The Power Of Delusion

Way back in the olden thymes, I was going back and forth with a liberal acquaintance about a topic related to his cult’s recent fixation on diversity. I no longer recall the details of the conversation, but at some point, he said, “The reason we moved to Arlington was so our child could experience diversity.” He was speaking of Arlington Massachusetts, one of the whitest places on earth. He had moved to honkeyville, but he had somehow convinced himself that it was a rainbow community of racial and ethnic diversity.

Being a polite person, I laughed in his face. There are limits to civility. I doubt he has ever forgiven me for not only laughing at the ridiculous claim, but then proceeding to point out the demographic reality of his new home. Arlington is roughly 85% white and 10% Asian, and those Asians will be college professors and professionals. The tiny black and Hispanic population is clustered in one area of town. You can drive around the place all day and never see a brown face that is not riding a lawnmower or leaf blower.

Now, I have no doubt that my former acquaintance and his Progressive hive-mates glorified one another on a regular basis for their embrace of diversity. You can bet they swapped stories about how their kid had a black friend at school or about their supposed friendship with the Muslim coworkers. He actually tried that one on me once. Because it was nothing but virtue signaling, they never faced any push-back. In fact, they got nothing but confirmation from their hive mates, so their delusions were always reinforced.

When people outside the hive wonder how people in the hive can believe the nonsense about diversity and the blank slate, it is important to keep in mind the power of magical thinking. They want this stuff to be true, so they tend to gravitate toward others who have the same fantasies. It is exactly how cults work. The doubt or concern of one member becomes a reason for the rest to double up on their belief. Progressives are people in search of purpose and identity, so they tend to clump together for support.

Whether you call it self-delusion, magical thinking, wishful thinking or whatever, this is powerful juju. My old Progressive acquaintance was not fazed by my mockery or the facts I later sent him. In fact, he has only grown more deluded over the years. He is now one of those old guys who still wears an “I’m With Her” t-shirt and tells people he is a moderate libertarian. It is not that he is a liar or crazy, it is that he so desperately wants this image he has of himself to be true, that he has convinced himself it is fact.

It is not just lefty cult members who are prone to self-delusion. Magical thinking is just the grease that makes the gears of life turn smoothly for people. All of us engage in some degree of it. In fact, it may be a requirement of leadership. Read the biographies of great leaders and you almost always find that they had an extreme over-confidence in their abilities. Often, they believed it was their destiny to achieve greatness. It was what pushed them to conquer the world or accomplish some great contribution to humanity.

At the same time, over-the-top belief in some cause is the driving force behind the great evils of history. Stalin was not mindlessly evil. He believed he was on the side of the righteous, just as the Nazis, Chinese communists and other murderous movements of the last century believed they were on the side of good. The Allies in World War II incinerated cities full of women and children, in order to break the will of the other side, because they thought they were fighting a just cause. The self-righteous make the best killers.

The power of self-delusion is not just the belief in some cause, but belief in the face of available evidence. It is the conflict between the delusion and reality that is the chemical reaction, releasing energy the believers harness. The American Left refers to themselves as the “resistance” even though they are in complete control. It seems that the greater the gap between observable reality and delusion, the more fanatical the believer. That conflict between reality and delusion releases energy in relation to its contrast.

This is a useful thing to keep in mind when dealing with lefty relations. Your well-intended efforts to break the spell only serve to make it stronger. It is counter intuitive, but the best thing you can do for a deluded friend or relative is to act disinterested. If you argue with them, they see that as proof they are speaking truth to power. If you agree with them, even on a small point, they see that as confirmation. Indifference throws water on that chemical reaction and robs them of the energy to continue in the face of reality.

This is why the Left forces everyone to pick a side. For example, you cannot be indifferent to the various crotch fads. You are either enlightened or a homophobe, open minded or a gender-normative bigot. There can be no middle ground, because the delusion that fuels these causes depends upon the conflict. The indifferent are the black swans of the delusional. It is not simply hive-mindedness. It is a need for the conflict between their beliefs about themselves and the reality of the world in which those beliefs conflict.

