A Rambling Post About Sportsball

If you have ever followed sportsball, the one thing you have surely noticed is that some franchises never win, while others win a lot. In America, the New York Yankees are the example of perennial winners. In English soccer, Manchester United is the club that is the example of consistent excellence. The opposite is true as well. In America, the organization best known for futility is the Cleveland Browns. It’s not just that they never win anything. They find hilarious ways to lose and embarrass themselves.

The question is why? In the case of baseball, market size has always been assumed to be the main driver. With unlimited budgets for payroll and player development, the teams with deep pockets could dominate. The Yankees operate in New York. The Dodgers are in Los Angeles. Over the years, the correlation between winning and market size has been strong enough for most people to assume that’s the reason. Of course, the Mets and Cubs stand out as stark exceptions, so there is more to it.

In other sports, like English soccer, the market share answer does not apply. Manchester is the thirst largest metropolitan area, behind Birmingham and London, but it is a fifth the size of London and much poorer. The dominance of Manchester is a lot like the success of the Green Bay Packers in American football. Not quite to that extreme, but Man U has had much more success than the Packers. While having a big market helps in all sports, the rules and some other factors often neutralize the advantage.

One area where this “something” else is easier to notice is in how teams hire their front office people. The reason the Cleveland Browns, for example, lose all the time is they hire stupid people to run their club. The New England Patriots, in contrast, hired a cerebral coach, paid him well and staffed their front office with smart people. They also make sure the culture of the organizations rewards the smart and punishes the stupid. When these people leave for better jobs, they often fail in their new organizations.

While it seems obvious, the reason franchises have sustained success or failure is due mostly to their organizational IQ. This is most obvious in baseball. The Oakland A’s are credited with being the first team to employ statistics in player evaluation. Moneyball, as it is called, seeks to find the best value in the market for talent, but also the most useful players in the market. The stat-geeks have re-evaluated the stats in baseball and created new metrics to measure a player’s contribution to winning games.

What the Oakland A’s learned is they could get players that were 90% as good as the big stars, for 30% of the investment. That’s a bit of an exaggeration, but it is a useful way of thinking of it. They understood that a player who walks a lot is more valuable than a guy who strikes out a lot, but also hits for a high average. The former is on-base more often, so he contributes more runs than the latter. Hitting home runs is a good way to get a big contract and sell tickets, but getting on base is what counts most.

Now, all of the big clubs have armies of stat-geeks doing the moneyball thing. The Boston Red Sox have the godfather of stat geeks, Bill James, on their payroll. The use of stats has become so pervasive, it is changing the game. Managers no longer make decisions during games. Instead, they consult probability charts and select from the options the front office created before the game. It’s an odd form of computer chess. Instead of humans controlling the robot pieces, it’s the robots controlling the human pieces.

The fact is, winning is about avoiding error. Since the Greeks this has been understood, so why is this not a universal part of all sport? The owner of the Cleveland Browns is probably a smart guy. He’s rich enough to own a sportsball team, so he may not be a genius, but he is pretty smart. Why does he not hire a team of behavior scientists to study winning and create personality models for the various jobs within the organization? He could hire people to model how the Patriots run their organization.

It does not have to be a sci-fi version of this stuff to work. The team of analysts could come up with the five facts common to all failed coaches in the Browns organization and then compare that to the least successful coaches in the game. Odds are, they will find some commonalities. Knowing what does not work, they could simply avoid hiring coaches with any of those qualities. That would not guarantee success, but maybe it eliminates embarrassing, catastrophic failure. Better is better.

Sports organizations are systems, so the tools used in system analysis should apply to sports teams, corporations, political movements and so forth. American business employs continuous improvement techniques to fine tune daily operations. Some are more committed than others and some things work better than others, but fixing small things tends to have the greatest impact on performance. This is true in most systems. Fixing a simple error in a line of code can greatly increase system performance.

Despite this well-known reality, human organizations are the least likely to embrace empirical techniques. Politics is the most obvious. If the parties simply required an IQ test for party membership, they would save themselves a lot of trouble. Sports franchises tinker around with this stuff, but they have never embraced it. Even big corporations seem to drift from a focus on incremental improvement in various types of magic. Google is now a cult of sorts, which is how they make blunders like this one.

