The Court Loon

History is full of men who somehow managed to be wildly successful, only to be revealed as lunatics, madmen or incompetent. It’s an incredible thing to read about Caligula or Nero and think about what it must have been like to serve in the Imperial government during their reigns. According to Seneca, Caligula was presiding over games and ordered his guards to throw an entire section of the crowd into the arena during intermission to be eaten by animals because there were no criminals to be prosecuted and he was bored.

Imagine being in the next section over.

The thought that always comes to my mind is how it was possible for such lunatics to get into power. In most cases, it was simply the result of a faulty system of succession. A favorite example of this is Christian VII of Denmark. He became the king of Denmark because he was the next in line, despite his mental illness. Christian was a chronic masturbater who made visiting dignitaries play leapfrog with one another. He also would slap people in the face for no reason.

In the case of legendary madmen like Caligula and Nero, their madness came on after they assumed power so maybe it was just bad luck. Tiberius, Caligula’s predecessor started out as a perfectly sane and normal ruler, but slowly became a paranoid tyrant. Of course, there are example of men who rise to power simply because they are devious schemers. They finally get to the top and find they have no skill for the job.

The madmen and lunatics get all the attention, but history is littered with examples of mediocrities managing to thread the needle somehow, ending up on top, only to be undone by their own stupidity. In my lifetime, Jimmy Carter is the most obvious example. Carter was a smart man in an extremely narrow sense, but he was a terrible politician and he suffered from delusions of grandeur. His four years as president featured a series of unforced errors that still boggle the mind.

The point is, life is big and complicated with lots of variables. Under the right conditions, the dice can land the wrong way and we end up with a lunatic on the Supreme Court, which is why we have an impeachment system. if a nut winds up in the White House or on the bench, they can be removed. It does not happen often, but it’s a remedy, just in case we end up with someone like, say, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor submitted a racially-charged dissent in a Fourth Amendment case on Monday, which commentators hailed as a “Brown/Black Lives Matter manifesto.”

The case, Utah v. Strieff, was occasioned when police stopped Salt Lake City man Edward Strieff on leaving a house suspected to quarter drug activity. The state of Utah concedes the initial stop was illegal, as the officers in question had no probable cause to seize and search Strieff.

During the course of the stop, officers discovered Strieff had an outstanding warrant for a small traffic violation, and methamphetamine in his pocket. The Court was asked to decide whether the exclusionary rule — which prohibits police and prosecutors from using evidence obtained illegally — applies when an officer learns during an illegal stop that there is a warrant for an individual’s arrest, and finds additional contraband while executing the arrest on said warrant.

The High Court ruled 5-3 that the arrest, and the evidence obtained during the arrest, were legitimate, even if the initial stop was not. Justice Thomas wrote the majority opinion, joined by the Chief Justice, and Justices Kennedy, Breyer, and Alito.

Sotomayor filed a peppery dissent, joined in part by Justice Ginsburg.

“The white defendant in this case shows that anyone’s dignity can be violated in this manner,” she wrote. “But it is no secret that people of color are disproportionate victims of this type of scrutiny. For generations, black and brown parents have given their children ‘the talk’— instructing them never to run down the street; always keep your hands where they can be seen; do not even think of talking back to a stranger—all out of fear of how an officer with a gun will react to them.”

“We must not pretend that the countless people who are routinely targeted by police are ‘isolated,’” she continued. “They are the canaries in the coal mine whose deaths, civil and literal, warn us that no one can breathe in this atmosphere.”

Elsewhere in the dissent, she characterizes the United States as a “carceral state,” and pillories the “civil death” endured by those subject to arrest, a process she describes in vivid terms. She also accused the Court of treating minority communities as “second class citizens.”

The dissent’s citations are as interesting as the text itself, which read like a survey of the American black literary tradition. At various points, she cites “The Souls of Black Folk,” by W. E. B. Du Bois, Michelle Alexander, a law professor who has written extensively on over incarceration, and the more radical works of James Baldwin and Ta-Nehisi Coates.

