Note: More housing shenanigans today, so this is an item from the early days of the green door when I got the idea to review the AFI top-100 films.
Some movies are on the top-100 list because they are great stories told very well, while others are on the list for their great technological breakthroughs. Some are on the list for their cultural impact. That is the case with Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, a comedy about race mixing from 1967. The film had two legends, Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn, and a big star at the moment in Sydney Poitier.
The film was viewed at the time as groundbreaking because it featured a mixed-race couple in a positive light. Right around the time the movie was released, the Supreme Court had struck down anti-miscegenation laws in Loving v. Virginia. Of course, the civil rights movement was at its peak, so this was just what white liberals wanted to see, which was white liberals being celebrated for their goodness.
The movie itself is pretty simple. It opens with the couple in question, generic rich white girl and her much older black boyfriend, Sydney Poitier, getting off an airplane and strolling through an airport like lovers on a walk in the park. Keep in mind that this is 1967, but no one in the airport notices, because you see, this is the glorious future where race no longer matters, so get used to it you terrible bigots.
I was not around in 1967, but I was around in 1977. I was around in 1987 and 1997 as well, so I have some idea what it was like in 1967. I know in 1987, a mixed-race couple would have drawn a lot of stares. It was an extremely rare thing. In 1967 you can be sure the people in that airport would have been dumbstruck, but the story needed everyone to be cool with it so the rest of the story would make more sense.
Anyway, the couple arrives at the mansion of the white girl’s parents. The black maid, played by Weezy from the Jeffersons, is predictably flabbergasted by the site of the master’s daughter bringing home a black man. The two blacks are uncomfortable for a moment, until Poitier asks to use the phone. He goes into the den to use the phone, where there is a bug picture of FDR on the desk. That could be important.
The first parent home to meet the new man is the mother, who is uncomfortable, but tries to play it cool. This is where we begin to learn that Poitier is not just a black guy, but a special black guy. He not only knows exactly how the mother is feeling, but he knows exactly how to break the tension. Unlike the rest of the characters, he alone can rise above the situation and see everything from every perspective.
Next home is the father, who is home early to get ready for his golf outing. For some reason he is not surprised to find a middle-aged black man in his home with his daughter, so he just makes small talk for a while. Eventually, he notices there is a middle-aged black man in his home with his daughter and that is when they tell him that his daughter is planning to marry the middle-aged black man.
This is when we learn that Poitier is the most successful black man on the planet, as he is a famous doctor and world leader. Because the world depends on him, he is going to fly to New York to visit smart people and then head off to Geneva to run the World Health Organization. He has a plan to save Africa by teaching the smart African kids how to do stuff so they can make Africa great again. No kidding.
This is what sets the plot in motion. The parents have a day to give their blessing to the marriage or Poitier will break it off, as he is so noble and kind that he will not come between the white girl and her people. You see, he is not just the most accomplished black man on the planet, he is a numinous Negro. He is the saintly black character who exists to help the whites make their journey to enlightenment.
For a while Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn fret over what to do. Then a priest arrives and hams it up as the stereotypical Irish priest, accent and all. He thinks the whole thing is wonderful and this is where we see he is supposed the be the audience in this drama, enjoying how the rich white liberals struggle with their hypocrisy while trying to get with the times and accept the race mixing.
The catch phrase that is the title of the film comes when Tracy learns that Poitier’s parents are coming for dinner. Tracy is at his wit’s end over having been put in this situation when Hepburn says, “guess who’s coming to dinner?” Then she explains how Poitier’s parents are flying up from Los Angeles. Then the priest invites himself to the dinner, because he is the voice of the audience and needs to be there.
At the big dinner we learn that the black parents are opposed to the race mixing, but the mother is more open-minded to it than the father. We now have the predictable setup of the females trying to bring their stubborn husbands along. At some point the women commiserate and agree to work on the men. Poitier tells off his father, not so subtly implying that old blacks were responsible for keeping blacks down.
Finally, the black mother has a heart to heart with Spencer Tracy and he finally sees the light and agrees to bless the marriage. He then gives a big speech that sounds like it was written by the ad hoc committee of the revolutionary council on race in the 1967 people’s assembly. I actually felt sorry for Tracy having to say such stupid things in what would be his last movie before he died. It was ten minutes of cringe.
You have to judge movies in the context of their age, but even making big allowances for the age, this is a bad movie. It is ham-fisted, predictable, and preachy. The main characters are shallow and basic, with little to no development. Poitier is not even a real person in this movie. He is just a ridiculous version of the Magic Negro. The only character with any depth is Tracy and that is not much.
That said, the movie belongs on the top-100 list for its cultural value. It made $54 million in 1967, which is $420 million in today’s money. That is a massive success, which tells us that whites were enormously gullible and stupid back then. Sure, the movie had big stars and it was intended to be a comedy, but the fact they could not see that this was nothing but anti-white propaganda does not speak well of them.
There is also the fact that fifty years ago the usual suspects were pushing the idea that the only way for white men to be saved was to allow their daughters to run off with non-white males. The reason that white people face a long war to regain dominion over their societies is because it has been a long war against them. The people on the other side played the long game. Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner is a good reminder of that fact and therefore worth watching today.
If you like my work and wish to kick in a few bucks, you can buy me a beer. You can sign up for a SubscribeStar subscription and get some extra content. You can donate via PayPal. My crypto addresses are here for those who prefer that option. You can send gold bars to: Z Media LLC P.O. Box 432 Cockeysville, MD 21030-0432. Thank you for your support!
Promotions: Good Svffer is an online retailer partnering with several prolific content creators on the Dissident Right, both designing and producing a variety of merchandise including shirts, posters, and books. If you are looking for a way to let the world know you are one of us without letting the world know you are one one is us, then you should but a shirt with the Lagos Trading Company logo.
The Pepper Cave produces exotic peppers, pepper seeds and plants, hot sauce and seasonings. Their spice infused salts are a great add to the chili head spice armory, so if you are a griller, take you spice business to one of our guys.
Above Time Coffee Roasters are a small, dissident friendly company that roasts its own coffee and ships all over the country. They actually roast the beans themselves based on their own secret coffee magic. If you like coffee, buy it from these folks as they are great people who deserve your support.
Havamal Soap Works is the maker of natural, handmade soap and bath products. If you are looking to reduce the volume of man-made chemicals in your life, all-natural personal products are a good start.
Minter & Richter Designs makes high-quality, hand-made by one guy in Boston, titanium wedding rings for men and women and they are now offering readers a fifteen percent discount on purchases if you use this link. If you are headed to Boston, they are also offering my readers 20% off their 5-star rated Airbnb. Just email them directly to book at
sa***@mi*********************.com
.
” a bug picture of FDR”
Now that right there is what we call a freudian slip.
The women commiserated says it all.
For movie reviewers I dig that Lynch guy, and the drinker dude on youtubes, but
>ad hoc committee of the revolutionary council on race in the 1967 people’s assembly
made grapejuice shoot out my nose.
This z fvcker needs a warning lable.
Crit Drinker let us down by posting a fawning review of The Descent (2005-6?), which is one of the first significant gurlboss movies.
His generation doesn’t seem to have issues with girl power type roles.
Such riotous fun I’m going to repeat one I left below:
Oh no.
Now you’ve simply *got* to watch “White Man’s Burden”, with Belafonte & Travolta.
Africans colonized America.
A stupid white janitor, descendant of slaves, is accused of a murder.
The movie starts out with the janitor trying to tell/not tell his kid, no, don’t pick the black Superman toy.
I remember 1967. this movie caused a tremendous uproar. It was right after the civil rights movement . At the time reasonable people looked at any college freshmen girl marring a dude twice her age that she just met was just silly. I will point out , blacks of the time talked like richard roundtree. they were named dave and john. that kind of made the propaganda easier . to sum up the 60’s and 70’s her are 2 short movie clips. to watch .
hollywood does DIE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaCGeQifvdo
hollywood does whyts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntC0xJo2bSU
yeah the dammage was done then.
