The Crisis Of Conservatism

One of the subplots to the ongoing crisis in America is how various voices within official conservatism are struggling to come to terms with it. In the last years of the Obama administration, they were sure they had a good read on things. Their turn to run the system was coming up and they were busy getting their resumes ready for jobs within the next Republican administration. Then their plans took a direct hit from their own voters in 2016 and their thing has been taking on water ever since.

The neoconservatives, with their vermin-like rapacity, continue to focus on their project, regardless of what is happening. That means infiltrating the Biden administration through the foreign policy establishment and promoting the old-time religion through proxies like Liz Cheney and Lindsey Graham. It also means rooting out populists from the Republican ranks. From their perspective, the chaos is just another opportunity to warp the political process to their advantage.

The other side of official conservatism, the civic nationalist wing, finds itself a stranger in its own movement. The people they were sure they represented turned on them in the 2016 primary and remain hostile. The big stars of “right-wing” media now sound like Pat Buchanan, rather than Bill Buckley. Tucker Carlson is the biggest voice in official conservatism and he sounds like the people Conservative Inc ran out of their thing back in the 1980’s. Conservatism has an identity crisis.

Part of that identity crisis is the collapse of intellectual capital. The best minds on the Right are either in the grave or outside of official conservatism. Look around the organs of official conservatism and it is mostly kids repeating the old clichés. The rest are time servers who made their career by avoiding anything difficult. Part of the crisis is that there is no one around with the courage to question the orthodoxy or the grounding in political history to contextualize the current crisis.

The result is weird analysis like this from guys like David Brooks, arguing that the solution is to attack the people now abandoning conservatism. “Republicans and conservatives who believe in the liberal project need to organize and draw a bright line between themselves and the illiberals on their own side.” Those “illiberals” he claims, will “eventually turn to the strong man to salve the darkness and chaos inside themselves.” That’s paranoid madness, not analysis..

A less deranged analysis comes from fellow Times man, Ross Douthat, who seems to have spent some time listening to the swelling ranks to his Right. He points out that conservatives don’t conserve anything. This is an old observation of dissidents, going back to before Trump ran for president. Douthat repeats many familiar claims by dissidents about how liberal democracy destroys family, tradition and community, before it then consumes the ancient liberties it is supposed to defend.

Then Douthat inadvertently reveals the nature of the crisis within conservatism by framing what he thinks is the list of currents tearing through the Right. “What are we actually conserving anymore? is the question, and the answers range from the antiquarian (the Electoral College!) to the toxic (a white-identitarian conception of America) to the crudely partisan (the right to gerrymander) to the most basic and satisfying: Whatever the libs are against, we’re for.”

You cannot help but note that the one item on the list with any intellectual and popular vigor is identified as immoral. He uses the language of the Left to describe demographic realism as off limits. Maybe it is the need to signal his obedience to the Left or a genuine embrace of progressive morality, but the default position of the modern conservative is to treat demographics as automatically immoral. They rule out the problem when discussing the solution to the crisis.

The specter haunting conservatism is the specter of demographic reality, the same specter that is haunting America and the West. So-called conservatives like Douthat refuse to acknowledge it. In fact, they say it is “toxic” to point out that America will soon be a majority nonwhite country. The reason this bit of observable reality is toxic to professional conservatives is that the Progressives say it is toxic. They have anathematized any discussion of demographics.

The conservative political theorist Russel Kirk wrote, “A people’s historic continuity of experience, says the conservative, offers a guide to policy far better than the abstract designs of coffee-house philosophers.” The only way there can be a “people’s historic continuity of experience” is if the people actually exist. At its core, conservativism has always been about preserving the people, not their stuff. Once you stop conserving the people, conservatism is just an ornament in the liberal democratic garden.

Modern conservatives, rather than defending the historic American nation, defend the liberal democratic process. No matter the ends that result from that process, conservatives believe they must defend the process. The result has been a couple of generations of politics where one side defends the process while the other side works to subvert it for short term gain. Conservatives end up defending those subversions and the perversions they create become conservative principles.

Both Brooks and Douthat wonder if conservatism can exist within liberal democracy, but neither is willing to consider both answers to that question. They just assume the answer is it can, so the project is to figure out how. That blindness shows that conservatism cannot exist within liberal democracy. It must yield to the morality of liberal democracy, which will always be controlled by those who are able to muster fifty percent plus one in favor of the morality they favor.

The crisis of modern conservatism is that conservatism must begin and end with the conservation of the people. What conservatism has become is a conservation of a system that is literally destroying the people who created it. Worse yet, it has become a defense of a moral framework that is the enemy of the fundamental conservative tenet that there is an enduring moral order. Conservatism is either the opponent of liberal democracy as practiced, or it is the tool of it.

The death of modern conservatism, and its morally ambiguous traveling partner libertarianism, is a necessary step toward a genuine alternative. It is only when the fight steps out from the prevailing moral framework of egalitarianism and the blank slate that politics can return to a debate about what is in the best interest of the people. At that point, liberal democracy recedes, and the role of leaders is to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.


A new year brings new changes. The same is true for this site as we adjust to the reality of managerial authoritarianism. That means embracing crypto for when the inevitable happens and the traditional outlets are closed. Now more than ever it is important to support the voices that support you. Five bucks a month is not a lot to ask. If you prefer other ways of donating, look at the donate page. Thank you.


Promotions: We have a new addition to the list. Havamal Soap Works is the maker of natural, handmade soap and bath products. If you are looking to reduce the volume of man-made chemicals in your life, all-natural personal products are a good start. If you use this link you get 15% off of your purchase.

The good folks at Alaska Chaga are offering a ten percent discount to readers of this site. You just click on the this link and they take care of the rest. About a year ago they sent me some of their stuff. Up until that point, I had never heard of chaga, but I gave a try and it is very good. It is a tea, but it has a mild flavor. It’s autumn here in Lagos, so it is my daily beverage now.

Minter & Richter Designs makes high-quality, hand-made by one guy in Boston, titanium wedding rings for men and women and they are now offering readers a fifteen percent discount on purchases if you use this link.   If you are headed to Boston, they are also offering my readers 20% off their 5-star rated Airbnb.  Just email them directly to book at sales@minterandrichterdesigns.com.


229 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
We are all Kosh
We are all Kosh
3 years ago

I had a thought today: The purpose of BLM is to exterminate black people. No one will hire a black. Liability. No one wants to be around them. Dangerous. No one will support paying them to breed. Resentment. This might end the welfare state. I might send money to BLM! Not really, but it’s funny! The welfare state was the first iteration of BLM. Destroy their pride, destroy their soul. BLM destroys their moral claim. Woo hoo! Make them re-discover personal responsibility, or die. That is true for every one of us. I always thought Alistair Sim’s speech at the… Read more »

370H55V
370H55V
3 years ago

Douthat.

OK, here’s filler to make the comment longer.

ChrisZ
ChrisZ
Reply to  370H55V
3 years ago

You’re missing the brilliance of Zman’s repeated “spelling mistake.”

“Duothat” it will be hereafter. He was a very promising guy (as was Brooks), but like his fellows, he proved a yuge disappointment.

Zman, this essay is one of your strongest ever. Too late in the thread to say more, but I’m sure the subject will come up again.

ChrisZ
ChrisZ
Reply to  thezman
3 years ago

I see you corrected it. But the earlier version is too good not to own. Lay a claim before Mr. Spellcheck does.

pepelepew
pepelepew
3 years ago

From France, letter from retired soldiers, including 20 Generals. OPEN LETTER TO OUR GOVERNORS Mister President, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Government, Ladies and Gentlemen, The hour is serious, France is in danger, several mortal dangers threaten it. We who, even in retirement, remain soldiers of France, cannot, in the current circumstances, remain indifferent to the fate of our beautiful country. Our tricolor flags are not just a piece of cloth, they symbolize the tradition, through the ages, of those who, whatever their skin color or their faith, have served France and given their lives for it. On these flags,… Read more »

We are all Kosh
We are all Kosh
Reply to  pepelepew
3 years ago

So, we are not all cowards who deserve to die. Nice!

She Was A Constitution Nut
She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

Douthat “points out that conservatives don’t conserve anything”, but this claim strikes me as weak. Surely we can find something which conservatives, in the USA’s sense of the word, are good at conserving. Consider as an example the legacy of the rebellion (1775-1783) against crown and altar. It swept away the nobility in favor of populist egalitarianism led, at first, by planters and bourgeois go-getters. Still to this day we don’t have a king or queen and nobility. There was no restoration as in Great Britain after the Cromwells, though we did in time get a central bank with powers… Read more »

Brah
Brah
Reply to  She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

We have nobility, they literally call our citizen rulers by their highest government office title obtained for the rest of their lives.

We are all Kosh
We are all Kosh
Reply to  She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

That was badass.

Station Road
Station Road
Reply to  She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

The Restoration did not hand back the Royal Prerogatives to Charles II, Parliament was now the executive. It’s called “the Restoration” but it was more a settlement. Parliament was and is now the dominant institution.
The uS did not revolt against George III, it revolted against Parliament.

Bill
Bill
3 years ago

Assuming that the last presidential election was indeed stolen, the ‘democratic process’ no longer exists. So working to preserve it is like welcoming the burglar into your home. The ‘anti-racist’s’ great victory was in convincing conservatives that demographic realism is racist. They can only do this by deliberately obscuring/denying the crucial distinction between racism and race realism. It’s my hope that the stolen election has removed the blinders from the eyes of many fence-sitters who hadn’t imagined that such a thing could happen. LDS conspiracy-affirmer Joel Skousen— he emphasizes the distinction between ‘conspiracy theories’ and ‘conspiracy facts’— believes it’s too… Read more »

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Bill
3 years ago

Skousen is right again. America is hardly a democracy; it’s a Power Structure. And those in the Power Structure are our mortal enemies.

