or even close to one, but it is a substantial minority. Their fight within the Jewish community over Jewish identity is a mirror of what is happening within the Occident.

It’s a good reminder that even if you embrace the fact that human diversity requires separation, it does not mean hostility. In fact, diversity requires cooperation in order for peaceful separation to work. Even though one group may have different interests and a radically different sense of identity than another, they can still cooperate with one another where their interests align. For the JQ people who think they have taken the ultimate red-pill, this understanding about cooperation and diversity is the ultimate red-pill.

I’m fond of pointing out that much of what defines the modern age is that everyone forgot the timeless lessons of the human condition and now we have to rediscover them. This great awakening we see on our side of the great divide is, in many respects, a rediscovery of the past. So much has been hidden from view in order to prop up the current regime, it’s shocking to most people. Like that kid who learns his parents had lied to him and he was adopted, what matters next is what we do with this new knowledge.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Saml Adams
Guest
Saml Adams

Giles MacDonogh’s “After the Reich” is a solid treatise of the immediate postwar refugee and POW problems and the massive dislocations of populations. The American antipathy towards the Germans in general is amply discussed. Overall, the immediate post war periods, both WWI and WWII and the degree to which old scores were being settled and the new “isms” were battling for adherents is hugely under-examined. At the same time I’d also recommend George Friedman’s book “Flashpoints”— another good treatise on the irrepressible legacy of Balkan grudges. Something to think about when we are handing out defense and nuclear umbrellla guaranties… Read more »

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

George Friedman — another Jewish neocon warmonger, founder of Stratfor. His worldviews remind me of that jerk Zbigniew Brzezinski (may he rest in peace). Delusional arrogance written for the military industrial complex and (((other interests))). He had another book that was to be released in Jan 2018, but since his warmonger Hillary didn’t get elected and Trump is shaking things up, the book’s release has been twice delayed for re-writing, now scheduled to release summer 2019.

Saml Adams
Guest
Saml Adams

Make sure you check under your bed for Ted Herzl and Max Nordau before you go to bed every night….you never know.

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

Keep your friends close and your enemies closer!

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

Ha! I don’t blame you for thinking I’m JQ-obsessed with the way I vent on Z Man’s blog. I’m not such a hater, it’s just a relief to be able to vent all these things that cannot be said in our current society. We really need to be able to talk about the inordinate amount of Jewish influence in our government, schools, courts, finance, foreign policy as well as about the history of Jews and their expulsions — what caused them and our subsequent history together. You think I exaggerate Jewish involvement in our governance and active demise? Well, look… Read more »

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

Same here. Once you see the tendrils, you can’t stop seeing them.

This cannot be conscious conspiracy, the recurring pattern is millenia old. Only genetic history explains such persistence, such length.

Eric
Guest
Eric

We haven’t so much discovered that we were adopted as that our “parents” are degenerate child-eating monsters from Mars. But yes, we aren’t going to go anywhere with separatism unless we can present it as a beneficial or essential move to the other interest groups in our polity. On the other hand, given the somewhat parasitic nature of some of those groups, the degree to which separatism actually will be beneficial to them in the short run is debatable. I doubt that the break-up of the U.S. is going to do all that much for, say, welfare mothers, if it… Read more »

Member

It’s also possible to get out of print books from all over the world. I got a little out of print book habit that started when I gave up reading living authors. And generally I read non-fiction so everything has an index and that’s where I go to find the new one. It doesn’t mean I’m reading about politics or economics or philosophy all the time either. I’m finishing up a book written in 1911 on the Australian aboriginals right now. Fascinating. Reading all the older books also shows me how poorly educated I am. Not just the fact I… Read more »

Member

Would be so great if you would post a sampling of bibliography of your readings

Severian
Guest

This is where the “all HBD, all the time” people lose me. The question for our purposes boils down to: When “representative government” fails — as we all agree it already has — what will give the State (whatever that ends up being) legitimacy? That’s purely the realm of culture. No one will be loyal to a government that says “only those with this specific gene sequence may apply” — not even people who have it. A divinely-sanctioned moral order is the only way to go; our version of Dear Leader will start as a prophet of some kind.

Member

Is this your way of saying you think Jesus is really coming back?

Severian
Guest

No. But as Z Man himself often points out, humans are hard-wired to believe in the transcendent. Trying to build a political philosophy around “Resolved: The American Nation consists of those with gene sequence XXX” is a fool’s errand. You need to find some kind of mythical “Essence of ___” to make it work. This has been done before, e.g. “kokutai no hongi.” It didn’t work so well, but were the bad parts bugs or features? (It’s an academic question, as far as I’m concerned, because I’ve been saying for years now that we’re going to find out, one way… Read more »

Toddy Cat
Guest
Toddy Cat

In what exact way did it not work so well? You think that attacking Pearl Harbor was inherent in Kokutai? With all due respect Severian, that’s absurd.

Severian
Guest

1,000 years in Manchuria was most definitely part of kokutai. That didn’t work out so well. (The US was only involved in a very small part of WWII in Asia).

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

The Transcendent can best be found in the lines of blood, and spirit. We seek the transcendent because we sense it, but can only see it’s fleshly half.

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

The Romano-Christian Jesus doesn’t need to be tied to the Semitic ba’al / Elohim /Hub-Al-i-lah. (Jehovah and Allah, in short)

That was an attempt at scientific legitimacy, in accord with the science of the the time.

A primitive version of HBD moral philosophy, come to think of it.

Good King Jesus would make a splendid god of our forefathers, he’s the best model out there. The oogily-boogily can stay in the bar and the nursery.

Member

I see no reason a state could not be run by those with a gene-sequence. Of course, no responsible state would do that, because it excludes too much talent. But, for example, our government is highly meritocratic. The fact that stupid people have very little power does not affect the legitimacy of the state much. The state’s legitimacy among the proles and NAMs is pretty much irrelevant. The thing you’re missing is that we are moving (or have moved) from a technological situation where the average man had substantial military power, to one where he does not. As such, the… Read more »

Severian
Guest

“The state’s legitimacy among the proles and NAMs is pretty much irrelevant.” Really? Who staffs the armies? The police forces? ” the average man had substantial military power, to one where he does not.” Again, really? The guy who shot up a Republican Party softball practice begs to differ. I know, I know, the Media doesn’t cover it, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen, and it certainly doesn’t mean it lacks lessons for the rest of us. A state that’s legitimate in the eyes of “proles and NAMs” is generally free of political violence.

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

The word you’re looking for is “a People”.
The divine example, the standard to strive for, is an archetype. A King above kings, but for us only. The Face of the People, to earth and to heaven.

Their forefathers followed other gods, because they are different Peoples. They aren’t us, nor should we expect to make them so. Let them keep their ancestor’s spirits, and we shall keep ours. Now we understand each other.