The point of this post, if there is one, is that there is something that prevents otherwise smart people, like sportsball owners, from using well known techniques to improve their organizations. The result is a repetition of unforced errors. Sportsball owners are hyper-competitive, yet they are often allergic to considering concepts and tactics that work in other organizations. It is only after an innovator proves it can work that we see the rest jump on board and start aping what worked for them.

An even stranger thing about sportsball teams is that this institutional blundering attracts owners prone to the same sort of blundering. These bad franchises come up for sale and the new owners turn out to be as accident prone as the previous ones. In fact whole cities seem to attract losers in this area. Again, Cleveland is a great example. All of their sportsball teams are terrible and the owners are some of the worst in sport. Maybe there really is something in the water there that causes this.

Anyway, it is something reformers and rebels should probably consider when plotting how to attack the Death Star of modern culture. Maybe that silly plot device from Star Wars has a grain of truth to it. The bad guys left the back door to the Death Star open, because in the end, they were the Cleveland Browns of space villains. Perhaps all villains leave a window open at some point. Maybe size makes organizations stupid and then exploitable to those with subversion on their mind.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Rob
Guest
Rob

This was something I could never figure out when interviewing for various jobs in large organizations over my lifetime. Inevitably the firm didn’t just want me to work for them, they wanted me to love them, and “be part of their culture” as if that mattered more than what I could do to produce results. Needless to say I almost never got through the interview process.

Calsdad
Guest
Calsdad

It’s front facing propaganda. If you actually made your way thru the gates and got to work there – you’d likely find that “culture” they promote so heavily – doesn’t exist. I work in a large multi-national , they very heavily promote all the typical pozzed multicultural talking points and call them their “culture” – the reality of working there doesn’t even come close to the hype. Maybe it’s because I work in the engineering space – and the majority of MEN I work with – simply have no time for – or tolerance of that Globohomo BS. Just down… Read more »

Member

It’s cover. Camouflage.

DLS
Guest
DLS

That’s all the oversized HR departments can find to focus on to try to add value. I once worked at a small public company with 1500 employees and 6 VPs of HR who reported to the Sr VP of HR. 90% of their activity was globohomo time wasting. HR should process payroll/benefits, and onboard/offboard. Anything beyond that and they are living above their utility. If I never see another HR person in my life, I will be a happy man.

Member

And most companies of any size outsource payroll and benefits, so there really isn’t much for HR to do beyond the mechanics of hiring and firing under the direction of the business side departments which decide who should come and go. BUT – HR is the perfect place to harmlessly house the diversity hires with big titles (but responsibilities commensurate with their very modest talents) required by customers. Hence, HR bloat. And although everyone else would be pleased if the strictly decorative HR staff just sat around and collected their checks, their egos lead them to pester others with ridiculous… Read more »

DLS
Guest
DLS

“their egos lead them to pester others with ridiculous initiatives….”

At my current company we have quarterly 360 reviews. Like your coworkers are going to change their opinion of you every 90 days. I have been to more training sessions than I care to count, and can honestly say I never learned anything that helps me or the company. Our HR SVP was able to push payroll onto my accounting department so she could focus on higher value added tasks. This has become satire.

Linda Fox
Guest

Which is why I say that a would-be successful organization has to outsource their HR functions to a firm that hires at-will employees. Anyone overstepping their assigned functions will be reported to the contracting firm, and removed forthwith.

Mark Hastings
Guest
Mark Hastings

My annual company meeting is next week. The breakfast is never that good, and listening to all the corporate BS and multi-cultural crap makes it even less palatable. If it wasn’t mandatory, none of the technical people would be there. We’ve got a couple of sloths on the technical side, and even they would rather be working.

Hoyos
Guest
Hoyos

I think this is why the Greeks near worshipped humility. Smart people get successful, success increases confidence and this turns to pride; it works because “I’m great” as opposed to it works because “it’s correct”.

Just spitballing here, but I suspect it isn’t the size of the organization per se but rather the kind of person who gets to the top of a large organization. Greater heights means greater pride or the danger if it.

Hoyos
Guest
Hoyos

Should probably elaborate, the focus shifts from doing the right things to an unfounded overconfidence in oneself. You stop reasoning and judging on external realities, and start judging on internal feelings of confidence, looking inward for external answers,

Alien
Guest
Alien

“… and start judging on internal feelings of confidence, looking inward for external answers,..” This. Any organization not totally market-facing and committed to leading in that market will become increasingly incestuous over time. The old adage about opposites attract is organizationally false; like promotes like because the approval/reward system penalizes unlike. Despite claimed corporate embrace of “diversity,” boat rockers are a threat to the culture (“diversity” is a skin color/educational background/genital structure factor, not a performance factor). Common HR phrases regarding cultural intruders – “we don’t parachute people in” – etc., are a good indicator of both opposition to innovation… Read more »

Member

Trump shows signs of thinking he got elected because of him, and not because of a desire for politicians to rep his positions and in spite of him being the one doing it.