Where does one start with this? This is a Supreme Court Justice, not a college freshmen writing her first college paper. The nonsense about blacks being the victims of police harassment has been debunked so many times, even race hustlers have dropped it. The facts on black crime are simply too easy to lookup. Here’s a study from the Obama administration that tells us that young black males are 3% of the population, but commit 27% of homicides. You would think a judge would know about this.

Of course, that misses the elephant in the room. Sotomayor is launching off on a Black Lives Matter rant over a white guy, who was the alleged victim. A fanatic is someone who can’t change their mind and won’t change the subject. When you layer in the references to guys like Genius T. Coates, it is not unreasonable to wonder if this woman has not lost her marbles. She may not be randomly slapping people or demanding members of the gallery be fed to the lions, but she is acting just as nutty as those legends I mentioned at the start.

How did we end up with a mentally disturbed dwarf on the high court? The same way Christian VII landed on the throne of Denmark or Caligula donned the purple. The process for selecting judges means ticking the racial boxes and a willingness to catch spears for the One True Faith. Obama nominated this woman because she was a Latin lesbian. Finding someone who checks those boxes and is competent in the law is impossible so he just took a loyal fanatic. The result is we have a mentally disturbed woman on the high court – for life.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Flying Tiger Comics
Guest

Corrupting elements of a governmental system while preserving their outer form is recommended by Machiavelli.

Appointing the incompetent to positions of power is essential when the plan is the destruction of the Republic.

james wilson
Guest
james wilson

Aristotle described that very method as being in use in Athens.

Doug
Guest
Doug

“From the top down, inside to out”.
Was it Socrates who mentioned internal domestic enemies are a cancer to a republic?
There is a clause in the Oath of all enlisted solders that mentions domestic enemies. Written by men who employed reason and history in formulating those words of that Oath. Who just got through fighting the loyalists of King George.

Crickets
Guest
Crickets

So, just when in the Hell is enough enough? These people will not go away unless they are put down. Killing these people is essential if the republic is to be saved. …Crickets…

Shelby
Guest
Shelby

I do not get out much, and definitely not in your circle, but I listen and I read. This is the first time I have heard that woman called a Latin lesbian. I knew she was not a good choice and that I would hate to be trapped in an elevator with her but …… Why haven’t the gays prattled on and on about her being one of them? He really does not care what he does to this country.

Andy Texan
Guest

Caligula appointed his stallion to the Senate. Obama appointed a dwarf to the supreme court and made a moron Vice President. This is a trend that is wide spread and quite troubling.

Doug
Guest
Doug

Hey, useful dupes and sycophants come in all sizes and shapes. Every tyrant needs them. It is tyranny 101. It is how it works. Sotomayer isn’t an outlier, she is the norm. It is the lowest common denominator in action. You think psychopaths like obama appoints people smarter than them? It is surviving your tyranny you got to be concerned with when your a mad emperor in a corrupt system of organized crime.

Member

Two dwarves.

LetsPlay
Member
LetsPlay

As with the need for term limits for Senators, SCOTUS needs a mandatory retirement age. This lifetime appointment crap is way too much. So just when will the States Convention happen? We need some amendments to strengthen our freedoms.

james wilson
Guest
james wilson

The states, too, have been corrupted beyond repair. By the turn of the 20th century Conservatives were so weary of hearing Progressive bullshit about bringing on an Income Tax that they took it to the states just to shut them up, and what do you think happened?

IronBrigade
Guest
IronBrigade

But, if you check the historical record, there is a serious question as to whether the 13th Amendment truly and fairly passed all the states necessary for ratification. In other words, the deal was rigged!

Doug
Guest
Doug

That was the original intent of impeachment. For both impeachment and term limits, it requires a representative republican form of government to work. A government ruled by rule of law, not by rule of men who’s sole motivation is enriching themselves at out expense. Why would they have any motivation to limit that power and wealth? I’m not picking on you, honestly it is a logic question: How have those Amendments been working for you? It is like the great joke about the guy who says “We have to vote the bums out!” And the other guys asks “How did… Read more »

LetsPlay
Member
LetsPlay

Yep, I know what you mean. I pointed out those two specifically because they are always on my mind. In the Senate you get professional white collar criminals who are in office for 20-40 years! And SCOTUS, till death do us part? Really? Ginsberg looks like she is already on life support. How do we know she isn’t brain dead already? Just asking cuz she sure looks like the walking dead.

