Voting Your Skin

Way back in the olden thymes, when Pat Buchanan was challenging Bush the Elder in the GOP primary, I found myself in a working class Irish bar talking politics. The TV in the bar was on the local news and they were doing a segment on the race. A male and female were beside me at the bar, chatting about the race. The woman said something like, “I can’t vote for Buchanan. He’s a racist and I can’t vote for a racist.” The male sort of nodded along, hoping to score some points.

I think that was the point when I began to realize politics, at least for me, was only going to be for entertainment purposes. I did not fully comprehend the implications of what was happening, but in retrospect, Buchanan’s run was the beginning of the great unraveling of the Reagan coalition. The ruling class had managed to convince working class whites that their interests must come second to the new religion. Antiracism is who we are now.

Of course, the managerial class was built on a lie. The managerial elite, particularly the corporate side of the house, hate working class Americans. They developed a particularly healthy disdain for normal white people, as seen in their jihad against companies like Walmart. This was the heart of the Sailer Strategy for Republicans to regain the edge in elections. Now it appears the Progressives are beginning to come to terms with it too.

With the 2018 midterms months away and the 2020 presidential election cycle approaching rapidly, Democrats are considering how to improve their poor showings in 2014 and 2016. The party has been debating — sometimes heatedly — how to do this. Which voters should they target? How should Democrats target them?

But here’s what’s clear: White voters have been fleeing the Democratic Party, and that’s a big reason Democrats are looking to rebound from back-to-back losses.

Whites have slowly but consistently moved away from the Democratic Party. These recent losses are on top of Democrats’ losses among Southern whites during the 1960s and 1970s after Democrats’ support of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Bill Clinton won 49 percent of the white two-party vote in 1996. Al Gore won 43 percent in 2000. John F. Kerry won 41 percent in 2004. Barack Obama won a slightly larger share in 2008, but then dropped to only 39 percent in his 2012 reelection bid. Hillary Clinton got the same percentage as Obama.

Obama was able to mask the Democratic Party’s weakness among whites by prompting record-high turnout among African Americans, as well as strong turnout from other Democratic-leaning minority groups. Hillary Clinton was unable to generate the same level of enthusiasm from racial and ethnic minorities.

What some on the Left are beginning to notice is called math. If you increase your share of a large voting block, like say white people, you get more votes that if you increase your share of a small voting block, like Hispanics. This was the point Sailer made a long time ago, one that Donald Trump took to heart in his 2016 campaign. There’s also the fact that the black vote is maxed out and the Hispanic vote has proven to be quite fickle. It takes a massive effort for the Democrats to get that vote out in strong numbers.

I used the American National Election Study data to show that many whites view the Democratic Party as moving further away from their own positions. This is true both when whites are asked to assess the positions of the parties generally and on a variety of specific issues such as government-sponsored health care and the government’s role in providing employment.

My research suggests this combination of political “sorting” and changing white perceptions of the Democratic Party has resulted in an almost eight-point swing in white vote choice. That lines up well with actual vote returns. White votes were split between the two parties about 50-50 in the 1970s — but in elections since 2000, that has become closer to 60-40 in favor of the Republican Party. Democrats might be gaining more votes from Latinos, Asians and other emerging demographic groups, but they are losing whites as a result.

Furthermore, the demographics of the white voters who are likely to support Democrats are different from the white voters who supported the Democratic Party in previous decades.

Most notably, while the Democratic Party is winning a lower percentage of whites overall, a greater proportion of college-educated whites are voting for Democrats. Attitudes on social issues in particular have become stronger predictors of voting behavior in recent elections; economic attitudes have become more important, too, but were already quite a strong predictor to start with.

The reason for this phenomenon is another temporary factor. College educated whites can afford to avoid many of the realities of multiculturalism. At least they think they can, by moving to ex-urban enclaves. That is something this study missed. The suburban white boy vote started to move toward Trump in the last election. Despite the hand-waving from the Left, these voters are waking up to the reality of the demographic age as well. It’s playing out in their neighborhoods now and they are responding accordingly.

There is also something else that left-wing analysts do not get and that is the intensity of the white response. In the South, whites are much more keenly aware of race and therefore more attuned to voting on racial lines. When it matters, whites will come out hard for their team. The white vote is much harder to split using the normal subversive tricks. This is starting to play out on the national level as even areas close to the Canadian border are seeing violent African and Hispanic migrants dumped into their communities.

As an aside, take a look at the comments of that Post story. You see many of the usual auto-responses from people who think it is still 1968. You also see many more normal responses from people who get it. It takes time for this type of culture changes to seep into all the nooks and crannies of a society, but people are slowly waking up to the demographic reality of our age. While we still bother having elections, white people will increasingly choose to vote their skin over all other considerations.