DeBeers Diamonds
Guest
DeBeers Diamonds

IIRC, when I was still a Browns follower, the franchise had to routinely overpay for free agents because star players viewed Cleveland as a career dead-end. So the advantage of having the salary cap was squandered.

Member

Of course, the original Browns played in their league’s championship game in each of their first ten seasons of existence. Eventually they moved to Baltimore and an expansion team took over the logo a couple years after that. So, that team has been in existence and unsuccessful for less than 20 years, which hardly puts them in the running for epochal futility. The Arizona Cardinals and Detroit Lions are better candidates.

Member

Perhaps the Cleveland Browns should examine their own history. The Browns once employed a man who is on the Mount Rushmore of head football coaches, Paul Brown. Under Brown, from 1946-1955 the team went to 10 straight title games, and won 7. Paul Brown is credited with being the head coach who invented modern football. He was the first to scout opponents through regular, systematic film study. He was the first coach to call plays from the sidelines. He developed a system for evaluating and scouting college players. Brown, it should be noted, did not tolerate a lot of dysfunction… Read more »

Drake
Guest
Drake

A couple of decades ago they had Belichik as head coach, Nick Saban and a bunch more top flight assistants – so they decided to clean house.

Member

The team you’re talking about is now known as the Baltimore Ravens.

johnmark7
Guest
johnmark7

The Paul Brown legacy includes the brainiest coach prior to Belichick. Bill Walsh was crushed when Brown retired from the Bengals and he wasn’t made head coach. Went to Stanford then the 49ers where he created the kind of dynasty that the Patriots have but he burned out at ten years at it while Belichick seems able to ignore the pressure. Tom Landry was part of a great system, too.

Member

It would seem the Chinese are the best bet for bringing down the Death Star, though they are certainly no friends of ours. But once the Death Star is gone…who knows?

c matt
Guest
c matt

FYI – Man U probably not the best example. It has been in the down cycle for the past several years (at least by their standards). Not necessarily unexpected, after having the same coach for decades, once he retired it’s been a revolving door.

c matt
Guest
c matt

Hmm . . . Perhaps you meant Manchester City rather than Man U? City has been at the top for the past five years or so. In its case, the rise to dominance coincided with a huge influx of Arab oil money, and thus the the ability to contract world class players and coaches.

Walt
Guest
Walt

The United example is still apt. The club has been the most successful in England in the last 40 years in an incredibly competitive market. If sheer dominance is what you’re looking for, Juve is probably the best example among the European big leagues.

Carl B.
Guest
Carl B.

There are the Harlem Globetrotters and then there are the Washington Generals. In politics, sports, and business, that’s just the way they want it. It’s all Kabuki for the masses.

Member

Hey, aren’t we all members of the Washington Generals? Trump is our new center.

Carl B.
Guest
Carl B.

99% of the people on this earth are “Washington Generals,” doomed to have their shorts pulled-down around their ankles while the 1% laughs while their servants bring them another drink.

What’s really hilarious is that the “Globetrotters” force the hapless “Generals” to fund the stadiums, wars, indentured servants, etc., the Trotters get fabulously rich off of. Yea Team!! Rah Rah Sis Boom Bah….

P.T. Barnum(or is it Emperor Titus?) pick-up the White Courtesy Phone please!

Rcocean
Guest
Rcocean

Most sports teams are terrible because many of the owners are egomaniacs. They can’t resist micro-managing, interfering, and 2 guessing – even when they are incompetent. Why don’t they recognize their incompetence? Easy. They’d rather lose “doing it my way” then win by butting out. And losing doesn’t really cost them $$, sports has become so profitable you can have the 30th worst team and you still see your team rise in value every year. BTW, you also have cheap/greedy owners who don’t really care. They’re unwilling to invest in talent, and are willing to trade players – or let… Read more »

Rcocean
Guest
Rcocean

Also, some teams – particularly in the NBA – have a race problem. The black players just don’t want to play in Portland, Salt Lake City, or Cleveland. They want to be in Atlanta, New York, Chicago and LA. Some place with warm weather or great Media and lots of other black folks. It seems to be less of a problem in the NFL, but it still exists. How many people know that Lombardi couldn’t wait to get out of Green Bay and go back to the East Coast?