I forgot about the arrow scene. Interestingly, I’ve never seen a broad head arrow penetrate and stick out of both sides since that movie scene. A bit of director’s prerogative? But the bleed out took a believable amount of time. Deservedly so I’d say.
The bows of that day were not as powerful as they are now.
He looked like he was using a compound bow at perhaps 50 feet or so. I suspect at that range it was pretty powerful. This State mandates the bow’s power for the particular game. 50 lbs minimum for deer. The resistance is in penetration. Once the arrow tip leaves the body, it’s pretty much “home free” to drive through and exit.. I suppose it could be slowed by going through some bone which would continue to drag along the shaft. Who knows? But the arrows and bows of today often drive through and the animal barely flinches. Hence we never… Read more »
OT: There are still based working class white men in Queens.
Construction Worker Who Confronted Man Tearing Down Missing Israeli Posters in NYC Says He is Not a Hero
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/11/construction-worker-who-confronted-man-tearing-down-missing
Includes video of the confrontation.
Of course the poster remover shouldn’t be here in the first place.
Brandow Laskow: Why are there “Israeli Posters” up all over America? These are not our people. AINO was not attacked. The remnants of America do not need Jews and Muslims bringing their disputes to our land. And neither Jews nor Muslims should be here in the first place. But, while the odious George W. Bush and others deserve plenty of blame, it has been the Jews who have been agitating for endless immigration and open borders since shortly after the Civil War.
“America(ns) do not need Jews and Muslims bringing their disputes to our land.”
Of course not–and if they really were Americans (you know of the mythical CivNat kind)–they’d leave that shit back home. Ironic isn’t it, by their very behavior they prove they are not Americans and will never be. Just foreign interlopers looking for a better place to shit in.
How many posters were torn down? I’ll have a guess – 6 million? And is this the construction worker from the Village People? Joking aside, I’ll agree the poster remover shouldn’t be here. Neither should the people who put them up.
Twitter:
“The missing children posters are put up in New York pretty much only to be able to film people tearing them down and get them fired from their dental assistant job”
Of course the poster remover shouldn’t be here in the first place.
Neither should the posters or those who put them up.
I forget if I heard this from Ed Dutton, but they were saying that it’s very logical from an evolutionary standpoint why studies show that males of all races show far more resistance to daughters marrying other races. Throughout history, seeing a male of another tribe with one’s own daughter has been symbolic of that tribe conquering your own. I think many here would say it still does. The only difference today is that it’s been done through deception rather than on the battlefield.
Makes perfect sense. Females are genetic safe bets. If the tribe is conquered they will be enslaved and bred. Males… they lose when they are conquered. This is why women are more pro immigration, they may gain from it if the local bucks aren’t men enough to stop it.
Women are also better at learning new languages. Same logic
Years ago, someone named Black Pigeon Speaks created a comprehensive video called “Why Women Destroy Nations” in which he covers the Conquered/Traitorous Women phenomenon quite well. Now that women have pretty much taken over the reins of power, the western world is screwed!
“…seeing a male of another tribe with one’s own daughter has been symbolic of that tribe conquering your own.”
Actually, if geneticists such as David Reich are accurate, it is probably the *last* thing you’ll see. Reich has written about following population lineage through both male and female DNA. More than one population replacement he’s studied has shown an abrupt ending of male DNA (being replaced by another male lineage) while the woman’s remains unbroken. Basically a superior tribe (as you put it) killed all the men of the inferior tribe and then f**ked all the women. 😉
Every black man I’ve ever met has dressed and spoken like Sydney Poitier, and has been as successful and insightful as his character in this movie. The profound realism of this movie leaves me awed.
That’s raciss! Only 32% of black men dress and speak exactly like Sydney Poitier. 48% dress and speak exactly like Obama and the remaining 20% follow the manner of Clarence Thomas.
Poitier was playing himself. He discarded his black wife in favor a white Canadian actress a number of years his junior..
A far better film is “Nothing But A Man” (1964)
His might come in handy.
https://www.notwokeshows.com/
Its sort of ironic that I mentioned Sidney Poitier yesterday. Which black archetype do you like better:
The goofy lovable black like Louis Armstrong or uncle Remus
Or the urbane educated, and often not raised in America kind of black as embodied by Poitier?
Krustykurmudgeon: “Its sort of ironic that I mentioned Sidney Poitier yesterday.” I noticed it too, and did some Wiki searching yesterday, and I stumbled upon a fascinating blurb: “…one of the few films of the time to depict an interracial marriage in a positive light, as interracial marriage historically had been illegal in many states of the United States. It was still illegal in 17 states, until June 12, 1967, six months before the film was released, and scenes were filmed just before anti-miscegenation laws were struck down by the Supreme Court in Loving v. Virginia.” That strongly suggests [i.e.… Read more »
Interesting you bring up abe fortas. I’ve long suspected there was something up with him. LBJ manages to sneak him on the court by getting Arthur Goldberg to step down by offering a un ambassadorship (which is a downgrade). Earl warren tries leaving the court in 1968 and Johnson wants to promote him to chief justice. The nomination stalls out but instead of staying on as an associate justice, fortas resigns his seat. The question is why would he resign. Is it possible that there were some real skeletons about to be unveiled? Like maybe he was in the mafia?… Read more »
There’s a lot to that story. Goldberg was definitely dirty (he was Kennedy’s Secretary of Labor, for crying out loud) and Kennedy put him on the Court to follow Brandeis and Frankfurter in the designated Jewish seat. But Johnson wanted his good buddy Abe Fortas there to help manage any Court problems with the Great Society programs (FDR’s New Deal Court problems were still in living memory). So Johnson levered Goldberg out into the UN ambassador job with all sorts of promises (reappointment to the Court, VP slot in ’68 etc.) all of which were of course bogus. Fortas on… Read more »
What? Black male over white female?
Like Dumuzid over Ninil, Tammuz over Inanna, Adam over Eve?
Why?
Because it creates more of THEM…!!
Alzaebo: “Because it creates more of THEM…!!” No one has ever axed me whether I am a “White supremacist”, but if they were to axe me, then I would say, “No, I am a White inferioracist!!!” Then I would explain that when a White breeds with a j00, the resultant offspring is a j00. That when a White breeds with a kneegr0w, the the resultant offspring is a kneegr0w. That when a White breeds with a street-defecator, the resultant offspring is a street-defecator. That when a White breeds with a g00k, the resultant offspring is a g00k. That when a… Read more »
Up for this: “genes for Whiteness are always recessive opposite any other genes.”
But how can that be true?
The children are lighter most of the time; “a nigga in the woodpile” ends up with kinkier hair surfacing, but rarely a hint of darker skin in future generations.
May I suggest that you do a review of the movie “A Night to Remember” (1958) about the sinking of the Titanic. In particular, the part about the dance band that continued playing while it sank. That is the most apt metaphor of our demise as a nation and culture. Congress is about to send another boat load of fiat to Ukraine and Israel, even as the annual deficit passes $1.7 trillion. Why is it that thousands of Muslims will take to the streets here protesting the Israeli bombing of Gaza, but not a single normie will get off the… Read more »
What are “normies” to do? Riot? Quit asking for the impossible. The time will come, but it has to be in line with our own racial proclivities—which is not “chimping out” at the slightest reason. Yes, this may be a loser in the Darwinian sense, but it is what it is.
On one hand it is disheartening to see the lack of concern from normie, but OTHO, as you note, it wouldn’t matter if that wasn’t the case. The regime has shown that they will jail anyone they view as too much of a pest so the doom of this place is completely beyond the control of any normie anyway.