124 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Whitney
Member
6 years ago

I’ve had a couple ‘conservative’ people say to me how happy they are about that PC wedding in England and how the little black babies in the royal family will be so cute. It completely bizarre to me that these white people are gleefully advocating for the destruction of the white race and for the harm to their own white children. I don’t understand. I don’t have any children so I don’t have any skin in the game but these people do. I can’t really chalk it up to anything except really effective brainwashing

Liberty Mike
Member
Reply to  Whitney
6 years ago

Yes, you do have skin in the game. You have other Caucasian kith and kin, some of whom must have children.

I assume that you do not want to see the destruction of the white race.

Therefore, let your voice be a bulwark against the brainwashing.

Whitney
Member
Reply to  Liberty Mike
6 years ago

I wasn’t silent

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
Reply to  Whitney
6 years ago

What was the response to your speaking? My guess is that they either tried to burn you at the stake or they ran away screaming.

Whitney
Member
Reply to  LineInTheSand
6 years ago

One of them immediately wanted to call me a racist and the other one heard me.

Dr, Dre
Dr, Dre
Reply to  Liberty Mike
6 years ago

Also, it would help if you found a nice girl to marry and have some children with. Get some skin in the game, brother!! Your country is calling you to do your part. No excuses.

Epaminondas
Member
Reply to  Whitney
6 years ago

I recently ran into a retired British couple who were taken aback because I predicted Harry and Meghan would split in a year or so, three at the most. These people are idiots. They really believe all the gush they see on TV. I’m glad my ancestors left that fog beshrouded isle centuries ago.

David Wright
Member
Reply to  Epaminondas
6 years ago

They are no worse that a lot of people in the U.S.

Teapartydoc
Member
Reply to  Epaminondas
6 years ago

I don’t think they are quite so enthralled: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XrwKRlBsDNc

Mark auld
Mark auld
Reply to  Teapartydoc
6 years ago

Loved it doc,thanks for the grin.

Eddie
Eddie
Reply to  Epaminondas
6 years ago

Eh, money and power make up for a lot. Harry does seem like a nice guy, and being married to royalty will give her lots of attention, fun vacays, etc.

I’ll give a decade before she gets bored and cashes out. I’m romantic like that.

Zeroth Tollrants
Zeroth Tollrants
Reply to  Eddie
6 years ago

5-7 years, max.

Dutch
Dutch
Reply to  Whitney
6 years ago

The British royal family is not exactly a shining light of the white thing, once you get beyond Elizabeth and Philip’s generation. A lost cause, actually.

Whitney
Member
Reply to  Dutch
6 years ago

I don’t care about the royal family but white people gushing about non-white people marrying into it is symptomatic of a larger problem.
Sometimes I think the self sacrifice of Christ is being manifest the secular descendants of Christendom but, of course, they are not divine

MBlanc46
MBlanc46
Reply to  Dutch
6 years ago

Lilibet is regal. Philip played his part spot on. How their children turned out to be such losers is a mystery. That said, there were quite a few losers in the House of Windsor.

Rod1963
Rod1963
Reply to  Whitney
6 years ago

What is wrong with Harry? Marrying a low grade mulatto of all things is stupid. Did anyone even talk to the fool about this? He pretty much could have had the pick of the little and instead went for gutter trash,. His kids won’t look like him and will not identify with his side of the family. He doesn’t get Markel went out her way to make herself look white. When the babies come they will have afros and Harry will be going WTF? And yeah I agree with the other poster, the marriage won’t last long either. Big culture… Read more »

Liberty Mike
Member
Reply to  Rod1963
6 years ago

If Harry responds to the birth of nappy headed issue borne by his negress spouse by asking WTF, perhaps a wiser, probably elder, friend or relative will, in turn, ask Harry, “WTF did you expect?”

anonymous
anonymous
Reply to  Rod1963
6 years ago

Isn’t she a bit too old to have kids anyway? They could remain childless, the best case scenario.

Zorost
Zorost
Reply to  anonymous
6 years ago

If Barry and Michael Obama managed to have kids, I’m sure these 2 will figure out a way.

Karl McHungus
Karl McHungus
Reply to  Rod1963
6 years ago

Meghan also did a lot of escort work, so poor Harry is marrying a prostitute!

Liberty Mike
Member
Reply to  Karl McHungus
6 years ago

How was she?

Did you give her a tip?

Zeroth Tollrants
Zeroth Tollrants
Reply to  Karl McHungus
6 years ago

A *strong * rumor I heard from one of my few powerful contacts, assures me that (((Steve Mnuchin))) had a go with Miss Markle, some yrs ago.

Pete
Pete
Reply to  Rod1963
6 years ago

I was in a buffet at Las Vegas. At a table close to me was a slightly bewildered-looking white guy in his 30’s sitting next to a decent-looking black gal. The rest of the table of six was taken up by her relatives, all of whom were both large and loud. I’m thinking he didn’t bother to meet her family before the wedding. I wonder if the Prince has met his in-laws….

Wolf Barney
Wolf Barney
Reply to  Whitney
6 years ago

I understand it. Many white people truly believe the answer to racial problems is for everyone to inter-marry into one “happy human race.” I actually used to believe that, (a long, long time ago) so I understand the mindset. So you take that mindset and help it along with nonstop We-are-the-world/I’d-like-to-teach-the-world-to-sing propaganda, along with making it taboo or Nazi to be pro-white, and here we are.

