Under New Management

President Trump has wrapped up his trip to Saudi Arabia and the Western media is trying hard to ignore it. The main reason is they hate Trump, of course, but a secondary reason is they do not understand the importance of the trip. To them, it just looks like another foreign trip by a president. In reality it is a glimpse of how the large share owners of America Inc. are restructuring the company. The deals signed in Saudi Arabia are the first step in that restructuring.

For fifty years, the United States and Saudi Arabia had an agreement primarily centered around oil trade and the use of the U.S. dollar. The formal part of the agreement committed the Saudis to investing their profits from energy into U.S. Treasuries in exchange for American military commitments. The result was the Saudis priced everything in dollars, which led all other OPEC members to work in dollars, thus establishing the petrodollar concept.

The reason the dollar is the world’s reserve currency is it is backed with energy, the one thing everyone needs. The gold bugs like to say the dollar is “fiat currency” and is just colorful bits of paper, but that was always false. The dollar, like all real money, represents power. From the 1970’s to the present, the dollar represented the power of the United States and the power of hydrocarbons. Instead of money backed by shiny bits of metal, the dollar was backed by energy.

Another consequence of this arrangement is it provided an unlimited demand for dollar-denominated debt, especially treasuries. Because that debt is created within the American banking system, it made the United States the global bank. In effect, the petrodollar arrangement made the United States the world mint and the world’s banker, with the oil producing countries as the miners. With only one mint, it meant that the United States also controlled the mines.

This system has been under great pressure of late for a few reasons. One is the abuse of the system by the neocons in their foreign policy schemes. No one cared that much about using the financial system against small, nuisance countries like North Korea, but when the system was turned against big countries like Russia, one of the important mints, then people did care. The rise of BRICS as an off-dollar trading system was a response to the abuse of the system.

Another reason for the faltering dollar scheme is the Saudis decided to let the fifty-year-old agreement lapse. One reason for this is the abuse of the system by the neocons during the Biden years. The neocons were deliberately trying to destabilize the region in their war against Russia. This is not what the Saudis want. The other reason is the world is changing, and the Saudis need to adapt. They cannot continue to be a gas station in the desert. They need to diversify.

The biggest reason for the pressure on the petrodollar system is it hollowed out the American economy. It is not just the decline in manufacturing, which gets most of the attention, but also the decline in the nation’s infrastructure. This is becoming acute as the demand for electricity climbs. Artificial Intelligence may be oversold, but it is a real thing that will spike demand for electricity. Without trillions in new investments, the United States will not keep up with the world.

That last bit is the what the Saudi deal addresses. The Saudis are not going to plow their profits into treasuries, but into direct investments in the United States, while the United States provides support for Saudi Defense and infrastructure. This means the Saudis will be investing in American companies that are doing work inside the United States to build factories and infrastructure. The Saudis are not just a mint serving the American bank, but an investor in America Inc.

That is another thing easily missed about this trip. In the past, presidents went to Saudi Arabia to talk about military cooperation and the local politics. Business was delegated to Treasury and Commerce. The Treasury Secretary might make a trip to the region and meet his counterparts to discuss money. When a president visited these countries, money was not on the agenda. It was politics and the military situation in the places where America had stationed soldiers.

Notice on this trip that Scott Bessent was on the trip. Notice also that Bessent turns up in all of these foreign policy events. He led the charge on the so-called mineral deal with the Ukrainians. For the first time in a long time the bankers are now part of the foreign policy discussion. In fact, Bessent is involved in everything. He is part of the effort to root out some of the massive waste in government. What we are seeing is the return of political – economy to America Inc.

For several decades, at least, the managerial class has separated economics from politics, leaving the latter to the elected officials. Economics was too important to let the politicians get involved, so it was handled by experts. The result has been the perversion of economic policy. Instead of economic policy that benefits the people of the nation, we got policy that satisfied the theorists and the tiny minority that was able to arbitrage their access to the experts.

What this trip to Saudi Arabis represents is the return of political-economy where political decisions, including foreign policy, is measured against the standard of the national interests. Trump made that clear in his speech. He declared that foreign policy would no longer be about nation wrecking but about making deals that benefit the American people. Much as economics is being dragged from the abstract to the practical, foreign policy is being brought back to reality.

This trip also symbolizes the return of American Inc. The United States has never been a country in the traditional sense. It was always a business, something like a conglomerate containing many regional companies. The post-Cold War years were a monopoly phase, where managers stopped worrying about profits and focused on pet projects and social schemes. That time is done, and the company needs to be radically reformed to become competitive again.

Like all corporate restructurings, this one will fall far short of the dreams of the reformers, but whatever the result, it must be better than the alternative because the alternative is bankruptcy. In the case of empires, bankruptcy usually ends with the shareholders swinging from trees. The oligarchs of American seem to get this, which is why they are backing Trump and his turnaround team. Time will tell if American Inc. re-emerges as a strong company or a failed experiment.