She Was A Constitution Nut
She Was A Constitution Nut
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

As I suggested just above, the established ruling class and its institutions deserve to be called the right wing, the place where one finds the conservers of the status quo, even if those people seek modifications or extensions of their system, as do the Democrats. Everyone who is not part of that ruling class and its institutions, or their loyal subjects, is not right wing but something else. Moreover, if someone wants to smash the establishment to pieces, surely such a dissident does not qualify as a member of that establishment, i.e. as part of the right wing. That person… Read more »

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
Reply to  She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

“let’s reject the totalitarian collectivism”

While I reject totalitarianism, the opposite of collectivism is individualism, and individualists get picked off by organized groups.

If there are any “experiments that have been run too many times not to learn that they lead to bad outcomes” in our country, they are that individualists get crushed.

Dinothedoxie
Dinothedoxie
Reply to  LineInTheSand
3 years ago

Pathological individualism is one of YTs weaknesses.

The Wild Geese Howard
The Wild Geese Howard
Reply to  Bill
3 years ago

Skousen’s book on strategic relocation is also pretty good.

Bill
Bill
Reply to  The Wild Geese Howard
3 years ago

Yes indeed. It played a big part in my ending up where I’m now living, on Colorado’s western slope.

Hi - Ya!
Hi - Ya!
3 years ago

“No matter the ends that result from that process, conservatives believe they must defend the process.“

Perfectly said. Same with women with a public voice, or a right to choose, or “courts have spoken.” They have bad philosophies, which lead to destruction, but the principle is so precious to them, they will go to hell with the principle, equality, the democratic process, Liberty…

It reminds me of alchemy, or witchcraft. They believe that things just work out if you say the right spell, capitalism, same thing.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Hi - Ya!
3 years ago

“It reminds me of alchemy, or witchcraft. They believe that things just work out if you say the right spell, capitalism, same thing.”

Just gotta say- oho, that’s good.
That’s very good.

Dinothedoxie
Dinothedoxie
Reply to  Hi - Ya!
3 years ago

I compared true-cons dislike of Trump to magical belief.

They’re hatred wasn’t driven by what he did, which was conservative or his intentions – which were also conservative.

Nope what made him unacceptable to them was his inarticulateness. The failure to use the right combination of words was all that mattered. Because incantations have to be uttered with perfection to cause the magical result. And Trump just couldn’t pulll it off.

Gedeon
Gedeon
Reply to  Dinothedoxie
3 years ago

MAGA and Trump as its figurehead is perceived as an existential threat to the legacy powers that be and IS an existential threat to the technocracy. What we all know now is Trump was the cleanest POTUS ever and the mighty five eyes could find nothing on him. Zero. Think about that! TPTB could only objectively criticize his vernacular and, perhaps, calculated spelling deviance. It is important that everyone understand that Soros and his ilk are esperantists, raised by the original esperantists. They fully understand what they are doing to the language and Trump’s normie vernacular is a direct attack… Read more »

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
3 years ago

Two questions: If conservatism cannot exist in any meaningful sense within liberal democracy, what is the optimal form of government in which it may flourish? Second, if conservatism is dead, what replaces it on the right side of the political spectrum?

BTP
Member
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

Monarchy

Monarchy is where we are going

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  BTP
3 years ago

In North America?

Paintersforms
Paintersforms
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

Tough sell here, true. Maybe a return to something like the Articles of Confederation. Call it separate nations if you want.

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Paintersforms
3 years ago

Seems to me that if you’re going to have a monarch, you need a history of a nobility and royal bloodlines. There are, of course, powerful families that have ruled in the US (Kennedys, Bushes, Clintons), but they’re hardly the same thing as the Romanovs, Plantagenets and Carolingians. And I’m not sure you can just conjure royalty ex nihilo.

Charles St. Charles
Charles St. Charles
Reply to  Paintersforms
3 years ago

Monarchy isn’t “sold”; it is imposed. We’re going to get it anyway. Do you think our new rulers will keep liberal democracy or representative government or constitutions or civil rights around when the facade is no longer necessary? It will be the Oppressive Reign of the DMV Lady, all around. They might even rename it “The People’s Democratic Republic of America”, but a monarchy it will be. The problem is that the people change nothing, Every revolution is fought between different factions of the elites, not the mass of people. And we, normal white legacy Americans, have no elites on… Read more »

billrla
Member
Reply to  Paintersforms
3 years ago

Yes to a confederation. It would be particularly nice for individual states to opt out of welfare (“entitlement programs”) and Social Security.

BTP
Member
Reply to  Paintersforms
3 years ago

Tougher sell to Americans than it was to Romans?

Paintersforms
Paintersforms
Reply to  Paintersforms
3 years ago

I don’t see Americans accepting a monarch, even now. Maybe recent arrivals, but not Yankee Doodle, and if we’re throwing democracy out the window, the tolerance of nakedly foreign politics goes with it.

A strongman, sure. FDR was one imo. But after a while he’d have to go. Hell, it was only 5 years ago the Bush and Clinton dynasties were rejected. Things aren’t that bad yet, but Democracy! so we still have the culture of putting up with ‘the will of the people’ until the next election.

BTP
Member
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

Why not? It came to Rome, though it hesitated to call itself that. It can come here, too.

Paintersforms
Paintersforms
Reply to  BTP
3 years ago

Romans had kings before the republic. We had a king as British subjects, but almost as soon as an American identity developed, we threw off monarchy and did our own thing.

Imo a huge chunk of American history has been about suppressing American identity. We cannot be allowed to have our own country, apparently.

Strike Three
Strike Three
Reply to  BTP
3 years ago

But there is no longer ANY divinely ordained authenticating body that can legitimize a monarchy. The current RCC is a joke. The Church of England has been a joke since the coronation of Elizabeth II. The state Lutheran churches of Germany and Scandinavia aren’t even Christian anymore; they are merely wokeism in a cassock.

If a monarchy is no more than “a rule of one”, then I guess you could have an ersatz king or queen pop up somewhere or other. Insofar as he has any real power and authority, it will be from Below, not from Heaven.

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Strike Three
3 years ago

“Insofar as he has any real power and authority, it will be from Below, not from Heaven.”

Queen Latifah?

BTP
Member
Reply to  Strike Three
3 years ago

I don’t know why people think a monarchy needs the Church to authenticate it. Rome’s monarchs never had that, neither did the barbarian tribes that took over after the western empire disbanded.

Martin Luther
Martin Luther
Reply to  Strike Three
3 years ago

I’d say the Catholic church has just returned to form: it’s mostly always been a joke.
The European countries with superior cultural ambitions turned from it when a more christian alternative appeared.

Dinothedoxie
Dinothedoxie
Reply to  BTP
3 years ago

We’re headed to a dictatorship like the Roman imperial system. Not a monarchy.

Charles St. Charles
Charles St. Charles
Reply to  Dinothedoxie
3 years ago

A dictatorship is a monarchy (rule by one).

Dinothedoxie
Dinothedoxie
Reply to  Charles St. Charles
3 years ago

No, monarchy is hereditary rule.

Dictatorship can have hereditary elements – or not. The emperors of Roman were not inherently hereditary. In 1400 years of the imperial system less than 1/4were hereditary. The overwhelming majority were generals that overthrew their predecessor. Followed by non related successors appointed by the predecessor or military with a few installed in palace coups along the way. In all that time the longest dynasty only lasted four generations – most were done in two.

KGB
KGB
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

The Chinese system is one thought, whereby the Party leaders have to prove their mettle within ever-widening circles. A man like Jiang Zemin served as mayor then Party Secretary of Shanghai during the Tiananmen era, but avoided the bloodshed of Beijing by clamping down early on protests. Already a member of the Politburo, he was made General Secretary of the CCP and elevated to the Politburo’s Standing Committee and would be slowly accorded more power by Deng Xiaoping until he was unquestionably the leader of the CCP’s “Third Generation”. It’s almost a corporate structure. In some sense, it harkens back… Read more »

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  KGB
3 years ago

So, a one-party state with that party comprised exclusively of DRs?

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  KGB
3 years ago

Remarkably prescient.
The fusion of dynasty and corporatism- a Corporate State.

I can see this replacing voter democracies, just as federal governments replaced Westphalian monarchial empires in the 4 years of WW1.

(North America or the Anglo-Dutch Colonies as the Arian Goths, then? A footprint, but the people are no more?)

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

“if conservatism is dead, what replaces it on the right side of the political spectrum?” As the comments display, many people are attracted to monarchy. While I am would accept monarchy, I fear that regression to the mean is a problem. That is, a great king will often have mediocre sons. This is not a deal breaker because all theories of government have problems. My guess is that what most of our people want is a government that has its explicit purpose to be something like the flourishing of white families. No other value is higher. Not the economy, not… Read more »

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  LineInTheSand
3 years ago

In posing that question, I was less concerned with the form of government than with the ideology or political stance that replaces conservatism. But, perhaps in the new form of government–presumably monolithic–there will be no ideology.

Gedeon
Gedeon
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

The short answer is I wouldn’t be firmly committed to a permanent collapse, or end, to a Constitutional republic. It is rational to believe some strong men will get together to do the hardest work and that they will decide just how much influence women will have in a future republican government. FWIW, the systemically damaging demographic is the Karen, not the orc or zombies. BLM and ANTIFA could be ended tonight if philosopher man told Karen to go find the oven, make something tasty, clean up and wait for me in the bed in something sexy. The female race… Read more »

Gedeon
Gedeon
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

Military dictatorship until the purge is complete and a constitutional convention is held to increase powers of the President, Senate is restored to state legislations and a justice of the SCOTUS can be terminated.

It will be similar to Sulla restoring the republic.

Rwc1963
Rwc1963
3 years ago

Speaking of Tucker, Torba at Gab has a post from him that echos Z and most here.

https://gab.com/a/posts/106137352540372580

Tucker is well aware of the predicament Whites are in and knows the system is collapsing.