99 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
AntiDem
Member
6 years ago

Here’s how it works in academia (particularly social sciences): 1) Paper A makes an unverified (and often unverifiable) claim. This is either made in a book that is subject to no real academic rigor or is given a pass by the astonishingly corrupt peer review system because it tells the liberal hive what they want to hear. 2) Papers B, C, D, and E make the same claim, citing Paper A as their source. 3) Papers F-Z cite papers A-E as sources. 4) The unverified and unverifiable claim is now “extensively documented in multiple peer-reviewed papers”, and thus must be… Read more »

MBlanc46
Member
Reply to  AntiDem
6 years ago

You’re a denier, anti-science.

George Elwit
George Elwit
Member
Reply to  AntiDem
6 years ago

This also how a lot of internet attacks work. Some really dodgy left-wing website says that Lefty X has received “death threats” from unspeakable “white supremacists,” and the “mainstream” outlets immediately pounce on it, and then each other, as a “source.” And then it becomes a manufactured “reality” in our Gaslight World.

Severian
Reply to  George Elwit
6 years ago

Can confirm. Don’t take my word for it — google up “Michael Bellesisles” and “Arming America.” He flat made his sources up, and his thesis is laughable to anyone who knows anything about American history, but he told them what they wanted to hear, so nobody bothered to check. He won the Bancroft Prize, which is like the American History version of the Nobel Prize… then he got debunked by a software engineer.

Xwarper @ purpleboxx.wordpress.com
Reply to  Severian
6 years ago

It is hard to avoid flaunting yourself when you can.

A lot of men in college, surrounded by pretty girls with bright, attentive eyes, and young Forces of Nature BMOC’s, feel inspired by the Human Factor to be More Than They Can Be — and Get An Edge On Life . . . in the library..

Whattt
Whattt

Sorcery goddess. what are you doing here?

Apex Predator
Apex Predator
Reply to  Whattt
6 years ago

You answered your own question. The sorcery is strong and mysterious he moves between the worlds man!

Bruce A Seibert
Bruce A Seibert
Reply to  George Elwit
6 years ago

Evidence: the Steele Dossier, a fantasy made up, leaked to the press, and then sited as a “source” of “evidence.”

Teapartydoc
Member
Reply to  AntiDem
6 years ago

Legal precedent works pretty much the same way.

“The foregoing cases suggest that specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance. Various guarantees create zones of privacy.”

From Grissold vs Connecticut.

Ursula
Ursula
Reply to  AntiDem
6 years ago

News, supposedly “factual” news, is made the same way.

Ursula
Ursula
Reply to  Ursula
6 years ago

The mainstream narratives we’re flooded with are created that same way as well.

Andy Texan
Reply to  Ursula
6 years ago

Funny. The ‘factual’ evidence of ‘Russian collusion’ gathered by Obamanauts in the DOJ were created similarly. Seems to be a pattern.

Wilson McWilliams
Wilson McWilliams
Reply to  AntiDem
6 years ago

I’ve been on the faculty of three universities in two countries; some academics really are admirably intelligent and creative, but 95% are at or near the general level of “hack”, and do essentially nothing to advance human well-being.

To borrow from Bill Buckley, we’d be better off governed by the first 1000 people listed in the local phone book, than by any set of academics.

Member
Reply to  AntiDem
6 years ago

AntiDem get back to writing your blog

AntiDem
Member
6 years ago

What Brett Stevens calls the “Age of Ideology” has been the age in which if there was a conflict between a theory that made us feel good and observable reality, people went with the theory. They could do this because figuring out ways to produce excess resources put enough distance between us and starvation that we had the margin to indulge in delusions. This is why great philosophical and religious systems from the Stoics to the Christians to the Buddhists warn us against the effects of too much wealth on our mental and spiritual wellbeing. In the Middle Ages, Christian… Read more »

Harmonium
Harmonium
Reply to  AntiDem
6 years ago

I always love your posts—are you in social sciences or something related?