I’m agreeing with you, by the way.

Wnohmor@gmail.com
Guest
Wnohmor@gmail.com

First of all good luck waiting. The falcon cannot hear the falconer and Jim Jones ran out of purple drank.

Member

” There are a lot of alt-Jews out there. It’s not a majority or even close… ” Yes kind of but not close. Few Jews outside of Israel seek the truth without first asking “is this good for the Jews.” (While most Israelis do not follow the truth, if a Jew dies, he is usually Israeli Jew). Unz is an exception for a Western Jew and one of the more honorable men of the modern age. Reading him is entertaining and enlightening, both for what you can learn and for a rare opportunity to observe an intelligent person, who is… Read more »

Member

I like the idea that separation does not mean hostility. I’ve mentioned before that I actually like POC. I just don’t see why we have to be crammed together in unnatural ways. The Rhodesians tried a combination of voluntary integration with peaceful separation. School was segregated at the primary and secondary levels and integrated at the college level. Africans who had proven themselves economically and culturally could live in white neighborhoods and vote, others were allowed to work in towns and have homes in tribal trust lands, where there wives and kids resided, unless they had the resources to bring… Read more »

Lineman
Guest
Lineman

@tpd
I like people as long as I’m not subsidizing them to the detriment of my family, my tribe, my culture…I will give you the shirt off my back if you are truly in need…I don’t like being forced too by the end of a gun though and will do everything in my power to stop it…

Toddy Cat
Guest
Toddy Cat

I disagree with Ron Unz on a lot of things, but one thing I’ll say – he doesn’t lack guts.

Tax Slave
Guest
Tax Slave

“There is something about reading from a screen that makes long articles less pleasant for me.” That’s because you are left side dominant. Marshall McLuhan used to talk about “light on” print, as opposed to “light through” screen. He claimed that light on was processed in the logic side of the brain, the linear side: one. letter. at. a. time. Light through requires the brain to fill in more of the gap subjectively, the right side. The moonbat side. In a very general sense, he claimed that wide scale dissemination of print raised our culture, brought about the Enlightenment whereas… Read more »

Member

Cute idea, but I don’t think there is any compelling evidence for it. A lot of that right brain/left brain stuff is about as scientific as horoscopes.

Tax Slave
Guest
Tax Slave

So you believe the part of the brain that governs reason is the same as the part that governs emotion? Kind of like the transmission of a car is the same as the engine? Hmmmmm…

Member

The human brain is not an automobile engine and the pop culture left-brain/right-brain dichotomy is a ridiculously reductive description of something that is poorly understood by science.

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

It’s shorthand. Works well enough. I await your delighted sneer- because palmistry proves you incorrect. Yes, palmistry! The lines of the hands are not merely creases, but also a map of the major circuitry. Right brain “Heart” Left Brain “Mind” Spinal cord “Life” Corpus Callosum “Fate” (Conscience is a better descriptor) The Women’s line, base of the palm to the little finger, or Gut Instinct. Yes, they read people and think with their c*nts. The Negro line, a Conscience line canted offset, illustrative of their sure certainty, self-centeredness, and love of the limelight. Too determinedly individualistic to ever unify. Plus… Read more »

Member

*Delighted sneer!*

Lorenzo
Guest
Lorenzo

“I’m fond of pointing out that much of what defines the modern age is that everyone forgot the timeless lessons of the human condition and now we have to rediscover them.”

Kipling wrote about this in “The Gods of the Copybook Headings” just after WWI.

Drake
Guest
Drake

Everything going on in Western Europe today is due to forgetting (purposefully) their history. A country that spent 770 years wrestling control back from invading Muslims now invites them back in instead of shooting them on the beach?

Lineman
Guest
Lineman

@Drake
It’s that old normalcy bias raising it’s ugly head again…They had never experienced the savagery and horror of Moslem dominance so they invite them in and spread their legs…I wonder if their children will hate them or the Moslems more… Problem is we aren’t that far behind them on the path we are going because we don’t read, understand history or maybe just can’t relate to it enough to say hell no you aren’t living here…Bracken has some pretty good post on this issue…

Member

If you are going to mention Kipling how about The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon. The civil war may get hot and this poem alludes to how it happens.

MAA Shyuejinn
Guest
MAA Shyuejinn

“it is not enough to undermine the moral legitimacy of the prevailing orthodoxy” This reminds me of the terrible damage that atheists do when they attack the entirety of Christian belief because some parts, such as evolution, are “not true” or because certain priests or pastors have engaged in reprehensible behavior. What is supposed to replace Christianity? If one chooses not to believe in a supreme being who created this world, why haven’t atheists put forward a simple, commonly accepted moral code to replace the Ten Commandments: respect (not “love”) your parents, do not steal (also applies to abstract things… Read more »

Lineman
Guest
Lineman

@MAA
Brother I think you could spend the rest of your life trying to answer those questions and still not have a definite answer…I would try instead to focus on being a better person in whatever you believe…I’m a Christian so I try to be more like Jesus Christ although I fail miserably most of the time…Keep your chin up…

Shyuejinn MAA
Guest
Shyuejinn MAA

Yes, instead of trying to improve other people, “focus on being a better person”. Such a simple, yet profound idea!

“Intellectuals” keep on failing to improve society, but they remain convinced that they have all the correct answers.

Member

What is supposed to replace Christianity?
Progressivism. In case you hadn’t noticed, they mostly adopted your moral code while removing key parts of it, but also augmenting it with some of their own. (This is not surprising since Progressivism is hyper-evolved Christianity.) Of course they have dynamited the foundation of it, which is God. But this hasn’t slowed them down much.

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

“Progressivism is hyper-evolved Christianity”

No.

james wilson
Guest
james wilson

Ya. Progressivism is devolved Christianity, it’s acts separated from it’s motivations, the loop of feedback snuffed out. The man who donates to charity is not the charitable man.

A.B. Prosper
Guest
A.B. Prosper

Yes it is, a mutated version of the the “God is Good” ignore the Old Testament as its unpleasant strain common to America, the Jefferson Bible on crack if you like. It also not going to work as its current form intersectionalism puts inferior people on top of the social ladder which even Communism was smart enough to try and avoid. That said people got along fine with folk religions for centuries and were morally, thought granted not a moral set we fully share, educated well enough/ My guess is that if modernity continues and that’s not a given, we’ll… Read more »

Member

Ursala, read this article from Time, 1942, and let me know what you think.