JR Wirth
JR Wirth
Reply to  Rwc1963
3 years ago

I’m almost there…..just one….more…year….

I’ve always found that life gives you the breaking point you need. It’s hard to change things up midstream.

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
3 years ago
Ssbishop
Ssbishop
Member
Reply to  thezman
3 years ago

You mean like the new ‘red flag’ on guns they want to pass? One could be prohibited from acquiring a gun for whatever reason by whoever, and then your name might just be scooped up and go on the DHS list.

Gedeon
Gedeon
Reply to  Ssbishop
3 years ago

I just keep buying to see how it goes. There is good steel hitting the market again if you know what and where to look.

JohnWayne
JohnWayne
Reply to  Ssbishop
3 years ago

They know what you have, but what if you lost it or it was stolen and you file a report? Pay cash for ammo. 😉

Gedeon
Gedeon
Reply to  JohnWayne
3 years ago

I learned math, organization, asset protection, and trading through a baseball collection starting at age 4. I don’t approach 2a implements as just tubes of steel and and aluminum anymore than I did baseball cards as paper or photographs. I own many NATO coins and buy by the case. As long as you have no corrosive primers, the shelf life is very long, it stacks and stores efficiently and has an atomic mass that is within about 5% of gold. If you can hoard gold coins and bars, you have no excuse because 55 grains works out to $8.73/ozt. at… Read more »

Gedeon
Gedeon
Reply to  JohnWayne
3 years ago

I will add that since April 2018 I have made it a personal mission to proselytize AR ownership and operation. I have yet to meet anyone who does not like shooting one and anyone can still afford one who can pass a NICS check. The black rifle can be a little scary, but exciting to the gun virgin. At about 1/10th the recoil of a 12 gauge shotgun, they are much more pleasant to shoot and very manageable for a woman to operate if you are the gambling type. There is a reason the Pentagon buys them and the control… Read more »

JR Wirth
JR Wirth
3 years ago

“Look around the organs of official conservatism and it is mostly kids repeating the old clichés.” – And look at who they’re related to. One by one, if you read each name and bio, it’s someone with a parent who made their bones in the Reagan era or even before. Almost none of them are fresh-off-the-street “conservatives.” Conservative Inc. is not only a family business, it’s an inherited one. And much like a restaurant that had good food in 1980 and now serves something that’s been under a heat lamp for 30 years, and roaches under the tables, it’s going… Read more »

JR Wirth
JR Wirth
3 years ago

Today’s post should be the preamble to the future strong man government that will emerge. The one they’re so frightened of.

B125
B125
Reply to  JR Wirth
3 years ago

I’ve always thought that if a strong man does emerge, he will be a Latino. Most likely with large support from the prole whites.

Import the third world become the third world can go both ways.

Either way, I’m not letting some hypothetical future scenario affect my actions right now, as I said below. We need to do what we need to do, no matter what.

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  JR Wirth
3 years ago

Re: David Brooks, if it’s a choice between Western civilization under the thumb of a strong man, or Third World savagery rouged up with liberal democracy, then it’s really no choice at all. Brooks and his fellow weasels and invertebrates can go with the latter; I’ll take the former.

Gedeon
Gedeon
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

Brooks is a tribesman and on narrative. I had business dealings with E. Wallison, son of P. Wallison at AEI, who was their emissary. Wallisons are Cohens of Ukrainian extraction.

Thinking it’s going to be a Latino or Han is just a product of demoralization. Cheer up my man; go bend the old lady over and give it to her good. You will feel much better after.

Gedeon
Gedeon
Reply to  Gedeon
3 years ago

I read my comment and should add that Brooks was a subject of EW and I’s conversations as he was bartering Brooks to me.

B125
B125
3 years ago

It’s hard to say if people like Brooks are losing on purpose or not. His people have been feeling the pressure lately too, according to acquaintances from that community. Apparently Arabs, Africans, and Latinos don’t respect (or even know about) the Holocaust victims. The gentile conservatives basically have to be raging leftists now or else be accused of white supremacy. This is one reason I’m not too concerned about overall demographic % of whites, or what some writers say or don’t say. I know what needs to be done on the ground level and I’m working to carry it out.… Read more »

B125
B125
Reply to  B125
3 years ago

Also, please get in shape and dress well, nobody will listen to a fat fuck in real life.

Stop filling your body with toxic junk, sold to you by anti white corporations like Coca-Cola or McDonalds.

JohnWayne
JohnWayne
Reply to  B125
3 years ago

In short, eat infrequently and eat keto.

Walrus Aurelius
Reply to  B125
3 years ago

Lift, honor Christ, eat real food, make friends, prepare. All we can do now.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Walrus Aurelius
3 years ago

Indeed- the Spirit, as all else, is downstream from biology.

(It is the nascent seed of biology, as well.)

Glenfilthie
Glenfilthie
Member
Reply to  B125
3 years ago

That’s one hundred thumbs up right there. May I add another one? Your ballot may not be worth anything… but your $$$$ are. Send your political hack a letter of termination. It’s amazing how many people will rant for pages on the internet but won’t send a letter to their politico. Be reasonable and courteous like our esteemed blog host. Tell them what ticks you off and tell him he won’t be getting your vote. Don’t be fooled – letters like that scare the living chit out of those guys. They want their place at the trough if nothing else.… Read more »

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Glenfilthie
3 years ago

You know, I’ve never sent a letter to a politician. But you’ve inspired me to do so.

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

Check out numbersusa.com. They have an efficient fax and email system for contacting your representatives.

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  LineInTheSand
3 years ago

Thanks, mi amigo. That’s exactly what I’m looking for.

Hi - Ya!
Hi - Ya!
Reply to  B125
3 years ago

I’ll take someone receptive to “anti white”. To most Whites, they look at you as if you just said the sun revolves around the earth if you ay there’s an anti White agenda

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Hi - Ya!
3 years ago

May have been true five years ago. Nowadays? I don’t think so.

Cameron
Cameron
3 years ago

Re: Buchanan and even Tucker you wonder if they are crypto white nats. Buchanan used to come close (sometimes he sounded like Jared Taylor). He seemed to go just as far in describing the problem – he just never talked much about solutions. Buchanan was close friends with Sam Francis who was explicitly pro white. I think Tucker has given props to revolver which links to Vader. The thing is if they were explicit like you z, they would be destroyed, – no public voice whatsoever. Buchanan managed to keep his spot on MSNBC for some time and kept his… Read more »

Cameron
Cameron
Reply to  Cameron
3 years ago

Vdare – damn phone correcting me

Bilejones
Member
Reply to  Cameron
3 years ago

What ever did we find to blame before our phones knew (or thought they knew) English Grammar?

Ben the Layabout
Ben the Layabout
Reply to  Cameron
3 years ago

“Darth Vdare.”…hmmmm… 😈
Would probably risk a call from Disney attorney…

Cameron
Cameron
Reply to  Cameron
3 years ago

Ok so not Tucker I’m afraid. Just saw an interview with him quoted on the oz conservative website. Tucker’s real in to the “wanting to live somewhere where you’re seen as an individual not a color” thing. Would be nice if it were a smokescreen.

It was fun to try to link him to vdare but alas.

OffByOne
OffByOne
Reply to  Cameron
3 years ago

Tucker has had Beattie (the guy behind revolver) on his show.

Beattie is quite good, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he lurked this site, or related ones.

Cameron
Cameron
Reply to  OffByOne
3 years ago

Revolver also has links to Steve Sailer on a regular basis.

Gedeon
Gedeon
Reply to  Cameron
3 years ago

Tucker wears a bow tie when not in a tuxedo…

Paul Bonneau
Paul Bonneau
3 years ago

“It is only when the fight steps out from (1) the prevailing moral framework of egalitarianism, and (2) the blank slate, that politics can return to a debate about what is in the best interest of the people.”

I have modified the above statement to be more clear, although I am far from sure the end result is what the author intended.

Also, I get nervous whenever someone brings up a phrase such as “the people”. It begs the question, “What people?” Not every human being has the same interests as the others. And who speaks for “the people”, anyway?

Evil Sandmich
Evil Sandmich
Reply to  Paul Bonneau
3 years ago

A related aside, back in the day I had several black people tell me that “Jesse Jackson does not speak for all black people!”, even though, you know, Jesse Jackson speaks for all black people.

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Evil Sandmich
3 years ago

A Hutessa once informed me that not all blacks listen to rap. Yeah, right.

Gedeon
Gedeon
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

The sophisticated and boomer high status blacks listen to miles Davies, Louis Armstrong and other black jazz names. I once knew a man named George Daniels in Chicago. He would sit down with his little white dog on the patios of Carmine’s and Tavern on Rush. I learned a lot during my Chicago period. Jesse Jackson used to eat at Rosebud on Taylor Street. Many or most urban blacks know Jesse is a grifter, but they all fall into line when it matters. Rather than asking the question, “is this good for Jews” they ask the question, “will this hurt… Read more »

Gedeon
Gedeon
Reply to  Gedeon
3 years ago

https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/george-daniels-chicago?phrase=george%20daniels%20chicago&sort=mostpopular

These photos only scratch the surface of George’s influence, but JJ is pictured among them. George’s wife was actually RK’s manager. Having personally discussed RK with prominent as well as the bourgeoisie of Chicago’s black community, they distinguish between the R&B performers as the “artists” and the hip hop performers. Within hip hop, they distinguish between pop performers like Kanye and Drake and the gangster performers like JayZ, Dre and Suge Knight names.

Generally speaking, you can learn something about an urban black if you ask them if they like Kanye or JayZ.