Primi Pilus
Primi Pilus
Reply to  AntiDem
6 years ago

The “Wolf at the Door….,” Yes. Without the threat to our survival, we become wholly self-absorbed and self-referential, and all the worst in the human animal begins to boil out of the pores. I’m of mixed opinions about the Trumpian econimic boom — make things too good, in this dangerously ideological age, and people will likely go fully off the rails.

calsdad
calsdad
Reply to  AntiDem
6 years ago

Who are the worst believers in the delusion though? Is it people who are “wealthy” but had to work for it – or is it people who have “wealth” – but did absolutely nothing to attain it? I believe that unwarranted “wealth” is the true devil. Since absolutely no work has in the past equaled absolutely no reward , what we have going on right now with the welfare states is a condition where millions upon millions of people are wealthy far over and above their actual work input would warrant. If you’ve ever been exposed to “inner city” dwellers… Read more »

Alvin Tostig
Alvin Tostig
6 years ago

Lived in Laguna Beach for six months in early 90s for the surf… rented an apartment from a far Leftist couple with children. Engaged in rare and meaningless chit-chat but remember the father saying, “We wish it was more diverse here.” I didn’t utter a word – but as if from out of the clouds I heard myself silently say, “Well aren’t you the goddamndist biggest liar. What you really wish for is that your little blond Jewish daughter isn’t molested by a heaving aboriginal and THAT’S WHY you live in lily white Laguna”.

Simon
Simon
Reply to  Alvin Tostig
6 years ago

I asked a woman in a pub in Bridport, Dorset, how she liked living there. She told me it needed more diversity! I proceeded to ask her if she was missing Muslim Rape gangs and black muggers in her life. She got hysterical and told me I was making it all up. How we laughed at her reaction. They have no clue what it is like to live in a big city and think they need culturally enriching.

james wilson
james wilson
Reply to  Simon
6 years ago

I prefer laughter to indifference. It has to be spontaneous though. Indifference must be a cultivation that is best left for the truly evolved man.

A.T. Tapman (Merica)
A.T. Tapman (Merica)
Member
Reply to  Simon
6 years ago

I do believe in fairies, I do!!!!

Teapartydoc
Member
Reply to  A.T. Tapman (Merica)
6 years ago

I live in a college town. They’re everywhere.

Spud Boy
Spud Boy
6 years ago

Speaking of diversity, with the Supreme Court trending conservative, I’m hoping we can finally end Affirmative Action. The idea that you can end racial discrimination by discriminating on the basis of race was crazy from the start. You end up with people in power who don’t deserve it, and a whole lot of white resentment.

Mark Stoval
Mark Stoval
Reply to  Spud Boy
6 years ago

“The idea that you can end racial discrimination by discriminating on the basis of race was crazy from the start.”

Yes, and the idea that a race with an average IQ of 85 should be doing just as well as whites with and average of 100 or Asians with 106 did not make sense either. There was no real discrimination holding them back. There was only delusion about abilities.

Member
Reply to  Spud Boy
6 years ago

Yes and what makes affirmative action increasingly a destructive idea is that it applies to immigrants and bit just blacks.

Dutch
Dutch
6 years ago

The left generally labels Trump as a homophobe. All I see from him is indifference to the subject. True believers cannot stand indifference, as it trivializes their passions. We all will be made to celebrate such things, comrade.

Da Lurker
Da Lurker
Reply to  Dutch
6 years ago

That’s an odd one to push.1.Nobody really sees “gay rights are threatened” as an issue, except for college girls, and 2. With the NY and global elite crowd T has been with in Hollywood, London, Paris, etc….they think he has not done business with and formed friendships with any gays? They really think that’s going to sell with the average people? C’mon! P.S. Why does my text box say “CIA”??

Ursula
Ursula
Reply to  Da Lurker
6 years ago

Ric Grenell, Trump’s appointment as Ambassador to Germany, is gay. He has no problems with gays, blacks, hispanics, asians. He loves women and jews. He seems to worry most about radical Islamic Muslims, but that’s perfectly reasonable. But I’m sure he’s got plenty of middle-eastern friends from all his international dealings, maybe even some Iranians…

Roger C. Acton
Roger C. Acton
Reply to  Dutch
6 years ago

That is homophobia by their standards. Russia is a ‘deeply homophobic society’ simply because it doesn’t have an array of ‘civil rights’ specific to gays. There are no anti-gay laws in Russia, but the absence of pro-gay laws is, in the “lets worship the abnormal and the substandard” west of today, ‘homophobic’ Queers in Russia have to make do with merely the same rights as the rest of us peasants. Terrible, eh? If a queer in Russia is assaulted, he is treated just like anyone else who is assaulted, rather than have the whole community go into some hysteria about… Read more »

Epaminondas
Member
6 years ago

The ability to overcome cognitive dissonance is always the primary trait of the fanatic. Whether in religion or politics, fanatics always display the power of invincible ignorance.