Doug
Guest
Doug

I know what you mean too. It would be a really great thing if Amendments worked as advertised. The reality is those who usurp them, also hide behind them. And it is fast becoming our responsibility as freemen, to show the bastards what it is like without the protections the Constitutions affords them.

ChiefIllinicake
Guest
ChiefIllinicake

Appointments for life assumes that the appointees aren’t political operatives. The Lefties on the court are clearly partisan creatures with an agenda. While one might wonder which way a Kennedy or a Roberts might swing, nobody considers for even a minute that Kagan or Sotomayor or Ginsberg will, reflexively, 100% of the time, support the agenda of the Democrat party. It’s such a given that it doesn’t even garner a moments attention anymore.

As such, the Justices need to face the voters, just like any other politician. And term limits for the lot of them, of course.

Ivar
Guest
Ivar

No tinkering with systems can make up for the lack of decent human material in the country as a whole.

Tom Saunders
Guest
Tom Saunders

Certainly it might be preferential to play Russian Roulette every couple of years rather than maybe twice a decade, kinda like playing with two loaded chambers rather than one. The problem with Senators is the Seventeenth Amendment, after all they’re already limited to 6 years. Repeal the 17th and to control government requires winning hundreds of elections. As it stands now a super-faction, which is what the 17th instigated, only has to control 52 elections to rule the country (51 senate seats + the executive). With all wealth transferred to the national government under the 16th there is more than… Read more »

james wilson
Guest
james wilson

May all my enemies be of such poor quality. There’s a lot more damage to be had by a shrunken communist Jew than a disturbed dwarf Latina dyke. Nobody’s laughing at Ginsberg.

Doug
Guest
Doug

Your salient observation points out the ugly truth the axiom there is no voting our way out of this. Not with the ballot box.

James LePore
Guest

Bush, Sr. paved her way, appointing her to the District Court in New York. Madness.

Guest
Guest
Guest

In fairness to Bush Sr., candidates for district court judge positions have traditionally been forwarded to the Executive branch by the Senators for a given state. It’s one of the privileges of being a Senator. Sotomayor was recommended for appointment by both Patrick Moynihan (D) and Al D’amato (R). She had worked as a prosecutor and there was nothing in her background which would have indicated she would become a leftist loon. Bush had little reason to oppose her nomination to a district court. I do fault the Bush administration for failing to maintain strict conservative criteria as a baseline… Read more »

Buckaroo Banzai
Guest
Buckaroo Banzai

In fairness to Roberts, he was blackmailed into the ObamaCare decision. Although he shouldn’t have illegally adopted those two Irish babies via South America in the first place.

IronBrigade
Guest
IronBrigade

Bush, Sr. is part of the Establishment and absolutely NO conservative!!! he is entitled to no fairness or other consideration. Nor is “W” who is even more of a NWO central government Establishmentarian. “W” gave us the Patriot Act, the most dangerous assault on our rights ever passed and the Department of Homeland Security, the largest most intrusive, bureaucracy ever. And the one designed to enforce the unconstitutional Patriot Act, when push comes to shove.

And look how close the Bush Crime Family has become with the Clinton Crime Family! Sweep them all w away!