If you like my work and wish to donate, you can buy me a beer. You can sign up for a SubscribeStar or a Substack subscription and get some extra content. You can donate via PayPal. My crypto addresses are here for those who prefer that option. You can send gold bars through the postal service to: Z Media LLC P.O. Box 1047 Berkeley Springs, WV 25411-3047. Thank you for your support!


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
109 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mycale
Mycale
6 hours ago

I read an article on CNN today where the lead paragraph was, in summary “Trump was lying about egg prices dropping, but now they are dropping.” Of course, the media is the Enemy of the People and everything they say about the Trump presidency is part of their false narrative building. I also noticed the neocon rags tried to center Israel in its reporting on this trip, even though Trump explicitly pushed Israel to the side in a way that seems unprecedented. This speaks to both the strong headwinds that Trump faces as he tries to center America, and also… Read more »

Jack Dodson
Jack Dodson
Reply to  Mycale
5 hours ago

 I also noticed the neocon rags tried to center Israel in its reporting on this trip, even though Trump explicitly pushed Israel to the side in a way that seems unprecedented. 

It is striking. We may not live to see it fully realized, but the Israel-centric world of the last eighty years is going away now. The frenzied ethnic cleansing of Gaza indicated Israel knew the relationship was diminishing so a decision was made to finish the job. The calculation was right. It will be nice not to hear and read about Israel all of the time everywhere, won’t it?

ProZNoV
ProZNoV
Reply to  Jack Dodson
5 hours ago

The 80 Year Israel curse remains undefeated.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Jack Dodson
4 hours ago

I think it’s breaking before our eyes. I enjoy a youngish streamer, Asmongold, who is quite the centrist. I even joked in the comment stream that he was more of a Boomer than I was. He’s quite popular and his content is as much political as gaming. (India has just announced him a national hero for his coverage of the Pak-India brouhaha.)

Even he rolls his eyes at the amount of Noticing he gets. He frequently has to warn his audience to lay off all the Noticing. Apparently nobody except him believes the Holo horsepuckey anymore.

Last edited 4 hours ago by Alzaebo
Whiskey
Reply to  Alzaebo
2 hours ago

It was real, it did happen, and it was awful. However, it was not unique. It was neither the first in the 20th Century (Armenians claim that “honor”) nor even the second (the Greeks in Turkey, then the Holodomor were #2, and #3). Off the top of my head I can add in no particular order: the Chinese in Indonesia and Malaya, the Ibo in Nigeria (Biafran Civil War), the Parsis in Zanzibar (why Freddy Mercury’s parents fled), the Rohingya in Burma, the Tibetans, the Uighurs, the Copts in Egypt, the Tutsis in Rwanda, the East Timoreans, the Cambodians, the… Read more »

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Whiskey
39 minutes ago

Thank you, brother, for the reply. You have been much on my mind, as we are the same in the most profound way. Please, my pen name, small “a”, alzaebo at yahoo email; just say ‘this is Whiskey,’ if you would.
———————
Genocide? No. Ethnic cleansing, you bet. But the lurid phantasms were no more than that, a true blood libel that cannot be reconciled with.
Strongly agree that right rat-bastards were involved, as or more revolting to the conscience than the ones commiting atrocity on the Allied side. Both are hard to stomach, much less admit to.

Last edited 11 minutes ago by Alzaebo
Falcone
Falcone
Reply to  Jack Dodson
3 hours ago

Our glorious future now means instead of having to hear about Israelis 24/7 we get to hear about Arabs all day long. They’ll soon be here taking over swaths of the economy, undoubtedly accompanied by millions of Arab immigrants getting preferential loans and so forth.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Falcone
1 hour ago

That is exactly what I am afraid of. Muslims are a different order of threat entirely.

Stephanie
Stephanie
Reply to  Alzaebo
1 hour ago

People are more primed to go along with an Islamic POV now than they were before, by a long shot. And we all remember the quote about the strong horse. They could make some serious inroads into the American culture.

Last edited 1 hour ago by Stephanie
miforest
miforest
Reply to  Falcone
1 hour ago

giberish

Falcone
Falcone
Reply to  miforest
57 minutes ago

Indians and Armenians get preferential loans. They have special programs just for them I’m sure others. Arabs won’t be any different. They’ll undoubtedly have banks opening up in America tied to the Saudi royals and/or wealth funds.

verdict: NOT gibberish

Stephanie
Stephanie
Reply to  Falcone
1 hour ago

Could be. India got knocked out of the running recently with the H1B thing so now it could be Saudi Arabia’s turn to give it a go. Let’s watch and see what happens.

If they think they can come over and act like entitled douchebags and slap around the American kids with ease, build a million ostentatious mosques, and so forth, then Houston, we have a problem.

I.M. Brute
I.M. Brute
Reply to  Jack Dodson
53 minutes ago

I’ve been predicting for decades that the next time an atomic bomb is used in anger, it will be Israel unleashing this hell. I see no reason to change my prediction.

Jannie
Jannie
Reply to  Mycale
4 hours ago

Not Israel so much as Netanyahu (or “The Man Who Should Have Resigned On October 8th”). Edan Alexander’s family thanked Trump and Witkoff for his release, not Netanyahu. Many believe he is simply prolonging the Gaza war to appease his Kahanist coalition partners (Ben Gvir and Smotrich) and cling to power – once out of office, he is looking at jail time for corruption charges.