I agree with this sentiment, but there are many ways to protest and it is the lack of initiative that I find disheartening. It signals defeatism, which can be infectious and become another step on the road to sheepledom. Firearms sales have been rising steadily for years now, and this is a form of protest. But what if normie started buying cheap drones by the dozen (which is still legal). Methinks that would send a more dire message to the Deep State.
Speaking of guns, at my age I need no more, but have places where they’ll go upon death—and these weapons are of current quality and technology such as night and thermo vision. My widow is not going to drag these things to the local gun store, or worse, the Sheriff for disposal. When I die, with luck, they’ll be more of me equipped for futures—whatever they may be. Something I believe is helpful as these things cost money, more than a young person starting out can afford, but no less necessary to have at that age than at mine.
TomA: Can you suggest a good (reliable, simple, and affordable) model? We’ve been discussing the utility of a drone for a few years now. I’ve also read about requisite federal licenses, etc. Not sure we want to deal with that.
https://www.tomsguide.com/us/best-drones,review-2412.html
P.S. I am not the Tom is this link.
I bought a DJI drone a couple of years ago and I still cant believe it’s legal and available for anyone to buy at their local costco. The technology is remarkable.
If you’re concerned about the federal registration buy a DJI mini. Don’t have to register drones below a certain weight.
Buying several drones, that is a really interesting idea. One issue that comes to mind is that drones might become obsolete much faster than guns. With the accessories may become obsolete but not the gun itself. Drones, otoh, batteries don’t last forever, jamming technology improves (much faster than ballistic material). But I really like the idea.
It is a stellar idea, kudos TomA.
Thinking like white man, he is.
Moran ya Simba: “drones might become obsolete much faster than guns”
Man-portable drones are routinely taking out Main Battle Tanks in Ukraine. The West is providing Ukraine with the best electronic countermeasures it has available – and yet the life expectancy of armor on the battlefield is now measured in minutes. And nexgen drones will be autonomous hunter-killers that do not require either ongoing communications nor a human operator.
Why is it that thousands of Muslims will take to the streets here protesting the Israeli bombing of Gaza, but not a single normie will get off the couch to protest impending bankruptcy? We have earned our downfall. Taking to the streets and making noise is not exactly my style, but I have been writing about America’s fiscal situation for as long as I can remember, and I’ve devoted a considerable portion of my adult leisure time toward working through the problems of modern political economy. When the SHTF and people are looking for someone to lead them, I will… Read more »
Hrmmmmmmmmm…. I grew up in a shitlib hive family infested with garbage liberal women – and though I never saw it… this one strikes me as a classic shitlib chick-flick. A wise, strong willed young liberal woman does Her Own Thing, ignores the stuffy, stupid parents, and sails off into the sunset to Have It All, leaving the naysayers chastised and humiliated by her success. My mom ate this shite right up, I think she secretly imagines herself as the heroine in such tripe. Looking back on it I was fortunate not to live with parents caught up in the… Read more »
That’s the problem with most women, they’ll be happy to embrace the picaninnies that result from such a miscegenous union. When I see a mixed race child, all I can think of is a lost child, neither here nor there. No wonder these children grow up so often to be anti-White. The hatred needs to be directed from their parents to somewhere.
Those children do often grow up to be anti-white. It’s not solely based on today’s anti-white culture though. I know it was noted that in Sparta, when a Spartan male would have a child with a helot woman, the child would almost always embrace the culture of the helot mother. It could be some evolutionary behavior that the child always identifies with the parent’s race they see as victims.
Interesting thought.
Strong character starts with a strong identity. Writ large, too. Look at America. The more we embrace multiculti, the weaker we become.
We are an open society. What else can we do?
The breeder-brained are more susceptible to the lower register vibes, the bestial gods of f*cking, feeding, fighting. To Hell’s call, if you would. That is Its function, as a base of the organic formative layer, the ground effect ancillary to the broiling viral formative layer àt the edge of the atmosphere. Aryan-Erectus combinations, such as -Negroid and -Aborigine (Semites and dot-Indians) produce a wickedly effective type: cannibal instincts with white smarts. Smart enough to be dangerous, blindly determined, ruthlessly loyal to their tribe against outsiders. Utter collectivists, or Hives. The Left is ancient wiring awakened, responding to the vibe- the… Read more »
Entomology 101
???
Matriarchy >>>>>>> Patriarchy
???
That matches up just about perfectly with what we know about the Hive Mind of Passive Aggression.
Thanks and sorry folks, there’s nowhere else to put such observations, too far out of the mainstream.
Filthie, that’s a fascinating familial history you’ve got there.
Did your parents constantly quarrel over politics & religion & whatnot?
Not really. Dad was fiercely apolitical. Outside of his job and his farm things didn’t interest him much. Mom and I fought like cats and dogs! I was banished from the hive years ago when my daughter discovered she was gay, and I had the wrong opinions about it. It worked for me; I was happier without them too. Then the hive just started to fall apart. They started fighting with each other, divorces and other estrangements happened… it’s sad. Most of that was driven by the pig headed bloody minded women too. There are times I get down on… Read more »
Filthie: “A wise, strong willed young liberal woman does Her Own Thing, ignores the stuffy, stupid parents, and sails off into the sunset to Have It All, leaving the naysayers chastised and humiliated by her success.” The chick who starred as Katherine Hepburn’s daughter in the movie was IRL ackshually Katherine Hepburn’s NIECE, Katharine Houghton. Note that Houghton was a graduate of Sarah Lawrence College. And Hepburn was a graduate of Bryn Mawr College. Clearly Stanley Kramer & the Frankfurt School wanted an obvious GENETIC link between the mother figure and the daughter figure; they wanted actual tangible corporeal blood… Read more »
The latest in this genre is A Man Named Otto starring (predictably) Tom Hanks as an aging, childless, taciturn Scandinavian widower steel industry engineer who lives in a modest, aging townhome complex in Pittsburgh. He struggles with lack of purpose as he is forcibly retired from his job and struggles further with the competency crisis as his townhome complex is progressively blessed with the benefits of diversity. Hanks finds new purpose in helping his new, helpless neighbors perform mundane tasks such as, for example, parking. Predictably, once again, the diverse crowd teaches Otto the value of life, love, and friendship.… Read more »
Thanks for the warning even though Tom Hanks has been on my avoid at all costs list since before Saving Private Ryan. He’s always come across to me as a sanctimoious prick. He ruined Saving Private Ryan for me, except for him it was a fairly good movie, because he was about 20 years too old for his role.
Too old…well perhaps by what we are used to generally. However, Hanks was born in ‘56, movie came out in ‘98. Hanks was therefore aged about 42 yo. WWII draft act (1940) had eligible men up to and including 44 yo. So it is indeed possible that a man of Hanks age could be found as a Sargent on D-day.
My grandfather was 34 when he was drafted and had lived a life of truck farming and odd jobs before he lost his leg and eye in the hedgerow country of northern France.
It wasn’t just 18-24 year olds fighting over there. Many of the officer candidates would’ve been older.
Yep, we often forget just how young our soldiers now are. As mentioned, in WWII we had a high average age in the field—mid to upper twenties. I don’t think we’ve fielded an army since then that old.
And I suspect the military likes it that way. As we age we become a little more retrospective wrt our actions. The service I think prefers the less thoughtful to carry out the (naturally) brutal—but necessary—aspects of killing your fellow man. 🙁
Compsci: “The service I think prefers the less thoughtful to carry out the (naturally) brutal—but necessary—aspects of killing your fellow man.”
It also correlates perfectly with a military brass comprising solely Passive Aggressive personality types, with nary an Active Aggressor in their ranks.
Passive Aggressives will always maneuver to have “Yes Men” under their command, rather than the kinds of “Phμck U” men who pose an existential threat to the Passive Aggressive Industrial Complex.
If he was 42 then he would have been some sort of supply officer or something like that. He would have aged out of front line infantry by then. Mid-thirties was about the limit for field grade officers in combat units at the time I think.