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
Reply to  Paul Bonneau
3 years ago

Paul, your question, “What people?” is foundational. I’ll just mention two conclusions that I have come to. For non-whites race is more powerful than values. Yes, you can find a few outlier non-whites who don’t put the dominance of their race before any political values that they profess, but they are few and difficult to identify. For example, find me a black Republican who didn’t vote for Obama. With the exception of a few outliers, your skin is your uniform. Many whites are anti-white. I believe that a lot of them are conformists who can be saved if the anti-white… Read more »

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  LineInTheSand
3 years ago

I’d estimate that roughly 1/3 of whites are our enemies. For all intents and purposes, they might as well be black. Unfortunately, they’re on average quite a bit more intelligent than almost all blacks, and that makes them more dangerous.

Ben the Layabout
Ben the Layabout
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

When the culling finally starts, it will be death to the enemy and collaborators, race notwithstanding. I’d expect the same for our side.

JohnWayne
JohnWayne
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

True. But, white people at least have the potential to be white. Life is too easy now. Come crunch time, these black whites may show their true color. Chameleons change their color when threatened.

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  Paul Bonneau
3 years ago

On this blog, “the people” means white people. All others are free to make their own way in the world to the best of their ability. They are simply not our concern.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Paul Bonneau
3 years ago

That is THE question.
Ask them. ASK them- “ok, who do you mean by ‘the people’?”

I didn’t say demand an answer or deliver one. Just plant the seed, let them or others chew on it for themselves.

Paintersforms
Paintersforms
3 years ago

“Duothat repeats many familiar claims by dissidents about how liberal democracy destroys family, tradition and community, before it then consumes the ancient liberties it is supposed to defend.”

It’s almost as if society is a recursive loop of that fundamental unit— the family. Almost as if things like patriarchy, blood, and soil aren’t just the fever dreams of racist badmen.

Almost as if classical liberalism was supposed to be the immune system of the body politic, run out of control these days. Brings to mind all the talk of the wonder shot and ADE. Just daydreaming…

Paintersforms
Paintersforms
3 years ago

“Republicans and conservatives who believe in the liberal project”

Did anyone else hear the laugh track when they read that?

3 Pipe problem
3 Pipe problem
3 years ago

I can’t do any better than Z’s money quote:
“What conservatism has become is a conservation of a system that is literally destroying the people who created it.”
That is a cold, hard truth that must be confronted. Until then, the operative phrase is, “and so it goes.”

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  3 Pipe problem
3 years ago

I’ll tie it to this: “Brings to mind all the talk of the wonder shot and ADE.”

Reintroduction to foreign bodies has made the social organism’s autoimmune system overreact.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Alzaebo
3 years ago

Excusee. “Reinfection” may be a better word.

Milestone D
Milestone D
3 years ago

David Brooks lives in DC. Maybe physically, certainly spiritually. And that’s enough to explain his thought-process. To be truly culturally conservative here is be un-person’d. That’s why my neighbor here in Chevy Chase is speaking to me in hushed tones *in his own front yard* when making reference to the People’s Republic of Montgomery County in context to their recent ban on lawn fertilizer (seriously). Since everything here is political, and thus related to both identity and employment, you cannot both threaten the Company and maintain a social/work life here. There is no way Brooks can simultaneously inhabit spiritual DC… Read more »

Bilejones
Member
Reply to  Milestone D
3 years ago

Brooks and Goldberg (and the late unlamented Will) will say whatever their whore-mongers tell them to say.

D'shunemployable
D'shunemployable
3 years ago

Tucker dips his toe in the dissident water, then recoils back to safe civnatism.

He had Pete D’Abrosca on exactly once for a 2 minute segment. Then never again on the show.

After the bloody nose he gave the ADL the other day, he seems to be content that they have kinda sorta left him alone since. He should have followed up with a full one hour exposé on ADL, then SPLC, then AEI. Go for the jugular while they’re reeling. Let people connect the dots, if needed.

Aside, anybody notice how the AEI logo resembles a Mideastern font?

The Wild Geese Howard
The Wild Geese Howard
Reply to  D'shunemployable
3 years ago

I understand your points, but I find myself unable to agree.

Carlson is useful as a pink-piller in the MSM. If he gets some normies thinking for themselves, that’s a win.

No one else in the MSM is saying anything similar.

I think a similar argument applies to Sailer, who is useful as a boatman that ferries pink-pillers to this side of the divide.

B125
B125
Reply to  The Wild Geese Howard
3 years ago

Here’s a guy that openly discussed white racial replacement on the largest TV network in the country and some guys are complaining he didn’t go far enough. Unbelievable.

He’s testing the waters. Go too far and Tucker, and maybe his whole family might disappear one night or have a tragic carbon monoxide incident.

BTP
Member
Reply to  The Wild Geese Howard
3 years ago

I don’t think it’s controversial to observe that he is at the very absolute limit of what could possibly be said on American television. One inch further and he is fired, to be replaced with a younger version of Sean Hannity.

Would he _want_ to move that inch? Who cares?

Rwc1963
Rwc1963
Reply to  D'shunemployable
3 years ago

If Tucker pushes it he will be gone like Lou Dobbs and we would lose our best red piller. Lets face it the DR has near zero personalities that can do outreach like Tucker can among the normies.

American Citizen 2.0
American Citizen 2.0
Reply to  D'shunemployable
3 years ago

I am not a fan of how people refer to the call-and-response back and forth in the media and on twitter as “slamming” or, as you say, “giving them a bloody nose”, or “punching back”, etc. Tucker Carlson made a statement about Immigration. The ADL called for him to be punished for it. He responded that he is not going to be cyber-bullied off the air basically. Oh but if only he had in fact given that ADL guy Greenblatt a bloody nose. That would be progress. But people are just saying crazy stuff in the media to provoke their… Read more »

Ostei Kozelskii
Member
Reply to  American Citizen 2.0
3 years ago

There’s this thing called the paragraph. Perhaps you’ve heard of it?

American Citizen 2.0
American Citizen 2.0
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

This isn’t a 4th grade book report. Your conformity to white male cis-normative writing styles only proves the limitations on your capacity to think. Even the bible was a continuous wall of text until someone like you came along and decided to add punctuation and number the lines, in contravention of the sacred word. Obviously.

Give it a rest man, your comments are usually pretty lame regardless of formatting.

3 Pipe problem
3 Pipe problem
Reply to  Ostei Kozelskii
3 years ago

Obviously, from the response, he thinks using proper grammatical construction is a sign of blatant White patriarchy.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  D'shunemployable
3 years ago

“D’shunemployable”! LOL

nailheadtom
nailheadtom
3 years ago

” It is only when the fight steps out from the prevailing moral framework of egalitarianism and the blank slate that politics can return to a debate about what is in the best interest of the people.” The best interest of the people, in collective terms, is the continued health and prosperity of the banking industry, just as it has been for a very long time. A few years ago then Fed head Janet Yellen expressed public dismay over low oil prices which were, according to her, idling thousands of oil field trash. Of course her real concern was that… Read more »

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
3 years ago

Brooks isn’t a conservative, never was. Well, he’s a conservative in that he wants to conserve his people, and he’s noticing that the destruction of whites – both demographically and politically – might not be reaching a point of diminishing returns, if not turning negative, i.e. “Not good for the Jews.” Douthat seems to be recognizing that the conservative whites were the only thing holding back the Dictatorship of Democracy, a particularly terrifying thought when you realize that the voters are blacks and browns who just don’t seem to be picking up the Anglo-Saxon love of the rule of law.… Read more »

B125
B125
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 years ago

The whites who will be surviving the new Brazil / South Africa / Yugoslavia (and that’s the best case, simply staying alive) will be the Dissident types. Armed, organized, connected, and ruthless. There’s really only three ways whites have a community the days – church, gun range, or family. We’re quickly seeing that the Anglo Saxon law system doesn’t work in a country bereft of Anglo Saxons. The rule of law will degrade further and the Latino gangs start baring their teeth. These animals only respond to bullets, not old Jewish men pompously reading something some gringos wrote 300 years… Read more »

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
Reply to  B125
3 years ago

Yeah, it’s stunning that Jews didn’t realize a long time ago that flooding the West with blacks and browns just to spite gentile Whites would wind up hurting Jews.

But, hey, Jews aren’t the most self-aware people on the planet. They’ve also fully bought into the holocaust story so they think that anything is better than gentile Whites.

BTP
Member
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 years ago

Hatred can impair prudence, I’ve noticed.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 years ago

Proto-Jews used African beast-men as shock troops to destroy Aryan-descended Mesopotamia in 2500 BC, and haven’t looked back since.

In 200 generations of cousin marriage, that essence is distilled and bone deep.

RoBG
RoBG
Reply to  B125
3 years ago

You might enjoy this article: The Vanishing Anglo Saxon https://bit.ly/3aIlE7h. Written by an immigrant who doesn’t hate us.

Screwtape
Screwtape
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 years ago

Conservativism, civnattery with their paperwork americans, zionist “judeo-Christian” concoctions, and all the rest are all just about putting honey in the hemlock. Shaken or stirred. Take your pick. All sides agree on one thing: to be a real american, you must drink up. These soymales see what is coming as do we. So their productions of “(not) who we are” are increasingly difficult to pull off. They struggle to both acknowledge the approaching hellscape that is downstream of our destruction while also avoiding acknowledging us as a People and our right to exist as such. Sweetening our suicide was easier… Read more »

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
Reply to  Screwtape
3 years ago

I joined Gab a few months back. Nothing to do with the Capitol stuff, just decided to join. Anyway, it’s stunning how many CivNats came over to Gap after the Capitol. They were expecting a warm welcome compared to Twitter, but they’re getting roasted by the DR.

Colorblind CivNats have no home. First, their strategy doesn’t work, so it’s pointless. The Dems hate them and are winning. The DR thinks that they’re morons and coward, and we destroy their arguments, making them look stupid.

Colorblind CivNat is a suicide cult and that’s becoming more and more obvious.

3g4me
3g4me
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 years ago

Citizen – I don’t do any social media, but it’s good to hear the DR on gab don’t hold back. In the short time you’ve been on gab, have you noticed that the DR is having any effect on the civnats other than embarrassing them? Specifically, do the civnats even understand what they’re being accused of, or that their basic tenets are the same as those of the left? Or do they merely cry “rayciss” and pout about incivility?