Dutch
Dutch
Reply to  Epaminondas
6 years ago

Hypnosis will do that to a person.

DLS
DLS
Reply to  Epaminondas
6 years ago

I have had this exact experience with a co-worker. He will spout some silly lefty bubble line. I will present facts that are so obvious he has to acknowledge their truth. Then I will later overhear him spouting the same delusions to someone else, completely ignoring the truths he acknowledged days before.

Member
Reply to  Epaminondas
6 years ago

Yes. A trait Hofer described in the true believers

Observer
Observer
6 years ago

“Whether you call it self-delusion, magical thinking, wishful thinking or whatever…” I call it tribal enemy propaganda. White people did not generate these silly beliefs in their own minds. These ideas were presented to them by the people who controlled the information that they received. That happened in an intellectual way throughout their time in Jew-influenced educational system where they learned which beliefs demonstrate high status & which beliefs demonstrate low status. It was even more powerfully reinforced with imagery & emotion every time they consumed Jew-influenced media. After a lifetime of this propaganda, most white people cannot perceive or… Read more »

George Elwit
George Elwit
Member
Reply to  Observer
6 years ago

The word “status” is key. From Paul Johnson’s “A History of the American People” (especially the second paragraph): *** The 1932 election saw the emergence of the ‘Democratic coalition of minorities,’ based on the industrial Northeast (plus the South), which was to last for half a century and turn Congress almost into a one-party legislature. But it was only in 1932 that the Republicans finally lost the progressive image they had enjoyed since Lincoln’s day and saw it triumphantly seized by their Democratic enemies, with all that such a transfer implies in the support of the media, the approval of… Read more »

james wilson
james wilson
Reply to  George Elwit
6 years ago

You want Republicans to get back their progressive image?

George Elwit
George Elwit
Member
Reply to  james wilson
6 years ago

In this context I don’t take “progressive” to mean specifically left-wing, I take it to mean “leading,” i.e., ascendant, believed by the influential and powerful–the regnant thought system.

Could be wrong, though. Remembered the quote from way back, and pulled it without much context.

Nothing is more awful than a left-wing Republican, no doubt. “Conservatives” who conserve nothing–ghastly, despicable. (Cf. the recent actions of the British “conservative” prime minister.)

Observer
Observer
Reply to  George Elwit
6 years ago

You could say “status”, “progressivism” or just “moral high ground”. My point is that the way people judge it is culturally transmitted from one generation to the next. And that while white people directly transferred it between themselves, we passed on sane, healthy, white-benefitting criteria to judge it. But at some point, another group inserted itself into the cultural transmission mechanism. So instead of passing on white-benefitting criteria, they passed on criteria that benefitted their group. For a picture of how that process would work, imagine the values that a WASP Ivy League professors would have taught a young Jewish… Read more »

George Elwit
George Elwit
Member
6 years ago

“I moved here for the Diversity.” Just capitalize it, and you’re good to go. “Diversity” is just one of the names of their cult. Don’t need any black people for that. I find redpilling these guys to be damn near impossible. As soon as I start ever so gently, they *sense* where I’m going and put up furious resistance. Of course this suggests that they *already know* the facts, and at the same time *refuse to know.* If they KNOW AND STILL REFUSE TO KNOW, well, that’s a tough nut to crack. Notice how closely this fits with Orwell, who… Read more »

Dutch
Dutch
Reply to  George Elwit
6 years ago

If you watch the eyes, you can see the lies kick in, when a leftie is presented with the truth. They drop into the “approved” and “mandatory” language and arguments, bypassing all logic and reasoning, to go to the rote response. The same statement, word for word, turns up again and again from different people. There is no thinking involved, it is more akin to hypnosis.