Jews across the spectrum seem to be fed up with Netanyahu, Witkoff included. So I wouldn’t read Trump’s trip as a snub to Israel, but rather its current government.

ProZNoV
ProZNoV
Reply to  Jannie
4 hours ago

The Crusades held functional control of Jerusalem for about 88 years.

The post 1900 European movement into the same area appears to be on track to last roughly as long.

Establishing an alien colony in the middle of lands where you’re the vast minority means every roll of the dice has to come up 7.

(7 million vs about 400 million 1:55 …and it’s much greater if you consider the global population sympathetic to the recently displaced…
15.8 million vs 2 billion)

Jannie
Jannie
Reply to  ProZNoV
1 hour ago

Well, the Boers are still going strong in South Africa!

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
Reply to  Jannie
3 hours ago

Sure, Netanyahu is the problem. If it wasn’t for him everything would be fine.

What would be different if Netanyahu was out? Genocide at half speed. Not that I care all that much, but your deflections are annoying.

Jannie
Jannie
Reply to  LineInTheSand
1 hour ago

Netanyahu out means Ben Gvir and Smotrich out, more reasonable Israeli leadership which can get the hostages home.

Steve
Steve
Reply to  LineInTheSand
49 minutes ago

Genocide at half speed.”

Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

That’s an “over there” matter. We have a great plenty of “over here” matters to keep us busy.

I.M. Brute
I.M. Brute
Reply to  LineInTheSand
47 minutes ago

Did Netanyahu have anything to do with the USS Liberty attack?

Falcone
Falcone
Reply to  Jannie
3 hours ago

You think part of the deal was that Edan had to agree to shun Bibi? I can see Team Trump going for that so they could publicly humiliate Bibi.

Jannie
Jannie
Reply to  Falcone
1 hour ago

That’s a good point: quite possibly!

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Jannie
1 hour ago

I think that is a very accurate read of the situation by Jannie and Falcone.

Last edited 1 hour ago by Alzaebo
crabe-tambour
crabe-tambour
Reply to  Jannie
1 hour ago

Ler’s just say that Hamas’s attacks on Oct. 7, the IDF’s stupefying unpreparedness, and Bibi’s self-styling as The Essential Man may not have been coincidental. And oh, yeah, Bibi faces an eventual reckoning courtesy of many influential enemies once his coalition inevitably collapses.

Jannie
Jannie
Reply to  crabe-tambour
1 hour ago

Bibi is renowned for stirring up strife on the Temple Mount just before elections, presenting himself as the “War Leader”. As for IDF “stupefying unpreparedness” prior to October 7: very similar to 1973, when they got complacent about the Egyptians and Syrians and were nearly defeated. Thinking all Arabs are just inferior and stupid.

Ketchup-stained Griller
Ketchup-stained Griller
6 hours ago

the dollar was backed by energy…
and aircraft carriers.

lavrov
lavrov
Reply to  Ketchup-stained Griller
4 hours ago

On the second point, Houthis like to have a chat with you 🙂

IIRC, Saudis had an ongoing war against Houthis, which they lost and settled.

miforest
miforest
Reply to  lavrov
1 hour ago

we did too.

Falcone
Falcone
Reply to  Ketchup-stained Griller
3 hours ago

Was it backed by or better said underwritten by energy trading?

when a currency is backed as was with gold, didn’t one dollar equal a certain amount of gold? Where you could trade it in for the metal if you wanted?

Paintersforms
Paintersforms
Reply to  Falcone
2 hours ago

Interesting point. I’d always taken the weekly change in gas prices for granted. Now they’re in a completely different context.

ArthurinCali
4 hours ago

What was most striking about Trump’s remarks in Saudi Arabia was his acknowledgement of the failures of 21st century Neoconservative policies in the region. Ideas of nation building and democracy at the barrel of a gun were some of the worst self-inflicted injuries to American credibility. To see an American president point this out, to the regional powers no less, is something I did not expect to see in this lifetime.

usNthem
usNthem
6 hours ago

Ending the endless war policy of the past 40 odd years and focusing on internal affairs would be damned welcome. Trump has a hell of a lot on his plate, but does seem to be getting things done, despite the opinions of the whining “experts”, fake news media and libtard demoncraps.

RealityRules
RealityRules
5 hours ago

It was nice to hear the neoconservatives renounced in front of the Middle East and the entire world. Trump’s voice sounded more tired. The man is a force of nature, but these next four years are going to drain him bigly. America Inc. surviving isn’t an exciting prospect. Bringing back huge numbers of factories but importing a new people to work in them only makes Trump Biden who is helping to Finish the Job. Ideally, the leader will do what they never did, which is build a country out of a nation and address the serious civilizational problems. Like the… Read more »

Last edited 5 hours ago by RealityRules
ray
ray
Reply to  RealityRules
4 hours ago

‘America Inc. is just a transnational’s colony.’ Especially over the past few decades, with the financialization of everything. What was the NAFTA ‘free trade’ agreement, if not a function of transnationalism? Recall how rapidly and uniformly the nations knelt before Godling Covid, as if directions arrived from a central source. Also, how Transnational America uniformly sets up — often under force — copies of its own Diverse, Feminist, Hive self. The Book of Revelation has much to say concerning a certain time in human affairs when men of commerce come to rule the world, instead of kings and emperors. It… Read more »

Jannie
Jannie
Reply to  ray
4 hours ago

But what can you do to the great hydra of corporations?”