Member

I read it. Point well made. But Ursula is right in her own way. None of that blather is Christian. It is Marxism wrapped up in Christianity. Those same National Council of Churches, and World Council of Churches pulled the same crap up until recently. The highly liberal denominations, such as the United Methodists and Episcopalians got away with telling a complicit American press that they represented Protestantism in America, meanwhile they were shrinking away to nothing while non-denominational churches grew like wildfire. I’d bet only 10% of American Protestants would be represented by those two denominations today. People left… Read more »

Auntie Analogue
Guest
Auntie Analogue

Progressivism has noting to do with Christianity because Christ accepted that temporal inequality – the human condition – is an immutable fact. Progressivism is utopianism that merely opportunistically borrows bits from Christian doctrine, from Marxism, from Fabian socialism, from all sorts of sources to suit Progressivism’s constant moving of the goalposts and thus its constantly shifting list of enemies based on whatever the Progressive utopians deem to be the evil de jour to suit their lust for totalitarian “we have all the answers” power.

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

Sorry, I had to leave the blog yesterday and didn’t get back to it till now. I read the article. I couldn’t have said it any better than teapartydoc’s excellent comment, though he added quite a bit more erudite substance that I could’ve. And Auntie Analogue put it well, too, I thought. I guess I would only add that the Time article from 1942 reflected an American people involved in the second world war after coming out of the first world war and then a great depression, with no Social Security (until 1935) or other safety nets. It was the… Read more »

Shyuejinn MAA
Guest
Shyuejinn MAA

“They have dynamited the foundation, which is God.” That’s my point. Stalin, Hitler, Mao and other “great” leaders were failed “gods”, but atheists keep hoping they will find replacements for the one that is not supposed to exist. “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” comes to mind.

Member

This. In the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Constitution the French revolutionaries stated that care of the poor was a “sacred” obligation, and then proceeded to desacralize everything, and secularize that which had been declared sacred. Then, without the infrastructure of the church (they drove out or killed over half of the priests and abolished the orders of nuns which would have been there) the people starved, while the government officials in charge somehow ended up with better houses.

Member

why haven’t atheists put forward a simple, commonly accepted moral code It’s simply not possible. Both Kant and Stefan Molyneux made gallant tries, but both rest on certain a priori assumptions and if you can’t get people to agree to those assumptions, or people realize, correctly, that they can gain advantage by ignoring those assumptions, then their philosophies have no force. Philosophies rely on reason and throughout history there have been an awful lot of reasonable people who ended up with unreasonable peoples’ swords sticking out if them. Without recourse to a divine mandate, human philosophies lack power. No one… Read more »

GU1
Guest
GU1

Kant was not an atheist.

Member

No, but he was his own god.

Member

The categorical imperative and Kantian philosophy are an attempt to define moral truths a priori via pure practical reason such that they stood on their own without the requirement for a divine mandate. It is irrelevant whether Kant himself was an atheist.

Troll King(-46)
Guest
Troll King(-46)

Great post great post! I had so much to say at every point, but I’ll limit. I read the unz article on the jfk assasination. He draws together many good points, but I still doubt lbj was the true mover, but rather you-know-who. Lbj called back the planes during the Liberty attack simply because he was afraid of what happened to Kennedy. When I read about Ruby’s shooting of Oswald, I said aloud: “he had cancer!” I instinctively understood he was a fall guy who they already knew was about to die! Sure enough, several years later, during an appeal,… Read more »

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

Few know that LBJ, as well as Hillary, had Jews as grandparents. I suspect LBJ’s extensive Mob payors, as well as Clinton’s Dixie Mafia allies, probably descended from Lucky Luciano and Meyer Lansky’s move to Hot Springs AR and Florida/Baton Rouge in the 1940s. Hillary’s father was head of the Jewish Mafia in Chicago for a reason. One Jewish family gang, the Krinskys, made a fortune during Prohibition, and bought the near bankrupt Grumann weapons company after WWII. I think networking explains the corrupt Model Cities real estate Projects and Vietnam weapons/equiptment shipments by LBJ, as well as Hillary’s protected… Read more »

Troll King(-46)
Guest
Troll King(-46)

What’s your source for this? Are you really alluding that someone else has a Jewish grandparent? It would be one grandparent, correct?

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

Mixed sets, not all the grandparents were Jewish. Done from memory, I see it as a clue that ethnic ties can open doors and explain loyalties.

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

About the Khazar thing: it’s a way of saying “they’re not real Jews! The state was declared Jewish by the king’s edict!” I suspect their semitism was revealed, not declared. Quite possibly a side branch in hiding, like the ones that failed in Turkey and Yemen, or the Donmeh branch that prevailed in Arabia, intoduced Wahhabi rule, and later allied with the British Rothschilds (and currently with Israel). The squabble between the Sultan and the Caliph was a perfect replica of the fight between Judah and the Israelites. The Semitics- Jews, Arabs, Turkics- are slippery, dangerous, facile, and batshit crazy.… Read more »

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

Sorry ’bout the diversion into a pocket history of the Mohammed. The question was, “why would a Bedouin pagan demand that Jewish elders declare him a prophet?”

Toddy Cat
Guest
Toddy Cat

In terms of punitive attitude towards the conquered German population, the order of ranking seems to be, from most to least; Soviets, French, Americans, and British. Interestingly, it was usually Allied military leaders who were more conciliatory, with civilian leaders taking a more punitive attitude. Generals like Patton, Mark Clark, and Montgomery tended to see the defeated Germans as potential allies against the Reds, while the civilians in London and DC took the hardest line. You saw the same thing in the Pacific, with men like MacArthur and Admiral Nimitz expressing serious doubts about the “Unconditional Surrender” formula. It was… Read more »

Troll King(-46)
Guest
Troll King(-46)

Why?

Toddy Cat
Guest
Troll King(-46)
Guest
Troll King(-46)

No I just wanted to hear your own version

Dutch
Guest
Dutch

Because, by and large, the Germans and other western elements of the Axis practiced the chivalrous and professional respect of their military foes, while the Japanese were notorious for not doing so. For example, ritual execution of captured military POWs. There is a famous photo of a captive and tied up Australian soldier being beheaded under the sword. Whether or not the photo represents an outlier behavior, the idea was taken to heart.

shane
Guest
shane

Fair point, Niall Ferguson’s World of the World maybe neoliberal softcore porn, but he does discuss the differences of treatment of pow’s between enemies who had similarities with a lot of examples. The Wehrmacht treated Slavs brutally, but restrained themselves with White British Empire troops and Americans. The Japanese treated Allied troops brutally as they were viewed as a Racial enemy.

Troll King(-46)
Guest
Troll King(-46)

They were just as bad to the Chinese. They were a cruel race at one time. Unfortunately it seems that high iq is linked with cruelty.

Dutch
Guest
Dutch

Troll King, cruelty seems to be hard wired into being human. Point out to me a society or culture, just one, which didn’t witness some widespread form of it, be it organized or spontaneous.