Mike_C
Mike_C
Reply to  Dutch
6 years ago

>hypnosis Perhaps. I tend however to view it more as repeating a catechism, albeit a Progressive one rather than a Catholic one. (Though these days sometimes you can’t tell the difference….) Two instances spring to mind immediately. One was while talking about immigration and the effect on jobs: I was stunned then bemused when an otherwise intelligent friend said, all in one breath and with an intonation and cadence that sounded as if someone was talking THROUGH her (think “meat puppet”) rather than she herself speaking, “We just have to accept that manufacturing jobs are gone from the US, will… Read more »

DLS
DLS
6 years ago

The problem with expressing disinterest is that they smugly assume they just enlightened you with their brilliance and left you speechless. That is hard to let stand. The approach I use is to agree with them on some level, and then throw in a twist to hit them over the head with. For example: -George Bush was an awful president. Too bad Obama adopted most of his policies. -I agree global warming could be a problem. How do you like your new SUV? -The problem with abortion and immigration is that they are diluting the African-American population. -If we are… Read more »

Linda Fox
Reply to  DLS
6 years ago

I’m stealing these.

Severian
6 years ago

I saw this all the time in academia. They thought they were “diverse,” even though they all knew one Black guy… and it was the same guy… and, except for the fact that he wore a dashiki and wrote “academic” “papers” about rap music, he was as white as lifetime tenure at $300K per year could make him. Ditto “the resistance” – the Left runs everything in a college town, including the police department, but they all think they’re standing up to The Man 24/7. It’s actually kinda enjoyable, being a secret shitlord in a college town – it’s like… Read more »

George Elwit
George Elwit
Member
Reply to  Severian
6 years ago

The Man against the Man who doesn’t know he’s the Man! Could do a sci-fi Kafkaesque movie/novel: going to find the Man and finding…himself!

Severian
Reply to  George Elwit
6 years ago

I’ve thought many times about writing a comic novel about my time in academia. The problem is Poe’s Law — I could quote real academic papers, with impeccable citations, and nobody would believe me. Even Swift couldn’t make fun of this stuff.

James LePore
Member
Reply to  Severian
6 years ago

Check out Lucky Jim by Kingsley Amis.

Saml Adams
Saml Adams
Reply to  Severian
6 years ago

One twist on that. The daughter of one of my colleagues (who is black) actually chose to go to a historically black college. Not for the reason you’d think. Wants to be a doctor and every “white majority” school she visited the students expected her to be “extra woke” and in the vanguard of social justice or some such shit. She actually found the black schools were more focused on academics and less on protesting every perceived outrage 24/7. She just wanted to get a chemistry degree and be a doctor…

Dutch
Dutch
Reply to  Saml Adams
6 years ago

The very tail end of Z’s two hour conversation touched on this. To be a black American is a negative sense of being, in that every element of black American culture is defined by its relationship to whites. There is no stand-alone element to being a black American, unlike being black in most of the rest of the world. To the extent that this is a true thing, your colleague’s daughter is attempting to escape that negative trap. It makes all the sense in the world.

Saml Adams
Saml Adams
Reply to  Dutch
6 years ago

She’s a smart kid. And you are bang on about not wanting to be defined by the latest protest outrage. Have always thought Z’s messaging on this made a hell of a lot of sense. And bolstered from what I’ve observed from the non-American brand–they refuse to be defined by their relationship with white people.

Drake
Drake
6 years ago

I have to visit a rabidly leftist sister-in-law next week. Nothing disappoints her like an indifferent shrug. I think it’s because there’s no response to it.

Dr, Dre
Dr, Dre
Reply to  Drake
6 years ago

My rule of thumb for political/current events discussions is to have a good idea of the person’s true feelings/opinions. before you get all worked up arguing about something. This goes for family members, too. You NEVER want to motivate the wrong person to VOTE!!

red=prisoner?
red=prisoner?
6 years ago

Well put, but it’s the majority who hold these delusional views, at least from my experience. We are not talking of some fringe conspiracy theorists—it’s the mainstream!

red&mike Buds
red&mike Buds
Reply to  red=prisoner?
6 years ago

I have a serious hypothesis that I’m the only sane person in my state!