It’s hard to break through that conditioning, although the left piling on with their evils of whiteness campaign is helping us out. So we’ve got that going for us….

David Wright
Member
Reply to  Wolf Barney
6 years ago

Reminds me of Ursula LeGuin’s The Lathe of Heaven. Solving racism by making everyone light gray.

Gandydancer
Member
Reply to  Whitney
6 years ago

She’s no more than an octoroon. Thinking her children will “destroy the white race” is what is bizarre.

Tamaqua
Tamaqua
Reply to  Gandydancer
6 years ago

The fact that the words that have come pouring out of her mouth, as well as her commitment to racial grievance,
sounds like she considers herself to be just as black as a pure bred African when it comes to which side she’s identified with- just like mulatto Barry.

Sim1776
Sim1776
Reply to  Tamaqua
6 years ago

My wife watched the BBC broadcast. I tuned it out as I usually do when she has the remote. Every nattering nabob on there just spouted on and on about diversity and inclusion. My “favorite” was a coal black blondie who said, “that could be me!!”

Zeroth Tollrants
Zeroth Tollrants
Reply to  Whitney
6 years ago

Why don’t you have any children? Other than a medical condition, I can’t think of a good reason an adult white person wouldn’t have procreated.

Tykebomb
Tykebomb
6 years ago

The turning point for me was talking to a normal looking white girl in college, so she hadnt gone full hair all over body except her head feminist. Somehow, we got to talking about race and the welfare state in a round about way. We kept it cordial. At some point, she looked me in the eye and completely innocently said, “The more I talk about it, the more I realize white people need to die off so we can get socialism.” I was expected to nod along to this realization. All the Hispanics and the one black woman nodded.… Read more »

Karl McHungus
Karl McHungus
Reply to  Tykebomb
6 years ago

Did you bang her? My money says the African lady got her, not you.

Epaminondas
Member
Reply to  Tykebomb
6 years ago

I wouldn’t pull these people from a burning vehicle.

David Wright
Member
6 years ago

Yes whites will increasingly vote their skin color. The response by the Democrats has been and will continue to be bringing more dark skins into the country and out to the polls. I know I’m not saying anything new here but that is basically still it.

Oh, and corruption at the polling booth, that’s worth a few million votes.
In actuality Hillary probably lost big in the popular vote also,

Karl McHungus
Karl McHungus
Reply to  David Wright
6 years ago

There will be a steady reduction in dark skinned parasites, as they leave for greener pastures ) or are just repatriated to their own shit holes. Watch for white immigration to sky rocket too.

Jackson
Jackson
Reply to  Karl McHungus
6 years ago

Who is going to repatriate dark skinned parasites. There is plenty of USA blood to suck out of us before we expire. I don’t see any sign of recent immigrants leaving the USA. Much less the original dark-skinned residents. The “back to Africa” movement ended with the 1960s. The Rastafarians had it right: Marcus Garvey is prophet. All blacks should join his cult and return to Africa, as he preached. Well, that would be nice, but it’s not happening. I bet a million Jamaicans have arrived here since 1980. What’s gonna make them go back to their shithole? Certainly nothing… Read more »

David Wright
Member
Reply to  Jackson
6 years ago

I think you are wrong, the Wakandans regretted coming here and would gladly go back.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  David Wright
6 years ago

The NSA (yes, “the” NSA) vote count showed Trump winning the popular vote by 12 million, unlike the Cook County (Chicago) count used by the MSM.

WOPR
WOPR
6 years ago

The Progressives plan of dumping POC immigrants across the country is backfiring. They figured it would swing the vote for them in elections. Instead it is solidifying the white vote against them as people realize what multiculturalism means in reality.

Wolf Barney
Wolf Barney
Reply to  WOPR
6 years ago

Time is the white man’s enemy. They’re helping us out by going too fast with their POC immigration plan, along with the white privilege crusade, and race-mixed couples everywhere on TV and ads. The anti-whiteness has increased since 2016, meaning even more awakened whites voting for Trump in 2020.

Zorost
Zorost
Reply to  WOPR
6 years ago

I read a shitlib study recently which found that when counties receive non-white immigrants they suddenly start voting more Republican. The authors attributed this to racism, of course.

Din C. Nuffin
Din C. Nuffin
Reply to  WOPR
6 years ago

The White guilt vote peaked in 2004 with Obama’s election. The internet has exposed the violence of the black race that the MSM hid for years, and still obscures. The worm has turned.

Whiskey
Whiskey
6 years ago

Upper class Whites particularly women view themselves as honorary non Whites. Add in female disgust at men their equal and mass Third World immavasion and you get California.

This state used to be special. Now it a public restroom.