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

Disagree a little bit. East Asians are astonishing in their cruelty. Their religions reflect it as well. Even commoners do things to animals and each other that makes one wonder how they can think of themselves as still human.

Herzog
Guest
Herzog

To me, a middle-aged German, your ranking of punitive attitude in the victorious powers sounds about right, according to what I heard from the older folks who had lived through it over the years and decades. Perhaps sporadically the Americans outdid the French, which was easy, as the French only occupied a minuscule portion of Germany, and had very limitid resources themselves.

Herzog
Guest
Herzog

As to the Russians, in Nobel laureate Svetlana Alexievch’s “Second-hand Time” (2013) I recently testimonials by Russian soldiers who admitted to her that after WWII they basically raped every German woman between 8 and 80 they could get a hold of, semi-proudly claiming that pretty much every German born in East Germany in 1946 must in fact have been half Russian. German women of that generation used to speak about this Russian behavior themselves, for sure, but only in hushed tones, out of shame but also because the German powers that be always signaled that such tales were politically highly… Read more »

Arch Stanton
Guest
Arch Stanton

The Russian army behaved no differently than the Wehrmacht did when invading Russia. What goes around comes around.

Herzog
Guest
Herzog

That’s just so much BS. Wehrmacht misbehavior and crimes in Russia were of a totally different nature when and where they occurred (reprisal killings, burning down of villages, such things), but without sexual predation on a large scale, let alone one condoned or even egged on by commanders. Again I can recommend Alexievich’s book for Russian accounts of Wehrmacht behavior in the East.

But likely you’re not much interested in historical accuracy anyway, but just want to indulge your anti-German animus, facts be damned.

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

Totally agree with Herzog, here.

I call and raise you one- the human sacrifice demanded by prophecy was fulfilled- but it was six million Germans who burned.

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

I see Svatlana Alexievich is a darling of the West (i.e., anti-Russia, anti-Putin), with no less than the Council on Foreign Relations giving her some BS award for the book you mention. And I hate to say it, but at least since the Clinton administation and forward, Nobel awards are given to Western globalist puppets. In other words, the nice book you read may have been massaged quite a bit so I’d take it with a grain of salt if I were you. If you Google her name, you see outlets like The Guardian and The New Yorker fawning over… Read more »

Herzog
Guest
Herzog

Didn’t know about some of the (leftist) circles cheering Ms. Alexievich, but that must be for very different reasons than the ones that concern me here. When Ms. Alexievich (or rather the testimonies she collected) show the Wehrmacht in Russia in a rather friendly light, and expose the Red Army’s post-war behavior in Germany as often rather degraded, that in no way serves to confirm the lefty narrative of Hitler / Germans / fascists always bad — communists always good; rather, it undermines it. So, even if Ms. Alexievich has some of the wrong friends (but how much can you… Read more »

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

You are free to remain willfully blind. Do so at your own risk. God bless.

Herzog
Guest
Herzog

You’re not reacting to my argument with a counter-argument, but with assertion and condescension (in the guise of generosity, in time-honored female manner).

You’re free to cultivate that attitude at your own risk. God bless.

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

And your counter lacked just as much substance, dear sir, talking about her friends and such. And I wasn’t intending to be condescending when I wished you God bless. I do enjoy your comments. You’re right, it may be less risky to accept unquestioningly the product generated by the pets of the elite. So I suppose my attitude is riskier in that sense.

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

The elite are very good with managing intellectual product. They know how to present mostly the truth but then include just enough of what they want you to believe but is not true among all the truths so that it’s accepted. On top of that, trusting, smart people like you go on to actually spend their hard-earned money on their Right-Think products. The mistake is in giving them the benefit of the doubt that they are as decent as you are. They’re not! Don’t give them your money and only give them enough of your mind so that you keep… Read more »

Al from da Nort
Guest
Al from da Nort

Herzog; FWIW, I agree with your general comments about relative post war behaviors of the various victorious allies after WW II. IMHO the primary reason behind this ranking is that atrocity was open State Policy for the USSR, as it had been for Germany before their surrender. As evidence, they both maintained specialized paramilitary units for just this purpose (see below) BTW, the vitriolic controversy in the Unz posting (particularly in the mostly unbelievable comments) is whether it became State Policy (official or unofficial) for the US or the UK, particularly post-war re POWs.* Re Soviet atrocity, I’m old enough… Read more »

Herzog
Guest
Herzog

Al,

thank you very much for all this additional info and analysis. You’re much more well-read and informed on these issues than I am, who, as a German living his life in Germany but mainly busy with other, more pressing concerns, just happened to accumulate anecdotal pieces evidence over the years, and tried to make sense of them. So, thanks again for your input.

LFMayor
Guest
LFMayor

Good stuff boss. “Everyone forgot the timeless lessons”.
How many clay tablets, chunks of granite and re-tellings of Kings and Judges (shit was so important and painful they wrote it down twice) have to created?
Nothing new.
As far as replacements go, mushrooms pop up out of nowhere after the rains. Trick is in not eating the amatias.

Member

Unz is already paying the price and might as well keep it long form. The web filter at work now blocks unz.com for “intolerance.” No more reading a paragraph or two here & there for me.

EMP
Guest
EMP

Same here. Last week I read his antisemitism article at the office; the next day the web filter blocked unz.com entirely, citing ‘Intolerance’.

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

How Orwellian! Poor, poor America. Hurts my heart.

Dtbb
Guest
Dtbb

What would happen if you complainef? I aa seriously ignorant of how offices work.

EMP
Guest
EMP

Wouldn’t be able to find an arbiter, I reckon.

Juri
Guest
Juri

One thing what must be understand to defeat communism or like you say, liberalism. It is not politics, is is religion. And in the religion, facts does not matter. God burned down Sodom and Gomorrah, caused flood to kill all living things and Christians are fine with that. God is still good and Devil is bad despite average christian cant say what evil Devil did. That is why holocaust denial also does not work. Until Jew is holy, then instead of mourning and gloating sixmilliongassed, just they keep gloating 300 000differentreason. Until Nazis remain ultimate evil, everything done against them… Read more »

Moran ya Simba
Guest
Moran ya Simba

“liberalism. It is not politics, is is religion”

Agree

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

“we can not let things to gas chambers again and because of that, we have to take off silk gloves sometimes. And even when comes out that there were no gas chambers, well Nazis were ultimate evil anyway”

Beautiful stuff, Juri, I could not have said it better. The World Wars’ glory showed our mettle, and ruined us at the same time.