Stealth Spaniel
Stealth Spaniel
6 years ago

What the powerful Elites won’t tell you, is that for every job an illegal, or “diversity candidate” gets; it’s another white person who is unemployed. As a kid, I questioned my parents on how giving a black (my father’s term: negro) over a white person, simply because of the skin color, equitable? Of course, they answered the truth, it wasn’t. I can’t begin to tell you the number of white women, who married ethnic, getting promotions and special privileges at AT&T. I saw far too many highly qualified individuals shoved aside for the rainbow effect. The whole Affirmative Action idiocy… Read more »

LineInTheSand
LineInTheSand
Reply to  Stealth Spaniel
6 years ago

Scott Adams became a cartoonist (Dilbert) because he hit the “diversity ceiling” twice, meaning, “there was no hope for a white male like me to get promoted.”

http://blog.dilbert.com/2014/10/31/loser-choices/

Glenfilthie
Glenfilthie
Member
6 years ago

Agree with all of it, but My experience differs by a bit. Faking indifference did not shut them up. If you didn’t validate their virtue signalling they’d redouble their efforts and they’d get pretty snippy about it too. Me thing I’ve noticed about leftists is that they will run their mouths, play head games and destroy their families … but it’s never their fault. When they win these dog fights they start, it’s because they have the moral high ground. When they lose, they are the noble, stoic victims of fascism and tyranny. The women are the worst.

Saml Adams
Saml Adams
Reply to  Glenfilthie
6 years ago

There should be a caveat that when you are closely related to them, the rules of indifference may not apply.

MBlanc46
Member
6 years ago

Engaging them is almost always a losing proposition.

Saml Adams
Saml Adams
6 years ago

Two best weapons are indifference and, when appropriate, ridicule. When you can combine the two it’s deadly. I tend to be careful anymore about “casual” conversations around here since they always seem to turn to the outrage du jour, since they know I’m a Republican. Sometimes the opening for something like this will occur: “Come again, now what is it the trannies have their panties in a twist about? Bathrooms again? Oh sorry, I meant “boxers”, or should it be “panties”? What kind of trannies are we talking about? I just don’t have the time to keep up on this… Read more »

TomA
TomA
6 years ago

The parasite views the world through the prism of dependence as the sole mode of survival. Their social fanaticism exists because it “works” in the sense that it enables them to obtain and sustain control over the host. In times of plenty, the producers (host) feel a moral obligation to prop up the less fortunate and will yield to the incessant whining. This is in our DNA, e.g. the parental reaction to a crying baby.

Spud Boy
Spud Boy
Reply to  TomA
6 years ago

“This is in our DNA, e.g. the parental reaction to a crying baby.”

I would refine that to say it’s the Mother’s reaction to a crying baby. Just one of the negative consequences of giving women more political power in our society.

Tim
Tim
Member
6 years ago

If you are talking to a middle aged liberal woman, don’t argue with her. Just talk about the opportunities available to her children. They are very focused on that, and what immigration and the diversity does their prospects after college is what gets their attention. To say nothing of what the current emphasis on railroading college aged men does to their thoughts about their own sons.

Jaqship
Jaqship
Reply to  Tim
6 years ago

Yeah, Tim, that may well work for that demographic, but I propose something that can make dents in other demographics, relating to the subtle SOCIAL aspects of these interactions with Lefties, esp. insofar as they place ANY value on their relationship with you. (If SJWism is THE point of their lives, then don’t waste your time.) Most of these Lefty pitches involve bulldozing/ virtue signaling, touting the status or interests of “the poor people of color”, but with a preference that the Lefty’s contempt for normal rules of civility, and for the legit interests of people of “non-color”, be hidden.… Read more »

Drake
Drake
6 years ago

“we moved to Arlington (MA) was so our child could experience diversity”

Having grown up in MA, that’s hilarious. If he actually believed it, he would have moved Roxbury or Dorchester (probably both gentrified since I left). Maybe Bentley and Tufts are using affirmative action in their admissions?

My old town has become much more “diverse” as professional Indians have moved in to area to work in medical and high tech companies.

calsdad
calsdad
Reply to  Drake
6 years ago

Roxbury and Dorchester have I believe gentrified a *little bit*, probably due just to the obscene real estate prices around Boston and people’s need to just find an affordable place to live.