Leave a bad Yelp review. For some reason that scares the sh*t out of them.

RealityRules
RealityRules
Reply to  Jannie
19 minutes ago

Ha! Ha! Very nice! Well played.

Jack Boniface
Jack Boniface
Member
5 hours ago
  1. Best thing was he specifically called out the neocons for their murderous wars.
  2. Another big factor: Saudi Arabia’s population has increased from 8 million in 1975 to 38 million today, almost 5-fold, although a lot of those are foreign workers. As the antinatalist Europeans are finding out, you can’t have power without people.
Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Jack Boniface
3 hours ago

Holy shinola. Iran’s population is 91.6 million. Iraq’s is 42 million.

Egypt, 116.5 M. Turkey, 86.6 M. (Just to round out the biggies.)
Even Yemen is 40.5 M, growing at over a million per year.

Last edited 3 hours ago by Alzaebo
Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
Reply to  Alzaebo
3 hours ago

This is where the war on meat fails. There’s no way to feed all these wogs without breeding lots of livestock. Perhaps western baizuo can be convinced to eat bugs, but good luck selling that to the 3rd world.

Arshad Ali
Arshad Ali
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
2 hours ago

And that is why these countries are going to face a major die-off, including Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia’s carrying capacity is around 1m. It has over thirty times that population, kept alive by oil revenues. As those revenues falter, subside, and flicker out, the population will crash to a more sustainable level. All efforts to “diversify the economy” have come a cropper. This population crash will occur throughout the Middle East. A textbook example of overshoot.

Bitter reactionary
Bitter reactionary
Reply to  Jack Boniface
3 hours ago

“People” is too broad a term. You can’t have power without smart, productive people. Some call it the smart fraction. By all accounts most native Saudis are not that.

America’s population has been growing relentlessly, but adding all these bodies isn’t making us more powerful. It’s just making wealth distribution vastly more inequitable. Every meztizo crossing inti the US makes this place a poorer, shittier country.

Sometimes less is more.

Arshad Ali
Arshad Ali
Reply to  Bitter reactionary
2 hours ago

most native Saudis are not that

That is correct. And that is why these countries run on South Asian brawn and white (and increasingly East Asian) brains and expertise.

ProZNoV
ProZNoV
Reply to  Jack Boniface
3 hours ago

Past populations and massive growth in them distort the historical narratives we’re all taught in tangible ways.

The entire Indian subcontinent had roughly 170 million people pre-British colonization.

It’s almost 1.5 billion in India alone now. Many of them feel perfectly justified heading to the UK (population 67 million) to extract some payback.

From tiny acorns mighty oaks grow.

Captain Willard
Captain Willard
6 hours ago

Trump’s effort is complicated by the fact that a huge portion of the Elite has gotten rich off of Globalism and resents his attempts to reform the broken system. For every Apple with the cash and profit margins to shift its supply chain to India/US and away from China, you have an Amazon (addicted to Chinese suppliers) or a Pfizer (subsidizes low prices outside the US with high US prices) for whom it’s going to be much more difficult. The massive Eurodollar market is an entire essay unto itself and the money men don’t want it to change either. In… Read more »

Whiskey
Reply to  thezman
1 hour ago

I don’t know if they fear a share holder revolt so much as great power rivalry. Bezos, Musk, and the Waltons are not stupid. They profit greatly from slave labor in China (Foxconn’s conditions are so bad they installed anti-deletion nets on the factory roofs to prevent workers from jumping off). But that will not last, China MUST transition from an export driven economy (vulnerable not just to the US imposing limits) to domestic consumption and they have ambitions to control the entire business chain also in foreign countries. Shein and Teemu are a threat to Wal Mart and Amazon… Read more »

Hemid
Hemid
Reply to  Whiskey
1 hour ago

Amazon’s and Walmart’s job isn’t to make money but to destroy other American businesses. Tariffs are neutral. Their decision to bitch about them or not will be wholly “political,” a question of whether they want to be seen resisting.

Steve
Steve
Reply to  Hemid
29 minutes ago

Amazon’s and Walmart’s job isn’t to make money but to destroy other American businesses.”

Only those who insist on competing in a low-margin business model and/or refuse to innovate. The purpose of advertising and marketing has always been to distinguish your product from that of your competitors. If you can’t or won’t do that, maybe joining the buggy whip manufacturers is not unmerited.