S. Bishop
Guest
S. Bishop

The other contributing variable may be the ‘Peter Principle’. “The Peter Principle is an observation that the tendency in most organizational hierarchies, such as that of a corporation, is for every employee to rise in the hierarchy through promotion until they reach the levels of their respective incompetence.” Most head coaches served elsewhere or even in the same organization, doing part of ‘head coach’ job, i.e. Offensive Coordinator, Special Teams Coach, etc. This makes sense in the whole scheme of things, but also results in numerous failures when moved to the head coach position. The other factor is probably related… Read more »

c matt
Guest
c matt

Not so sure size makes organizations stupid, as much as it makes them immune from the consequences of their errors, and frankly, they no longer care. Take Microsoft (please). Most techies I know always harp about how crappy the products are, and anyone who has ever used MS products (i.e., everyone) wants to kill Bill Gates . . . slowly . . . painfully. Yet, they dominate, and you are “stuck” with them (is Linux really an option for most of us?).

JohnTyler
Guest
JohnTyler

Microsoft products are a good example of the QWERTY problem. Apparently, when typewriters were first invented in the late 1800s, they arranged the keys to slow down the typists bc if the typing was done too fast, the “arms” would get all jammed up. The arms could not retract fast enuf to avoid jamming if the typist was very fast. When computer keyboards came out, some efforts were made to re-arrange the letters in the keyboard so that the most oft used letters would be most accessible (that is, directly under the eight fingers of the starting position). Well, it… Read more »

Member

No, the QWERTY keyboard was designed to speed typing by separating the most-used-letter-combination bars to avoid jams. “Slowing typists down” played no part in the design.

johnmark7
Guest
johnmark7

You can buy a Dvorak keyboard (put stickers on keys) which is what I wanted to do since it is easier to memorize and more efficient for the hands, but that meant the only keyboard I could use would be the one I had at home unless I wanted to carry a Dvorak keyboard with me to every computer I might want to use.

DraveckysHumerus
Guest
DraveckysHumerus

You can come to own stacks of gold and surround yourself with the ablest of advisors yet still be an idiot. I have powerful clients like this who are utter dumbf cks.

Mountaindogsix
Guest
Mountaindogsix

I’m a Pats fan and have read enough about BB and NE Pats history to come to understand the organization. With them it began with ownership. Kraft was moderately heavy handed like ownership in Cleveland and made mistakes early on. BB had been the coach in Cleveland and about had em turning the corner when he was fired. Both guys had success at other places and learned from winners. Once they got together and BB was allowed to work his plan…..well you see the results. Each position has metrics associated with it….size/speed/value assigned to it. BB learned this from other… Read more »

DLS
Guest
DLS

Great analysis. Ernie Adams is rarely mentioned. He studies and databanks other teams formations and tendencies, which allows BB to know what the other team is planning on almost every play. It also allows him to exploit mismatches, like pairing quick possession receivers on safeties and linebackers. He knows how to beat teams who mimic his offense, by using more defensive backs. But other teams just keep running the same defenses against him. The signal stealing and spying is part of the NSA approach, but was more simple overreach than a primary reason for success.

BestGuest
Guest
BestGuest

Jack Easterby (“the most influential Patriot you’ve never heard of”) also deserves credit. https://www.patriots.com/news/you-don-t-know-jack-the-most-influential-patriot-you-ve-never-heard-of

miforest
Guest
miforest

two words. Detroit Lions. they have had great players, barry sanders , calvin johnson, matt stafford. And great coaches.. but year after year, decade after decade they manage to miss the playoffs.

Dutch
Guest
Dutch

I would rather argue that the “moneyball” mentality along with hard core statistical analysis has sucked all the fun out of sports. It is the unusual, the unexpected, and the unintentionally comical that make the game fun. Remember the Dolphins kicker that reverted to his soccer skills when he flubbed a kick, about 35 years ago? That would never happen now. Or the player that would punch himself in the face on the sidelines after a screwup? The agents, the owners, and the players unions have the players by the short hairs, and acting up isn’t allowed any more. NASCAR… Read more »

Member

Toro caca..sir Todo caca.

Member

Most paying customers want to root for a winning team.