Dutch
Dutch
Reply to  Whiskey
6 years ago

The problem is that they see wealth and prosperity as simply something that is, and has not been earned or worked for. It is also seen as relatively bottomless, so it can be spread around and divvied up. There is a part of me that would like to see no inheritance, 100% estate tax. That would hurt the whites the most, as they are the ones who save and pass wealth on most reliably. But it would be good revenge for the sorts you are talking about. And since no one else should get my tax, stack it up on… Read more »

dad29
6 years ago

PJBuchanan was accused of being Anti-JOO, not anti-black. Like Sobran, he was read out of Polite Society for that–and all PJB did was ask the question “Do US and Israeli national interests ALWAYS co-incide”??

Also notable: he was running against G H W Bush, who was probably using his CIA (and yes, it was “his” CIA) to spy on PJB. GHW Bush was a Platinum-Card Member of the Deep State and most likely one of its top consiglieres.

Thorsted
Thorsted
6 years ago

A danish conservative journalist and author, MJ wrote a few days ago about an episode. He should be in a debat on danish national radio on immigration and multiculturalism.In the reception at the national radio he rans into a leftist he knew. The leftist spontaneously said; “Oh, fucking hell, MJ- you have been right all the time”. MJ wrote that some of the left is waking up to realise that they have seen the world as chronic teenagers .

Drake
Drake
6 years ago

Here comes Stacey Abrams to make your point.
Democrat Candidate for Reparations to Blacks and Free College for All Wins Georgia Primary for Governor.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/democrat-candidate-for-reparations-to-blacks-and-free-college-for-all-wins-georgia-primary-for-governor/

What white person with a job (and without incredible self-loathing) would vote for this?

james wilson
Reply to  Drake
6 years ago

My daughter had a more extensive education graduating from sixth grade than the average 18 y.o. black college applicant in Georgia, and her education was solid, not extraordinary. It is cruel to shine people on about their ambitions and talent. Ironically, my daughters entire twenty something generation is now dealing with that issue themselves. The world is not at their feet and they are not special.

thekrustykurmudgeon
Reply to  Drake
6 years ago

how do you give reparations. Wouldn’t it be a pain in the ass to figure out who had slave ancestors and who didn’t? What if your slavemaster was also black?

Arch Stanton
Arch Stanton
Reply to  thekrustykurmudgeon
6 years ago

The intended recipient would have to provide some form of proof. Good luck with that!

Dutch
Dutch
Reply to  Arch Stanton
6 years ago

Wait a minute. Proof of ID for reparations is discriminatory to the black communiteh.

Ursula
Ursula
Reply to  thekrustykurmudgeon
6 years ago

Anyone wanting to move from the U.S. to Africa should be given reparations, stripped of U.S. citizenship and sent away. Why tell anyone no? Think of the types who’d like to live there. Bye bye!

james wilson
james wilson
Member
Reply to  thekrustykurmudgeon
6 years ago

One trillion in reparations has already been paid since 1965, but the interest is apparently running ahead of the debt.

Arch Stanton
Arch Stanton
Reply to  Drake
6 years ago

I think the woman is spot-on with the idea of reparations. The US government grants a tax-free, lump-sum amount to every black family in the US, only on the condition that the recipient immediately renounce US citizenship and leave the US within a a year. And at least 50% of black citizens have to participate or nobody gets any money. Hell, as a taxpayer, I’d even be in favor of building settlements all over West Africa for the recipients to move to.
In the long run, the white taxpayer would save a lot of money.

Ursula
Ursula
Reply to  Arch Stanton
6 years ago

I love it. Arch Stanton for President!

Zeroth Tollrants
Zeroth Tollrants
Reply to  Drake
6 years ago

I was born in Atlanta, but I can’t wait to leave GA. The GOP is clueless to the fact GA is on the tipping point of permanently turning blue. My best guess is 2024.

Drake
Drake
6 years ago

Democrats scratching their heads and wondering why they are losing whites votes is pretty funny.

They constantly tell white people they hate them, can’t stop droning on about White Privilege (maybe the most annoying subject in the world to working-class whites), attack every institution whites value, and are actively importing their replacements.

Gee, I wonder why whitey won’t vote for you?

David Wright
Member
Reply to  Drake
6 years ago

Tucker handles this diversity cuck well here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ-o3ZT1fOs&t=838s

Spud Boy
Spud Boy
6 years ago

Democrats are the party of open borders, affirmative action and suffrage for anyone who can fog a mirror–all anti-white policies. I hope more whites wake up to this fact.

Simon
Simon
6 years ago

I seriously doubt it. In England, the white working class are still voting Labour, who sold them out to their leftist lunacy and mass immigration 40+ years ago.
Whitey, at least here, is too tribal to vote another way and too scared to be labelled a racist to vote for their skin.
Also, the main parties will lie that they will represent Whitey and once elected, favour the immigrants and minorities after the vote.

james wilson
Reply to  thezman
6 years ago

I watched the Irish loudly suffer African troops invading their public schools in yellow buses and then turn around and vote for Teddy. Every ethnic group has its distinguishing characteristics, or their wouldn’t be ethnic groups, but there is something hidden in Irish DNA that eludes me.