Jannie
Jannie
Reply to  Captain Willard
4 hours ago

Big Saudi arms deal (what, $150 billion?) should get the MIC off his back without having to meddle in/cause another war.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Captain Willard
3 hours ago

Mentioning the Eurodollar market brings to mind an essay from Postcards from Barsoom; apropos of yesterdays, he says the left is a hall of mirrors of self-referencing fictions. Their minds are locked away in a seperate virtual reality. What could be a better example of that than the ultra fake, gay, and Jewish* financialization markets? A vast “market” of derivatives far larger than all the actual wealth on earth, claims and counterclaims and futures and seniority rights and collateral obligations and on and on. Now Lutnick wants to extend his hoary hand trying to make it work in a paperless… Read more »

Last edited 3 hours ago by Alzaebo
ray
ray
5 hours ago

Informative report, thanks. Trump is best at these Restructuring Corporate America gigs, and weakest at confronting cultural components like diversity, feminism and LGBTQ. I suspect he’d have to overthrow his own household to accomplish that. He showed in his first term that economic/international matters was his strength, hardly surprising given his Making Big Deals career. His USAID strike was a fine beginning, but DEI has barely been touched throughout the culture, ruling unchallenged, and the strike now begins to appear calculated for the base and mostly performative. How can his appointees crush Diversity Inc. when they themselves are Diverse? Also,… Read more »

My Comment
My Comment
6 hours ago

I am still not clear as to how much the oligarchs are backing the financial restructuring vs backing Trump backing Israel. It seems to be a mixed bag. It would be interesting to see the demographic breakdown of the oligarchs and their support for Trump. My hypothesis is that many of the goys are backing the economic while the tribe oligarchs are more concerned with Israel. But that hypothesis could be like most hypotheses: wrong.

JMDGT
JMDGT
Reply to  My Comment
6 hours ago

What does Israel Inc. offer USSA Inc.?

ShortShanksDaley
ShortShanksDaley
Reply to  JMDGT
6 hours ago

Misery. Pathos. Strip mining. Subjugation, liquidation and erasure. Malappropriation of culture, history and technology. Child mutilation and rape. And these are just the ordinary for them.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  ShortShanksDaley
2 hours ago

Just about every one of our major social pathologies, to be honest.

JMDGT
JMDGT
Reply to  JMDGT
6 hours ago

“The nation which indulges toward another an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave.”

George Washington.

Mr. House
Mr. House
Reply to  JMDGT
5 hours ago

A fortress in the heart of Oil Inc.

Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
Reply to  Mr. House
5 hours ago

This has always struck me as overrated. Especially now in the era of instaglobal comms. Fortress from which to stage what?

Mr. House
Mr. House
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
5 hours ago

Iraq war, Potential Iran war. The boss has to check in on the lackeys now and then. Easier to do if you have a physical location! Why were the English involved in that neck of the woods for decades before the US?

Mr. House
Mr. House
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
5 hours ago

Why did the Germans invade North Africa?

Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
Reply to  Mr. House
5 hours ago

They didn’t. The Italians did, looking to expand their empire. When they faltered, the fuhrer sent a token force to assist in the failing project. It’s arguable that WW2 Italy was the worst ally in the history of allies, accomplishing precisely zero without German support, which drained German efforts elsewhere. But that’s another subject. Although possibly analogous in some ways.

Mr. House
Mr. House
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
4 hours ago

So how does that discredit what i stated?

Diversity Heretic
Member
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
4 hours ago

I remember reading in one of the books I was assigned at the Naval War College that German net assessers before the start of World War II had concluded that Germany would benefit most by Italian neutrality, not belligerance. The success of the Afrika Korps in north Africa was a bit of a fluke. The one country that stayed neutral that Gemany would have liked to have entered the war on their side was Franco’s Spain.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
2 hours ago

If the Italians hadn’t suddenly needed the Germans to come save them- I think it was in Sardinia?- then Operation Barbarossa would’ve been a success, as the Germans would not have been sidetracked until Mr. Winter showed up.

The War would’ve been over, and the USSR would’ve been saved. United Europe might’ve been the hegemon, and not the US.

Last edited 2 hours ago by Alzaebo
Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
Reply to  Alzaebo
1 hour ago

Greece you’re thinking of, another place the Italians invaded and got bogged down until the Germans came to help. Which delayed Barbarossa. Whether or not Barbarossa would have succeeded otherwise, I dunno, opinions vary, but I kinda doubt it. The main problem with Barbarossa was one side had zero margin for error, and the other side had a huge margin.

Arshad Ali
Arshad Ali
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
2 hours ago

The Italians did, looking to expand their empire.”

What a bunch of losers. That “new Roman empire” lasted all of five years. In the space of 18 months Italy went from being considered by the Germans as a near-equal to being considered a junior partner. When the Greeks surrendered, they insisted on surrendering to the Germans rather than the Italians. Italy posing as a great power in the late 1930s has to be the joke of the 20th century.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Mr. House
4 hours ago

Yup. I wonder if we should call it the Railroad War instead of an extended oil war, as Britain, France, and Germany scrambled to lay rail lines between the oil, mining, and port sites. Even in WWII Germany’s domestic main transport was draft horse carts away from the rail depots.