Yves Vannes
Member

The great weakness of the poz’ed death star is its arrogance. They believe they can manipulate nature at will, whatever arises.

Though the organizational dissident HuWhyte has floundered since Cville, its sentiments and influence have steadily grown. Thanks to the above mentioned arrogance.

DeBeers Diamonds
Guest
DeBeers Diamonds

Disagree, we’ve seen marginal improvements in the real economy, and that is dissipating the anger from younger men that provided most of the energy in ’16. Now we have greater anger from indebted and credentialed younger women.

Yves Vannes
Member

All things being equal, I’d agree with you. But the proggies are accelerating anti white attacks. Economically, things have gotten somewhat better, but do you think people in our tribe – and by that I mean normies and assorted fence sitters are missing the lessons from things like the Covington affair and the blood libel that rode on the back of the Jussie Smollett affair? They aren’t mutually exclusive: rising white racial interest and a better market place.

DeBeers Diamonds
Guest
DeBeers Diamonds

More attacks doesn’t seem to be hardening our attitudes, it seems to do the opposite, encouraging more whites to go fetal. BLM went a lot farther with one sportsballer than it did with years of riots. Conservatives are living in a society that says we have no moral authority and no redeeming values. Trump has not been able to do anything to force F500s and major universities to recognize conservatism as a morally legitimate choice. Nor has he or anyone in Conservatism Inc been able to shame non-whites out of tribalism.

Rod1963
Guest

Our side forgot how to fight. They have no idea they are in a war with the Left. All they can do is bleat like sheep as they get beaten. Our side doesn’t get that the Left and it’s allies use all tools at their disposal against us. Until whites recognized they’re in a fight for their lives nothing will change. As for Trump, he’s gutless and indifferent. I remember his rally in 2016 in San Jose where his supporters had the shit beat out of them by imported Mexican gangster and Blacks while the police looked on. What did… Read more »

PawPaw
Guest
PawPaw

And now we have the Zenith of pozzed absurdity in sports; breakdancing has come to the Olympics.
What do they think the reactions going to be from the perpetually outraged crowd when the first gold medalist is a white boy from Russia?

JohnTyler
Guest
JohnTyler

“Despite this well-known reality, human organizations are the least likely to embrace empirical techniques. Politics is the most obvious. If the parties simply required an IQ test for party membership, they would save themselves a lot of trouble. ” I don’t think so. Both LBJ and FDR relied on their respective “brain trusts” to formulate and implement policies. It did not work out well at all; they totally F’d up the nation. The Federal Reserve is a group of PHD economists from the best universities on earth. Their track record basically sucks; their stratospheric IQs notwithstanding. And by the way,… Read more »

DLS
Guest
DLS

WF Buckley’s magazine has turned into a crapfest of cuckiness, but he did give us a great quote: “I would rather be governed by the first two thousand people in the Boston telephone directory than by the two thousand people on the faculty of Harvard University.”

Member

This is why many leaders in ancient civilizations were chosen by lot. Something we should relearn.

Member

“many”?

Name one.

Ryan
Guest
Ryan

I’ll play devil’s advocate. Look at the quality distribution of skilled players in the NFL. The best quarterbacks are numbered in the single digits, and they are objectively much better than the mediocre quarterbacks and in a different universe from the worst. Same with most skill positions. There are 64 starting cornerbacks in the NFL, the best 10 are way better than the worst 20. I think the same is true of coaching and management. Bill Belichick is the Lebron James of coaches. No one else comes close to his talent. The number of truly extraordinarily talented people who dominate… Read more »

JohnTyler
Guest
JohnTyler

If you took the worst 20 QBs in the NFL and put them on a team with Bill Belichick as coach , would the QBs still be the worst 20?? Well, nobody knows. A QB could b lousy only bc his team, strategy and coaching sucks. If Joe Montana spent his career avoiding getting sacked or having lousy receivers, would he b a great QB? Probably not. A gifted QB is considered gifted if he wins. But if his team sucks he will not win, irrespective of his ability. Not to say that some QBs are not good, but it… Read more »

Barnard
Guest
Barnard

The Detroit Lions would have been a better NFL example than the Browns. Up until Art Modell moved the Browns to your Lagos on the Potomac, the Browns were consistently making the playoffs and within a few plays of making the Super Bowl twice. The move and subsequent expansion team replacement caused the futility. The Lions have none of those excuses and only had a few good seasons even through the Barry Sanders era.