Liberty Mike
Member
Reply to  james wilson
6 years ago

Better that they be devoted to the drink than demagogic democrats.

Dr, Dre
Dr, Dre
Reply to  james wilson
6 years ago

I saw that too in Boston in the 1970s. It was sickening. Louise Day Hicks vs. Ted Kennedy. She was lower class and he wasn’t (although you could have fooled me with his behavior). Anyway, Southie got beaten down — helped in good part by thugs like Whitey Bulger sending in boatloads of drugs, ruining a generation of kids there. Awful Robert Mueller was on the scene, too, and made sure the FBI framed the wrong people and kept them in jail, and had on the lam Whitey as an FBI informant vs. the Italian mafia. Weird how Uber-WASPy Mueller… Read more »

Zeroth Tollrants
Zeroth Tollrants
Reply to  james wilson
6 years ago

They’re not all bad. The potato ni&&ers on my mother’s side have been in this country since the 1600s, fought in every war, and have always reliably voted correctly.
Some of them were drunks, though, I will admit.

teapartydoc
Member
Reply to  Simon
6 years ago

It’s going to take a populist.

anonymous
anonymous
Reply to  Simon
6 years ago

Voting is (supposed to be) secret. I wonder if people feel free to vote their conscience, or if their conscience is so pickled that they’re looking over their shoulder, even in the voting booth.

I’d vote differently if people could figure out my vote. In my state, people can look up what party you voted for in particular local and state elections. So, as a Republican, if as a protest, I voted for a Democrat, the entire R apparatus knows about it.

Mark Taylor
Member
Reply to  Simon
6 years ago

Sometimes I think we need to see a western country fall for people to wake up. My money’s on Sweden.

Zeroth Tollrants
Zeroth Tollrants
Reply to  Mark Taylor
6 years ago

The Belgians are neck and neck.

Dirtnapninja
Dirtnapninja
6 years ago

How ironic will it be if social justice tyranny turns whites into a monolithic voting bloc with 45% of the population.

The antiwhite coalition will eventually break up. The liberal whites and secular jews that hold it together are dying off and no one else will be able to hold it together.

Once that happens the tribal confederation will break up, and one of the factions will see this huge, seething mass of people and start to mobilise them.

Pimpkin's Nephew
Pimpkin's Nephew
6 years ago

To get away from it all, I watch ‘Me TV’ – Gomer Pyle, Hogan’s Heroes, Carol Burnett, Perry Mason, Andy and Barney, etc.

But not without a remote. The ads – targeted to us old people who enjoy such programming – are filled with black people, middle-aged white-haired lesbians; ok, sure, the ads show some guy walking away from his tractor or his barn, a white guy with twenty pounds more weight than is good for him.

The controllers can’t leave us alone even when we’re “out of it”.

Dr, Dre
Dr, Dre
Reply to  Pimpkin's Nephew
6 years ago

I hate those Blue Cross/Blue Shield advertisements, too. Always happy-clappy light-skinned black couples with “natural” silver hair, skipping along on some nature trail. This has never happened. The ads refuse to show giant pubescent gorilla girls like the ones you see at Wal-Mart wearing flourescent leggings and sandals revealing their horrible flat feet, or the dusky skinny “yout” with the falling-down pants, orange socks and soccer sandals, and the latest “flowerpot” haircut, carrying his 10 month old offspring while he picks up something for dinner. Why don’t the insurance companies feature these very real folks?

Member
6 years ago

People will continue to vote their interests. For whites, it’s less about skin color than things like basic law and order…which do happen to coincide with race, but most white people wouldn’t put it that way even if deep down it’s what they think. Hispanics are going to get neutralized because it’s a phony, made up, Government category. There are black people who are “Hispanic”. There are white people who are “Hispanic”. There are the Mexican dirt farmers who are “Hispanic”. From a political polling point of view, “Hispanic” simply means “people with a Spanish language heritage or surname WHO… Read more »

Eddie
Eddie
Reply to  hokkoda
6 years ago

This, all of it … except for failing to mention that the reality is that whites are the only racial group where the clear majority falls into category #1.

You’re right that the Pubs don’t need to identify as the “white party,” and that they can pull off meaningful fractions from other groups … but it’ll never be more than a fraction.

Member
Reply to  Eddie
6 years ago

I agree, but if you really want to just torture the Progs, start stripping away their core voters. That would just tear them up and drive them crazy. Plenty of “Hispanics”, Asians, and Blacks willing to vote to put their country ahead of the plutocrats.