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
Reply to  3g4me
3 years ago

Not sure that the DR is having an effect on them. In part, we should be more patient with the CivNat, but their moral superiority makes that a bit hard. You really have two types of CivNat over there. First, the patriotic CivNat who views being colorblind as part of being an American. They hate the Left because of policies and because “they are the real racists.” I do think that we can get some of these guys with time and patience. They’re slowly realizing that their strategy of having no team isn’t working against the Left, even if they… Read more »

Evil Sandmich
Evil Sandmich
Reply to  3g4me
3 years ago

Citizen missed the third type: the LARPer. The conversation inevitably goes like this:
Q: “Why then as a white person do you hate white people so much?”
A: “Lol, I’m not white”

Captain Willard
Captain Willard
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 years ago

Yes, this makes sense. But the DR needs to have more patience with the CivNats because they’re the logical recruits for the DR. The CivNats are in a crisis of denial, just like kids who’ve been told there is no Santa, nor milk nor cookies either…..

The grief and acceptance come soon after this phase. It’s a process.

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
Reply to  Captain Willard
3 years ago

I agree, even that I don’t always practice what I preach. Instead of telling them that they’re stupid for being colorblind, we need to walk them through how it’s not working and how it’s not so terrible to love your own people.

However, they are pretty insufferable. They definitely love being your moral better by calling us racists. Hard to keep your cool when they act like that.

3g4me
3g4me
Reply to  Captain Willard
3 years ago

Captain Willard: In my (admittedly) limited experience, the religious civnats are equally adept as the left when it comes to cognitive dissonance. On the one hand, they will rabbit on about how we’re all God’s children and how hate is corrosive and vengeance is the Lord’s. On the other hand, the more realistic ones (usually the Scots-Irish) will admit that one has a responsibility to one’s own family first, that self defense is perfectly normal and acceptable, and that Christianity was not meant to be a suicide cult. I’ve also gotten the excuse “I’ve had so many blacks/browns/etc. be so… Read more »

ProZNoV
ProZNoV
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 years ago

David Brooks divorced his wife of almost 30 years, changed religions, married his “research assistant” who was 20 years younger than him, the write a celebrated article called “The Nuclear Family Was A Mistake.”

What could possibly be more conservative than that bio, I ask you?

3g4me
3g4me
Reply to  ProZNoV
3 years ago

ProZnoV – Actually, I don’t think Brooks changed religions, he’s always been a Jevv. Both his wives converted to Judaism for his sake prior to the marriage. So the first one dumped her family and faith for him and then he dumped her. What a mensch.

Captain Willard
Captain Willard
Reply to  ProZNoV
3 years ago

I heard him speak in person at a conference a few years ago and he described his personal journey and new romance with passion and sincerity. Only Brooks could make his tale of chucking his old lady for a new, fresher piece sound like a Herman Hesse novel…..

Many in this thread have commented on his staggering lack of self awareness, but you really have to see it “live” to believe it.

Ben the Layabout
Ben the Layabout
Reply to  Captain Willard
3 years ago

Werner Erhard, the founder of the 1970s Est movement, was little different. And that’s per his official biography. Abandoned wife and family, faithless businessman, etc. Changed identity and started over. I’m ashamed to admit that I paid money to this scam artist. in the 80s, when it was called “The Forum” by Werner Erhard Associates, which could be accurately described as a mix of all the worst features of a self-help movement, a cult, and multi-level marketing. 🙁

Melissa
Melissa
Reply to  ProZNoV
3 years ago

What could possibly be more conservative?

Perhaps Brooks in a sundress, heels and lipstick-?

Charles St. Charles
Charles St. Charles
3 years ago

More true now than when it was written ten years ago.

https://www.amazon.com/Are-Doomed-Reclaiming-Conservative-Pessimism/dp/0307409597

Though he sometimes makes a case for his “Ice People” (Whites + Asians) alliance against the coming black and brown demographic tsunami, Derb knows the West is doomed. It’s not coming back. The numbers are too overwhelming and White people can’t even get it up to reproduce themselves, much less reclaim their cultures and lands.

B125
B125
Reply to  Charles St. Charles
3 years ago

The idea of whites and Asians teaming up is ridiculous. Asians, especially Chinese, resent whites due to our perceived role in the opium trade and the century of humiliation. They hate that white men sleep with Asian women so much. Just because they’re meek and polite (to you) doesn’t mean they like you. And anybody who has been over to Asians’ houses know that they are actually quite lively in private. The super meek attitude is a facade they have on while at work, on the bus, etc. Seems to be cultural. They’re also quite lively in their resentment of… Read more »

The Wild Geese Howard
The Wild Geese Howard
Reply to  B125
3 years ago

People who think the Germans had an ethnic superiority complex have never dealt with the unvarnished sentiments of Han Chinese, Japanese, or Koreans.

She Was A Constitution Nut
She Was A Constitution Nut
Reply to  B125
3 years ago

You describe the character and mentality of the passive-aggressive: They are mostly reticient in public, for now, but are hostile in private.

The males resent us, I’m sure, for the fact that we offer the females, in many cases, an opportunity to enjoy a much larger tool without the extreme social disgrace of burning coal in bed with a low IQ semibonobo. This combination of characteristics makes us serious mating rivals in a way that few of semibonobos can be.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  B125
3 years ago

Ridiculous, sure- but still, it’s happening, an unlikely a pairing as Siberian Denisovians pairing with Euro Cromagnons to create the mestizo New World.

Nature’s scale is patience; Creation keeps trying new combinations. All to effect fulfillment of the final function of a living world- the Seeding, the Heaven unlocked by the Whites and their Christ-like Spirit.

TomA
TomA
Reply to  Charles St. Charles
3 years ago

Low birthrate is a consequence of long term affluence & its consequent extinction of fitness selection culling. As any population persistently accrues DNA contamination, nature’s response is either colony collapse or hyper-selective mating behavior by females. So what is the best way to reintroduce fitness selection culling is the modern era? Boy-o-boy, talk about a toxic taboo subject for public debate!

Bill
Bill
Reply to  Charles St. Charles
3 years ago

John Derbyshire is a genius!

And a big fan of the Z-man, I first heard of him from the Derb

RoBG
RoBG
Reply to  Charles St. Charles
3 years ago

The stat people should bring up whenever somebody mentions “minorities” is that white people ARE a global minority making up a smaller population worldwide (12-15%) than many groups benefitting from affirmative action in the European and European diaspora countries.

TomA
TomA
3 years ago

All across the West, Elite Inc. & its lapdog politicians are pushing as hard as they can to force a violent explosion within their nation’s ancestral population. Yes, this is madness, but it is reality nonetheless. Why they do this is beside the point. They have become the root problem. And at some point that will become obvious to a critical mass of the public. They fear the pitchfork mob storming the gates of the citadel, but what if a different remedy occurs? One that exploits their greatest weaknesses and is extremely difficult to defend against. What if the antibodies… Read more »

Evil Sandmich
Evil Sandmich
Reply to  TomA
3 years ago

That’s a pretty decent one today.

Corinthian Leatherface
Corinthian Leatherface
3 years ago

Here’s to a new column entitled ‘The Conservative Case for Embracing White Identity’.

tashtego
Member
3 years ago

What is the shape of a plausible future configuration of human organization? One perspective I take on things is recognizing there is some finite carrying capacity of the planet for its human population. Coupled with the true “dismal science” of HBD and what it reveals about the potential and capabilities of genetic populations a lot of policies being pursued do have a certain consistency and logic. The material wealth generated through advances in technology has enabled the explosive growth of populations that could never have generated it nor could they sustain it. Obviously you can’t have representative government working with… Read more »

joey jünger
joey jünger
3 years ago

The short answer to what is killing conservatism in America is “America.” But you cannot tell that to people who spent most of their lives in the twentieth century, even if they’re conservative. They’ve been bred to believe “America” is great, and the solution to all problems. America is a staggering zombie, a reanimated version of a loved one. It looks like your dead grandma, and as it lumbers toward you it plays on your heart strings, but if you get too close, you get bit and and you’re toast, too. How do we get normies to accept that America… Read more »

tashtego
Member
Reply to  joey jünger
3 years ago

As someone that spent the better part of my life so far in the 20th century one of the most disorienting things about today’s America is that it embodies everything we were raised to think it was worth nuking the whole world to prevent. I wonder how many of my coevals have the same outlook.

She Was A Constitution Nut
She Was A Constitution Nut
Reply to  joey jünger
3 years ago

Let’s keep the land, and extirpate the Columbians. Here is a depiction of the whore, Columbia: Her District (https://dc.gov/) we must abolish as a separate political entity apart from the rest of Maryland, which has a repugnant name, I would add. As it turns out, the Democrats have opened a conversion on the latter goal. They want to convert the DC into a state, but the precious Constitution prescribes a “District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States” (Art. I,… Read more »

She Was A Constitution Nut
She Was A Constitution Nut
Reply to  She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

Ugh. A conversation, not a conversion,

tashtego
Member
Reply to  She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

An amendment requires a constitutional convention. Congress has been avoiding that for decades through the expediency of getting the holy priests of democracy in the supreme court to enunciate the revealed commandments as desired. My bet is that Roberts, fresh from being reminded of that donkey f*cking episode in Tijuana casts the tie breaking vote on the opinion that the requirement for the district was actually a requirement for no district.

RoBG
RoBG
Reply to  tashtego
3 years ago

I always thought what they had against Roberts was the dodgy adoption?

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  tashtego
3 years ago

The death knell- a Constitutional Convention.

Just as our Civil Rights were a replacement fot the black-letter law of the Anglo Constitution (and the Canadians got Trudeau’s communist Charter), a Convention will enshrine the Second Gentleman, Doug Emhoff, as Holy Regent.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

Where to put the Africans?
Not the long-suffering South.