Rhodok
Guest
Rhodok

Statistical analysis => Meritocracy => Not politically correct

TomA
Guest
TomA

Why does dysfunction persist (at least in the short term)? Because of the power of habit. Owners are all very mature by the time they can afford to buy a team, and they all bring with them a lifetime of ingrained mental habits. And these habits were (more often than not) acquired in a business environment were employees were typically average in physicality rather than apex Alpha males will 6 sigma physical talents and physiques. Owners bring the wrong skill set to the party. And the Browns are finally on the rise because they found a GM who has the… Read more »

JR Wirth
Guest
JR Wirth

We’re living in the movie Rollerball. James Caan was excellent in that by the way. Notice that one was hardly ever played on TV, too close to the truth. Organizations are self selecting and never age well. Some of the worst decision makers are populating our oldest institutions, from banking to universities. The Yankees are an old organization, but they have insanely deep pockets. Deep pockets can paper over problems for years. Also, all sports teams are on the field, playing by the same rules, unlike banking and just about anything else. This is the problem with our country right… Read more »

DLS
Guest
DLS

People in organizations are risk averse and are incentivized to repeat past patterns, but with more efficiency. That is the Republican party in a nutshell. A bunch of risk averse pussies, who just want to keep their jobs and future lobbying gigs in tact. So they follow the Democrat playbook and stay in the liberal media and cultural Overton window, but promise to do it more efficiently. They have to fool the conservative rubes into voting for them every few years by trumpeting abortion, immigration, etc., but then never actually doing anything about them.

Dansidea
Guest
Dansidea

Interesting post – I’ve worked my entire career in one of the few Massachusetts high tech companies to survive since the 1960’s and prosper. Our company is relentlessly focused on continuous improvement of everything, we call it a weakness focused culture. It isn’t for everyone as it takes brains and fortitude to deal with the unending questions and analysis required. One small aspect is that even our ceo’s have always sat in the same sized cubicle as everyone else, the founder once said he wanted everyone focused on the business not who got a credenza…

Larkin Lover
Guest
Larkin Lover

You have to take into account that sports is entertainment and image is a large part of it. I don’t want to watch some decrepit dwarf even if he can get on base. A cockroach could get on base. Sports is a psychosocial ritual in which we are showcasing our genes. The type of person that dominates pro football is not interesting to me. That’s why I watch college or preferably nada. The movie Big Fan shows what I mean nicely

thud
Guest

My local team Liverpool are direct competitors of Manchester and arguably as or more successful even though from a smaller, poorer city. We are owned now though by the Red sox owners and moneyball seems to be playing its part in our resurgence.

c matt
Guest
c matt

You also have one of the best coaches in the business. May not be long before RM or PSG throw $$$ at him.

Member

Managing a business or group is like managing a baseball team. Everyone has a position to play. Place the people in the best spot to take advantage of their strengths and minimize their weaknesses as much as possible. Business is a meritocracy if you allow it be one. If not, underperforming sometimes useless individuals populate your team. Many corporate entities have become way too politically correct to effectively manage their organizations in this way even though they maintain the illusion that they do. Each group almost always has a few top performing individuals that are surrounded by a majority of… Read more »

james wilson
Guest
james wilson

The essential reason sports franchises are perennial losers (my baseball child was raised at Griffith Stadium) is that they can and do fail yet survive. Increasingly, it’s actually been made profitable to fail. But change, like bankruptcy, is forced upon us, we do not chose it. Still, since good organizations cannot play themselves, the leagues see to it that nobody folds do to ineptitude. There exists no creative destruction. Like, ah, lemme see…..government. The difference is, in sportsball, you do have the occasional good organization.

james wilson
Guest
james wilson

Re-Patriots. It has been obvious for years that the Patriots always have the least talented team in the Bowl, and it’s not an anomaly, it’s a method. Belichick finds his 90% for 60%, and in a salary cap league, that is a formula to win. He signed a great talent at WR one time but the guy had to and did agree going in not to be his usual assholeness. This is a team that will sit you down for cracking a joke’ much less behaving like a clown. After the Pats win it all again the league values their… Read more »

Dutch
Guest
Dutch

I am very familiar with sports ineptitude—I am a San Diego fan. The Chargers, for most of their existence, have had two owners. The first was a slightly crazy Volvo car importer named Gene Klein. The team bumped along, and actually had a few very good years under coach Sid Gilman. The Chargers were mostly futile on the field, but it was all fun. Klein would basically lead a city-wide party at every home game. Then, after the early ‘70’s drug scandal, Klein said “its no fun any more”, sold the team, and segued into horse racing. He sold the… Read more »