Rod1963
Rod1963
Reply to  hokkoda
6 years ago

You make one mistake. Whites have no real political representation. Prior to Trump the GOP was ready to pass amnesty and TPP and roll out the red carpet for Hilary. Basically slit our collective throats. Trump is the only thing holding the GOP from reverting back to the open border, free trading mega-cucks they were before. When he’s gone. They will revert and collapse as a party. Look the GOP has always been hostile to white blue collars and the middle-class. This is why the Democrats had a lock on their votes up until NAFTA. Look at the way the… Read more »

Eddie
Eddie
6 years ago

Another part of this that was foreseen by the right but not the left is that as nonwhites increasingly dominate the Democratic Party, even whites who are liberal are going to start feeling excluded. Just this morning there was a thing in the paper about “students of color” at Georgetown holding an event and ordering their “white allies” not to attend. That kind of thing is happening more and more, and it’s not hard to see how even the most perfectly progressive soyboys are going to start understanding that no matter what they say or do they will always be… Read more »

Wolf Barney
Wolf Barney
Reply to  Eddie
6 years ago

It will get to the point soon that the Democrats won’t be able to run a white male for president. It’s going to have to be a minority or a woman. And then eventually when it’s all minorities, they’ll squabble among themselves. Asian vs. Black vs. HIspanic vs. Muslim. The Democrats have rapid demographic change in their favor, but at the same time, anti-whiteness and tribal chaos is working against them.

Ris_Eruwaedhiel
Ris_Eruwaedhiel
Reply to  Wolf Barney
6 years ago

First, the Republicans will be pushed out of power and then the white Democrats. For example, the last Republican mayor of Newark, NJ, left office on 1/1/53, the last white Democrat on 7/1/70, and since then all of the mayors of Newark were black and a light-skinned Puerto Rican.

In diverse Democratic areas, they’ll split according to race, ethnicity and religion.

Dr, Dre
Dr, Dre
Reply to  Wolf Barney
6 years ago

Also, a very thin bench of talent.

Saml Adams
Saml Adams
Reply to  Eddie
6 years ago

You just have to watch the antics that guys like Schiff and Swalwell have to engage in to even have a shot of advancing in the party. Schiff will even commit potential felonies to virtue signal how down he is with the cause. But in the end, when Feinstein croaks, he’ll get bupkis.

Zeroth Tollrants
Zeroth Tollrants
Reply to  Saml Adams
6 years ago

Schiff and Feinstein aren’t white, they’re Jewish.

TomA
TomA
6 years ago

Europe is still the bellwether indicator of how this will all play out. My guess is that some of those nations will regroup in time to save themselves and others will succumb to eventual disintegration and chaos. We should be able to observe and learn from their leading edge experience. A rebound from disaster can only occur if the society still possesses a core of able-bodied males with which to fight back. You need fitness selection to produce studs.

Dutch
Dutch
Reply to  TomA
6 years ago

I think of the EU/Western Europe as collaborationists with the Iranian mullahs, simply for their own financial benefits. “Collaborationists” with all of the ugly connotations intact and emphasized.

teapartydoc
Member
Reply to  TomA
6 years ago

Following a trip to Ukraine, Herder wrote a prediction in his diary («Journal meiner Reise im Jahre 1769») that Slavic nations would one day be the real power in Europe, as the western Europeans would reject Christianity and rot away, while the eastern European nations would stick to their religion and their idealism, and would this way become the power in Europe

https://infogalactic.com/info/Johann_Gottfried_Herder

james wilson
Reply to  TomA
6 years ago

Agree. The object of the EU was to obliterate nations and their separate cultures. But a dozen cultures speaking different languages remain as a laboratory for rebellion from the plans of their masters. It is a form of federalism that we have lost. Once a single avenue of escape is demonstrated the dam will burst. If there is a first one. That’s the game.

Tom
Tom
6 years ago

Except for LBJ, which was a special case, FDR was the last democrat to get the majority of the white vote.

Jackson
Jackson
6 years ago

The GOP should outreach to Asians by individual ethnic group. “Asians” is a particularly ridiculous grouping of people in the USA, it’s designed to make high IQ 3rd generation Japanese Americans, who are all professionals feel that they have something in common with Samoans who are FOB. Each of the main groups should be wooed independently. There is a lot of anti-Chinese feeling among many other Asians, a strategy that points out that China is trying to take over Taiwan, invading Philippine waters, threatening South Korea with their proxy the Norks, and dis-respecting Thailand – and the Dems are a… Read more »

Kodos
Kodos
Reply to  Jackson
6 years ago

Yes, the high-IQ East Asians are in a similar situation to whites in that affirmative action for blacks/Latinos hurts them. That’s at least one angle. Also I suspect the old “law and order” dog whistles might work in that most Asian groups have very low crime rates and are generally quiet and self-effacing in public. Make sure the Democrats are represented by the loudest most obnoxious black activist types (the Dems do a good job of this anyway).

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
Reply to  Jackson
6 years ago

I find exhortations for more GOP racial outreach tiresome. Republicans have been saying this at least since Reagan and failed. Is there really some undiscovered magic pitch for getting non-whites to vote GOP? Perhaps non-whites are generally ethnocentric and the GOP isn’t a vehicle for that.

The Asians are one of the best examples of this. They are smart people who have every reason to vote GOP but they vote like Hispanics. They don’t mind the higher taxes and crime that come with voting Democrat if it furthers the dismantling of the dominant white group’s political power.