Dutch
Guest
Dutch

Germany was actually partitioned into four zones after WW2, Soviet, French, British, and American. I am interested in how different the postwar treatment of German civilian survivors might have been across the zones. My mother’s relatives were in Bremen, in the American zone. As their house was on the edge of town, it survived the war bombings intact. American soldiers evicted them, and turned the house into a barracks, stripping the interior and remodeling it to suit their needs. When the house was returned to them, years later, the Americans made the effort to return the home to its former… Read more »

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Zman’s points about Jews and JQ-ers are crucial. “Their fight within the Jewish community over Jewish identity is a MIRROR of what is happening within the Occident…. Jews are not the monolith JQ people need to believe.” Seeing as this “substantial minority” of (URBAN) alt-Jews is probably of comparable proportion to the “substantial minority” of (URBAN) alt-Gentiles, maybe we’d be better off if JQ-ers (and alt-Jews) would become Urban-Q-ers, or UQ-ers. Until JQ-ers get specific about how they aim to solve the JQ, I’m more interested in the UQ-ers. They’ve gotten quite specific, about how the UQ could be handled… Read more »

Moran ya Simba
Guest
Moran ya Simba

I agree. Im not into ‘lets hate all Jews’. But, we can discuss the JQ, and the extent to which it is or is not, a problem like adults. Leftie does not get to decide what is and what is not ‘within limits’.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Of course, Leftie shouldn’t decide Jack. But if we stew about the JQ, to the point of neglecting the UQ, we risk driving away good Jews, and OVERLOOKING practical ideas on how to stem the onslaught of Hollywood, MadAve., RadFems, etc. upon our culture.

Moran ya Simba
Guest
Moran ya Simba

Works for me, not sure what UQ is but sure

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Simba, above I say that: “Seeing as this “substantial minority” of (URBAN) alt-Jews is probably of comparable proportion to the “substantial minority” of (URBAN) alt-Gentiles, maybe we’d be better off if JQ-ers (and alt-Jews) would become URBAN-Q-ers, or UQ-ers.” My view is that, the (URBAN) Gentiles are as problematic as the (urban) Jews, seeing as both groups are corrupted by status-driven consumerism (esp. of single females), this driving the Media to target these women’s subconscious whims (e.g. fantasies of being raped by alpha PoCs). The Media propaganda appeals to these women by glorifying PoCs (Derb’s Sun People), at the expense… Read more »

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

Well done. Some like me are focused on past instincts, outraged that we swallowed so much falsified history. I could drive a bus through the obvious holes.

(One reason atheists are hopping mad. We know we’re being lied to. No reason to be obnoxious sh*ts about it, though.)

You suggest we pay more attention to the instincts grown large in our new environment. Kudos.

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

Outlaw *behaviors*, rather than people from any particular tribe.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Ursula, this sounds right, but we could allow restrictive covenants, wherein LOCALS can decide what level of risk they can afford to take, as to how much multiculturalism they’ll tolerate.
JFK’s idea of a Federally-mandated “colorblind” society was, in its way, worth a try, but we must now admit that it’s becoming a nightmare, all the more so since it was followed by other hyper-expansions of Federal power, such that now we all have major reason to fear a slew of Wacos, Ferguson Effects, FIU-style bridge collapses, and prospects of a hugely-devastation Civil War.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Correction: “hugely-devastating Civil War”.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

My emphasis on URBAN devolution is meant to contrast with *relative* rural cultural stability, so that rural Gentiles are less likely to be corrupted by “modern” culture, and thus went for Trump far more than did their urban counterparts. See the relevant thoughts about the cultural impact of mass urbanization (and other factors) at https://whiskeys-place.blogspot.com/2008/09/modern-romance.html , e.g. : “Under the Western System, men and women are mostly free to choose their own partners. But institutions, such as local Church, or benevolent society, or group/block civic organization dances, fairs, exist to mediate that choice. Guide the choices, control them, and ensure… Read more »

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

Wow. Kudos to Whiskey as well. Romance and it’s exaltation was a fine thing. Nice things simply work better.

A.B. Prosper
Guest
A.B. Prosper

That doesn’t work. Behavior is mostly but not entirely gene driven The number of people like Candace Owens or Thomas Sowell who are basically an allied tribe among the Blacks will always be slight Latin America is like it is because that is how Latinos are and so on, I know its unpleasant but any plausible future will involve repatriation and very possibly ethnic cleansing. Land can productively belong to a single tribe and try as you might to stop it when society begins a collapse , people will revert to what works, tribe In the end the future we… Read more »

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

But I admire it when they mimic us; they seek the higher life too.

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

The idea is to codify the white Christian way of doing things here and make them the laws of the land to stop the exploitation and damage done to white Christians. Those who don’t like our laws will leave so they can practice their crappy ways on people in a different country. That’s the idea. To make illegal the lousy things they like to do to us. Jews and gentiles alike.

Moran ya Simba
Guest
Moran ya Simba

“This great awakening we see on our side of the great divide is, in many respects, a rediscovery of the past.”

Agree!!! To pluck but one item, forget ‘counter-insurgency’ when dealing w muzzie f*cks. Stick their ‘hearts AND minds’ up their a$$es. If anything Genghis Khan was too soft on islam. He was the last one who could realistically have killed this the ultimate satan worship. Soft sentimental bastard he was, he failed to finish the job. Muzzies wanna see ‘holy war’?? Let’s give em one!

Moran ya Simba
Guest
Moran ya Simba

Ok, I admit, that felt good to write. But, I dont believe in being ‘nice’ to fanatics anymore. Islam or leftie, they take it as weakness. And I wanna f*cking survive and win, free of grade A a$$holes who wanna kill me. Ive had enough of that nonsense. It’s time to make evil men scared men again. Very scared men. Coz they share the planet w US. And we are slowly learning to like killing them again.

To all good men and women out there, have a great day. And buy some more ammo.

Drake
Guest
Drake

First thing any serviceman learns in the Middle East – never show them weakness. Always act the alpha in their presence or they’ll go for your throat.

Moran ya Simba
Guest
Moran ya Simba

Tells you all you need to know about em

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

Make Saudi Arabia Christian Again!