I can’t speak to that as I’m not military nor had relatives in American units in WWII, however I know of a 50 something yo Sargent in the AF Paramedics from local base here shipping out to combat duties in ME. The guy is a monster of a man and wanted action, so switched to a combat role from the paramedics. Seems Uncle Sam currently needs these folk regardless of advanced age.
I found it hilarious when Hanks “discovered” WWII after Saving Private Ryan and was Mr WWII for a while. That was shortly after he was Mr Apollo program. I read somewhere that Stephen Ambrose, author of Band of Brothers, had to bluntly tell Spielberg that Hanks was too old to play the part of Winters, otherwise old Tom was going to be Winters. Dunno, but funny if true.
I once heard Tom Hanks described as the Mr. Potato Head of the movie industry. After the Philadelphia story I put him on my “avoid like plague” list.
Sigh…Tom Hanks is probably the most talented and successful actor Hollywood has produced. That one doesn’t like Hanks is fine, for whatever reason, but denigrating his talent is unreasonable.
I don’t want to downvote because everyone’s entitled to their opinion, but it’s not one that I share.
Then name /describe your criteria for a “talented” actor?
Hanks movies are popular, numerous, and make money to boot. His roles are varied (as in not type cast, say as John Wayne was). He has been award the highest honors for his work. Is there any other criteria, other than “I don’t like the guy or his politics” you can provide?
And by the way, “I don’t like the guy or his politics” is perfectly valid for avoiding him—why give him any of your hard earned money—but not for denying his talent in his chosen profession.
I suppose I have to part ways with the claim that he’s the most talented actor Hollywood ever produced.
I haven’t seen many of his movies, but thought he was excellent in Saving Private Ryan, and Cast Away, neither of which are anti-white by any means.
Seeing him as Captain Phillips being spoken to by the Somali pirate is chilling, like watching an alien creature addressing an earthing- and boy, does it bring our message home.
He has a tremendous talent for imitating other people or playing fake people, all the while wearing a ton of make up. His talent lost to the world won’t mean a thing.
You’ve just describe the role of *any* professional actor, that is to say to mimic/portray a character whose lines and general behavior are dictated by the screen writer and director.
What the hell is your point–to revisit the middle ages whee actors and their profession were disreputable?
And what exactly is your problem with John Wayne?
He’s ok as an actor. Certainly worse out there. Hard to pin it down, but his characters always seem “fake deep” in the sense that he tries to be a deep character, but it comes across as somewhat fake, not genuine. His best role was Forest Gump.
As for more entertaining, Billy Crystal is pretty good, although he does often play the same/similar character – snarky New Yorker. But he does it well.
Makes Gran Torino sound like a ripoff.
Or an update for the boomers lol. Gritty old hand can’t stand his snowflake kids.
The movie was written by the same committee that wrote To Kill a Mockingbird, the most overrated book in history. It’s been years since I’ve seen the movie, but what struck me most when I saw it was the rudeness of (insert rich white girl) to spring this on her parents and then expect all of the supporting characters to do her heavy lifting throughout the movie. This is the only realistic part of the movie, as there are a lot of women like that to this day. I forgot that the timeline of the story is rushed because (insert-… Read more »
A lot of us were “pinkos” (loose use of that term to encompass more that commies) at that time. That I could see the movie when it came out and not throw up, puts me in that category. Today, I read Z-man’s summary and only think, “…did he really watch that movie and sit through it—again?”
This is extremely perceptive, and I thank you for taking the time to elucidate it so well for our edification. Bravo.
To Kill a Mockingbird is one of the most boring movies ever produced. Having said that, it should be mandatory for dissidents to view it. You have all the liberal psychodrama out there: The good white, noble, ethical …. The bad white, ignorant, violent, with bad teeth… The diverse people, like little children abused by the bad white and having the need of the good white to protect them. They even applaud the good white. The good white as a hero, as a knight that imparts justice. This narcissistic psychodrama is playing in the heads of every liberal. Nowhere was… Read more »
Satan and his legion of postmodern demons wriggled to the earth’s surface in the 1960s. Of that there is no doubt. Short of actual conquests such as resulted from the Mongol invasion in the 13th century, never has civilization been damaged so grievously in such a short time as the West circa 1964-1969. Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner? is one of that period’s semphores conducting the West into the abyss.
“ Satan and his legion of postmodern demons wriggled to the earth’s surface…”
Yes indeed, Ostei. That should be the first sentence of every post. Understand that—truly take it seriously—and all the rest is commentary.
Early boomer-1946- and like many now rue our small parts in the 60’s debasing the culture. Keep in mind that we were still wet behind the ears know it alls, not those responsible for manning the ramparts. Unfortunately, plenty of guilt to be spread about.
Someone needs to do an ai Pixar add for “Guess who came to dinner” featuring the White daughter with a black eye.
I love being at the age where I just don’t give a shit what people think of me. Truth be known, I’ve always been that way, it’s just when you are younger with a wife and kids to support, the necessity to simp is strong. I’ve stopped lowering my voice and whispering so as not to offend any of the “alphabet nazi’s” and am actively supporting my race. F’ em. F’em all.
The Cosby Show was also instructive. Season one, wholesome “gynecologist” with basement office, perfectly white acting family. By the last season they were jumping around like monkeys. Then 30 years later you find out that dad “the gynecologist” was in real life the most prolific rapist in modern history. We haven’t even seen the other shoe drop on the clean, articulate Obama.
One thing, I’m prety sure Obama will never be accused of raping a woman.
I’d be pretty pissed at the world too if all I got to f*ck was an ugly black man.
If you’re referring to Big Mike, I think it is the other way ’round…
His being a gynecologist, of all the specialties he could have been, can be seen in a new light after all the rape allegations. Which I take with a grain of salt btw. Since beloved house negroes like him had to be discredited, somehow, before The Precious could sic BLM on us.
Considering how many photos there are of simpering white floosies hanging off Cosby, sometimes 3 and 4 at a time, I doubt he ever had to ask twice for sex, let alone rape anyone.
I don’t think he’s a good guy (I remember how he stabbed Robert Culp in the back after Culp stood up for him for that first big role) but I think you’re right that there’s a secondary agenda here, tear down the black hero being uppermost.
Much agree. They had to tear down the statue of Uncle Tom before General Lee.
How did he stab Culp in the back? I know the show you’re refering to but have never seen it.
His being an ob-gyn was a way to introduce the concept of white women entrusting black men with the most sacred moment in their lives.
Double extra sacred gay black., the ever deadly third rail.
Guess Who Came In Your Daughter.
I’d say nothing dates the film more effectively than this: “He has a plan to save Africa by teaching the smart African kids how to do stuff so they can make Africa great again. No kidding.”
My father worked for the UN just after the film was made. This view — that Africa would be made into First-World nations by the generation born after the end of colonialism was irrefutable dogma among all aid agencies.
Understand: they all believed this.
In fairness, it was a less insane idea than Wakanda.
Had a professor who had worked for more than a decade in Africa to improve the economies before moving back and teaching.
He was a broken man. He said it was hopeless.
Africa always wins.
Around the same time as Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, the movie Africa Addio came out. A huge contrast between the latter’s harsh, brutal truths and the former’s propaganda lies.
“Wins,” indeed!
“It’s all so tiresome…”
exterminate the brutes
-original Kurtz
Take up the white man’s burden!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05vVnVETZmo
(thank goodness we’ll have no more of THAT!)
I don’t know when he took up the white man’s burden, but if he’d read VS Naipaul’s A Bend in the River, he might have been tipped off to what he was going to encounter. Naipaul was considered to be something of a race traitor for having written such an unflattering work in the late Seventies. After all, he was of Indian heritage. But Naipaul grew up in Trinidad and was not fond of the black, West Indian establishment, and he was overjoyed to find a home in England.