Rod1963
Rod1963
Reply to  LineInTheSand
6 years ago

Bingo!!! Yes they are ethnocentric and most whites don’t understand this because they aren’t ethnocentric themselves.

Asians have no use for Sailer’s Civicism or Civic nationalism. They don’t see themselves as Americans, but Chinese, Korean, etc.

Zeroth Tollrants
Zeroth Tollrants
Reply to  LineInTheSand
6 years ago

Asians voting record-
2008- 62% D 35% R
2012- 73% D 26% R
2016- 65% D 27% R

Communists love big gov.

Rod1963
Rod1963
Reply to  Jackson
6 years ago

Excuse me, why in the hell should the GOP cater to a bunch of tribalists when they still routinely tell white blue collars and middle-class folks to FOAD with their anti-American policies that decimate the lower class whites and are responsible for many of our economic and social problems by catering to the top 5% at the expense of the rest of the country.

Rube Goldberg
Rube Goldberg
6 years ago

I appreciate the positive outlook of your posts this week, but until whites start makin lurve for having babies again, it’s all lost anyway. Maths of demographics don’t lie.

Zorost
Zorost
Reply to  Rube Goldberg
6 years ago

More white births is a good thing, however its not the be-all end-all. Without a radical change, white birth rates only lighten up the color of a future mulatto America. And what happens as the nation fills up? If you think racial problems are bad now, wait until the US population is a billion+.

J. Jeffrey Baxter
J. Jeffrey Baxter
6 years ago

“It’s not the size of the dog in the fight, it’s the size of the fight in the dog.” (Mark Twain)

Whichever “tribe” has the most “fight” in the end, will win in the end.

H Fenet
H Fenet
Reply to  J. Jeffrey Baxter
6 years ago

I think WW2 disproved that one. Who, besides Lycurgus’ Sparta, had more fight in them than Axis Germany and Japan?

Ursula
Ursula
Reply to  H Fenet
6 years ago

Russia, but at great cost.

Tim
Tim
Member
Reply to  H Fenet
6 years ago

This country, in addition to an incredible industrial plant, had a solid ruling class and a tough minded working class. Not so much now. A war of any extended nature, and this country is a grease mark on the pavement.

FaCubeItches
FaCubeItches
6 years ago

” While we still bother having elections, white people will increasingly choose to vote their skin over all other considerations.”

Lee Kuan Yew nailed it years ago: in a multicultural society, everyone votes either their race, or their religion.

BestGuest
BestGuest
6 years ago

I think the diversity über alles crowd made a mistake when they turned the corner from attempting to redress historical wrongs against the descendants of slaves to actively promoting the displacement of white people in favor of any non-white person, even recent arrivals and those in the country illegally. That caused people to “notice.”

Anonymous White Male
Anonymous White Male
Reply to  BestGuest
6 years ago

“I think the diversity über alles crowd made a mistake when they turned the corner from attempting to redress historical wrongs against the descendants of slaves”

What historical WRONGS and why were they WRONG? Was White America, which had been stabbed in the back with the 14th Amendment, WRONG because they wanted to prevent blacks from being part of the body politic? How did including them BENEFIT Whites? And is that any different than what any other culture that has promoted their own ethnicity has done throughout the History of Mankind? Please discuss.

BestGuest
BestGuest
Reply to  Anonymous White Male
6 years ago

Okay. I believe that the capturing, transporting, and extracting the labor of people without their consent or remunerating them (i.e., Slavery) is a moral wrong. What happened in the 19th century–the 14th and the offer of return to Africa–is a done deal. The “should have picked your own d*mn cotton” argument is irrelevant. Nobody gets to know what might have been. Many waves of immigration have not benefited the descendants of the founders or their wish to bequeath this country to “our posterity.”
There was and is no immigrant metropolitan area that’s embraced the constitution. So what’s your big idea?

Anonymous White Male
Anonymous White Male
Reply to  BestGuest
6 years ago

You completely avoided the question. This is what you said: “I think the diversity über alles crowd made a mistake when they turned the corner from attempting to redress historical wrongs against the descendants of slaves” What you referred to was WRONGS against the DESCENDANTS of slaves. And yet, the only WRONG you can point to in response to my question was a WRONG done to the original Africans that were brought over here. A WRONG, I might add, that only a minority of individuals in the entire world considered a moral wrong when it happened. Try again, this time,… Read more »

Zeroth Tollrants
Zeroth Tollrants
Reply to  BestGuest
6 years ago

What about all the white slaves to the Americas, well before the Africans? Some of my ancestors came here unwillingly, as well.

Zorost
Zorost
Reply to  BestGuest
6 years ago

The problem for them is that the black hand is forever outstretched, always asking for more. In order to continue appealing to coloreds, the bribe has to constantly be increased.

Dirtnapninja
Dirtnapninja
Reply to  Zorost
6 years ago

Blackness is defined solely in terms of taking from whites.