Allen
Guest
Allen

I had Chargers season tickets for years. What a fiasco most of the seasons were. I could have sworn some of those players were being paid off to screw up near the end and blow games. It was still fun to go though even in the terrible loser seasons. There was one guy behind me, who we swore was going to stroke out at a game. Screaming at the refs, the players, the coaches, hell even at the cheerleaders at times. I think he might have had his season tickets for just a little too long. Half the fun was… Read more »

TJSwift
Guest
TJSwift

I see where you’re going, but your observation, however insightful and correct it may be as regards sportsball, or other large organizations really can’t be applied to politics; at least I don’t think it can. Political parties are dependent on gathering enough like minded people together to make it viable financially and organizationally. But winning political offices depend on convincing enough uninformed, make that deliberately uninformed people that your candidate has something good to offer. What I’m saying, or trying to say is, that I think successful politics requires lots of really ignorant people joining the team, irrespective of what… Read more »

Issac
Guest
Issac

The open window, or exhaust port, is white solidarity. The projectile of choice is the charge of anti-whiteness. Dissidents who can use germane and intelligible language without utilizing prog-loaded terms, eg. racist or antisemitic, which will instantly be turned against them, will hit their targets every time they aren’t ignored.

Jordan Peterson and Conservative Inc. are the Browns demanding and demonstrating the hilarious and ineffectual nature of using prog words against their masters and rejecting white solidairty out of “strategic,” cowardice.

Outis
Guest
Outis

a polite way of saying the left has many plants inside the right. and why we need to start over.

Member

It’s all about the brand (or, in sportsball terminology, the franchise). The Yankees, the Dodgers and, despite their tiny geographical location, the Green Bay Packers, have great franchises. Great franchises attract fans and dollars, not only for the teams, but also, for the media, for big business, and for local business. People want to associate with winners — a self-fulfilling phenomenon.

Walt
Guest
Walt

The Dodgers have only 2 titles in the last 50 years. Same with the Packers. Yankees only 1 title in the past 18 years. These are not “winners” as you write. They do have a lot of romance about them though and fans who want to be part of that.

Anonymous Reactionary
Guest
Anonymous Reactionary

Sports are fake and rigged, except for pro wrestling, if you think about it.

Graf von Zeppelin
Guest
Graf von Zeppelin

…and roller derby.

BadThinker
Guest
BadThinker

The problem with most ‘continuous improvement’ techniques is that they are applied in a cargo cult fashion. “Lean Six Sigma”, “S.M.A.R.T. Goals”, etc, are far to often just ways for MBAs to make a buck at the expense of employees and managers. There’s an *excellent* article on the subject written in 2003: The Life Cycle of a Silver Bullet. Organizational change requires a leader who is willing to actually lead and hold senior managers responsible. Human organizations naturally regress – see Pournelle’s Iron Law. The organization I work for is busy telling itself that it’s implementing ‘Agile’ software development techniques.… Read more »

Robert Pinkerton
Member

For myself, I have always beenremotely, lukewarm neutral-valence indifferent to the entirety of it. But my Dad was the kind of fan who would yell at the television; he called the Browns the “Cleveland Bums,” after Prospect Avenue winos.

Walt
Guest
Walt

The success of Manchester United was down to the stewardship of Alex Ferguson. They hadn’t won a title in over a generation, Ferguson enters and they win a dozen titles and 2 Champion’s Leagues. Ferguson won in Scotland twice with Aberdeen 40 years ago and this hasn’t happened since. Interesting though is that it took him 6 years to win at United and a lot of patience and heartbreak from the fans. He had to be given time to make the club into his own. Since United started winning in the early 90s, Liverpool, Spurs and Leeds – all with… Read more »

sirlancelot
Guest
sirlancelot

Since the left has taken over media, politics and now big business it would seem the only thing left would be gorilla tactics. The vietcong and middle east insurgents have proven hit and run tactics can be quite effective against the Leviathan. Seem to remember some quote about the Revolutionary War as one third of the colonialist loyal to the crown , another third ambivalent and finally the last third rebels. That would coincide with today’s numbers since most whites seem uninterested in taking up the charge. So the focus should be on that 1/3 ( us ) and how… Read more »