None of that however has changed the fact that “shooting in Dorchester” , or : “shooting in Roxbury” is a regularly run news item if you watch the local news or read the newspaper.

J Clivas
6 years ago

Diversity is the bitch goddess liberals worship.

Da Lurker
Da Lurker
Reply to  J Clivas
6 years ago

Once taught with a new teacher who said she went through a special process so her child could go to that district, to be around “diversity” (inner city black) . She stayed one year. I assume she put her offspring back in her home district when she left.

RafterRat
RafterRat
6 years ago

“He’s now one of those old guys who still wears an “I’m With Her” t-shirt and tells people he is a moderate libertarian. It’s not that he is a liar or crazy, it’s that he so desperately wants this image he has of himself to be true, that he has convinced himself it is fact.”

I had no idea Z knew my brother.

Cerulean
Cerulean
6 years ago

Zman, your writing style and content have always been good. Lately they seem to gotten even better. Might think about pulling some of your essays together in a book and self-publishing with some place like CreateSpace. If your goal is to get your ideas out to the public, this would advance it.

When your book becomes available, I can think of a few people from the middle of the political spectrum I’d buy copies for.

Linda Fox
Reply to  Cerulean
6 years ago

Yes, please!

Dutch
Dutch
6 years ago

It’s so easy to poke holes in the arguments of others, holes big enough to drive a truck through. But do any of us have a good handle on reality? Our own experiences are such a small part of the world, and every last thing that you receive second hand, to view or to read, has passed through a prism of sorts. If you aren’t asking lots of tough questions, every day, you easily fall into the trap of accepting what you see and “know” as real. Test your conclusions, all the time, with the most difficult contrary evidence and… Read more »

Teapartydoc
Member
Reply to  Dutch
6 years ago

I don’t know all the names, but I quit listening when that one guy started going off the rails about Texas. It’s a good thing to be aware of trends, but trends are not always ultimately determinative. Malthus is the most famous example of seeing a trend, thinking it was determinative, creating a whole world view out of it, and never having one prediction come true.

Everyone knows his name, though, and that’s something.

Teapartydoc
Member
6 years ago

It may be that “metaphysics” would be a better word than “magical thinking”. Comte tried to kill off the word, but it is not used enough and remains a good word. Two books I’ve mentioned here before are good for understanding how metaphysics affects thoughts and outcomes of the beliefs that metaphysical thinking brings about (we ALL do it, anyone who thinks that he simply looks at facts and is driven by them is either self-deluded or a liar), they are The Metaphysical Basis of Modern Science, by E.A. Burtt, and The Great Chain Of Being, by Arthur Lovejoy. My… Read more »

Harmonium
Harmonium
Reply to  Teapartydoc
6 years ago

This is good. Ts Eliot said of Henry James “he had a mind so fine no idea could penetrate it.” People sort of laugh at this, as if he was saying James was an idiot, but I think he meant what you are saying, that James was a rare individual who could see reality for itself and not through the lens of a metaphysics or an ideology. Thanks for posting the book titles. Not being gods, we humans require idea systems and metaphysics to approximate reality and guide us.

James_OMeara
Member
6 years ago

As for leaders, Trump certainly employs Positive Thinking, as per my books Trump:The Art of the Meme (Kindle, 2017) and Magick for Housewives (Manticore, 2018). Of course, although you are right that all leaders use it, Lefites are offended when someone they don’t approve uses it; see Gary Lachman’s Dark Star Rising for supposed details on how Bannon and Dugin used black magic to create the golem Trump.

tz1
Member
6 years ago

When they live in Segre-Gated-Communities, they can talk about how great the diversity they won’t experience is.

calsdad
calsdad
6 years ago

LOL. He wanted to move to Arlington to experience diversity?. Wow. Arlington is not totally white bread , but it’s damn close. I guess this shows how seriously delusional these people are. You’re not going to see much “diversity” on the streets of Arlington MA. I’m sure there is low income housing in town – which is likely more “diverse” now that the Obama administration’s effort to diffuse cancer all over the body seems to having an effect. I know the town I live in – which has (had?) something like a 1% African population – seems to have black… Read more »

Whitney
Member
6 years ago

Stalin did not believe he was on the side of righteousness

Member
6 years ago

So the question is how to be actively, or even effectively indifferent.