Used WWII vehicles are what began the trucking and lorry industry after the war, and pipeline routes replaced much of the rail tankers.

Last edited 4 hours ago by Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
4 hours ago

Well, remember today’s map was forged in the Great Game, the race for oil as industrial nations converted their navies and industry from coal. Germany and Britain were in direct competition over railroad lines to those oil-rich regions. Germany agreed to help the Roths push settlers into Palestine, as it was then called, who didn’t really want to go. Thus the scare and victimization campaign. Britain also cooperated even during the war years in the Havarra Transfer agreement, though it had few takers. France got Syria and Lebanon. Lawrence got the Arabs, and Britain the Mandate. The Empires were being… Read more »

Last edited 4 hours ago by Alzaebo
Stephanie
Stephanie
Reply to  JMDGT
1 hour ago

The ‘healthy practice’ of circumcising your male children? It makes me want to puke what they did to us on that one. What is it with these religious ME tribes who want to do genital mutilation to babies and young children? It’s either male or female genital mutilation they obsess over. God forgive us.

Stephanie
Stephanie
Reply to  My Comment
2 hours ago

Desert religion sexual sadism? Even, or especially, infecting our military? Being ok with leaving your people behind, or outright gunship helicopter firing on them, if it serves a war purpose?

Diversity Heretic
Member
4 hours ago

It’s a bit off-topic from Z-man’s post today, but Donald Trump will have to make some important decisions on support for Ukraine in the next week or so, that will likely determine the fate of his Administration. If he throws in with the neocons and the Europeans, places more sanctions on Russia and ships more weapons to Ukraine, his Administration is over, regardless of what he may do correctly in other areas, foreign and domestic. I’m old enough to remember LBJ’s Administration. He had ambitious domestic plans (mostly bad in my opinion, but that’s another comment), but it all came… Read more »

Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
Reply to  Diversity Heretic
3 hours ago

Does the “mineral deal” not foretell what the path is? If Trump were walking away from Ukraine, he wouldn’t have made that deal.

lavrov
lavrov
Reply to  Jeffrey Zoar
3 hours ago

No. Trump’s actions are consistent with the USA Inc view of him. He saw Ukraine project as a bad investment by Biden that had to be recouped. So, he pushed for the mineral deal. At the same time, Russians told him (check Putin’s public comments) that they would invite Americans to extract minerals from the eastern Ukraine under Russian control. Russians indeed had a number of US JVs before the neocons destroyed everything. If Russia Inc takes over policing of the entire Ukraine and lets USA Inc extract minerals, that is a victory in Trump’s worldview. Remember Vietnam was a… Read more »

TempoNick
TempoNick
4 hours ago

“In the case of empires, bankruptcy usually ends with the shareholders swinging from trees.” Immigration. We had some family up last week and I was arguing with my cousin’s husband. Standard stuff we talk about here, like JD’s wife being a dot head, which is why I couldn’t get behind him. Or whether Vivek ends up winning the governorship. (I’m not voting for him.) He doesn’t get why I’m not submitting to our new dot head overlords. Of course, he lives on the pasty white west side of Cincinnati and he’s a school teacher, so he doesn’t see what I… Read more »

Compsci
Compsci
5 hours ago

“…the Saudis need to adapt. They cannot continue to be a gas station in the desert. They need to diversify.” This bears watching. Can the Saudis “diversify” as a “nation”? This begs the question, “What is a nation?” My go to answer has always been, “A nation is its people.” The Saudis until now have bought whatever it was that its native stock could not produce, which was everything. Such includes millions of foreign workers “imported” to do the dirty work required to keep those things running. My suspicion is that “investment” in America will not change such. It will… Read more »

Evil Sandmich
Evil Sandmich
Reply to  Compsci
5 hours ago

The oil sheiks are all trying to find some investment that will allow the money spigot to continue with the least amount of work (i.e., tourism staffed by an army of foreigners working under slave-like conditions). The only true wealth though comes from either resource extraction or turning those resources into something. They’d be better off investing in a giant hole in the earth’s crust that would allow them to get at the smoking hot goodies inside.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Evil Sandmich
4 hours ago

Heh. They do happen to be big players in geothermal as well as the whiz-bang Green tech frauds; but for sure, bin Salman locked dotty old Dads in his room, offed a few of his more ambitious relatives, and is mad for alternative investment streams and financialization. Clever practitioners in Islamic jurisprudence (who can make Quranic gibberish sound reasonable) have making hay at the London School of Economics for a long time.

Last edited 4 hours ago by Alzaebo
Compsci
Compsci
Reply to  Evil Sandmich
3 hours ago

The only true wealth though comes from either resource extraction…”

But that’s my point, the most valuable resource to a nation *is* its people. I would maintain Saudi Arabia—as all Middle Eastern nations—is exceedingly “poor” in that respect.

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  Compsci
2 hours ago

One expat told me the highways in Saudi were littered with Cadillacs. They’d run the thing until it ran out of oil and freeze up, so they’d just go buy another one.