Moran ya Simba
Guest
Moran ya Simba

Turn the Kaabala or whatever the hell they call that black box they worship, into a public restroom

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

Yes, it can be the public restroom next to the new Christian cathedral.

calsdad
Guest
calsdad

Ron Unz’s American Pravda series is great. I’ve been using his “Was Rambo Right” ( http://www.unz.com/runz/was-rambo-right/ ) post for a number of years now , to send to “conservatives” I know who still practice either government worship or John McCain worship (or both). Just bringing up that column and what Unz put in it – sending it to them and telling them to read it ….. usually shuts them right the hell up. It’s nice red pill suppository stuffed right up their bung. The best part about it is – to dispute the McCain and government malfeasance claims, you have… Read more »

Burner Prime
Guest
Burner Prime

There is always a group of Jew haters on alt-right threads who attempt to co-opt the comments. It is autistic and tiresome to see that for them, every.single.problem. has its roots in (((Da Jooze))). That is not red-pill at all since it doesn’t face reality. It is simple scapegoating, and solves nothing. It’s also worth noting that those same people, including Vox Day, consider anyone other than Germanic, Scandinavian, and Anglos as inferior. So to all the Celts and Italians (yes Irish are degenerate in Vox and Heartiste’s eyes), the Portuguese (the great navigators), the Spanish (great Navies), and of… Read more »

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Well, Burner, if those who are “scapegoating, and solve nothing”, came clean with specific ideas as to how to “solve” the JQ, I’d grant that they might not be only scapegoating.
Meanwhile, the dissing of Jews, Celts, etc., risks us blowing a great opportunity to unite most Whites, in righteous wrath vs. the infantilism of the Sarah Jeongs and the NYT.

shane
Guest
shane

With respect to Vox Day he’s never been of the opinion that American identities have always been more defined regionally than as a sort of Nordiscist Madison Grant idea. Thats far more a Brett Stevens type position at Amerika.org. What Vox has said is that America’s main source of culture has been mainly British and predominantly English, and that the migrants from Central and Northern Europe eg, Scando’s, Germans, Austrians never really understood or embraced the concept of The Rights of Englishmen. Thats a point Z’s made before in a post i think, but I could be wrong. Regarding the… Read more »

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

I try not to co-opt, but end up foaming at the mouth. Somewhat embarrassed by it.

When Saxons own the Federal Reserve, Italians own Hollywood, and Portuguese determine immigration policy, I’ll relax.
The Irish- well, we’ll think of something.

Member

Z: “It’s good reminder that Jews are not the monolith JQ people need to believe.”

Ernest van den Haag wrote an casual book on the JQ, “The Jewish Mystique”. Back when NR had real men writing for them. Last time I picked it up I got the impression he was pretty fond of Jews. So it may not be for everyone. But it’s one more perspective.

Remember the old Haag? Always loved his glasses.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMv4XsL-1lU

https://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Mystique-Ernest-Van-haag/dp/0440042232/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1533744466&sr=1-1&keywords=the+jewish+mystique

Allen
Guest
Allen

One aspect of my own red pill experience that I struggle with the most is: what is patriotism? To me, for the dissident right to get anywhere they will have to come up with a good answer.

Moran ya Simba
Guest
Moran ya Simba

To secure the future safety and success of your people. I think that’s not a bad definition. Then ppl can start discussing who ‘their people’ exactly is and isnt

Lineman
Guest
Lineman

To secure the future safety and success of your people. I think that’s not a bad definition.
Pretty simple and straightforward…Amen Brother…

Burner Prime
Guest
Burner Prime

Actually it is so simple as to be ambiguous – for now. It is phony and a cheap throw-way definition that can be defined by any degree you want and whenever you want. But Vox already painted himself in a corner by rejecting Civic Nationalism, so that means “Your people” has to be race-based. So tell me, what is the race of an American who arrived in the US in the mid 1850s and is English, Irish, Portuguese, Austrian, Scottish, Italian, and even Mexican? There you have it. The future of “your people” is a pure BS concept within the… Read more »

Moran ya Simba
Guest
Moran ya Simba

Well arent you a killjoy? If you cant define an American people you dont have an American nation.

I said the tricky part was defining ‘your people’. Your line of reasoning leads directly to either national dissolution or civic nationalism which is clearly coming apart today.

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

White. That’s what it is. A little Latino in the woodpile means we can dance. Bailando!

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

“an American who arrived in the US in the mid 1850s and is English, Irish, Portuguese, Austrian, Scottish, Italian, and even Mexican”

The Mexican blood would make the above a Latino. Otherwise, they’d be considered simply White.

Burner Prime
Guest
Burner Prime

“Their people” cannot be well-defined in America where a majority of people are mixed blood in the sense that there are no pure German, Austrian or Scandinavians. They will not stop at defining “their people” as having white skin. “Their people” will exclude basically anyone they decide, including Poles, Slavs, Irish Celts, the list goes on forever. “Their people” cannot be a concept, it cannot be an idea or any kind of principle as that has already been nullified by people like Vox. It has to be genetic based in their eyes; it cannot be “Western” or physical feature-based. So… Read more »

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

There’s never been a pure bloodline. Even the Biblical times struggled mightlily with migration and intermarriage, yet the Twelve Tribes still became a People.

‘Purity’ is a strawman. Don’t fall for the J-propaganda. Mengele was trying to find a way to make the real Master race ‘pass’, not convert them into Teutons.

As far as I know, Uncle Dolphie never said “Master Race”, he wanted recognition for the Sudenten and a Danzig corridor, and the Ruhr iron mines back.

But the propagandists, Heydrich, Himmler, Goering? Wow, look at those low, slungback ears. The genetic tell.

james wilson
Guest
james wilson

The key to understanding what patriotism should and should not be so that it is not a tool used against you is 1) Menchen-“The American people, North and South, went into the War as citizens of their respective states; they came out as subjects of one.” 2) The Pledge, “one nation, indivisible”, propaganda consolidating those progressive gains upon school children in a daily prayer. By WW1 even the southern man was blue pilled in the new patriotism.

Anonermous
Guest
Anonermous

“Nationalism and patriotism are often (deliberately?) confused by people who style themselves progressive and who prefer the abstract to the particular. (Note: the abstract doesn’t actually exist). However it’s very easy to define the difference between the two.” Love.
https://albionawakening.blogspot.com/2018/08/whats-difference-between-nationalism.html

Juri
Guest
Juri

Unfortunately, nobody knows this anymore and this is the main reason, why we end up with massive war both here in Europe and America. This is called Glossocracy , the power of the word.
What patriotism means, what Christianity means what free speech means? The last one, do not answer just in case because your answer may be hate speech and you may lose your job.
Glossocracy is runned by Pathocracy, the power of psychopaths. Are you patriot or traitor? Well, the loudest screaming communist or liberal will decide.

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

The 14 words work for any race or people.
Everyone should be a patriot in their own place, I respect that.

LineInTheSand
Guest
LineInTheSand

Many of you eagerly welcome the Alt-Jews because they are smart, wealthy, and agree with you on some points. You overlook that they are the most ethnocentric people. Most of them will ultimately side with their own, even if they agree with you.

Here are tests of their assimilability. Will they:
• Accept that almost none of their people should be allowed to immigrate here, because almost all are far left?
• Support the repeal of laws that punish questioning the Holocaust?
• Agree to dismantle the Holocaust studies that traumatize our public school youth?