Meema
Guest

This topic–crazies given the helm–reared it’s ugly head for me this past weekend as I watched the movie Fury with Brad Pitt. Brutal and honest depiction of war. The take away was the staggering reality of how so many (millions) can be rallied to a bogus cause, to obey the call to destroy land and lives for nothing more than serving the power lust of lunatics. Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini were just the beasts du jour of the first half of the 20th century. We have a whole new set today. I’ve concluded that lunatics find their way to power because… Read more »

IronBrigade
Guest
IronBrigade

Hitler and Mussolini were true “pikers” when compared to Stalin! It was the infiltration of Communists into the FDR Administration that sold out this country to the Soviets, beginning in 1931 when FDR formally recognized the Soviet Union, without conditions, despite knowing of Stalin’s crimes against his own people in the Great Kulak Starvation effort; 12-20 million died under Stalin’s hand, but since they were only fellow Russians (and capitalists at that) that was okay….Uncle Joe was a great ally against Hitler, right? 6 million dead Jews versus 12-20 million dead Russians….wonder who had the better PR agents? Leftist historians… Read more »

Doug
Guest
Doug

Disturbed dwarf, that’s a good one. That makes her a dwarf ring wraith, a black robed dwarf Nasgal, us dirt people live in middle earth, and Mordor on the Potomac has sent out swarms of Ork and Oraki to eat out the dirt peoples existence. The two towers are the left and right party’s of cultural marxism.

Member

He became the kink of Denmark …..

Mike_C
Guest
Mike_C

I thought that was brilliant — until the “landed on the thrown” part later in the post made me think the “kink of Denmark” just a speech-to-text glitch. Too bad.

Drake
Guest
Drake

Hillary Clinton, 80% of the Senate, my former Battalion XO, and several former bosses – all “mediocrities managing to thread the needle somehow.” In most cases it was due to NCO’s / employees running around fixing their stupid mistakes and pointing the idiot in the right direction (usually without the idiot even noticing).

ambiguousfrog
Guest
ambiguousfrog

Ruth, when not taking a siesta, prefers the South African constitution dontcha know.

Member

Me too. Oh, wait. I’ll bet it’s a different one.

CaptDMO
Guest
CaptDMO

“This is a Supreme Court Justice, not a college freshmen writing her first college paper.”
Meh, Sophomores are WORSE!
A LITTLE bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing!
Sophomores have over heard “big words” being used.

cali
Guest
cali

Sotomayer – despite prior details of her racial animosity against white americans – was confirmed by a number of republicans to enable her to be confirmed into the Supreme Court. Her racial views were known far in advance, her intent to ‘get justice for her brown people’ was also no secret. When politicians forget their oaths – and go with the PC crowd – that is the result. Why the surprise? Then we have Lynch as AG – also confirmed with a majority of republicans to enable her confirmation. Yet – she too has not only dividing racial views but… Read more »

IronBrigade
Guest
IronBrigade

“… there was a coup beginning in 2008…” WRONG! The real coup began in 1931, with FDR.

cali
Guest
cali

I did not intended to go back that far and rather chose to stay in a more current era however, you are right and if we want to be historically correct – the coup began in 1917 at the commencement WWI.
It was also the time where the Federal Reserve and other control entities were placed directly into the US as a control mechanism as well as means to manipulate and condition the political apparatus and selection of presidents.

Karl Horst (Germany)
Guest
Karl Horst (Germany)

How is it all other American positions of government are limited terms and the Supreme Court is a life-time appointment? Can you briefly explain the history and rationale behind this?

James LePore
Guest

The traditional answer is to prevent them from getting thrown off the bench for making unpopular decisions. Put another way: to encourage them to make decisions that might be unpopular but that comport, in their opinion, with the constitution.

Tom Saunders
Guest
Tom Saunders

Yes, to give them a buffer against political retribution for an honest legal opinion. When the Constitution was written and ratified the understanding was that the Courts would be deciding exclusively criminal or civil cases and no one was so naïve as to believe that politicians wouldn’t try to coerce or intimidate Judges in cases that involved friends, family, or business interests. The concept of Courts becoming involved in disputes between the Executive and Legislative Branches, or deciding what is or is not Constitutional, wouldn’t appear until the Jefferson administration. By the way all Federal Judges are lifetime appointments, not… Read more »

LetsPlay
Member
LetsPlay

Oh great!