Another expat told me the only thing a Saudi thinks about is what he can get his dinky into next. (My dad said the same, but buggery.) This same guy was at the Jeddah airport talking to the head mechanic, a distant relative of the royals; the mechanic was “reading” a maintenance manual upside down, and didn’t realize it.

Last edited 2 hours ago by Alzaebo
Arshad Ali
Arshad Ali
Reply to  Compsci
2 hours ago

I would maintain Saudi Arabia—as all Middle Eastern nations—is exceedingly “poor” in that respect

They are and their leaders know it. But what would you have them do? Their population has an IQ of around 85 or even lower. That can’t be changed.

Arshad Ali
Arshad Ali
Reply to  Compsci
2 hours ago

They need to diversify

They’ve tried. They’ve failed. Attempts at agriculture have come a cropper. Now they’re trying to build a replica of Dubai. But that too will come a cropper and Dubai itself will not succeed. All they have is the black gold. The curse of the black gold — without it, Saudi population would not have increased from 1m to 33m.

JMDGT
JMDGT
6 hours ago

Nations will become corporations. The inclination for me is to tune in drop out. We have to have relationships with the other corporations. How we do business while USA Inc. still looks to be USSA inc. Heads up helmets on. It’s all business. The wind cries Mary.

Mr. House
Mr. House
Reply to  JMDGT
5 hours ago

I’m not certain they haven’t already. This bill was so unpopular, members of congress were not allowed to view but in a room by themselves without a phone, pen, paper, anything to take notes. It would have essentially elevated corporations above nation states if they passed laws that cost the corporation money, the state could be sued in an “international” court to force compensation for law. One was also done up for the “Atlantic”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Partnership

Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
4 hours ago

Maybe we should have more vigorously pursued coal as fuel (of which we have plenty), so as not to have to make deals with the sand people to keep our empire solvent. Of course, the fallacy in that is AINO itself receives hardly any middle eastern oil. But its imperial interests do, so it is forced to supplicate to the bedouins in an effort to prop up its fading empire, which it didn’t need to begin with!, having as it does the greatest combination of geographic security and resource wealth the world has ever known. But that wasn’t enough for… Read more »

Horace
Horace
4 hours ago

“ In reality it is a glimpse of how the large share owners of America Inc. are restructuring the company.” Contrast Saudi relations with Pres. Trump with Saudi interaction with the Biden administration. The Saudi Arabians, like many other countries, have a set-scene for a state photo shoot for visiting dignitaries. Presumably the purpose is to build diplomatic good will by giving the foreign dignitary something to remember their visit. It looks very elegant, with tapestries on the wall behind two finely crafted chairs (an expression of their traditional artisanal culture) each of which has a state flag adjacent. The photographer’s… Read more »

Arshad Ali
Arshad Ali
5 hours ago

“The Saudis are not going to plow their profits into treasuries, but into direct investments in the United States” Mostly agree with your post. Note that the Saudis and everyone else who has invested in US treasuries have been losing purchasing power because of the large difference between the interest afforded on the T-bills and the real inflation rate. In addition other countries can now offer military protection and defence systems that are at least as good (if not far better) than anything the US has. The US is not the only game in town anymore.This is what losing hegemony… Read more »

Last edited 5 hours ago by Arshad Ali
Paintersforms
Paintersforms
2 hours ago

Saw an article on Unz a day or two ago about how Drumpf lost the trade war to China, since Indonesia and Thailand were stepping up to buy Chinese goods. Seriously.

The Wild Geese Howard
The Wild Geese Howard
Reply to  Paintersforms
24 minutes ago

Point-of-origin washing is a thing.

No doubt the bamboo mafia (Han Chinese diaspora) in Malaysia and Vietnam are in on this action too.

lavrov
lavrov
5 hours ago

Saudis were really unhappy with Joe Biden and joined BRICS and even became friends with Iran under a Chinese-brokered deal. Also, Saudi-TV made these videos to mock Biden –

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vx3NBiQhQxQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1uiLNY9Nro

It looks like they welcome sanity return to USA.

Also, Saudis own a part of twitter. The investor prince made some complaining noise after Elon’s initial proposal, but since joined him as a co-investor.

lavrov
lavrov
6 hours ago

“There is No Such Thing as A Petrodollar [Eurodollar University, Ep. 215]”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1m6E4LK9raE

This guy argues that the petrodollar concept is not real. It is promoted by media to distract from the “eurodollar” market.