Put them in a ring around Columbia, and around New Jerusalem West, aka New York City, Broward County FL, and Hollywood.

Let the Wokies commute through that banlieu- they love urban rail, do they not?

Jack Dobson
Jack Dobson
3 years ago

“The crisis of modern conservatism is that conservatism must begin and end with the conservation of the people.” That along with the rest of the penultimate paragraph nails it. Conservation of a nation’s people make it a nation. Failure to do so makes it a factory farm with overwhelmed slaughter houses. I have taken to listening to conservative talk radio since the election. You detect both an unvoiced acknowledgement there is ongoing genocide along with fear to admit such. The hosts go up to the bell, refuse to ring it, and then fall back on clichés and fantasies such as… Read more »

usNthem
usNthem
3 years ago

Unfortunately, the population in this (former) country is now so polluted with various shades of pox and various forms of degeneracy, getting a majority to step away from the prevailing morality is going to be tough. The powers that be and the social media mobs won’t allow it – even at a local level. No one with any fame or gravitas has the stones to call out the demographic reality and further, lead the charge. Perhaps Carlson, sort of, but it’s the toxic third rail of everything these days. I still think the only chance is some sort of existential… Read more »

Chet Rollins
Chet Rollins
Reply to  usNthem
3 years ago

The only solution right now is to balkanize. We need to separate ourselves from the system as much as possible and coordinate with like-minded people in silence. If some dissident group disagrees with another, who cares, just don’t bother them and work on your own tribe. Once some of these groups gains enough power outside normal politics, we can talk about how we can live with each other.

JohnSmith
JohnSmith
Reply to  Chet Rollins
3 years ago

One way to “balkanize” would be to separate the control of rural and urban areas. Declare “city states” to be independent, self-governing entities. Dissolve geographic state boundaries and governments. Self-governing, non-urban counties organize into cooperative groups, regardless of geographic area.

The urbanites can coddle the trannys, the druggies, and the “oppressed minorities”, provided they are entirely self-financed, and their “values” and costs are not imposed on anyone outside their borders.

Rwc1963
Rwc1963
Reply to  JohnSmith
3 years ago

The only way that happens is with a complete collapse, otherwise the cities will send hordes of angry white men in blue to shoot you and your ilk dead., Yeah that’s right your fellow whites will be the first to try and kill you. Study your damn American history. Ever since lower class whites have gotten uppity, the ruling classes had no problem recruiting other white men in the form of ANG’s, Pinkerton men, rent-a-thugs to murder us. Today it would be no different. The various police departments, PMC’s and ANG units would have no qualms gunning us down. Those… Read more »

B125
B125
Reply to  Rwc1963
3 years ago

Yup, every week across Canada white thugs are being sent in to disrupt church services which are “violating” the lockdown.

That’s one reason I don’t care about Chauvin personally. I could easily see him attacking Christians, then returning home to his alien wife and mutt kids.

Which side would he take? I guess he will have a long time to mull it over.

Jim Smith
Jim Smith
Reply to  usNthem
3 years ago

The toxic third rail is failing. Witness Buchanan, Carlson and the entire emerging dissident right. Reality always intrudes. Eventually. So it’s happening now as demographic replacement becomes ever more obvious.

The Wild Geese Howard
The Wild Geese Howard
Reply to  Jim Smith
3 years ago

Tucker went about as far as he could go on MSM TV in terms of naming the unnamed people without having the screen immediately cut to a test pattern until a Slap Chop infomercial could be cued up to fill the remainder of his airtime.

KGB
KGB
Reply to  The Wild Geese Howard
3 years ago

Sometimes our impatience blinds us to the reality of what it would take to reverse our nearly-two century slide into obsolescence. The left got where it is today, through a persistent march through the institutions and an incremental (though at times, such as the present day, accelerated) capture of cultural territory. Tucker’s not going to come out as a dissident. It’s unlikely that Tucker’s one day replacement will either. But there are green shoots appearing in many places. The crumbling TV ratings for the Oscars and the Congolese Netball League are one example. There’s been an explosion of anti-woke sports… Read more »

The Wild Geese Howard
The Wild Geese Howard
Reply to  KGB
3 years ago

KGB- You nailed it. Tucker is not going dissident because he has too much to lose in terms of his pay check and family fortune. That said, it should be clear he understands what is happening and he is unhappy about it. His ADL monologue was specifically crafted to go right up to the line without crossing over it. If that gets some normies asking questions, that’s a win. Speaking of small wins, the alphabet soup movement is the best example of this in the modern era. The alphabet soup flood we see now can be directly traced back to… Read more »

usNthem
usNthem
Reply to  KGB
3 years ago

Well said. That GD guilt is the one main thing that has to be shed. As long as it’s there, tugging at YT’s heartstrings, the tough decisions will be hard to come by.

Jack Dobson
Jack Dobson
Reply to  KGB
3 years ago

“For me, the danger is that so many of the Dissident-curious types would quickly gravitate toward a female or colored “leader” in order to salve the guilt” I couldn’t agree more but there is hope. The tribal sorting is making the MLK fantasy seem even more fantastic, and the obviously mentally ill White gals at the BLM fests have opened many eyes. Today too many cucks would see Candace Owens as a savior, but tonight a few more Whites will make a wrong turn into a BLM love fest. The line in the 70’s/80’s was “a conservative is a liberal… Read more »

American Citizen 2.0
American Citizen 2.0
3 years ago

The problem is that there are no leaders anywhere on the Right. Even Trump. Trump got a big pass because he was willing to say directly that we (i.e. his supporters) do not want more (illegal) immigration from Latin America. That is pretty much what was driving most of his support. The other stuff that Chamber of Commerce or Religious Republicans try to throw into the conversation never really had an audience. Most people don’t really care about the Capital Gains Tax or Religion at all. The only thing the Republican Party is good for now is providing a platform… Read more »

Chet Rollins
Chet Rollins
3 years ago

One of my buddies knew Douthat in college, and apparently he was significantly more based than the pudgy piece of soy he is now. Apparently he was even part of a mildly-edgy newspaper. Rest assured, his views now are carefully calculated to be on the surface mildly provocative, but ultimately toothless. He’s the quintessential charlatan who goes with the wind of those in power because he likes the prestige, like most journalists and professors. If we had the strongman they pretend to fear and that strongman did the first obvious thing and turned Harvard to glass, he would be one… Read more »

Reynard
Reynard
Member
Reply to  Chet Rollins
3 years ago

“the pudgy piece of soy he is now” “quintessential charlatan”
Pure poetry. I know exactly who you are talking about, and can picture him perfectly.

Memebro
Memebro
Reply to  Reynard
3 years ago

You know, I honestly didn’t know who this doughy bean-head was until I looked him up just now. How do these neckbearded legume gluttons find their way into prestigious “conservative” media jobs in the first place? I mean, I get it that Conservatism Inc is a sham, but you’d think that they’d do a better job of finding minions who at LEAST look the part.

Yak-15
Yak-15
3 years ago

ZMan is totally wrong here. Ben Shapiro is about to point out that Chauvin voted for Obama. Twice!

Wait until that “sick burn” comes out and shows how hypocritical the left is and they’ll surrender on the spot.

Bartleby the Scrivner
Bartleby the Scrivner
3 years ago

Vermin-like rapacity

Just when you think Z can’t outdo himself, he does.

Thank you for your verbal acuity. It makes your posts that much more enjoyable.

Corinthian Leatherface
Corinthian Leatherface
Reply to  Bartleby the Scrivner
3 years ago

Just for the record, and perhaps to get a cheap ‘like’ from Zman, I never EVER think Zman can’t outdo himself.

imbroglio
imbroglio
3 years ago

But how do you define the people? I have a couple of friends who are Mayflower descendants yet are social justice warriors through and through. And a Latino acquaintance who very much believes in a moral order akin to the one you suggest.
Demographics, too, are malleable.

Glenfilthie
Glenfilthie
Member
Reply to  imbroglio
3 years ago

Back in the day we used to call them “Americans”. Nowadays they are split and divided along the lines of the frooty coloured rainbow. I would start with them, and of those, I’d start with the blacks. Any black person that thinks George Floyd is a saint gets a free ride back to Africa. And to prove I’m not racist – any whites thinking that way can go to. After that, the Jews. Those that foment race tensions get sent back to Israel. Whites afflicted with white guilt can be shipped back to their neoliberal peers in Europe. Germany would… Read more »

Charles St. Charles
Charles St. Charles
Reply to  Glenfilthie
3 years ago

“Any black person that thinks George Floyd is a saint gets a free ride back to Africa.” What are you going to do, drop them off on the beaches of Sierra Leone? Africa doesn’t want our shiftless, uneducated, entitled, psychotic blacks any more than we do. Lincoln or rather the post-Civil War USG missed its opportunity to remove blacks from the US after the 13th Amendment – repatriation was actually considered at the time. There were plenty of colonies in Africa and Central and South America that were still controlled by Europeans and we could have probably made a deal… Read more »

Technojunkie
Technojunkie
Reply to  Charles St. Charles
3 years ago

Ghana has extended an open invitation.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/africa/ghana-to-black-americans-come-home-well-help-you-build-a-life-here/2020/07/03/1b11a914-b4e3-11ea-9a1d-d3db1cbe07ce_story.html
We have passenger planes sitting idle. Let’s offer free one-way trips to anyone who wants one and bring white South Africans to America on the return trip.

Matrix
Matrix
Reply to  Technojunkie
3 years ago

Murder rate in Africa is very high. Blacks should feel right at home there!