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Line, quite an earfull! On “almost all are far left”, more so than urban Gentiles? PROVE it, comparing apples to apples, e.g. urban Gentiles vs. Jews. Above, I’ve made a case that urban vs. rural, and single female vs. the rest, are the key divides. On “repeal of laws that punish…,” and on “dismantle the Holocaust studies”, fair enough, INSOFAR as these Studies only propagandize, and overshadow other comparable, important subjects, e.g. Rwanda’s genocide of Tutus. On “will ultimately side with their own”, I quite doubt that the secular ones care much about the Orthodox, more than secular Gentiles care… Read more »

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Correction: Tutsies, not Tutus.

LineInTheSand
Guest
LineInTheSand

Let’s cut to the heart. You argue that conservative values can bind a country more tightly than race, which is civic nationalism. Here, all the standard criticisms apply. It may be sad, but race binds more tightly than values.

Sure, we have liberal whites. Some are sociopaths while others are universalists. Sociopaths can be handled by harshly punishing anti-white activity. Universalists are our deepest problem. But they are less of a problem than people who see themselves as fundamentally different from us.

Arch Stanton
Guest
Arch Stanton

+1 to Mr. Line.

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

Plus one more for the Test.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

No, Line, I don’t KNOW that conservative values can bind a country more tightly than race. I see the jury as being still out on that: Race is relevant, but not determinative. I’m with Derb, on the key difference being Ice vs. Sun People (esp. blacks and Arabs, e.g. on cousin marriage). It seems quite likely, that evolution (of races, as affected by local conditions, esp. climate) has a whole bunch to do with this difference. I certainly don’t view Jews (ESP. those from Europe), as seeing themselves as fundamentally different from us. The Arabs sure as hell see these… Read more »

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Part of the trouble with thinking about issues of race (vs. conservative values) is that, it’s so easy and common for similar “races” (e.g. Celts, Nordics) to biologically mix with each other, esp. in US cities. Out of this, and stimulated by hate from the Establishment and its SJW tools, is growth of a White identity, much stronger than before the SJWs. If blacks and other Sun Peoples had been behaving reasonably since JFK’s death, the White identity movement would have a fraction of its current strength, and most whites would have little problem with miscegenation. Alas, the ferociousness of… Read more »

Member

Jaq: “I certainly don’t view Jews (ESP. those from Europe), as seeing themselves as fundamentally different from us.” Obviously Jews feel closer to the white West than they do to the rest of the world. But they do see themselves as different than everyone. There’s no way for them to simultaneously know their history, know about the holocaust, and have seen Schindler’s List et al, and feel close to other peoples. Granted there are multiple psychological levels of feeling trust/kinship/affinity with other groups. But all in all Jews definitely feel unique/apart. (Though I’m not sure about young far Left Jewish… Read more »

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Frip, I could see this to theoretically be so, but actual evidence quite suggests otherwise. US Jews marry outside the faith, rather more than folks born in any other faith. I must suggest to you, that most US Jews (esp. post-Boomers) just don’t stew about the Holocaust nearly as much as alt-Gentiles might suppose. This is particularly true, for those Jews who grew up in hoods where Jews are a minority, and where they anyway got on well with (white Gentile) neighbors. Esp. when their personal experience, esp. with (pushy/ rampaging) blacks, contrasts SO much with their good interactions with… Read more »

Member

I know about all the marriage stats and the modern non religious Jews. Just trust me, Jews are Jews and they feel it down deep.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Frip: “Jews are Jews and they feel it down deep.” No doubt true of some, but overall, a major exaggeration in the US. More true of Jews, than of (esp. elite) Eastern WASPS (about being elite WASPS)? I don’t buy it. (Yeah, many really care about Israel, but are also REALLY proud to be Americans. This is esp. true of those who really care about their children, irrespective of whether their kids married Jews or Gentiles. It helps that they know damn well, how good the US is to Jews.) What you say is more true of E. European Jews,… Read more »

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Indeed, I’m much more suspicious of the (mostly Eastern WASP) old-money families, than I am of all but the wealthiest Jews.
Did Jews corrupt old-money families, or did old-money families corrupt wealthy Jews?

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

One of Unz’s main points (in the post to which Zman refers above) is “the puzzling contrast between the behavior of Jews in the aggregate, and Jews as individuals”.
He traces this to the ability of small numbers of energetic folks in key positions to sway masses, esp. via media narratives.

Thus, a handful of well-placed Jews make so much noise (say vs. Trump), while the mass of Jews vote like their urban Gentile counterparts.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Moreover, recall the Dershowitzism “two Jews, three opinions”.
Jews tend to pride themselves on being analytical and disputational, incl. about human nature.
So, books like Hannah Arendt’s about Eichmann can really get them going at each other.
Likewise, when guys like Bernie Goetz do their thing.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Insofar as they do see themselves as different than everyone, it’s a matter of intensity.
They’re a lot like us, except more so.
The “whitey-haters” really hate whites, and the “blackie-haters” really hate/ fear blacks, perhaps partly because they can so easily see blacks and Muzzies as the most likely groups to take real PLEASURE, in killing of Jews and other whites.

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

One of the difficulties in understanding the Jewish mindset is that they have always been, ultimately, at war with each other.

Why? Nobody else matters. We are but tools used in the internal conflict between the Tribes. That civil war for supremacy is so important, the True Humans, Adam’s descendents and heirs to the Kingdom, are mapping genetic lines.

Member

Sorry, I’ve already exceeded my self imposed Jewtalk quota of 45 words per year.

LineInTheSand
Guest
LineInTheSand

Jaqship. you seem kind of nervous. What’s up with that?

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

In a way I am, Line, in that (as I replied to Simba earlier in this thread), I fear that, if we stew about the JQ, to the point of neglecting the UQ, we risk driving away good Jews, and OVERLOOKING practical ideas on how to stem the onslaught of Hollywood, MadAve., RadFems, etc. upon our culture. And, I’ll add now, we also risk turning off Normies who much want to give our reasonable fears (e.g. of OBVIOUSLY pushy/ violent blacks) a fair hearing, but also fear that (esp. obsessive) JQ-ers are just VENTing at scapegoats. As Zman put it… Read more »

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

To Normies, it’s OBVIOUS that PoCs are disproportionately violent, and thus Normies quite understand resentment at SJWs’ McCarthyism at “racists”.
Whereas, insofar as JQ-ers push their view, as if IT’S truth is as obvious as are the dangers from PoCs, JQ-ers are seen as incapable of telling the Obvious from the Speculative.
This makes it all the easier for our foes, to plausibly pigeonhole us as unstable louts.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Correction: “ITS truth”, not “IT’s truth”. The possessive, not a contraction.

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

“There are a lot of alt-Jews out there. It’s not a majority or even close to one, but it is a substantial minority.”
“they can still cooperate with one another where their interests align.”