I agree with the larger point made by Zman in his post regarding restructuring of USA Inc.

lavrov
lavrov
Reply to  thezman
5 hours ago

Well, I am pagan and can tolerate both gods 🙂

Alzaebo
Alzaebo
Reply to  thezman
3 hours ago

No tickee, no washee.

lavrov
lavrov
Reply to  lavrov
5 hours ago

Here is another video on commodity-based money and FDR confiscating gold –

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nk8OoLflAjo

Whiskey
2 hours ago

Keir Starmer, fresh off being caught with Macron and Merz doing a white powder on the Z train to Keeeeevvvvvvv has given a speech “Nation of Strangers” decrying immigration and multiculturalism while his government has literally sentenced young mothers to years in prison for sayign the same thing. He is not scared of Reform / Farage. The key feature of democracies from Thailand, to Malaysia, to Turkey, to Russia, to Romania, to Germany, France, and the US is imprisoning popular rivals through Lawfare and facade of reasonableness to stave off any real challenge. The only reason Orange Man Bad is… Read more »

TomA
TomA
5 hours ago

Let’s hope Trump succeeds, but that is not a certainty. In fact, it’s a long shot because change is now happening at hyperspeed and complexity is fomenting uncertainty. The US & West are drowning in debt and swimming in the treacherous waters of massive illegal invasions. We now lack social cohesion and robustness, and it won’t take much to start internal wars of conquest. Europe cannot defend itself and the US citizenry is armed to the teeth. Can we cross the coming divide without bloodshed? The models say no.

Jeffrey Zoar
Jeffrey Zoar
Reply to  TomA
3 hours ago

With even Two Tier Keir publicly backing off the GR, it signals some kind of change is afoot. (although it would be unsurprising if he continues to support it clandestinely while denouncing it publicly, in fact that was western policy for most of the last half century, before they began openly embracing it)

Steve
Steve
35 minutes ago

I’m not at all convinced that foreign investment is a good idea.

After some deal Clinton worked out, I had a client in ’94 or so who was considering Saudi investment. Buried way deep in the fine print was that after 20 years, the property came under the sole ownership of Saudis, including IP, but vastly worse for the long term was that the Saudis instantly gained standing in our courts. Saudis for whom bribery is a way of life.

You think it’s bad when Big Pharma buys up judges? You ain’t seen nothing yet.

Dr_Mantis_Tobbogan_MD
Member
3 hours ago

The $142 billion defense deal will be a big boon for my industry, but man, I’m not looking forward to heading to the Middle East again to help Arabs solve technical issues with their new toys. They treat the engineers and tech reps well, put us up in great accommodations, feed us like kings, but the weather in the Persian Gulf is a non-starter and I grew up in the Deep South. I spent six months in Bahrain and the heat there is just atrocious. I don’t care how much I make an hour when my shoes are literally melting… Read more »

miforest
miforest
Reply to  Dr_Mantis_Tobbogan_MD
1 hour ago

Good luck there . hopefully the stuff you need to work on will be in air conditioned hangars

The Wild Geese Howard
The Wild Geese Howard
Reply to  Dr_Mantis_Tobbogan_MD
21 minutes ago

Heh, I’m starting to regret passing up my last opportunity in that part of the world.

For me, it’s pretty amazing how much you can put up with between the salary adjustments and tax benefits if you stay abroad 11 of 12 months. Also, there is no better feeling than flying business class on the company’s or customer’s dime.

Falcone
Falcone
3 hours ago

Does this Saudi deal mean that thousands of Americans will be working for / getting paid by Arabs? Isn’t that the dirty little secret no one is talking about?

if Yes, that could be why the scheme unravels.

Stephanie
Stephanie
Reply to  Falcone
1 hour ago

They do seem to all be on the same page as far as slave workers. So, we will see.
Trump marveling at the towers in SA built by slave workers. Not good.

Last edited 1 hour ago by Stephanie
Sam
Sam
3 hours ago

shorter version: keep your friends close and…

Last edited 3 hours ago by Sam
Hi-ya!
Hi-ya!
1 hour ago

Remember what we said earlier about sin and free will. But if it is too difficult to commit it all to memory, hold this brief summary in mind. Whatever the cause of the will might be, if the will cannot resist it, it is no sin to yield to it; but if the will can resist it, let it do so, and there will be no sin. What if the cause of the will deceives the will and catches it off guard? Then let the will guard against deception. What if the deception is so great that the will cannot… Read more »

Last edited 59 minutes ago by Hi-ya!
miforest
miforest
1 hour ago

Between this and negotiating an end of the India /Paki war he’s on a role . The India/paki solution is Real Nobel peace prize shit.

But leaving Israel out is dangerous, He better stay the fuck out of Dallas .

Geoff
Geoff
5 hours ago

It has been fascinating to watch the way Trump has become the right wing Obama, where all he needs to do is pitch hot air and let the cult of Trump provide a smokescreen for his constant bullshitting without delivering results. He got completely manhandled by the CCP over the tariff business, and yet I’ve already seen a dozen articles about how it is MAGA to make it seem like America has put another unreliable, senile old man who capitulates in the big chair. At this point it is becoming clear that Musk was the brains behind the high quality… Read more »

Whiskey
Reply to  Geoff
1 hour ago

Tariffs on China before Trump were about 3%. They likely will be about 25 to 40%, with some exceeding that. The days of China dumping stuff in the US market is over. That is not being manhandled. Trump is just the figurehead, the real power behind him is the combination of the Military Industrial Complex which understands the luxury boutique warfighting Global War on Terror model died in Ukraine, with its mass mobilization and critically, Russian air defense systems, and Oligarchs who understand they are next on the Chinese menu. Already you see in Youtube videos “Chinesium” and “Indianum” used… Read more »