(((They))) Live
(((They))) Live
Reply to  Charles St. Charles
3 years ago

If the US or Europe wanted to resettle their blacks in Africa, all you need to do if find an African leader willing to take a bribe, I’d say they would be lined up begging for the cash. if you offered $1 billion to any country willing to take in US blacks, so for $46 billion you could in theory start a program which would allow US blacks move to the African country of their choice $46 billion sounds like a lot of money, but actually its a bargain, in fact I’d add in a lot more, if paying blacks… Read more »

Ben the Layabout
Ben the Layabout
Reply to  (((They))) Live
3 years ago

Even if the scheme were otherwise plausible, a fatal flaw in it: Africa is very tribal. The Afro-Americans of North America, indeed any Negro descendant of slavery, have been in the West for up to five centuries. As such, they have no tribal identity. Most are chance hybrids of multiple Negroid races ancestral West Africa with admixture of non-African races. Transported suddenly to any region of Africa, they’d likely suffer the twin handicaps of having no identity of their own, and to be loathed by the natives of the area. It is only White liberal feather-heads that could imagine that… Read more »

Drew
Drew
Reply to  Charles St. Charles
3 years ago

“What are you going to do, drop them off on the beaches of Sierra Leone? Africa doesn’t want our shiftless, uneducated, entitled, psychotic blacks any more than we do.”

Yep. That’s why they sold them to us centuries ago.

Pickle Rick
Pickle Rick
Reply to  Charles St. Charles
3 years ago

Are you nuts? The abolitionist fanatics would never have let their precious Negroes be shipped off back to Africa after 1865. They wanted them right here in America because they were angelic, Christ-like black martyrs that had to stay put in America because we somehow owe them, in perpetuity, and must also wash their feet, in perpetuity- just like Saint George Floyd.

RoBG
RoBG
Reply to  Charles St. Charles
3 years ago

I know I’ve posted this before, but when Madison attempted to free his slaves and repatriate them back to Africa, they asked to be sold instead, which he did to a relative.

Dinothedoxie
Dinothedoxie
Reply to  Charles St. Charles
3 years ago

He’ll, I’d be willing to pay them a million or two a piece to permanently relocate out of the country.

To where? Who gives a fuck. I’m sure there’d be plenty of placing willing to take in nuveau rich African immigrants.

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
Reply to  Glenfilthie
3 years ago

“And to prove I’m not racist”

Don’t do that. Don’t submit to the Left’s morality. You literally just lost the argument right there. Break free or submit.

JohnWayne
JohnWayne
Reply to  imbroglio
3 years ago

“Demographic, too, are malleable.”

Two things.

Thing one. Demographic are malleable, but within limits. Genetic distance place limits on cultural malleability.

Thing two. Propaganda works. The media, the university, the government lies and propagandizes prodigiously. How resistant one is to these assaults on rationality depends on how strong your cognitive equipment is and how much exposure to the propaganda you suffer.

ProZNoV
ProZNoV
Reply to  JohnWayne
3 years ago

Repetition is a key hallmark of effective propaganda.

Let me repeat that: repetition is a key hallmark of effective propaganda.

Now watch TV/movies/news media…the anti-white, anti-hetero, anti-male messaging has been amped up to 11 for at least a decade.

It’s having it’s intended effect.

Because repetition is a key hallmark of effective propaganda.

The Wild Geese Howard
The Wild Geese Howard
Reply to  ProZNoV
3 years ago

Covid is the most obvious one at the moment.

The endless repetition from every angle should be a tip off that all is not what it seems.

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
Reply to  imbroglio
3 years ago

Nice try, fifth columnist. But your childish colorblind CivNat platitudes – which I don’t actually think you believe but just use a tool to undermine and divert – have long been destroyed around here and are now simply laughed at. I’m surprised that you didn’t start with “Italians and Irish weren’t considered white 150 years ago.” I guess that no longer works so you guys are going with “my conservative pretty-white looking Latino friend” these days. But for the record, for many thousands of years, countless races and ethnicities have managed to figure out who are their people and who… Read more »

Reynard
Reynard
Member
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 years ago

“But how do you define the people?” Needlessly splitting hairs, trying to get lost in the minutia. This is similar to the Left’s attempts to undermine genetics by claiming that “race doesn’t exist!” Oh really? Can me and my wife perform coitus and expect a little Asian baby to pop out 9 months later? Don’t try to complicate something that is extremely obvious and simple. (The Left seems to think that convolution is necessarily intelligent) Consider a healthy fit person who exercises daily, has a steady diet, a few reasonable vices, compared to a generally unhealthy person who leads a… Read more »

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
Reply to  Reynard
3 years ago

I learned long ago that the job of hasbara trolls was to muddy the waters, to get people to go down a rabbit holes of definitions and as you say hair-splitting. They also love, love, love to bring up the edge and present it as the middle, which is why they always use the “Italian and Irish weren’t considered white in the 18th century” or this guy’s “my conservative Latino buddy” schtick. Seriously, these tribal trolls are incredibly lazy. They literally use the same lines over and over. Admittedly, it’s worked extremely well against gullible whites, who argue in good… Read more »

Reynard
Reynard
Member
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 years ago

Totally agree with everything.

I’m at the point where I don’t care if I’m dealing with a shill or a dupe, if you’re making the same argument, I’ll treat you as a shill. The result is the same and its not my job to decipher which is which.

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 years ago

Actually, I retract my criticism of the Hasbara trolls using the same lines over and over. Look, they’re no different than a salesman, and a salesman has a script, which has been crafted very carefully to push emotional buttons in the intended audience. These guys are just following their script – because it works. Also, like any salesman, they make money with volumne, so they spit out the script and see if it works. If it does, they keep going with more scripted material. If not, they move on. Makes sense. Regardless, always remember, they’re not debating with you. You’re… Read more »

Reynard
Reynard
Member
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 years ago

Sometimes its good training to shadowbox. You can also teach others by shadowboxing. You’re not actually fighting anyone. But you’re getting things done all the same.

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
Reply to  Citizen of a Silly Country
3 years ago

Agree on the shadowboxing. The trolls arguments might be scripted and stupid, but they’re not any different that what a real CivNat says.

KGB
KGB
Reply to  imbroglio
3 years ago

Mayflower descendants who are social justice warriors? I’m sorry, is that supposed to be jarring?

3g4me
3g4me
Reply to  imbroglio
3 years ago

imbroglio: No one here would deny that goodwhites are a problem. And those who cannot be forced to their senses must remain outcasts – when the great sorting happens, they must be sent off to live with their ideological brethren, and their genetic legacy will be subsumed. Problem is with your purported ‘based’ Latino (or everyone’s favorite ‘x’ is different). Each race has its far-right end of the bell curve and/or the small minority with industry and independence combined with traditional values. The eternal problem, which I find individuals like you never address, is that you are then deliberately introducing… Read more »

3g4me
3g4me
Reply to  3g4me
3 years ago

I really need to edit before I hit reply.

tl;dr: just the last paragraph of my comment is sufficient unto itself. And Citizen, you are absolutely correct. I should have just ignored imbroglio as a troll rather than respond rationally,

Citizen of a Silly Country
Citizen of a Silly Country
Reply to  3g4me
3 years ago

They can be good practice. Stupid as they, they say the same thing as real CivNats.

Severian
3 years ago

It might well be there is nothing left to conserve. Once a culture is gone, how do you get it back? Trying to revitalize Western Civilization might be like trying to revive pharonic Egypt. Best case, we’re the Soviet Bloc. Whatever made, say, a Romanian had been stamped out, replaced by the loosest collective identity: “we are mutual sufferers of state repression.” Worst case — and I fear we’re worst case — we are the Ik, brutal individualists with no culture to speak of. How does one pull a culture together after that? That’s where goofs like Brooks are right,… Read more »

Reynard
Reynard
Member
Reply to  Severian
3 years ago

“How does one pull a culture together after that?” That’s the tragedy of this whole thing. Its this fact about immigration which the normie needs to understand. Once it happens, that’s it, there’s no going back. Things have changed now, forever, irrevocably. Whatever you had is gone and its not coming back. The cat’s outta the bag… One of the epiphanies I had while reading Marx– the economy/exchange system of a society will effect the way people interact with eachother. We live in an international exchange system. We buy cheap products which are disposable as opposed to durable. We don’t… Read more »

Robert Corliss
Robert Corliss
Reply to  Reynard
3 years ago

Yes, Marx is quite useful on that score. His contention in the German Ideology is that the base (the relations of production, as he calls them: working conditions, property relations, financial relations, employee/employer relationships) is generative of the superstructure in a society. The superstructure comprises the customs, culture, religion, social relationships, social mores, legal relationships that ensure the smooth functioning and continuation of the base. (Until such time as those relations of production change, as they always will.) In sum, how profit is extracted from your labor and the specific material conditions of “work” and capitalist production in your specific… Read more »

Reynard
Reynard
Member
Reply to  Robert Corliss
3 years ago

That was an incredibly erudite and succinct summary, if I may say so. “Over the years I have attempted to discuss Marx with conservatives on this point — pointing out to them the destructive march of globalism through American life and its effects upon the family and our heritage — with (obviously) no success” I too have struggled with this. I think many on the DR came here after reading through Leftist/Liberal/Socialist materials in earnest at some point in their life. However, there are a lot of “lifers” in the conservative party. For many of them, Marx is evil as… Read more »

Robert Corliss
Robert Corliss
Reply to  Reynard
3 years ago

Thank you for the compliment. I agree wholeheartedly. Take the meat and leave the bones, as Aquinas wrote. We must read everything we can, both for intellectual but also tactical reasons.

I will look for comments from you here henceforth, and hope to keep sharing thoughts with you.