May all the gods bless you for these, Zman.

We can’t kill everyone, nor should we want to. (Nor pry the vote from our ladies’ cold, dead hands. If so many men weren’t such f*cking shitheads, women could depend on ’em.)

Legitimacy. We’ve earned it before, because that’s who the God made us to be.
Let us revel in our good, great fortune, and earn it again!

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Yeah, Alzaebo, we needn’t kill any group. Rather, let’s break the Propaganda machines, and kill the other mal-incentives which warp the culture. At https://whiskeys-place.blogspot.com/2012/01/charles-murray-and-white-CLASS-divide.html , you’ll see ways to attack these mal-incentives: “On the incentive fronts, blue collar White guys, and White collar White guys, need to have incomes raised…. concrete action can be taken to increase earning power of White GUYS: deport illegal aliens (and their kids); increase military spending, particularly ship and plane building; ELIMINATE most legal immigration (and H1-B visas and variants); put import quotas on (increase local factory production); increase the ability to file and make… Read more »

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

That’s what grinds my teeth. The Propaganda machines, pushing mal-incentives.

Information must remain clean, or the software code breaks down, making the hardware useless or dangerous.

Cloudswrest
Guest
Cloudswrest

Re. Elite hatred of Germany, https://youtu.be/Rv1yZ6tq3mY
Written by Dr. Seuss, directed by Frank Capra, 1945.

shane
Guest
shane

It’s a fair point about the vision thing. From a meme centric prospective some of our sides best youthful one’s tend to take the aesthetic’s of the fantasy series Warhammer 40k as a template. https://imgur.com/gallery/HqvbXvq Inspiring optics aside (say what you want about the S.S but the uniforms were class) a grimdark apocalyptic Gotterdamerung isn’t going to do more but troll leftie, which is pretty easy. Going back I seem to recall Eric Hoffer’s opinion of Radical Leftism and other subcultures being a largely an idle rich/dysgenic poor phenomenon as it enables you to avoid the interaction with reality that… Read more »

Member

Unz is alright but they write the same dozen articles over and over: Russia, Trump, jews/zog, etc. The HBD articles are the only thing worth reading . The other stuff is just fanciful wishful thinking for the civil war/revolt/crisis that will never come. HBD is at least based on empirical and biological reality.

Tax Slave
Guest
Tax Slave

I just came back from visiting the local liberal leaning bookstore. I asked the genderconfused clerk with dreadlocks, a rainbow tattoo on his forehead and a huge nose ring: “I’d like a copy of President Trump’s latest book on immigration.”
He told me “get the f*ck out of here!” I said “yeah, that’s the name of it!”

Shane
Guest
Shane

Ha, I can’t like this multiple times unfortunatly. Well said.

Lineman
Guest
Lineman

LMAO…That was good…

Alzaebo
Guest
Alzaebo

Dagnabbit, people. Too much time yapping about the JQ, not near enough input as to “what matters next.”

I am way too easily triggered.
I blame the…!!!

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

OK, Alzaebo, but part of our sorting out “what matters next” is us becoming, and being respected as, DISCIPLINED, e.g. when we assess past records, or future options (e.g. about Jews). If we let (esp. the most rabid) JQ-ers bulldoze us, into blowing off Zman’s advice on “understanding about cooperation”, we set our cause up to blunder into unnecessary hornet’s nests, like Hitler got himself into, when his broke his pact with that “Slav-Tartar body with a Jewish head”. That big Red blob on the map looked oh so tempting to him, that he just had to dismiss the doubts… Read more »

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

Because the slavs aren’t lording it over us in a terrible, destructive way! The overlap we have with Jews is that of our secular, mostly degenerate, materialistic culture. The Jews are lords of money but make terrible lords of people.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Well, Ursula, I (and most Normies) find the claim, that THE Jews (more so than, say, wealthy WASPS) are “lording it over us in a terrible, destructive way”, to be closer to wild Speculation, than to being established as fact. If such Speculation leads to new pogroms or whatever, Slavs etc. will have much reason to fear that they’ll be next on the menu, that onslaught against them being LIKEWISE justified by new compositions of speculative “evidence” about the “destructive” conduct of these Slavs etc. When Slavs etc. learned that Unite the Right was organized etc. by guys like Angelin… Read more »

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

When I hear of JQ-ers putting *nearly* as much effort into assessing the impact of Rockefellers, Carnegies, etc. (whose impact dates to far before Jews had *any* power in the US), as the JQers put into the JQ, I may begin to take JQ-ers seriously.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

And, let’s talk about the *real* power, rather than the rich tools of power.
Did J. Edgar have to bite more cranks of Wall St.’s Jews etc., or did they have to bite *him* more?
Likewise with the Dulles boys.

Ursula
Guest
Ursula

Why are we not allowed to discuss Jews and their important roles in our government, media, institutions, etc. then? And you’re taking my criticisms out of context. Not appreciated.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Who said you can’t discuss Jews and their important roles?
All I’m saying (at this particular point) is, if you harp on Jews more than you discuss other *very* important players, you do injustice to the world’s complexity.
One German politician called Antisemitism “the Socialism of fools”.
I’m tempted to also call it “the Nationalism of fools”.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Why should Normies trust us with power, if we show ourselves to be such Fools?

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

And, please do clearly explain how I’m taking your criticisms out of context.

Hm Ol
Guest
Hm Ol

“People have looked into this and found that shorter is better than longer on-line. It’s one reason the long form essay is going away. Most people consume their content on-line, so they prefer short pithy articles.”

Lol. If the target audience is “most people” and the purpose to sell words, then size, topics, and discourse level to get optimal results are easily determined (and without differences between online or offline).
This is why the long essay (but also punctuation…) are going away: they hinder sales.

That’s not Unz’s concerns however.

Jaqship
Guest
Jaqship

Zman, have you any guess as to what Ursula was referring to, when she yesterday *accused* me of taking her “criticisms out of context”?
Seeing as she has not responded to my above request for clarification, and in light of her simultaneous straw-man charge that we are “not allowed to discuss Jews…”, I suspect that we’re seeing here a sh*t test.
But I’d be happy to be enlightened, were her beef to have any legit specifics.

Millie_Woods
Guest
Millie_Woods

Ron points to several interesting books written by fellow travelers after WWII. Unfortunately I don’t have that much time to waste.

Lergnom
Guest
Lergnom

“Unless you found a stash of old books that had been proscribed, you had to accept the official narrative at face value. ”
Too right. This is addressed in a short story published some years ago,
‘Sunrise at Coffin Rock’. It’s currently available at
http://www.angelfire.com/nv/cceducate/sunrise.html
and is the sequel to the very dark ‘Sundown at Coffin Rock’.
The Internet put paid to that information bottleneck, hopefully for good.