A Bend in the River is highly recommended reading (by me.) Another is Naipaul’s A House for Mr Biswas. Set in Trinidad (I think), it describes the efforts of an Indian man intent on building his dream house. It takes him decades. Illuminating as to the true nature of that demographic iis the constant backbiting and petty intrigues of his extended clan all seemingly intended to defeat his efforts.
There is a great book by a now dead telegram reported called Banana Sunday. it is his memoir of having covered Africa from right after the war through the end of colonialism. He has a lot of great observations about the Westerners who arrived in the 60’s and 70’s full of new ideas and new ways of selling them. He always returns to an axiom of Africa he learned when he started out there: Africa Wins Again. It means that all Western ideas eventually succumb to the reality of Africa.
There’s also Waugh’s “Black Mischief” from 1932. The aid workers give the Africans condoms, who use them to decorate trees, if I recall correctly. Modern people think the novel is “racist.” But Waugh, as a reactionary Catholic, really was satirizing modern whites for exterminating themselves with contraception. In 1930, the Lambeth Conference of the Church of England was the first major Protestant denomination to allow contraceptives, at first only for married couples. In the 91 years since Waugh’s novel, who has won the demographic war? Africa wins again.
Waugh and others of his era and earlier had to actually visit the Dark Continent to get a taste of its dysfunction. Today, we need merely drive down the street. Takes the fun out of it.
For anyone who hasn’t seen it, look up the documentary “Empire of Dust” (Chinese efforts to get something, anything, to work properly in Africa). The trailer suffices, and is still on Youtube. The Chinese administrator’s scathing rant to his foreman says it all.
I fully understand this idea ( of uplifting Negros). We were all naive at that time. What I don’t understand is why 50+ year letter we have not wised up.
After Germany and Japan bounced back from nothing but ashes the citizens of GAE got high on their own supply in thinking the success could be replicated everywhere.
Most whites seem impervious to race realism. It was not always thus. The steady decades-long barrage of propaganda has succeeded far better than the Foul Ones could have imagined.
A lot of whwt is denounced as “racism” is old race realism.
We must lose our fear of the accusation of “racism”. Brand those who throw the R word around
Agree. I’m a recovering civ at. I didn’t just drink the civnat Kool aid, oh no, i used to sell it. Today i have an oscillating sympathy for accelerationism
I sometimes wonder if the most radical dissidents won’t be us, the disabused former naive civnat idealists. Because added to the mix is the feeling of having been betrayed
“Understand: they all believed this.”
They really did. And they had the pure faith to back up their intentions. These people were goofy and laughable by that day’s standards, but they could move mountains and got shit done – ephemeral as their progress was and easily exploited and undone by the next local tinpot warlord.
An interesting turn in the plot was that the Draytons were not Catholic. The priest was just a family friend and not their spiritual advisor. I guess that justified their decision since it was motivated by (to them) secular advice.
As preachy and cringe as that Poitier movie was, the underlying sentiment of “racist White men must be schooled by noble negroes” got amped up to 11 in the mid-70s with TV sitcoms the likes of Good Times, What’s Happening!!, Diff’rent Strokes and a few others I am pleased to report that I can’t recall the names of. The overwhelming success of those humiliate-YT half hour homilies inevitably ushered in the pushy joosh angle (Bridgette Loves Bernie), blatant latino pandering (Chico and the Man) and even prototype stronk single woman-don’t-need-no-man fish bicycling (One Day At a Time). Naturally, there were… Read more »
Archie Bunker gave as good as he got.
Race was merely a comedic device in the vast majority of episodes of The Jeffersons, Good Times and Sanford and Son. The others, I don’t know much about, although I do recall Diff’rent Strokes being so dull and boring I couldn’t stand to watch it.
What-chu talkin’ about Rerun?
Diff’rent Strokes and Webster are routinely cited by leftists as “problematic” to “racist”. I guess the 1980s were a weird transitional period where white saviorism was not yet seen as backdoor supremacy.
Of course, the whole neoliberal project is a form of backdoor white supremacy. But no one knows that…yet.
It should have had a more realistic ending, either with her as a single mother with his kids unable to find a man willing to accept her and her offspring. Or even better with the husband facing a triple homicide rap where her and her parents are the victims. It is not at all difficult to find these cases IRL. It is no accident that the story is BM/WF instead of WM/BF. The people, and I’m willing to bet that they are spelled (((people))) who made this did it because they hate us. They thought the BM/WF formulation would maximize… Read more »
I think the BM/WF coupling was chosen because it was starting to happen at the time and the reverse, WM/BF was almost never happening. It was a significant form of rebellion among liberal college girls, although most of them didn’t take it to the point of marrying one.
Asian/White, Hispanic/White, Asian/Hispanic seem to go both ways. But black/White seems to heavily skew BM/WF for obvious reasons.
Hispanics appear to be the least miscegenating people of all. I respect them for that.
Hispanic is the result of miscegenation. The term Hispanic (in the US) usually refers to a mix of Indian (feather) and Spanish or Portuguese. IOW, a Mestizo.
There’s a movement in the Southwest somewhere where they claim to be the master race as bringing together the best of Indian and European. I forget the name of the movement though.
Supposedly there is what they call “colorism” in Central and South America where the higher your White ancestry the better and the higher your African ancestry the worse. Pretty funny when you think about i.
“ there is what they call “colorism” in Central and South America where the higher your White ancestry the better and the higher your African ancestry the worse.”
Very similar to the Indian (with a dot) Caste system. Darker you are, the lower the Caste.
Yeah but are Mexicans a mix?amerindian, Spaniards & African slave. Particularly of pygmy variety.
Hispanic is the result of miscegenation. The term Hispanic (in the US) usually refers to a mix of Indian (feather) and Spanish or Portuguese. IOW, a Mestizo.
True, but the definition used by GAE is much broader. Incidentally, several anthropologists (pro and amateur) regard Native Americans as being of Asian descent. So it could be argued mestizos are quasi-Hapas.
WMAF (white male asian female) is very dominant. I don’t know of any AMWF pairings personally, nor can I recall any in popular media.
You could see some BMAF (black male asian female) creeping into popular media recently, but it seems to have been halted. My guess is because you can’t humiliate Asians. They’ll just quietly boycott, and when their time comes, they will swarm and remove the problem.
I think I brought it up here not long ago, but I’ve had Chinese language ads for both Hyundai and Toyota on my phone recently. Guess how many negroes are featured? Guess how much miscegenation is depicted?
Just based on my personal observation, only know of one WM/BF, but know of several of the others, including AM/WF.
YMMV.
During the years 1967-70 WM/BW was something of a trendy thing. Van Morrison, ZZ Top, the Rolling Stones and Shocking Blue, among others, had hit songs rhapsodizing this dastardly dyad.
The question is and always has been why are modern whites so susceptible to the usual suspects’ (and their Puritan lackeys) propaganda? Sure, we got rich and lazy. There’s that. But other races have been wealthier and don’t seem willing to buy into the lies. Granted, the Japanese, Chinese and Koreans never allowed the usual suspects into their society so they can pick and choose what Western ideas to use and discard. But even Americans Hispanics, who aren’t the brightest bulbs and who live in America, don’t buy the Negro worship garbage, though that they are fine marrying whites. Also,… Read more »
The white guilt trip that the GAE laid on postwar Germany was so intense that it couldn’t be contained to just Germany
Absolutely. The modern German regime was rightly described as “anti-Germany”. But I don’t think that’s the whole story for the West. Something has gone totally wrong with all Europeans
“Also, whites used to be very race aware, just like other races. What happened to us? Why are we so ready to believe ridiculous lies?”
indoctrination in a country works only on native population, meaning american whites are the only ones who buy into the government bullshit.
chinese or mexicans are not susceptible to american hutu worship cause they’re not american, but they’re highly susceptible to indoctrination back home.
mexican/chinese states don’t promote miscegenation, that’s why people from those countries don’t worship hutus.
if chinese/mexican person fully integrates into white liberal society, then he also becomes susceptible to hutu worship.