Severian
Reply to  Severian
3 years ago

PS before anyone jumps down my throat for saying anything nice about Karl Marx, the best description I’ve read of Fascism — as it existed in the minds of reflective kids back when it was a going concern — was a war memoir called Black Edelweiss. It might be tough to find, as it was written by a member of the Waffen-SS and…well… you know. Anyway, he wrote it in prison in 1946, and he talks about the idealism of him and his comrades. Not for some glorious monochromatic future, but for a society absent the constant “class struggle” of… Read more »

She Was A Constitution Nut
She Was A Constitution Nut
Reply to  Severian
3 years ago

This looks like the book you mention:

Black Edelweiss:
A Memoir Of Combat And Conscience By A Soldier Of The Waffen-SS

By Johann Voss
(sounds like foss or fauce, auf Deutsch)
https://archive.org/details/BlackEdelweissAMemoirOfCombatAndConscienceByASoldierOfTheWaffenSS

Downloads available in the usual formats.

FYI, I believe that a new edition of Cialdini’s Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion is due out soon. As you know, he’s one of the darlings of the gaslighter class.

Severian
Reply to  She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

That’s the one. I don’t vouch for the translation or accuracy, and given the circumstances it’s more than a little self-serving, I suppose, but very interesting for all that. Thanks for the link.

She Was A Constitution Nut
She Was A Constitution Nut
Reply to  Severian
3 years ago

Don’t mention it. I think, however, that you may have undersold the book just a little. Voss was still quite young at the war’s end, but he wrote in the Preface that “I have enjoyed a rich professional life as a corporate lawyer with various international ties”. In fact,… This book was conceived and for the most part written a long time ago. I was then a prisoner of the US Army from March 1945 to December 1946. The idea of editing and publishing the manuscript had never crossed my mind in the following decades. The war and what followed… Read more »

RoBG
RoBG
Reply to  Severian
3 years ago

There’s “descriptive” Marx and “prescriptive” Marx. The former is the only one that should be discussed in 21st c. The latter is just a trail of carnage and no thinking person should defend it.

She Was A Constitution Nut
She Was A Constitution Nut
Reply to  Severian
3 years ago

Severian, I must object bluntly to your claim that Fascism always accepted Marxist analysis as correct… largely because it IS correct, at least in it’s very narrow lane That idea is difficult to defend once we understand that Fascism arose because, in part, Marxist analysis was utterly defective and, by the end of the Great War, had been discredited before the eyes of many communists. Fascism arose in no small part as a movment of disgruntled and disillusioned Marxists, syndicalists, etc. who sought a pragmatic route to power. One of the many dirty little secrets of Fascism is that Its… Read more »

She Was A Constitution Nut
She Was A Constitution Nut
Reply to  She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

Correction: The subtitle of Steele’s essay is

“Mussolini – as he would like to have been remembered”

Severian
Reply to  She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

Fascists accepted the reality of Marxist class conflict due to the means of production. They rejected the Marxists’ conclusion – that the revolution of the *International* proletariat was the inevitable result. Recall that Marx predicted that the State would wither away – they could still believe that in the 1920s. Mussolini’s vision of “all inside the State” was explicitly designed to end the kind of class conflict that led to international proletarian revolution. And as for whether or not Marx was right in the long run, look around – we are where we are because the managerial class has achieved… Read more »

She Was A Constitution Nut
She Was A Constitution Nut
Reply to  Severian
3 years ago

Who wouldn’t accept, in some form, the idea of class conflict arising between those who own and control productive assets and those who work for wages? Such conflict is older than the industrial revolution, and theories of such conflict are not uniquely Marxist. Marx was badly misguided also with his nonsense about surplus value. He thought that manual labor was the source of economic value and, hence, that the difference between wages and economic value was pocketed as profit, which Marx spelled as e, x, p, l, o, i, t, a, t, i, o, n. I’m fairly sure that Fascists… Read more »

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
Reply to  She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

“Genuine antifascism now knows that Fascism is a creature of internationalist communism.”

Fascism is just the desire to use the government to advance the interests of the native population.

Refute me. I’m happy to learn.

She Was A Constitution Nut
She Was A Constitution Nut
Reply to  LineInTheSand
3 years ago

The Constitution was adopted thanks to “the desire to use the the government to advance the interests of the native population.” But American federalism was not Fascist, not even when you point out the fasces displayed in Congress.

So your defintion is much too narrow. When writing a correct one, bear in mind the idea of stating first the genus, then giving specific differences.

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
Reply to  She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

I’ll grant that the Constitution includes “to ourselves and our posterity,” but that was quickly discarded. The Constitution was not explicit in its intentions the ways fascism is. We would not be where we are now if the Constitution was fascist. Of course, I grant the Founders a lot of slack for not seeing how the world would evolve. Ms. Nut, do you have a problem with a ruling document that says explicitly that the purpose of our government is the flourishing of white families? If not, how is this not fascism? What parts of fascism trouble you? (I do… Read more »

Dinothedoxie
Dinothedoxie
Reply to  She Was A Constitution Nut
3 years ago

A lot of Marx’s description a d critique of nineteenth century capitalism were correct. Including the idea that market capitalism was an acid bath that was dissolving traditional society and human connections, reducing the value of everything to its cost of replacement in the market. The downstream consequences of that include the destruction of religion and the family and culture and nations. The atomization of everyone into selfish immature consumers.* Marx was also wrong in believing that economics had been the driving force of history. That class conflict was central to everything. Worse, his predictions and prescriptions were childish fantasies.… Read more »

Shrugger
Shrugger
3 years ago

I you were a Conservative, this could be titled, “The Conservative Case for Jailing Conservatives”.

Reynard
Reynard
Member
3 years ago

To think I used to get excited in college when David “Baruch”Brooks would be a guest on the Charlie Rose show. I progressively became less impressed with him as I became more politically aware. By the time he wrote a scathing article around 2016 about the state of the conservatives and “white America” I was finished with him. He of course condemned the “tribalism” he observed and warned of the dangers which comes from tribal warfare. How rich. A proud member of “the Tribe” condemning that very behavior in others. If it wasn’t so typical and tragic, it would be… Read more »

Severian
Reply to  Reynard
3 years ago

To give Brooks the credit he’s due, “Bobos in Paradise” is worth reading, in the same way Marx is worth reading – his diagnosis of the disease is spot on. You’ll never find a better description of the Cloud People (that he thinks he’s writing as some kind of outsider is ironic enough to give Alanis a chubby, but that’s neither here nor there).

Reynard
Reynard
Member
Reply to  Severian
3 years ago

I’ll take your word for it, and order it now. I’ve never been steered wrong regarding recommendations from this comment section. I just finished a book the other day suggested by one of the commenters here.

Severian
Reply to  thezman
3 years ago

Yeah it was surreal. I guess I didn’t mind as much back when I read it, as I was in the academy at the time, which is an experience I can only describe as “feeling like you’re mildly stoned on bad dope, but all the time.” It’s the little details that make it great. Like the pause, and the almost apologetic uptalk, when they tell you where they went to school. “Ummm….Harvard?” They can’t wait to tell you — Harvard men are like vegans or CrossFit people, they can’t not bring it up within five minutes — but they’re kinda…you… Read more »

Milestone D
Milestone D
Reply to  Severian
3 years ago

Cross-fit is the polar opposite of Fight Club b/c the first rule of Cross-Fit is never shut up about Cross-Fit. Same goes for Ivy League attendance, at least among the middle class-strivers. That was (is?) my ex-wife, who went to Cornell and couldn’t shut up about it, she managed to fit that little detail into every conversation, no matter how routine. And that schtick fails to impress the truly elite, and alienates everyone else. My ex-wife so wanted to be in that elite world, and she could ape their mannerisms and their cadence, but they knew an imposter when they… Read more »

Milestone D
Milestone D
Reply to  Severian
3 years ago

Hate to bring up my lovely ex-wife again, but Sailer’s observation largely matches what I observed in my ex-wife’s “development” job for a relatively big university. (Development is term academia uses to avoid the term “fund-raisers”) The big money for college endowments is in estate planning – Harvard didn’t get to $41B by $10/month donations. The first rule of fund-raising, you can’t give big dollars unless you have big dollars. So, admissions, outside the diversity rackets, is largely geared towards those who are likely to earn big dollars – so that means family connections, extrovert tendencies, etc. (this is why… Read more »

RoBG
RoBG
Reply to  Severian
3 years ago

This a reply to Z below: “as you most likely end up in a cabin writing a manifesto.” That made me LOL! (Uncle Ted wasn’t wrong about everything, though.)

nailheadtom
nailheadtom
Reply to  Severian
3 years ago

“” Those “illiberals” he claims, will “eventually turn to the strong man to salve the darkness and chaos inside themselves.”

The guy that wrote this is a notable journalist and author?

David Wright
Member
Reply to  Severian
3 years ago

Read it way back when. I have to admit some of his insights into these people was enlightening or spot on from my experience. I just couldn’t figure how he placed himself outside of all that then realized , oh yeah, one of the tribe.

Reynard
Reynard
Member
Reply to  David Wright
3 years ago

I often find myself thunderstruck by what appears to be pathological hypocrisy and extreme lack of self-awareness in Brooks’ ilk. Like Z-man I wonder if I’m out of the loop of some inside joke, or some esoteric wink or nod to others “in the know.”

David Wright
Member
Reply to  Reynard
3 years ago

Oh there is an inside joke with winks to go with it. I have seen even with Jerry Seinfeld when interviewed by his people. One learns to pick up on it when you finally get it.

jrod
jrod
Reply to  Reynard
3 years ago

I followed the same path as you in regard to David Brooks. (But then I used to get amped about watching The Firing Line.) Around the time of Brooks’ article you mentioned, my friend, now at home (in many ways) in San Francisco, remarked to me during one of our conversations that he admired Brooks’ analysis and balance in covering social issues. My friend has continued to admire other high priests of progressivism like in this article by Jonathan Franzen that he recommended to me recently, saying it’s the best article he’s read on the subject. A mind (and a… Read more »

Reynard
Reynard
Member
Reply to  jrod
3 years ago

Oh crap, Johnathon Franzen. There’s a name I haven’t thought about since college. I used to get excited about the New Yorker as well, but just reading the title of this article gets my blood boiling. I’m not sure I can stomach it haha