Sidvic
Sidvic
Member
6 years ago

I would like to see a in depth analysis of South carolina voring patterns. 30% AA but consistently red. I’m not sure if the blacks fail to vote as a block or the whites vote their skin. When i examine south africa and see that many whites are still voting liberal, i lose hope. But if things flip along the lines of SC then maybe…. Not sure if there is enuf good whites to sink this ship.

Zorost
Zorost
Reply to  Sidvic
6 years ago

A big part of it is that blacks & hispanics have horrible voter turnout. Most pandering to blacks in elections is really pandering to guilty middle class whites.

james wilson
Reply to  Sidvic
6 years ago

Not expert on SA, but I have read now and again that aside from the obvious exceptions, like farmers, the white SA who understand perfectly what is coming have already left, leaving the people who are natural prey, the appeasers.

Dutch
Dutch
Reply to  james wilson
6 years ago

Financial Times had a big piece last weekend on high end homes in Cape Town and what a nice place it is. These people (elites and wannabes) have no idea what is coming. They are blind to the obvious (and they are in charge of things).

Tim
Tim
Member
Reply to  Sidvic
6 years ago

The thing that I have not gotten anout SC is that they re-elect Lindsay Graham. What kind of person does that?

Chiron
Chiron
6 years ago

I think the DNC is aware that they’re losing White votes, some Left-wing sites have been whining that a good part of the Dems running are coming from the CIA/Military and not the Bernie wing.

A.B. Prosper
A.B. Prosper
Reply to  Chiron
6 years ago

The irony is a Pro White Bernie immigration restrictionist wing would mop up the votes among Liberal Boomers and Gen Y Whites as well

Even a lot of the diversity would like a break from more diversity for while.

It won’t happen because the Democrats went corporate and are arguably more tied to lobbying money from cheap labor than the Republicans are

The perils of having mostly poor people as your baseI guess

Issac
Issac
6 years ago

The DNC and GOP still haven’t got enough policy delta between them to fill a shoe. I read this sort of agonizing as prolefeed for the old DNC reader who wants some kind of a nod to their unease. The GOP on its current trajectory can take as much power as they want and still deliver multicultural america to the DNC on a silver platter come 2024.

Richard Watson
Richard Watson
6 years ago

“Whites have slowly but consistently moved away from the Democratic Party. These recent losses are on top of Democrats’ losses among Southern whites during the 1960s and 1970s after Democrats’ support of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.” One problem; that is factually incorrect. Republicans voted in higher percentages for these bills than the Dems. debate. When the bill came before the full Senate for debate on March 30, 1964, the “Southern Bloc” of 18 southern Democratic Senators and one Republican Senator led by Richard Russell (D-GA) launched a filibuster to prevent its… Read more »

Joseph Suber
Joseph Suber
Reply to  Richard Watson
6 years ago

But LBJ pushed it and signed it, and the old Dixiecrats died off or renounced their past. The next 30 years were slow southern bleed to GOP white.

Richard Watson
Richard Watson
Reply to  Joseph Suber
6 years ago

LBJ signed it, then is quoted as saying, “I’ll have those niggers voting democrat for the next 200 years”.

Al Gore Jr. claimed his father lost reelection because he voted for the act, when in fact Gore Sr. voted against.

It’s the Dems and the media and academia (pardon the redundancy) gas lighting to change history.

Zorost
Zorost
6 years ago

And so the prophecies of Thomas Chittum proceed apace.

GU1
GU1
6 years ago

[blockquote]these voters are waking up to the reality of the demographic age as well. It’s playing out in their neighborhoods now and they are responding accordingly.[\blockquote] Yup. I’ve been red-pilled for a while, but I recently decamped my big blue city for the suburbs. I grew up in the suburbs of said city, so I am familiar with the general character, reputation, etc. of most suburbs of this city. But I was astounded by just how non-white UPSCALE suburbs have become. For fun I decided to look at the demographics of 5 of the most elite high schools in the… Read more »

Joseph Suber
Joseph Suber
6 years ago

Buchanan posting always welcome. If we ever “win” this thing we will need to find the next, better, Buchanan. Maybe his name is Fuentes. I don’t want to wait that long.

Sir Lord Baltimore
Sir Lord Baltimore
6 years ago

Z. Noticed that you linked the “One Man Crime Wave” article in the Sun. Good golly…Don’t know if this editorial by the Sun’s resident moonbat Boomer (Dan Rodericks) crossed your path. Unintentional humor of the blackest sort.
Enjoy:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/dan-rodricks-blog/bs-md-rodricks-0523-story.html

james wilson
Reply to  Sir Lord Baltimore
6 years ago

I read the link. One sentence stands out, encapsulates Prog thought. “,,,boys considered at-risk — that is, at risk of committing a crime or at risk of being the victim of one”. At risk of committing a crime.

Ace Rimmer
Ace Rimmer
6 years ago

Respectfully, Z, that’s not really math. It’s just arithmetic. Progressives have been caught living in the future while forgetting about the present.

Imagine that. Even us normies can see that clearly. Interesting times ahead.