I haven’t seen that. The Hispanics in the Northern Virginia openly hate blacks. The Asians and Indians avoid them like the plague and openly talk about blacks as animals.
I’ve never – never – seen an Asian or Indian with a black as a date. Come to think about about it, I’ve never seen a Hispanic with one either.
No. This is a white thing.
Where I live Puerto Rican girls with half black babies are extremely common.
Well most Puerto Ricans already have a great deal of jungle bunny blood flowing through their veins, so the genetic distance is not very great.
KGB: The entire population of the Dominican republic is half black/half mestizo. Extremely common mixture.
I have lots of experience working with hispanics. The vast majority I have observed hate blacks more than the KKK ever did.
I think it runs both ways. Recently had a Black electrician at my house to fix a few things and when confronted with each problem he’d look at the previous/original work and ask, “Did a Mexican do this?”
Glendower, I’ve had the same experience. Conservative Black guy we know rants and raves over IA’s and the border. Such speech is always startling for a White guy dutifully trained in what not to say. Makes me think it would be refreshing to be a minority some days and be free to say what the hell comes to mind whenever I want. ;-P
Yet, their pop culture is even more afro-centric than (((whitey’s))).
It is baffling why Whites fall for the propaganda, but the staggering number of hours spent in front of the TV explains a big part of it I’d say.
I’m guessing most of us here fell for it at one time, at least to some extent. I know I did, a long time ago. The good news is, once you snap out of it, there’s no going back to being a race delusionist.
In Latin America societies, whites are high status, blacks are bottom status..As Steve Sailer has noticed several times, skin whitener sells by the car load in Brazil…
Check out what Sammy Sosa looks like today vs. his late-90’s heyday.
Steve Sailer notices a lot of the little things, but somehow lately he misses a few of the big, obvious, important things.
Skin whiteners sell big in the Caribbean countries. There are even YT video interviews discussing the phenomena. One aspect are native women asking their prospective boyfriends whether they use such products. Truth in advertising as it were. Seems that it’s a big thing to be as white as you can be to land hot chicks.
Europeans are perfectly well adapted to dealing with the actual threats that historically faced them. We can see this even today in the Ukraine conflict with the pan-European response to a Russian incursion. Then they developed the technology to travel to places and people with which they had no prior connection (aside from Marco Polo and a few others, trade in the ancient world traveled in hops with no real intercourse occurring end-to-end). Initially, the European explorers’ reaction to the locals was about what you’d expect, with conquest and proselytizing being high on the agenda. Now, the former colonials (having… Read more »
Modern Whites on both sides overestimate how racist Whites were in the past, but the truth is Whites of Northern European decent have long been at least somewhat accepting of outsiders.
Heritage Americans used to treat non-Whites as second class citizens, while at the the same time they strongly believed they had a moral responsibility to care for them. This sort of good shepherd mentality is probably the main difference between (some) Whites and everyone else.
Another wise negro-bad white man film of the era was The Bedford Incident. Richard Widmark was the overzealous, even maniacal, navy destroyer skipper and Poitier a visiting press reporter. Poitier waxes poetic and Widmark ends up killing them all with his whiteness. Ostensibly a Cold War action film, it employed the same devices as Guess Who Is Coming to Dinner.
I didn’t think The Bedford Incident played up the racial angle nearly as much as Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner. Poitier’s photojournalist character could have easily been played by a white actor. Widmark’s character is a resentful martinet who has been passed over for promotion. He’s got a chip on his shoulder the size of the rock of Gibraltar. Widmark’s character dislikes Poitier’s character not so much for being black, but for being yet another smug, effete liberal who sneers at the military while sleeping soundly under the protection it provides. They filmmakers even take a swipe at Barry Goldwater… Read more »
Don’t forget that in 1967, the educated classes where very internationalist in their outlook and were quite taken with the idea of transnational institutions solving global problems. It was the pinnacle of the optimism of the human reason. For the upper crust in those days, the idea of a black doctor running the WHO, or an international man of mystery like Obama becoming the US president, was not really subversive or contrary to the felt pieties of the era. It was something they looked upon with a sense of accomplishment, just like the contemporaneous space program and the general advancement… Read more »
“Don’t forget that in 1967, the educated classes where very internationalist in their outlook and were quite taken with the idea of transnational institutions solving global problems.”
Agreed. These were the heady days of the post-colonial era when a new indigenous ruling class was coming to power in Africa and Asia. These were people who wore suits and could speak fluent English (or French). Two of the films Poitier was in have this transnational leitmotif — “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” and even more so “A Warm December.”
Who was in the driver’s seat then? It was the supposed greatest generation. Many of them were socialists at best, proto communists had a great deal of influence. Despite what the cold war was supposed to be the frankfort school types had a headstart & were a huge influence
on early boomers that were just getting started.
I think that’s why the first scene takes place in an airport, where (as Zman notes) everyone is cool with the inter-racial couple. In 1967, airports were The Future: stark and clean, upper class, trans-national, enlightened. Sparsely populated too.
The message is: This is where all the beautiful people already are, so the rest of you need to get with the program.
Yes indeed, and the Peace Corps was hot stuff everywhere in the Ivy League and beyond…It didn’t accomplish anything but made everyone feel good…
It helped accomplish one thing: a big population boom in Africa
Yes, and a lot of those peace corps people recognized a deal when they saw it, and bought up tons of land in the countries they were ‘helping’ for pennies on the dollar. Seems like an (((ivy league))) scheme…
Anything that gets the accolades & the relentless media promotion/spin I avoid like the plague & I’m in the biz but then I’m a heretic. Years ago flagellating over a stupid, insipid film called “Sideways” was all the rage; two ugly losers go on an extended drunk in Napa County & we’re supposed to think it’s the greatest thing since sliced bread. Fortunately saw it for free, not even worth $1.00.
General Rule of Thumb: anything the industry/corporate media complex tells you is “great” run the opposite direction.
A key component of the Satanic Inversion is an inversion of taste. Spend your time and money accordingly.
Precious metals steel, copper, lead , various other things have been winners for my portfolio.
Tangibals.
Monopoly money, not so much.
“Of course, the civil rights movement was at its peak, so this was just what white liberals wanted to see, which was white liberals being celebrated for their goodness.” That’s the rub, ain’t it? There may be no limit to how impressed white liberals are with themselves. That is why I’m skeptical of this notion of “guilt-ridden liberals” that I’ve seen a couple of the commenters here invoke. These liberals have never appeared the least bit guilty to me. Rather, they have consistently exhibited self-satisfaction in the extreme. Their seemingly masochistic racial views serve as status markers for them: those… Read more »
Guilty as charged. I think you are correct. Even urban whites were still rural and provincial. In the big urban centers they encountered a smug, arrogant group long accustomed to living above the riff-raff as cosmopolitans. Those provincials felt ashamed and lacked confidence so they bent over backwards to adopt every fashion and trend proposed by the well-heeled perma-cosmopolitans. I see it still today. The midwesterner who comes to the big city and feeling the weight of no status cave in around him, moves to hipster area, gets covered in tattoos, plasters his cafe with, “Trans Kids Have Rights”, posters… Read more »
R word? Republican?
Gods this is good stuff.
“Raciss”, then, is a codeword for ‘toothless sister-shaggin’ hillbilly’, ‘ungrateful peasant’, and the like.
As if the well-dressed, sternly professional, stiffly formal South didn’t know which fork to begin with.
Good point. The Southern elite maintained their aristocratic nature as the northern elite descended into a merchant driven order, which is to say, a disorder.
OT: There are still based working class white men in Queens.
Construction Worker Who Confronted Man Tearing Down Missing Israeli Posters in NYC Says He is Not a Hero
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/11/construction-worker-who-confronted-man-tearing-down-missing
Includes video of the confrontation.