Epobirs
Guest
Epobirs

Nitpick: I think you meant ‘throne of’ rather than ‘thrown and’ in the second sentence of the last paragraph. Those kinds of things can make the reader take the writer less seriously, so proofreading matters.

notsothoreau
Guest
notsothoreau

My theory is that the Founding Fathers couldn’t conceive of a justice that would try to make laws. They thought lawyers would only interpret the law. I think that is why they didn’t give us a better way to remove judges.

Tom Saunders
Guest
Tom Saunders

From what I’ve read the Founders mostly thought (or hoped) some modicum of wisdom would be employed in the selection of the people that would select the Judges. That’s what the, “… if you can keep it,” remark implied. They hoped that the electorate wouldn’t become mired in a constant state of FUBAR.
Term limits and fast track impeachment are, by definition, a day late and a dollar short. By the time those kick in as a remedy the only Judge anyone will be listening to is Lynch.

Member

So, being a chronic masturbater is a sign of mental illness, eh?

I have some things to think over.

OrcFromMork
Guest
OrcFromMork

“do not even think of talking back to a stranger” Right, because we all know how young black folks never, ever talk trash to strangers. Especially white people. ????? How the hell could someone in a position of her authority not only be that dishonest but seriously expect other people to buy into her lunatic BS? The alternate universe the progressive nuts have constructed and expect the rest of society to live in is what is truly, genuinely dangerous.

Ivar
Guest
Ivar

The progs are going to be running the show until system failure. The Puerto Rican firecracker’s arguments fit The Narrative perfectly. Why would she pay any attention to a system of logic created by Old White Men?

Member

I’ve been getting to thinking that the only real way to limit the damage from the bench is the Andy Jackson approach. The Supreme Court made some rulings about Indian policy at the time and Jackson just refused to enforce the decisions. That’s something that a real leader in an executive role could easily get away with. It would be wrong to keep someone incarcerated if a Court ruled he be released, but what about judgments that require the co-operation of other branches of government. Remember that Federal judge in Kansas that ordered the legislature to raise taxes to build… Read more »

Karl Horst (Germany)
Guest
Karl Horst (Germany)

If this article is true, it’s a wonder more of your supreme court justices aren’t also crazy. With over 300,000 criminal offenses, how does one do through a normal day without breaking a law?? “With more than 4,000 crimes in federal statutes and more than 300,000 more crimes specified in various federal regulations, every complex commercial enterprise is inevitably vulnerable to federal prosecution-and thus, given federal prosecutors’ leverage, to oversight through a deferred- or non-prosecution agreement. What that means is that the Department of Justice has sweeping regulatory authority, which according to the D.C. Circuit’s April decision in United States… Read more »

Notsothoreau
Guest
Notsothoreau

It’s a feature, not a bug. It’s a given that you’ve broken some law, some time. They just wait to charge you with it. If you are well connected, you can ignore all laws.

LetsPlay
Member
LetsPlay

I’m not generally a fan of genocide, if one can call this that, but I am reminded of The Eagles lyrics from the song “Get Over It” that say “Let’s kill all the lawyers, kill ’em tonight.” Way too many lawyers in America, maybe the whole world. The world would definitely be a better place with fewer of these scum.

Dr. Mabuse
Guest

“The process for selecting judges means ticking the racial boxes and a willingness to catch spears for the One True Faith.” It’s the same process that installed a retarded Communist hick as Pope. Taine said “There’s nothing as dangerous as a general idea in a narrow, empty mind.” Pope Shitty the First is a good example. His “general idea” is “The Poor!” Everything else comes out of that. Communism? Yeah! It talks about the poor! Free-range fucking, without the complications of marriage? Sure! The poor do that all the time, so he’s for it. Gangs of drifters surging into Europe… Read more »

Bah
Guest
Bah

Speaking of mentally disturbed women, gotta love our Attorney General’s brazen, deranged, and sociopathic public statement that the Orlando gunman’s motive “has yet to be established” and “may never be known” — and this after her minions deleted every reference to Allah and ISIS from the 911 transcript.

Member

Someone said that Sotomayor was a “wise Latina.”

Well, she’s sure shot that idea all to hell with this unhinged rant. She’s not even smart enough to be embarrassed!