Tamaqua
Tamaqua
Reply to  Adam
6 years ago

Corey Lewandowski’s “womp womp” seemed quite effective…

Drake
Drake
Reply to  Adam
6 years ago

My above mentioned sister-in-law was in a big tizzy over the Mexicans locked up without their kids.

My reply: (shrugs) “I don’t really care about illegal immigrant kids as long as they aren’t set free here.”

*insert feelings-based rant*

My reply: “Okay, throw them in jail with their parents or just deport them immediately. Hey, what do you guys want to do for dinner?”

phaedris
phaedris
Reply to  Adam
6 years ago

Yes. The alt-right meme “zero f**ks given” is a great example of this. It’s an effective rhetorical device. Drives leftists crazy.

Primi Pilus
Primi Pilus
6 years ago

Z-man: Just an observation …. I think “sef-delusion” is a reduntant construction. Not an intellectual here, but in the recent past I looked up this as well as “illusion” in order to better understand what I thought was going on. By definition, delusion involves the self — a construct one personally creates, then buys into. Whereas, “illusion” is some construct, idea or action created by one that fools another …. Another thought …. delusion lies at the core of that ancient, hairy and irrational beast at mankind’s core — that beast we have (rather incompletely) come to call the LEFT… Read more »

Harmonium
Harmonium
Reply to  Primi Pilus
6 years ago

In strict clinical terms, a delusion is a fixed, false belief, such as people are reading my mind or this woman is into me, whereas an illusion is something real that is misinterpreted, such as that tree is a witch or that bird was a spy plane.

Cold
Cold
6 years ago

One of your best! Thanks – it’s all crystal clear now. These people are sick (in the head), and the only restorative will be that old-fashioned Dutch cleanser of reality! The cult cannot cure itself, it just doubles down until “game over.” Thanks!

Jim Wilkins
Jim Wilkins
6 years ago

‘Fazed’.

Vince
Vince
6 years ago

Seems you missed Arlington guy’s point. White guy of some means moves in and hires brown guy to mow the lawn etc. See- brown guys are around all day so it MUST be a diverse neighborhood. Now don’t go thinking brown guy of some means is welcome there because in my experience we are not. Interestingly enough the lack of welcome is in an ‘affluent’ area of Connecticut – no exactly deplorable country.. or maybe it really is.

Ursula
Ursula
Reply to  Vince
6 years ago

It’s nice when affluent people of color make their own affluent areas. It’s the natural order and everyone is happier.

trackback
6 years ago

[…] The Power Of Delusion […]

trackback
6 years ago

[…] Via TheZMan.com, […]

trackback
6 years ago

[…] Via TheZMan.com, […]

trackback
6 years ago

[…] Via TheZMan.com, […]

Greg
Greg
6 years ago

This story is completely made up

I IMPLORE you to read to watch Adam Conover.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e68CoE70Mk8

whites made the problems we have to clean it up

Cloudbuster
Member
Reply to  Greg
6 years ago

White people don’t like to live around Black people very much. Why can’t the Black people make their own neighborhoods nice?

Guest
Guest
Reply to  Greg
6 years ago

I couldn’t get through the video because it was so sophomoric. The video cited the statistic that, due to redlining, 98% of the Federally guaranteed home loans in the 1930s were issued to whites. This sounds terribly unfair by 2018 demographic standards, but the US was approximately 90% white in 1930, so the racial balance of loan approval was not that far out of whack. (I’ve seen a couple other videos by this guy and he relies upon the inability of his audience to think critically, which probably explains his success among the left). There were no data processing systems… Read more »

Teapartydoc
Member
Reply to  Guest
6 years ago

The redlining was determined by mortgage failure rates compared to property values, not race. If a mortgage failed and a bank had to take it over, the property had to be resold.If the property the mortgage was taken out on was not worth much, there would be trouble turning it over and banks don’t like to hold property. Part of the reason blacks back then tried so desperately to move into white neighborhoods was because, taking into consideration the redlining, it was easier to get a mortgage in a white neighborhood, and if the morgage went bad the bank had… Read more »