Of course the poster remover shouldn’t be here in the first place.
He is right – he is not a hero.
Z took a high hard one for the team when he viewed this dreck.
“That is why I’m skeptical of this notion of “guilt-ridden liberals” that I’ve seen a couple of the commenters here invoke. These liberals have never appeared the least bit guilty to me. Rather, they have consistently exhibited self-satisfaction in the extreme.”
Agreed. Many dissident writers, Jared and Derb come to mind, sometimes refer to white people hating themselves.
They don’t hate themselves. As you noted, they feel great about themselves. They just hate us and our history.
Agree, as I understand cuck porn is quite popular & heavily promoted by ((( purveyors)))
[…] ZMan breaks out the popcorn. […]
Fast forward ten years: Sidney Poitier has a protective order against him by the mud sh*rk and her two mystery spawn. Katherine Hepburn has become an alcoholic and pill addict. Spencer Tracey is now a proto-SJW race-attorney and is constantly guilt-shaming his woebegone daughter. The priest has been exposed and defrocked as… well, you know. The elder Poiters are dead in a double murder-suicide that looks staged. Their son Sidney is the prime suspect but he’s been too slick to be caught, hiding behind his elite perquisites. I never watched this absurd melodrama. I never will. I might have watched… Read more »
It was so obviously ridiculous that no one I knew ever watched it…The audience was the middle class middle aged and elderly….
I think Spencer Tracey died only a week or two later, possibly from embarrassment at participating in such a cringe-worthy event….
Well Sidney Poitier was married to a white woman (Joanna shimkus) and there was never any of that stuff as far as I know.
Plus, only one of his two daughters he had with her had children of there own, and it was with a white guy.
(((Joanna Shimkus)))
Incidentally, shimkus means mudshark in Yiddish.
Holy smokes.
Collected his bounty, did he?
The talent scouts must’ve searched high and low like they did with Obama.
Yesterday I was on the treadmill at the gym and there was a bank of televisions in front of me. I always do my best to avoid eye contact with them but it’s impossible not to at least glance up from time to time. The one directly in front of me was broadcasting Fox News. I happened to look up while they were in a commercial break (keep in mind I can’t hear anything, the TVs are all muted with captions). An “ad” begins with a man walking out of his home in an upper middle class subdivision. He gets… Read more »
If you watched the World Series last night, you’ll have seen a commercial announcing, with stark white text on a solemn black card, that antisemitism has risen 388% lately (such a specific number must be true, right?). Then another title card announces that anti Muslim, black, Asian and LGBT hate has risen too. That got a series of audible “F You”-s out of me. Even if you grant that the rise in antisemitic statements is real—that they even represent antisemitism strictly defined—who exactly is responsible for it? Who are the protestors against Israel? Answer: Muslims, blacks, pink-haired lesbians, the whole… Read more »
Not to tell you what to do ChrisZ. Consider, no matter how cool baseball in the playoffs is, not watching it anymore. I think we are better off putting together an education curriculum or starting a pro-European mens group in our local area. That kind of blatant anti-white propaganda does not warrant support.
Just a suggestion my good man. God bless!
Ha—you’re a good guy, Reality. I had the game on in the background as I was puttering around, playing with the dog, and reading (an article about Eliot’s “The Waste Land,” as Providence had it).
The sound of baseball being played recalls some beautiful times for me. But the thought you express has frequently come to my mind; and I’ve warned my kids off of getting emotionally attached to sportsball.
Thanks for your good counsel, and good wishes. They are returned.
Yes. Of all the sportsball playoff MLB is the most compelling and riveting of the sports. At that stage every single pitch has meaning in the context of that shifts slightly with each pitch and count. It is a marvel of a game when the announcers can explain it to you from the manager’s, batter’s and pitcher’s perspective. It is a shame all of our games have been ruined by white erasure and oligarchs using them as a heavy handed propaganda mechanism. The same is true of tennis which is now an unenjoyable sack of ruins. Right on ChrisZ. I… Read more »
I have a group of engineers that I work with that I call “the lunch bunch.” The first time we went out to eat, I told everyone to turn off their phones and that everything we said would be off the record. We would have full free speech, even things considered verboten by those in charge. We supported each other and told the truth about the “crime of noticing” and other issues. We helped each other with our problems. We laughed. Sometimes we commiserated. Sometimes we celebrated. It was a great fellowship, united by the fact we were men being… Read more »
Whatever it has risen to is not enough.
Considering that their metric also encomposes criticisms – at all – of any of their behaviors, policies, or attitudes, even when warranted, we sail into the teeth of the gale they whip up.
“ …that antisemitism has risen 388% lately…” Been there, done that…. Way back when the Feminists were in their heyday on campus, they came out with the stat that 3 in 4 coeds would be the victim of sexual molestation on campus during their program of studies. The issue was not so much the statistic, but the *definition* of the term “sexual molestation”. Normal people consider the worse, like rape. feminists defined molestation to be just about any activity between the sexes that they disliked. Similarly, I take the above antisemitism stat as bogus until I know exactly their definition… Read more »
Glancing at a nice set of cams beneath a low-cut halter top–molestation.
Eating a ham-and-cheese sandwich–anti-semitisim.
Wow! Wow! Wow! Evil.
Duh duh duhhhh!:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2R1ZVygVHwk
Not quite as you recall, but I’ve half-watched stuff at the gym too. Still super ghey though.
Thank you, I looked for it yesterday evening and couldn’t find it. I missed the first few seconds, and couldn’t hear it. So my apologies to…ah fuck it. With all the anti-white propaganda out there, I get a Mulligan.
And the message itself still grates. You know where there isn’t any anti-Semitism? Israel. I hear it’s a wonderful place.
Yup
Gonna get me a mowhawk, a motorcycle, and some assless chaps
Gonna be the Road Warrior guy raving “kill..kill…kill…”
Maybe she was embarrassed with the poor workmanship of the swastika?
So, I take it this was an ad for Wolverine boots or Home Depot?
These boots’re gonna go joggin’
They’re gonna jog all over you
The good news is that Killers of the Flower Moon has bombed at the box office and is virtually certain to be a big money loser. After 3 weeks in theaters, not even halfway to recouping its $200 million budget. But for Apple, a $50 million loss (when all is said and done) is a rounding error. It can afford to do that a few more times in the name of whatever it is it is trying to do.
…soooo…I’m guessing academy award nomination/ award?
It will sweep the Oscars. No doubt about it.
The Fatigue is strong in that one.
Thank you for this. There is a silly view that anti-white propaganda just started in the last 10 years or so. But you can find it going back at least to the 1950s. Take a look at popular shows of the period and there was a lot of preaching us about how evil white bigots were etc
But as the article states, white liberals and moderate whites were so incredibly gullible. We need to point out the anti-wide agenda in TV shows and in schools going back to at least mid-century.
As a kid I noticed that on one episode of Kids Say the Darndest Things, Art Linkletter gave the microphone to one young kid-contestant who was black, who repeated what he had been coached to say: “the world needs to recognize Sammy Davis Jr. and Ray Charles.” Without comment, Art took the microphone to the next kid. Was he based?
The joke was on him. Even Ray Charles couldn’t recognize Sammy Davis.
And this is one reason I disdain the term “woke.” So-called “wokeness” is hardly anything new. It’s just the same old anti-white shit that had been going on 50 years hopped up on steroids.
This is a complex history, but I get what you mean. By accidents of life I came late to the liberal party and was around college students 15 years ago before the awokening happened. I remember then was peak Family Guy irreverence against everything and GWB bashing. But I also remember a young woman that called her friends tranny as a way to bond with them. At the time liberals fanaticism was contained to GOP bashing. But sometime around 2012 there was a viral contagion of anti white ideology. I used to live near a college campus B&N and then… Read more »
The long war against whites would have never succeeded if a major flank in the anti-white army was not comprised of guilt-ridden good whites desperate to assuage their imagined guilt by consuming and accepting images of them accepting fealty to the grand genius blacks who now flower due to our emancipating them. A strange idea. A people so impotent they need to be freed and then bowed down to by the people who they will be superior to. In any case, the stupid whites who see themselves as good whites are still arrayed against us. Unfortunately, those stupid whites have… Read more »
This is exactly how I read the Bible, a chronicle of the shifting winds of loyalty and identity between the white and mixed twelve tribes.
Reading it like that means the possibility that we can bring many Christians back to /our/ side, across the bridge, away from the universalists.
Not that the Word is false, but that its reading was shifted by false priests.
1960s, early 70s was the $ hegemony war with europe. jfk, ml, vietnam, watergate, degaulle’s naval ships to nyc to collect gold for $, kissinger, nixon, counter revolution, bra burning, abortion entitlements, feminism all happened & it was too early to bring forth a blackman messiah but hwood needed to appease
When that movie was released, I took great pains not to be corralled into watching it. I guessed it was bad, but until I read this post, I had no idea it was THAT bad.
I didn’t know anyone who watched it…really wonder whether the box office numbers were real….
Who could forget Weezie calling Portier “an uppity nigga”?
pyrrhus: I remember watching a bit of of it with my parents when it was on t.v. in 1971. Didn’t even know who the surprise dinner guests were and obviously the little I watched made no great impression on me. I was 14 at the time.
For the people pushing and peddling the yarn that there are no race differences, Sidney Poitier was a godsend. One of those rare blacks who actually had some intelligence and could talk and comport himself like a white man. He was not a bad actor. He made a number of films back then — “In the Heat of the Night” comes to mind but also “A Warm December.”
The deceit lies in portraying Poitier as representative of his race. He’s most emphatically not. Though guilt-ridden liberals might want to imagine so.
But Sidney Poitier did make an outstanding communist.
Poitier and a few others were the model that nice, naive Whites believed all blacks could be, given the elimination of poverty and segregation. The truth is Poitier was just at the right tail of the bell curve and was an outlier, one of the Talented Tenth. The naive Whites back then expected that eventually most blacks would become “more White,” similar to Poitier. Instead, in the same way that standards in school and professions have been lowered or eliminated, our Western culture has become degraded, becoming saturated with black “music”, movies, fashion, behavior, etc. Blacks never became Poitierized, and… Read more »
Once civilizing the negro proved impossible, whites chose to be Africanized.
I got suckered into watching “In the Heat of the Night”. It was the worst movie I had seen up to that time, and I had already sat through some Three Stooges films.
It is still high on my list of bad movies.
The same could be said of Tom Sowell and Clarence Thomas, both of whom I respect a great deal.
He’s Caribbean. Wasn’t raised in Oakland schools.
The director of Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner was Stanley Kramer. I just checked his early life and it’s Every Single Time again. It’s so predictable.
I wonder how loud the ‘Oy Vey’ would be if Stanley’s daughter brought home Sidney for dinner?
Again wit’ de schwartzes! I cannot digest my knishes and I think I’m getting a fever. I’m gonna have a lie-down…
Important to note the common thread between “Guess whose…” and another culture-impact movie in the same era, The Graduate — the producer-directors. The former, Stanley Kramer, the latter, Mike Nichols, nee Mikhail Igor Peschkowsky. Both Jews.
You beat me to it!
Don’t forget Norman Jewison and “In the Heat of the Night.”
Norm, despite his name, isn’t a Jew-son.
Ah, okay. The name had me fooled.
I can’t imagine why…
they call me MR.TIBBS!
Ha! He was only trying to civilize those uncouth little British barbarians.
In the mean time, the numinous ones have melted down the statue of Robert E Lee, and are forcing the re-naming of birds, because birds be rayciss..
JWM
Gonna start buying you coffee again around the Holidays just for the Title;
Came for Dinner and Never Left.
LMAO 🤣 ROFL 🤪
It is impossible for me to watch any movie Poitier was in. He is simply not very good. Same with Harry Belafonte. Ghastly back then, ghastly today.
Shoot To Kill, starring Portier, Tom Berenger, Kirstie Alley, and the great Clancy Brown as the villain, was a somewhat forgotten movie that is a fun watch. Not because of anything to do with Portier, he just happened to be there.
Oh no.
Now you’ve simply *got* to watch “White Man’s Burden”, with Belafonte & Travolta.
Africans colonized America.
A stupid white janitor, descendant of slaves, is accused of a murder.
The movie starts out with the janitor trying to tell/not tell his kid, no, don’t pick the black Superman toy.
I have mused on more than one occasion, What would I do if one of my daughters brought one home for dinner? I believe I have done a good job raising them and their tastes (I seem to have appropriately honed natural aversion), but I cannot help but sometimes wonder.
I saw a clip of a homeless man who said he saw a woman let herself be known by a dog for some crack. Now why would a crack dealer do that? Racial humiliation. I feel that the only way to regain honor once it is lost is through violence. But knowing Whites most of them would rather cope via their religion and take succor in that. But honor itself can only be regained by violence. Fact is Whites as a race were coasting on the honor of their ancestors. The White race is losing honor fast.
Absolutely Mr Burns, our Honor can only be regained by violence.
It takes more courage to just softly speak up for your people in a public setting.
What reason do you have for believing the woman was white?
Do you think that is part of black on white violence or is it just revenge for hate’s sake?
Well, can’t it also be that our women are, objectively (such as the term is worth), prettier? Then, mix in the dominance associated with sex.
A warehouser and I were chatting, late, in PA. Alone in the warehouse.
A driver had told him the joyous news: driver’s going to be a grandpa!
To a coal chile; baby daddy has already departed the scene.
His advice to the budding grandpa: drown it in a bucket.
Based!
Cultural value be damned, I have never, nor will I ever subject myself to one of these white-guilt movies. Why should I watch a movie that I know for certain I will hate? The whole genre of these “feel-sorry-for-the-negro” (or other oppressed-by-whitey) movie is to change white behavior and have us accept the forced-at-gunpoint desegregation of the federal government. No thanks. A short list among the dozens if not hundreds of these anti-white movies I have never nor will ever watch are: In the Heat of the Night, Patch of Blue, MS Burning, Till, Jungle Fever, 12 Years a Slave,… Read more »
You should watch these movies so you know what lurks behind the dark eyes of the negro right before he bashes your brains out.
Even though I agree with Boris and don’t willingly subject myself to anti-white movies, I upvoted you for the LOLs. In these dark times, a good laugh is always appreciated.
One or two is enough to get the gist. You don’t need to torture yourself with all of them. The Tarantino ones (based on maybe 5 min of each I have seen) are especially bad and to be avoided. They are just cartoons.
Tarantino is the king of Hollywood anti-white racists, and that’s saying something. Interestingly enough, he’s also a goy.
DiCaprio in “Django”!
Gods, I want to BE that guy. Especially when he shoots the shitlib!
You don’t need to sit through two hours of anti-white agitprop to know that.
I don’t watch them either but it’s important that people on our side understand what kind of propaganda is being used against us. And have the knowledge to ridicule it.
Scored a 100%: I haven’t seen ANY of the movies on Boris’ list.
The complete subjugation of Whites to their Jewish masters and their subsequent humiliation and abject grovelling prove once and for all how utterly non-exceptional the American nation really is.
At this point in history Mr. burns the American nation is utterly non exceptional. But it wasn’t always that way. In fact at one time we were the most exceptional nation that ever existed.
Not really, but we were once the most exceptional nation of the time.
Thinking like “greatestest of all time ever” leads to the hubris of thinking you cannot fail like other past great civilizations and makes you susceptible to accepting bad ideas because you are invincible. Like unexamined immigration.
This is a very good point, c matt, that deserves repetition and elaboration.